| Literature DB >> 34531466 |
Ryo Kamidani1, Takahito Miyake2, Hideshi Okada3, Genki Yoshimura1, Keigo Kusuzawa1, Tomotaka Miura1, Ryuichi Shimaoka4, Hideaki Oiwa1, Fuminori Yamaji1, Yosuke Mizuno1, Ryu Yasuda1, Yuichiro Kitagawa1, Tetsuya Fukuta1, Takuma Ishihara5, Tomomi Shiga4, Haruka Okamoto1, Masahito Tachi1, Masato Shiba1, Norihide Kanda1, Sho Nachi1, Tomoaki Doi1, Takahiro Yoshida1, Shozo Yoshida1, Kenichiro Morishige4, Shinji Ogura1.
Abstract
To evaluate the effect of cryoprecipitate (CRYO) transfusion in women referred for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). This retrospective cohort study included patients with primary PPH referred to Gifu University Hospital between April 2013 and March 2020. We analyzed the effect of CRYO transfusion on fluid balance 24 h after the initial examination using a multivariable linear regression model adjusted for several confounding variables. To evaluate whether outcomes were modified by active bleeding, an interaction term of CRYO*active bleeding was incorporated into the multivariable model. We identified 157 women: 38 in the CRYO group (cases) and 119 in the control group. Fluid balance in the aforementioned period tended to decrease in the CRYO group compared with that in the control group (coefficient - 398.91; 95% CI - 1298.08 to + 500.26; p = 0.382). Active bleeding on contrast-enhanced computed tomography affected the relationship between CRYO transfusion and fluid balance (p = 0.016). Other outcomes, except for the overall transfusion requirement, were not significantly different; however, the interaction effect of active bleeding was significant (p = 0.016). CRYO transfusion may decrease the fluid balance in the first 24 h in PPH patients, especially in those without active bleeding.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34531466 PMCID: PMC8445974 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97954-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Flowchart of participant enrolment in the study.
Clinical characteristics of the participants.
| Variable | N | Overall, N = 1571 | Control group, N = 1191 | CRYO group, N = 381 | p-value2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, yrs | 157 | 34 (30, 37) | 34 (30, 37) | 34 (30, 38) | 0.632 |
| Gestational age, wk | 155 | 39.14 (37.71, 40.29) | 39.29 (37.86, 40.29) | 38.57 (37.43, 39.86) | 0.276 |
| Parity | 153 | 0.940 | |||
| 1 | 93 (60.8%) | 72 (61.5%) | 21 (58.3%) | ||
| 2 | 42 (27.5%) | 31 (26.5%) | 11 (30.6%) | ||
| 3 | 17 (11.1%) | 13 (11.1%) | 4 (11.1%) | ||
| > 4 | 1 (0.7%) | 1 (0.9%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| Singleton/multiple birth | 157 | 0.200 | |||
| Singleton | 149 (94.9%) | 38 (100.0%) | 111 (93.3%) | ||
| Twin | 8 (5.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | 8 (6.7%) | ||
| Mode of delivery | 157 | 0.127 | |||
| Vaginal delivery | 96 (61.1%) | 77 (64.7%) | 19 (50.0%) | ||
| Caesarean section | 61 (38.9%) | 42 (35.3%) | 19 (50.0%) | ||
| Transfer time, min | 127 | 208.0 (115.0, 333.5) | 222.0 (117.0, 335.0) | 197.5 (95.8, 316.8) | 0.489 |
| Transfusion before arrival | 157 | 31 (19.7%) | 17 (14.3%) | 14 (36.8%) | 0.004 |
| Using of ART | 139 | 67 (48.2%) | 54 (51.4%) | 13 (38.2%) | 0.236 |
| Major pregnancy complications | 156 | 12 (7.7%) | 6 (5.1%) | 6 (15.8%) | 0.072 |
| Lactate, mg/dL | 153 | 25.0 (17.0, 34.0) | 23.0 (15.0, 31.2) | 30.0 (21.0, 40.0) | 0.009 |
| Hemoglobin, g/dL | 157 | 7.4 (6.0, 9.3) | 7.6 (6.3, 9.4) | 6.6 (5.2, 8.0) | 0.026 |
| Fibrinogen, mg/dL | 155 | 183.0 (136.5, 265.5) | 214.0 (150.0, 285.0) | 140.0 (53.8, 178.8) | < 0.001 |
