Marina Carvalho Arruda Barreto1, Fabianna Resende Jesus Moraleida2, Cristiane Vitaliano Graminha3, Camila Ferreira Leite2, Shamyr Sulyvan Castro2, Ana Carla Lima Nunes4. 1. Department of Public Health, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil. 2. Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Ceará, Major Weyne Street, 1440, Fortaleza, CE, 60430-450, Brazil. 3. Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Ceará, Uberaba, Brazil. 4. Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Ceará, Major Weyne Street, 1440, Fortaleza, CE, 60430-450, Brazil. aclnunes@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is both a challenging and disabling condition. The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) classifies FMS as chronic primary pain, and it can negatively impact individuals' functioning including social, psychological, physical and work-related factors. Notably, while guidelines recommend a biopsychosocial approach for managing chronic pain conditions, FMS assessment remains clinical. The WHODAS 2.0 is a unified scale to measure disability in the light of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Brazilian version of WHODAS 2.0 for use in individuals with FMS. METHODS: Methodological study of the validity and reliability of the Brazilian version of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0 with 110 individuals with FMS. The instrument gives a score from 0 to 100, the higher the value, the worse the level of functioning. We assessed participants with Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) (0-100), Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) (0-10) and Beck Depression Inventory instrument (BDI) (0-63). The construct validity, internal consistency, and test-retest stability. We used SF-36, FIQ and BDI to study construct validity analysis. For statistical analysis, we performed the intraclass correlation (ICC), Spearman correlation, and Cronbach's alpha, with a statistical level of 5%. RESULTS: Most participants were female (92.27%), aged 45 (± 15) years. The test-retest reliability analysis (n = 50) showed stability of the instrument (ICC = 0.54; ρ = 0.84, p < 0.05). The test-retest correlation between the domains was moderate to strong (ρ > 0.58 and < 0.90). Internal consistency was satisfactory for total WHODAS 2.0 (0.91) and also for domains, ranging from 0.44 to 0.81. The construct validity showed satisfactory values with all moderately correlated with WHODAS 2.0 instruments (> 0.46 and < 0.64; p < 0.05). WHODAS 2.0 evaluates the functioning encompassing components of health-related quality of life, functional impact, and depressive symptoms in those with FMS. CONCLUSIONS: WHODAS 2.0 is a reliable and valid instrument to evaluate functioning of Brazilians with FMS. It provides reliable information on individuals' health through of a multidimensional perspective, that allows for individual-centered care.
BACKGROUND: Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is both a challenging and disabling condition. The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) classifies FMS as chronic primary pain, and it can negatively impact individuals' functioning including social, psychological, physical and work-related factors. Notably, while guidelines recommend a biopsychosocial approach for managing chronic pain conditions, FMS assessment remains clinical. The WHODAS 2.0 is a unified scale to measure disability in the light of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Brazilian version of WHODAS 2.0 for use in individuals with FMS. METHODS: Methodological study of the validity and reliability of the Brazilian version of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0 with 110 individuals with FMS. The instrument gives a score from 0 to 100, the higher the value, the worse the level of functioning. We assessed participants with Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) (0-100), Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) (0-10) and Beck Depression Inventory instrument (BDI) (0-63). The construct validity, internal consistency, and test-retest stability. We used SF-36, FIQ and BDI to study construct validity analysis. For statistical analysis, we performed the intraclass correlation (ICC), Spearman correlation, and Cronbach's alpha, with a statistical level of 5%. RESULTS: Most participants were female (92.27%), aged 45 (± 15) years. The test-retest reliability analysis (n = 50) showed stability of the instrument (ICC = 0.54; ρ = 0.84, p < 0.05). The test-retest correlation between the domains was moderate to strong (ρ > 0.58 and < 0.90). Internal consistency was satisfactory for total WHODAS 2.0 (0.91) and also for domains, ranging from 0.44 to 0.81. The construct validity showed satisfactory values with all moderately correlated with WHODAS 2.0 instruments (> 0.46 and < 0.64; p < 0.05). WHODAS 2.0 evaluates the functioning encompassing components of health-related quality of life, functional impact, and depressive symptoms in those with FMS. CONCLUSIONS: WHODAS 2.0 is a reliable and valid instrument to evaluate functioning of Brazilians with FMS. It provides reliable information on individuals' health through of a multidimensional perspective, that allows for individual-centered care.
Authors: Marianne Jensen Hjermstad; Peter M Fayers; Dagny F Haugen; Augusto Caraceni; Geoffrey W Hanks; Jon H Loge; Robin Fainsinger; Nina Aass; Stein Kaasa Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Lidwine B Mokkink; Caroline B Terwee; Donald L Patrick; Jordi Alonso; Paul W Stratford; Dirk L Knol; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2010-02-19 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: F Wolfe; H A Smythe; M B Yunus; R M Bennett; C Bombardier; D L Goldenberg; P Tugwell; S M Campbell; M Abeles; P Clark Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 1990-02
Authors: G J Macfarlane; C Kronisch; L E Dean; F Atzeni; W Häuser; E Fluß; E Choy; E Kosek; K Amris; J Branco; F Dincer; P Leino-Arjas; K Longley; G M McCarthy; S Makri; S Perrot; P Sarzi-Puttini; A Taylor; G T Jones Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: N Samartin-Veiga; A J González-Villar; M Pidal-Miranda; A Vázquez-Millán; M T Carrillo-de-la-Peña Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 3.440