| Literature DB >> 34531932 |
Mariane Le Fur1,2, Alana Ross1, Pamela Pantazopoulos1, Nicholas Rotile1,2, Iris Zhou1,2, Peter Caravan1,2, Zdravka Medarova1, Byunghee Yoo1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In our earlier work, we identified microRNA-10b (miR10b) as a master regulator of the viability of metastatic tumor cells. This knowledge allowed us to design a miR10b-targeted therapeutic consisting of anti-miR10b and ultrasmall iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles (MN), termed MN-anti-miR10b. In mouse models of breast cancer, we demonstrated that MN-anti-miR10b caused durable regressions of established metastases with no evidence of systemic toxicity. As a first step towards translating MN-anti-miR10b for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, we needed to determine if MN-anti-miR10b, which is so effective in mice, will also accumulate in human metastases.Entities:
Keywords: MR imaging; RNA interference; biodistribution; metastasis; microRNA; positron emission tomography
Year: 2021 PMID: 34531932 PMCID: PMC8442631 DOI: 10.1186/s12645-021-00089-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Nanotechnol ISSN: 1868-6958
Scheme 1.Preparation of nat/64Cu-MN-anti-miR10b: 1. Coupling reaction between MN-NH2 and NODAGA-NHS to form NODAGA-MN. 2. Functionalization with the hetero-bifunctional linker, SPDP. 3. Conjugation to anti-miR10b antagomir via disulfide linkage to form NODAGA-MN-anti-miR10b. 4. Complexation reaction with natCuCl2 or 64CuCl2 leading to nat/64Cu-MN-anti-miR10b
Fig. 1Characterization of nat/64Cu-MN-anti-miR10b. a Radiochemical purity confirmed by iTLC. (Top) unlabeled Cu-64, (middle) separation of 64Cu-MN-anti-miR10b and unlabeled Cu-64, and (bottom) 64Cu-MN-anti-miR10b after PD-10 purification. b HPLC traces of 64Cu-MN-anti-miR10b using size exclusion chromatography, (top) UV trace at 254 nm, (Bottom) radiodetector. c TEM of Cu-MN-anti-miR10b and natCu-MN-anti-miR10b. d Nanoparticle size by TEM and DLS. e In vitro cell uptake by breast adenocarcinoma cells. f qRT-PCR demonstrating target engagement (inhibition of miR-10b). natCu was utilized for the preparation of natCu-MN-anti-miR10b (t-test, n = 3, **P < 0.01)
Fig. 2Ex vivo biodistribution measured at 24 and 48 h after administration of a a microdose of 64Cu-MN-anti-miR10b (%ID/g), b a therapeutic carrier-added macrodose of 64Cu-MN-anti-miR10b (%ID/g). Insets show the %ID/g values in liver and spleen. #Denotes organs with metastasis as detected by BLI. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. Correlation between the %ID/g in non-metastatic organs obtained after administration of a microdose and the %ID/g obtained after administration of a macrodose at c 24 h and d 48 h post-injection (c and d Pearson product–moment correlation, the dashed line corresponds to the line of identity)
Fig. 3PET–MRI of 64Cu-MN-anti-miR10b uptake by metastatic lesions. a In vivo PET–MRI maximum intensity projection (MIP) images of mice bearing metastatic breast adenocarcinoma 24 h after injection of a microdose or a macrodose of 64Cu-MN-anti-miR10b. The yellow arrows point to bone or lymph node (LN) metastasis. b Quantitation of 64Cu-MN-anti-miR10b accumulation in metastatic (Mets+) and non-metastatic (Mets−) organs obtained from in vivo PET images at 24 h post-injection (%ID/cc). The high signal intensity in the metastatic organs compared to the non-metastatic organs confirms uptake of the therapeutic by the metastases. Open circles represent mice injected with a microdose and closed circles represent mice injected with a macrodose. c Ex vivo PET–MRI of bone and lymph node metastases. From left: in vivo BLI, ex vivo PET, and ex vivo white-light photograph of metastatic lesions. d Ex vivo biodistribution of 64Cu-MN-anti-miR10b as visualized by PET 48 h after microdose injection and 24 h after macrodose injection