| PT-INR | 153 | 1.1 (1.0, 1.2) | 1.1 (1.0, 1.2) | 1.2 (1.1, 1.4) | < 0.001 |
| Platelet count, × 103/μL | 157 | 134.0 (104.0, 182.0) | 140.0 (115.0, 193.5) | 95.0 (49.0, 148.2) | < 0.001 |
| Body temperature, °C | 157 | 36.7 (36.3, 37.1) | 36.6 (36.3, 37.0) | 36.8 (36.0, 37.2) | 0.805 |
| Shock Index | 157 | 0.9 (0.7, 1.2) | 0.9 (0.7, 1.2) | 1.1 (0.8, 1.4) | 0.038 |
| APACHE II score, pts | 156 | 11.0 (9.0, 14.0) | 11.0 (9.0, 13.0) | 13.0 (10.0, 18.0) | 0.001 |
| Clark’s criteria, pts | 157 | 1.0 (0.0, 2.0) | 0.0 (0.0, 1.0) | 2.5 (1.0, 3.0) | < 0.001 |
| Number of patients who met Clark’s DIC criteria (≥ 3 scores) | 157 | 29 (18.5%) | 10 (8.4%) | 19 (50.0%) | < 0.001 |
| Obstetrics DIC score, pts | 156 | 6.0 (4.0, 9.0) | 5.0 (3.0, 8.0) | 9.0 (7.0, 12.0) | < 0.001 |
| Number of patients who met obstetrics DIC score (≥ 13 scores) | 156 | 14 (9.0%) | 5 (4.2%) | 9 (23.7%) | 0.001 |
Major pregnancy complications include pregnancy hypertension syndrome, gestational diabetes, and abruptio placentae. Body temperature was recorded as the lowest body temperature during blood transfusion. Shock index was calculated as heart rate divided by systolic blood pressure.
CRYO, cryoprecipitate; BMI, body mass index; ART, assisted reproductive technology; APACHE II score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score; DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation.
1Statistical data are presented as the median (interquartile range) or n (%).
2Statistical tests performed: Wilcoxon rank-sum test; Fisher's exact test.
Figure 2Estimated blood loss from delivery to the start of initial treatment at our hospital.
Multivariable linear regression analysis.
| Outcome | N | Control group, N = 1191 | CRYO group, N = 381 | Coefficient | 95%LCI | 95%UCI | p-value2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall transfusion requirement, units | 157 | 701.64 | 158.58 | 1244.7 | 0.012 | ||
| RCC | 4 (1, 6) | 8 (6, 14) | |||||
| FFP | 2 (0, 6) | 8 (4, 17) | |||||
| PC | 0 (0, 0) | 0 (0, 20) | |||||
| Total infusion volume within 24 h, mL | 157 | 3904 (3067, 5043) | 5033 (4413, 6793) | 1.16* | 0.99 | 1.37 | 0.074 |
| IN–OUT balance within 24 h, mL | 157 | 1225 (232.5, 2384) | 1550 (256, 2950) | − 398.91 | − 1298.08 | 500.26 | 0.382 |
| Obstetrics DIC score variation, pts | 157 | − 2 (− 1, − 5) | − 7 (− 3, − 10.5) | − 0.2 | − 0.89 | 0.49 | 0.568 |
CRYO, cryoprecipitate; RCC, red cell concentrate; FFP, fresh frozen plasma; PC, platelet concentrate; ICU, intensive care unit; DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation.
1Statistical data are presented as the median (interquartile range).
2Statistical tests performed: multivariable linear regression.
*Coefficients obtained from multivariable linear regression analysis for log-transformed outcome values are back-transformed to the original scale. This coefficient indicates the fold-increase of the outcome in the Cryoprecipitate group relative to the Control group.
Multivariable binary/proportional odds logistic analysis.
| Outcome | N | Control group, N = 1191 | CRYO group, N = 381 | Odds ratio | 95%LCI | 95%UCI | p-value2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transcatheter arterial embolization | 157 | 71 (59.7%) | 31 (81.6%) | 1.01 | 0.08 | 12.53 | 0.993 |
| Hospital stay, days | 157 | 4 (3, 6) | 5 (4, 9.5) | 1.46 | 0.69 | 3.11 | 0.323 |
| Ventilator stay, days | 157 | 0 (0, 0) | 0 (0, 0) | 8.32 | 0.96 | 71.79 | 0.054 |
| ICU stay, days | 157 | 2 (2, 3) | 3 (2, 3) | 1.32 | 0.54 | 3.2 | 0.544 |
CRYO, cryoprecipitate; ICU, intensive care unit.
1Statistical data are presented as the median (interquartile range) or n (%).
