Literature DB >> 34533668

Value of intraoperative monitoring of the trigeminal nerve in detection of a superiorly displaced facial nerve during surgery for large vestibular schwannomas.

Yasmine A Ashram1, Youssef M Zohdy2, Tarek A Rayan3, Mohamed M K Badr-El-Dine4.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of trigeminal and facial nerve monitoring in the early identification of a superiorly (anterior and superior (AS)) displaced facial nerve. This prospective study included 24 patients operated for removal of large vestibular schwannomas (VS). The latencies of the electromyographic (EMG) events recorded from the trigeminal and facial nerve innervated muscles after mapping the superior surface of the tumor were analyzed. The mean latency of the recorded compound muscle action potential (CMAP) from the masseter muscle was 3.6 ± 0.5 ms and of the peripherally transmitted responses by volume conduction from the frontalis, o. oculi, nasalis, o. oris, and mentalis muscles was 4.6 ± 0.9, 4.1 ± 0.7, 3.9 ± 0.4, 4.3 ± 0.8, and 4.5 ± 0.6 ms, respectively, after trigeminal nerve stimulation in 24 (100%) patients (pattern I response). In 6 (25%) patients, the mean latency of CMAP on the masseter was 3.3 ± 0.3 ms, and the latencies of the CMAP from the frontalis, o. oculi, nasalis, o. oris, and mentalis muscles were 6.5 ± 1.3, 5.0 ± 1.5, 7.5 ± 1.3, 7.4 ± 0.6, and 7.0 ± 1.5 ms, respectively, longer than those of the peripherally transmitted responses (p = 0.002, p = 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.015, respectively) indicating simultaneous stimulation of both nerves (pattern II response). All patients with this response were later confirmed to have an AS-displaced facial nerve. Recognizing the response resulting from simultaneous stimulation of both the facial and trigeminal nerves is important to help early identification of an AS-displaced facial nerve before it is visible in the surgical field and to avoid misleading information by confusing this pattern for a pure trigeminal nerve response.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electromyography; Facial nerve; Facial nerve displacement; Intraoperative monitoring; Trigeminal nerve; Vestibular schwannoma

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34533668     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-021-01646-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  23 in total

Review 1.  Facial nerve monitoring during cerebellopontine angle and skull base tumor surgery: a systematic review from description to current success on function prediction.

Authors:  Marcus André Acioly; Marina Liebsch; Paulo Henrique Pires de Aguiar; Marcos Tatagiba
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 2.104

2.  Intraoperative facial motor evoked potential monitoring with transcranial electrical stimulation during skull base surgery.

Authors:  Charles C J Dong; David B Macdonald; Ryojo Akagami; Brian Westerberg; Ahmed Alkhani; Imad Kanaan; Maher Hassounah
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  The feasibility of recording blink reflexes under general anesthesia.

Authors:  Vedran Deletis; Javier Urriza; Sedat Ulkatan; Isabel Fernandez-Conejero; Jonathan Lesser; David Misita
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.217

4.  Multichannel facial nerve monitoring: value in detection of mechanically elicited electromyographic activity and prediction of postoperative outcome.

Authors:  Yasmine A Ashram; Mohamed M K Badr-El-Dine
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 5.  Facial nerve electromyography and other cranial nerve monitoring.

Authors:  C M Harper; J R Daube
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.177

6.  Facial nerve grading systems.

Authors:  J W House
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  The fate of the tumor remnant after less-than-complete acoustic neuroma resection.

Authors:  Dov C Bloch; John S Oghalai; Robert K Jackler; Monica Osofsky; Lawrence H Pitts
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  The anatomical location and course of the facial nerve in vestibular schwannomas : a study of 163 surgically treated cases.

Authors:  Chae Wan Bae; Young Hyun Cho; Seok Ho Hong; Jeong Hoon Kim; Jung-Kyo Lee; Chang Jin Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2007-12-20

9.  Intraoperative electromyography and surgical observations as predictive factors of facial nerve outcome in vestibular schwannoma surgery.

Authors:  Isabelle Bernat; Alexis Bozorg Grayeli; Gonzalo Esquia; Zhihua Zhang; Michel Kalamarides; Olivier Sterkers
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Do facial nerve displacement pattern and tumor adhesion influence the facial nerve outcome in vestibular schwannoma surgery?

Authors:  Gonzalo N Esquia-Medina; Alexis Bozorg Grayeli; Evelyne Ferrary; Florence Tubach; Isabelle Bernat; Zhihua Zhang; Carlo Bianchi; Michel Kalamarides; Olivier Sterkers
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.