Literature DB >> 34531936

ANALYSES OF PREVENTIVE CARE MEASURES WITH INCOMPLETE HISTORICAL DATA IN ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS: AN EXAMPLE FROM COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING.

Yingye Zheng1, Douglas A Corley2, Chyke Doubeni3, Ethan Halm4, Susan M Shortreed5, William E Barlow6, Ann Zauber7, Tor Devin Tosteson8, Jessica Chubak5.   

Abstract

The calculation of quality of care measures based on electronic medical records (EMRs) may be inaccurate because of incomplete capture of past services. We evaluate the influence of different statistical approaches for calculating the proportion of patients who are up-to-date for a preventive service, using the example of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We propose an extension of traditional mixture models to account for the uncertainty in compliance, which is further complicated by the choice of various screening modalities with different recommended screening intervals. We conducted simulation studies to compare various statistical approaches and demonstrated that the proposed method can alleviate bias when individuals with complete prior medical history information were not representative of the targeted population. The method is motivated by and applied to data from the National Cancer Institute-funded consortium Population-Based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regiments (PROSPR). Findings from the application are important for the evaluation of appropriate use of preventive care and provide a novel tool for dealing with similar analytical challenges with EMR data in broad settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer Screening; EMR data; Event-time analysis; Mixture Model

Year:  2020        PMID: 34531936      PMCID: PMC8442666          DOI: 10.1214/20-aoas1342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Appl Stat        ISSN: 1932-6157            Impact factor:   2.083


  13 in total

1.  Estimation in a Cox proportional hazards cure model.

Authors:  J P Sy; J M Taylor
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Across Healthcare Systems.

Authors:  Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; Shivan J Mehta; Yingye Zheng; Nirupa R Ghai; Dale F McLerran; Jessica Chubak; Virginia P Quinn; Celette Sugg Skinner; Douglas A Corley; John M Inadomi; Chyke A Doubeni
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Accounting for misclassification in electronic health records-derived exposures using generalized linear finite mixture models.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hubbard; Eric Johnson; Jessica Chubak; Karen J Wernli; Aruna Kamineni; Andy Bogart; Carolyn M Rutter
Journal:  Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol       Date:  2016-06-03

4.  The use of mixture models for the analysis of survival data with long-term survivors.

Authors:  V T Farewell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Jennifer S Lin; Margaret A Piper; Leslie A Perdue; Carolyn M Rutter; Elizabeth M Webber; Elizabeth O'Connor; Ning Smith; Evelyn P Whitlock
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Estimation using all available covariate information versus a fixed look-back window for dichotomous covariates.

Authors:  Steven M Brunelli; Joshua J Gagne; Krista F Huybrechts; Shirley V Wang; Amanda R Patrick; Kenneth J Rothman; John D Seeger
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 2.890

7.  Can choice of the sample population affect perceived performance: implications for performance assessment.

Authors:  Bruce E Landon; A James O'Malley; Thomas Keegan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Influence of Age and Comorbidity on Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Elderly.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Yingye Zheng; Virginia P Quinn; Elisabeth F Beaber; Carolyn M Rutter; Ethan A Halm; Jessica Chubak; Chyke A Doubeni; Jennifer S Haas; Aruna Kamineni; Marilyn M Schapira; Pamela M Vacek; Michael P Garcia; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Defining and measuring adherence to cancer screening.

Authors:  Jessica Chubak; Rebecca Hubbard
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 2.136

10.  Estimating screening test utilization using electronic health records data.

Authors:  Ra Hubbard; J Chubak; Cm Rutter
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2014-11-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.