2Statistical tests performed: multivariable logistic regression; multivariable proportional odds logistic regression.
Figure 3Association between use of CRYO and fluid balance at 24 h from the initial examination by presence of active bleeding. CI, confidence interval. CRYO, cryoprecipitate.
DIC diagnostic criteria in obstetrics.
| Score | |
|---|---|
| 1. Underlying diseases | |
| a. Placental abruption | |
| Stiffening of the uterus, death of the fetus | 5 |
| Stiffening of the uterus, survival of the fetus | 4 |
| Confirmatory diagnosis of placental abruption by ultrasonic tomographic findings and CTG findings | 4 |
| b. Amniotic fluid embolism | |
| Acute cor pulmonale | 4 |
| Artificial ventilation | 3 |
| Assisted respiration | 2 |
| Oxygen flux alone | 1 |
| c. DIC-type postpartum hemorrhage | |
| In case the blood from the uterus has low coagulability | 4 |
| Hemorrhage of 2000 mL ≦ (within 24 h after the start of hemorrhage) | 3 |
| Hemorrhage of 1000 mL ≦, but not exceeding 2000 mL (within 24 h after the start of hemorrhage) | 1 |
| d. Eclamptic attack | 4 |
| e. Severe infection | |
| Those with fever accompanied by shock, bacteremia, and endotoxemia | 4 |
| Continued fever or remittent fever | 1 |
| f. Other underlying diseases | 1 |
| 2. Clinical symptoms | |
| a. Acute renal failure | |
| Anuria (≦5 mL/h) | 4 |
| Oliguria (5–20 mL/h) | 3 |
| b. Acute respiratory failure (amniotic fluid embolism excluded) | |
| Artificial ventilation or occasional assisted respiration | 4 |
| Oxygen flux alone | 1 |
| c. Organ failure | |
| Heart (rales or foamy sputum, etc.) | 4 |
| Liver (visible jaundice, etc.) | 4 |
| Brain (clouding of consciousness, convulsion, etc.) | 4 |
| Digestive tract (necrotic enteritis, etc.) | 4 |
| Other severe organ failure | 4 |
| d. Hemorrhage diathesis (Macroscopic hematuria and melena, purpura, hemorrhage from the mucous membrane, gingival bleeding, bleeding at the site of injection, etc.) | 4 |
| e. Shock symptoms | |
| Pulse rate ≧ 100/min | 1 |
| Blood pressure ≦ 90 mmHg(systolic) or blood pressure reduction of ≧ 40% | 1 |
| Cold sweat | 1 |
| Pallor | 1 |
| 3. Laboratory findings | |
| Serum FDP ≧ 10 μg/mL | 1 |
| Platelet counts ≦ 10 × 104 /μL | 1 |
| Fibrinogen ≦ 150 mg/dL | 1 |
| PT ≧ 15 (s) (≦50%) or hepaplastin test ≦50% | 1 |
| Erythrocyte sedimentation rate ≦4 mm/15 min or ≦15 mm/h | 1 |
| Bleeding time ≧ 5 min | 1 |
| Other coagulation and fibrinolysis factors; AT ≦18 mg/dL or ≦60%, prekallikrein, α2-PI, plasminogen, other coagulation factors ≦50% | 1 |
CTG, cardiotocogram; DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation; FDP, fibrinogen and fibrin degradation; PT, prothrombin time; AT, antithrombin.
Efficacy evaluation criteria for DIC in obstetrics.
| 1. Clinical symptoms | |||||
| It is based on “2. Clinical symptoms” of DIC Diagnostic Criteria in Obstetrics (Table | |||||
| 2. Coagulation Tests | |||||
| Score | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Serum FDP μg/mL | < 10 | 10 ≦ < 20 | 20 ≦ < 40 | 40 ≦ < 80 | 80≦ |
| Platelet count × 104/μL | 20 < | 16 < ≦ 20 | 12 < ≦ 16 | 8 < ≦ 12 | ≦8 |
| Fibrinogen mg/dL | 200 < | 150 < ≦ 200 | 100 < ≦ 150 | 50 < ≦ 100 | ≦50 |
| PT sec | 12 < | 12 ≦ < 15 | 15 ≦ < 20 | 20 ≦ < 25 | 25≦ |
| 3. Evacuation of efficacy (post–pre) | |||||
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | Aggravated | |
| Difference | ≦ − 9 | − 9 < ~ ≦ − 5 | − 5 < ~ ≦ − 1 | ± 0 | + 1≦ |
DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation; FDP, fibrinogen and fibrin degradation; PT, prothrombin time.