| Literature DB >> 34530895 |
Yahya Benbouchta1,2, Nicole De Leeuw3, Saadia Amasdl4, Aziza Sbiti4, Dominique Smeets5, Khalid Sadki6, Abdelaziz Sefiani4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: 15q26 deletion is a relatively rare chromosomal disorder, and it is described only in few cases. Patients with this aberration show many signs and symptoms, particularly pre- and postnatal growth restriction, developmental delay, microcephaly, intellectual disability and various congenital malformations. CASEEntities:
Keywords: 15q26 deletion; Array-CGH; CHD; Case report
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34530895 PMCID: PMC8447573 DOI: 10.1186/s13052-021-01121-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ital J Pediatr ISSN: 1720-8424 Impact factor: 2.638
Fig. 1High-resolution R-banded karyogram (a,c), partial RHG (b) karyogram (c) showing deletion 15q chromosome with an abnormally short q-arm. (Red arrow)
Fig. 2A. CGH-array data showing a terminal loss of 9.15 Mb in 15q26.1-q26.3 involving 93,275,228-102,429,113 breakpoints. B. UCSC genome browser assembly (GRCh37/hg19) highlighting genes involved in the loss segment
Clinical and cytogenetic data in patients with “pure” 15q26 deletion CHD
| Clinical findings | Our case | Dateki 2011 [ | Poot 2007 [ | Tönnies 2001 [ | Nakamua 2011 [ | Slavotinek 2006 [ | Hengstschlagr 2004 [ | Bhakta 2005 [ | Rump 2008 [ | Choi 2011 [ | Chui 2015 [ | Biggio 2004 [ | Okubo 2003 [ | O’Riordan 2016 (38) | Iopez 2006 (39) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient 1 | Patient 2 | |||||||||||||||
| 4y | 13y 9 m | 8y 6 m | 19 m | 33 weeks | newoborn | newoborn | newborn | newborn | 6 m | 2 y | 3 y | newborn | 10 y | newborn | fetus/19 wg | |
| F | F | F | F | F | F | F | F | F | M | M | F | F | F | M | F | |
| 15q26.1qter | 15q26.2qter | 15q26.2qter | 15q26.1 | 15q26.2 | 15q26.2 | 15q26.2 | 15q26.1qter | 15q26.1qter | 15q26.2qter | 15q26.2qter | 15q26.2qter | 15q26.1qter | 15q26.1qter | 15q26.2qter | 15q26.1qter | |
| 9,15 Mb | 5 Mb | 6,87 Mb | NA | 5,78 Mb | NA | NA | NA | NA | 5.8 Mb | 8.58 Mb | NA | NA | NA | 6.554 Mb | NA | |
| De novo | De novo | De novo | De novo | NA | De novo | NA | De novo | NA | De novo | NA | NA | NA | De novo | De novo | De novo | |
| + | – | + | + | + | NA | NA | + | + | – | + | NA | – | + | NA | + | |
| + | – | + | + | + | + | + | – | + | + | + | + | NA | + | + | NA | |
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | NA | + | + | NA | |
| + | NA | + | + | + | NA | NA | NA | + | + | NA | + | NA | + | + | NA | |
| + | + | – | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | + | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| + | – | + | + | + | – | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | NA | |
| + | – | – | + | NA | NA | + | NA | + | + | – | – | + | – | NA | NA | |
| + | – | + | + | + | NA | + | NA | NA | – | – | + | + | – | NA | NA | |
| + | – | – | + | + | – | + | + | + | + | – | – | + | – | – | NA | |
| + | – | + | – | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | + | + | + | NA | + | NA | NA | |
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| – | – | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | |
| + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| – | – | – | + | – | + | + | + | + | – | + | – | + | – | + | – | |
| – | + | – | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | + | – | – | |
| – | – | – | + | – | – | + | – | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| + | – | + | + | + | – | + | – | – | + | + | – | – | + | – | – | |
| – | – | + | – | – | + | + | – | + | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | |
| – | – | – | – | – | + | + | – | + | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | |
| – | – | – | – | – | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | + | – | – | + | |
| – | – | – | + | + | – | + | + | + | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | |
| + | – | + | – | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| + | – | + | – | – | – | – | – | + | – | + | + | + | + | – | – | |
| + | – | – | – | – | + | – | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | – | – | |
Fig. 315q26.1-q26.3 deletions displaying the 36 missing genes together with the four genes involved in the Phenotype in our proband