| Literature DB >> 34531918 |
Tieniu Zhao1, Xiaonan Yang2, Ruixin Wan3, Lihui Yan4, Rongrong Yang5, Yuanyuan Guan6, Dongjun Wang6, Huijun Wang7, Hongwu Wang1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To establish the diagnosis model for syndromes of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2-DM) and explore symptoms, the pulse and tongue signs, and laboratory indexes related to syndromes of T2-DM.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34531918 PMCID: PMC8440087 DOI: 10.1155/2021/5528550
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Comparison of sociodemographic characteristics between the SHF syndrome and QYD syndrome.
| Total | T2-DM syndrome | Statistics value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHF syndrome ( | QYD syndrome ( | |||
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 162 (62.1) | 141 (48.1) | 10.834 | 0.001 |
| Female | 99 (37.9) | 152 (51.9) | ||
| Age (years) | ||||
| <40 | 36 (13.8) | 24 (8.2) | 11.422 | 0.003 |
| 40–60 | 154 (59.0) | 153 (52.2) | ||
| >60 | 71 (27.2) | 116 (39.6) | ||
| 56.0 (48.0, 61.0) | 57.7 (51.0, 66.0) | 3.558 | <0.001 | |
| Education (years) | ||||
| 6 | 28 (10.7) | 42 (14.3) | 4.774 | 0.092 |
| 12 | 203 (77.8) | 231 (78.8) | ||
| ≥13 | 30 (11.5) | 20 (6.9) | ||
| Occupation | ||||
| White collar | 223 (85.4) | 251 (85.7) | 0.006 | 0.940 |
| Blue collar | 38 (14.6) | 42 (14.3) | ||
| Ethnic | ||||
| Han nationality | 256 (98.1) | 290 (99.0) | 0.272 | 0.602 |
| Others | 5 (1.9) | 3 (1.0) | ||
| Marital status | ||||
| Married | 225 (86.2) | 233 (79.5) | 4.306 | 0.038 |
| Unmarried | 36 (13.8) | 60 (20.5) | ||
| Past medical history | ||||
| Yes | 93 (35.6) | 85 (29.0) | 2.776 | 0.096 |
| None | 168 (64.4) | 208 (71.0) | ||
| Family history | ||||
| Yes | 132 (50.6) | 144 (49.1) | 0.113 | 0.737 |
| None | 129 (49.4) | 149 (50.9) | ||
∗Female patients with T2-DM are more prone to develop QYD syndrome, while male patients with T2-DM are more likely to develop SHF syndrome. Elderly patients with T2-DM are more prone to develop QYD syndrome, while young and middle-aged diabetic patients are more likely to develop SHF syndrome. The ratio of SHF syndrome of married patients with T2-DM is higher than that of QYD syndrome.
Logistic regression of symptoms associated with SHF syndrome and QYD syndrome.
| Variable |
| SE | Wald | df |
| Exp ( | OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odor in the mouth | 0.688 | 0.322 | 4.557 | 1 | 0.033 | 1.989 | (1.058, 3.741) |
| Fatigue | −0.787 | 0.395 | 3.969 | 1 | 0.046 | 0.455 | (0.210, 0.987) |
| Limb weakness | −0.907 | 0.386 | 5.527 | 1 | 0.019 | 0.404 | (0.189, 0.860) |
| Polyphagia | 1.734 | 0.357 | 23.549 | 1 | <0.001 | 5.661 | (2.811, 11.401) |
| Vulnerable to starvation | 0.666 | 0.333 | 4.002 | 1 | 0.045 | 1.947 | (1.014, 3.739) |
| Burning sensation in the stomach | 1.527 | 0.421 | 13.163 | 1 | <0.001 | 4.606 | (2.018 10.511) |
| Slippery and replete pulse | 4.021 | 0.382 | 110.545 | 1 | <0.001 | 55.752 | (26.347, 117.974) |
| Weak pulse | −3.682 | 0.777 | 22.438 | 1 | <0.001 | 0.025 | (0.005, 0.115) |
| Pink tongue | −0.860 | 0.360 | 5.706 | 1 | 0.017 | 0.423 | (0.209, 0.857) |
| Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) | 0.178 | 0.068 | 6.922 | 1 | 0.009 | 1.194 | (1.046, 1.363) |
| Hemoglobin A1C (HbAlc) | 0.152 | 0.062 | 5.927 | 1 | 0.015 | 1.164 | (1.030, 1.316) |
Results of three classification methods for 554 cases with T2-DM syndrome.
| Method | T2-DM syndrome | TN | FP | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Accuracy (%) | AUC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FN | TP | ||||||
| LR | SHF syndrome | 233 | 28 | 89.3 | 90.1 | 89.7 | 0.953 |
| QYD syndrome | 29 | 264 | |||||
|
| |||||||
| QUEST algorithm of DT | SHF syndrome | 204 | 57 | 78.2 | 91.5 | 85.2 | 0.931 |
| QYD syndrome | 25 | 268 | |||||
|
| |||||||
| CHAID algorithm of DT | SHF syndrome | 204 | 57 | 78.2 | 91.5 | 85.2 | 0.931 |
| QYD syndrome | 25 | 268 | |||||
|
| |||||||
| KNN | SHF syndrome | 211 | 40 | 84.7 | 91.5 | 88.3 | 0.887 |
| QYD syndrome | 15 | 278 | |||||
Sensitivity = TP/(TP + FN); specificity = TN/(TN + FP); accuracy = (TP + TN)/(TP + FN + TN + FP).
Figure 1QUEST algorithm of decision tree analysis of T2-DM syndrome.
Figure 2CHAID algorithm of decision tree analysis of T2-DM syndrome.
Figure 3Comparison of the area under the ROC curve of three classification methods.