| Literature DB >> 34533992 |
Gerard Bryan Gonzales1,2,3,4, Daniella Brals5, Bakary Sonko6, Fatou Sosseh6, Andrew M Prentice6, Sophie E Moore6,7, Albert Koulman3,4.
Abstract
Growth faltering in children arises from metabolic and endocrine dysfunction driven by complex interactions between poor diet, persistent infections, and immunopathology. Here, we determined the progression of the plasma lipidome among Gambian children (n = 409) and assessed its association with growth faltering during the first 2 years of life using the panel vector autoregression method. We further investigated temporal associations among lipid clusters. We observed that measures of stunting, wasting, and underweight are dynamically associated with each other and that lipid groups containing polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and phosphatidylcholines consistently predict future growth outcomes. Linear growth was dynamically associated with the majority of lipids, indicating a higher nutritional demand to improve height compared to weight among growth-restricted children. Our results indicate a critical role for PUFAs and choline in early life dietary interventions to combat the child growth faltering still so prevalent in low-income settings.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34533992 PMCID: PMC8448443 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abj1132
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Adv ISSN: 2375-2548 Impact factor: 14.136
Growth characteristics of 410 Gambian children in the first 2 years of life.
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 298 | 327 | 323 | 345 | 338 | |
| 138 (46.3) | 155 (47.4) | 157 (48.6) | 165 (47.8) | 158 (46.7) | ||
| WAZ, mean ± SD | −0.70 (1.04) | −0.81 (1.17) | −1.26 (1.06) | −1.28 (1.06) | −1.38 (0.93) | β = −0.22 |
| LAZ, mean ± SD | −0.37 (1.04) | −0.46 (1.03) | −1.03 (1.03) | −1.13 (1.05) | −1.33 (0.94) | β = −0.28 |
| WLZ, mean ± SD | −0.52 (1.12) | −0.63 (1.22) | −1.03 (1.14) | −1.01 (1.07) | −0.97 (0.93) | β = −0.16 |
*Partial correlation (β) and P value obtained using fixed-effects panel model analysis, i.e., by estimating the following equation: Y = α + βTt + ε, where Y is the respective growth parameter (WAZ, LAZ, or WLZ), α is the individual fixed effect representing unobserved time-constant characteristics of the child, and Tt is the time-trend variable, which takes values between 1 (12 weeks) and 5 (104 weeks).
Fig. 1.Growth patterns of children from 12 to 104 weeks of life.
Clusters of similar growth curves were generated using latent class mixed modeling. (A) Three latent groups representing different LAZ progression in the population—25% belonged to cluster 1, 32% to cluster 2, and 43% to cluster 3. For WAZ (B) and WLZ (C), two latent groups were obtained, but 98 to 99% of the population belonged to cluster 2. A few children showed an increasing trend in their WAZ (three) and WLZ (nine) in the first 2 years of life.
Fig. 2.Lipid progression in the first 2 years of life among children in The Gambia.
(A) Sum of total lipids over time. Fixed-effects panel analysis revealed no significant change in total lipids over time (P = 0.70). (B) Number of lipids significantly altering through time [P = 0.05 adjusted for false discovery rate (FDR)]; ↑ indicates significant increase, ↓ indicates significant decrease, and ↔ indicates no significant change after Bonferroni correction. (C) Weighted correlation network showing 11 lipid clusters obtained using the WGCNA package in R. (D) Intermodular relationship showing closely related lipid clusters (modules). (E) Progression of eigenlipid (MEq, where q is the module number), which represents the collective behavior of the lipids in the module, over time. Significance levels: ***P < 0.0001; **P < 0.001; *P < 0.01. Comparisons were made using paired t test comparing the time point with the preceding time point. Analysis was only made among those with values in both time points. Gray shadow around the line indicates the 95% confidence interval.
Association between module eigenlipid (MEq) and growth outcomes over time in the first 2 years of life.
Upper numbers are partial coefficients estimated by using a fixed-effects panel model; lower numbers in parenthesis are FDR-adjusted P values. Boxes are colored blue when a significantly positive association was found and red when negative. Fixed-effects panel models were estimated by the following equation: Y = α + βTt + ME + ε, where Yit is the respective growth parameter (WAZ, LAZ, or WLZ), α is the individual fixed effect representing unobserved time-constant characteristics of the child, Tt is a time-trend variable taking values between 1 (12 weeks) and 5 (104 weeks), and ME is the respective module eigenlipid. PC, phosphatidylcholine; PS, phosphatidylserine; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; TG, triglycerides; DG, diglycerides; FA, fatty acid; SFA, saturated FA; PUFA, polyunsaturated FA; MUFA, monounsaturated FA; PA, phosphatidic acid.
|
|
|
|
| ||
| WAZ | LAZ | WLZ | |||
| ME1 | 16 | −2.65 | −0.06 | −3.67 | Ether-linked PCs and |
| (<0.001) | (0.92) | (<0.0001) | |||
| ME2 | 39 | 2.55 | 0.58 | 2.66 | All PUFA-containing |
| (<0.001) | (0.54) | (0.011) | |||
| ME3 | 31 | −1.36 | −1.47 | −1.49 | Most common TGs and |
| (0.14) | (0.19) | (0.22) | |||
| ME4 | 26 | 0.13 | −0.08 | 0.47 | PA, PEs |
| (0.84) | (0.92) | (0.70) | |||
| ME5 | 37 | −2.43 | −0.34 | −3.67 | Unassigned lipids; free |
| (<0.001) | (0.71) | (<0.0001) | |||
| ME6 | 11 | 1.26 | −0.59 | 1.41 | TG containing PUFAs |
| (0.15) | (0.54) | (0.22) | |||
| ME7 | 14 | 0.26 | 0.76 | 0.09 | LysoPC mainly SFA and |
| (0.74) | (0.50) | (0.91) | |||
| ME8 | 11 | −0.89 | −1.38 | −0.82 | LysoPC mainly MUFA |
| (0.27) | (0.20) | (0.51) | |||
| ME9 | 25 | 0.83 | −0.64 | 1.45 | Most abundant PCs |
| (0.27) | (0.54) | (0.22) | |||
| ME10 | 41 | 1.13 | 1.25 | 0.38 | Most common |
| (0.18) | (0.19) | (0.74) | |||
| ME11 | 27 | −0.47 | −1.29 | −1.18 | All small TGs and |
| (0.63) | (0.20) | (0.33) | |||
*Number of lipids belonging to the module.
Fig. 3.Eigenlipid progression of the children grouped based on latent class linear mixed modeling.
(A) Each facet represents a module obtained from weighted correlation network analysis. No significant differences in the time course progression of MEq were observed among the three clusters in all modules. (B) Multidimensional scaling analysis showing time-dependent clustering of observations but no distinction between latent classes
Fig. 4.Results of system GMM-PVAR analysis.
Temporal network visualization of the system GMM-PVAR model. Arrows indicate that a node predicts another node (or itself) in the next time point. Full arrows indicate positive association, while dashed arrows indicate negative association. Loops indicate that the current value of a node predicts the future value of itself. Arrow thickness depicts the strength of the association. Node annotation for ME1 to ME11 is shown in Table 2. All roots are inside the unit circle indicating stability of the model and stationarity of the variables (fig. S2). WAZ, LAZ, WLZ, and all ME eigenlipids were included in the model as endogenous variables in the first order (lag t−1). Sex variation was taken into account by adjusting for sex as an exogenous variable.