Juan Pellico1,2, Irene Fernández-Barahona3,4, Jesús Ruiz-Cabello1,3,5,6, Lucía Gutiérrez7, María Muñoz-Hernando8,4, María J Sánchez-Guisado5, Irati Aiestaran-Zelaia5, Lydia Martínez-Parra5, Ignacio Rodríguez1,3, Jacob Bentzon8, Fernando Herranz1,4. 1. CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), 28029 Madrid, Spain. 2. School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, SE1 7EH London, U.K. 3. Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain. 4. NanoMedMol Group, Instituto de Química Medica (IQM), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), 28006 Madrid, Spain. 5. Center for Cooperative Research in Biomaterials (CIC biomaGUNE), Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), 20014 Donostia San Sebastián, Spain. 6. IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, 48013 Bilbao, Spain. 7. Departamento de Química Analítica, Instituto de Nanociencia y Materiales de Aragón, Universidad de Zaragoza-CSIC y CIBER-BBN, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain. 8. Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III (CNIC), 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
Vascular microcalcifications are associated with atherosclerosis plaque instability and, therefore, to increased mortality. Because of this key role, several imaging probes have been developed for their in vivo identification. Among them, [18F]FNa is the gold standard, showing a large uptake in the whole skeleton by positron emission tomography. Here, we push the field toward the combined anatomical and functional early characterization of atherosclerosis. For this, we have developed hydroxyapatite (HAP)-multitag, a bisphosphonate-functionalized 68Ga core-doped magnetic nanoparticle showing high affinity toward most common calcium salts present in microcalcifications, particularly HAP. We characterized this interaction in vitro and in vivo, showing a massive uptake in the atherosclerotic lesion identified by positron emission tomography (PET) and positive contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In addition, this accumulation was found to be dependent on the calcification progression, with a maximum uptake in the microcalcification stage. These results confirmed the ability of HAP-multitag to identify vascular calcifications by PET/(T1)MRI during the vulnerable stages of the plaque progression.
Vascular microcalcifications are associated with atherosclerosis plaque instability and, therefore, to increased mortality. Because of this key role, several imaging probes have been developed for their in vivo identification. Among them, [18F]FNa is the gold standard, showing a large uptake in the whole skeleton by positron emission tomography. Here, we push the field toward the combined anatomical and functional early characterization of atherosclerosis. For this, we have developed hydroxyapatite (HAP)-multitag, a bisphosphonate-functionalized 68Ga core-doped magnetic nanoparticle showing high affinity toward most common calcium salts present in microcalcifications, particularly HAP. We characterized this interaction in vitro and in vivo, showing a massive uptake in the atherosclerotic lesion identified by positron emission tomography (PET) and positive contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In addition, this accumulation was found to be dependent on the calcification progression, with a maximum uptake in the microcalcification stage. These results confirmed the ability of HAP-multitag to identify vascular calcifications by PET/(T1)MRI during the vulnerable stages of the plaque progression.
Atherosclerosis is
a complex chronic inflammatory disease of the
blood vessel wall in which plaques build up inside the arteries and
is the leading cause of cardiovascular diseases. It is well known
that the formation of calcified nodules is an important process in
atherosclerosis development, often after a first inflammation step.[1] These microcalcifications are associated with
plaque rupture, leading to a cardiac event, or with plaque stabilization
through the formation of macroscopic crystals (macrocalcifications)
later in plaque development.[1,2] Atherosclerosis microcalcifications
are mainly composed of a mixture of hydroxyapatite (HAP), calcium
oxalate monohydrate, and β-tricalcium phosphate, with HAP as
the major component.[3] Due to the relevance
of these microcalcifications, several imaging probes have been developed
in the past years. There are two main approaches to develop tracers
for in vivo detection of calcifications: the use
of [18F]FNa and bisphosphonate-based tracers. [18F]FNa is the gold standard for positron emission tomography (PET)
detection of calcifications in the clinical scenario owing to the
favorable pharmacokinetic profile and the lack of toxic effects.[4] On the other hand, the [18F]FNa only
binds to HAP, while bisphosphonate-based (BP) tracers or nanoparticles
recognize a broader spectrum of calcium salts, relevant in several
diseases.[5−8] The mechanism of accumulation in calcifications is different for
both types of tracers: in the case of [18F]FNa, 18F substitutes one hydroxyl group in the HAP matrix, forming fluorapatite,
while when using BP-based probes, the bisphosphonate moiety coordinates
with the Ca atom. When using [18F]FNa or BP-based tracers,
one of the main drawbacks is the high uptake they show in the bone,
increasing the off-target signal, often complicating vasculature differentiation.[9] If the main focus is atherosclerosis, using a
tracer for which the bone signal is minimized is highly desirable
for imaging purposes. This limitation is overcome in humans and large
animal models by selecting regions of interest (ROIs) in the imaging
acquisition or post-processing steps. However, this strategy is impractical
in small animal models where the vasculature is extremely small and
PET resolution, even when combined with computed tomography (CT),
is flawed. Examples of microcalcification detection in mice have been
exclusively described in breast cancer and chronic tuberculous models.[10−12]A second key aspect is the imaging modality. Current probes
for
vascular calcification detection are mainly based on nuclear imaging
techniques, particularly PET. This technique offers unparalleled sensitivity
but poor spatial resolution. For this reason, PET scanners are combined
with CT and, more recently, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
scanners, providing detailed functional and anatomical information
with micron resolution.[13] The combination
of PET with MRI is arguably the most convenient since it pieces together
the extraordinary sensitivity of PET with the excellent resolution
of MRI.[14,15] The development of this technology is associated
with the design of novel probes, providing signals in both imaging
techniques. Among the different chemical compounds used to produce
dual PET/MRI probes, iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) possess several
advantages and one major drawback. IONPs are biocompatible and easy
to produce, and there are a large variety of possible coatings to
tune their bioconjugation and biodistribution.[16] IONPs have a single drawback for this application; however,
it is a major one: the typical signal they provide is T2-based, negative, or dark. This option complicates in vivo uptake identification, particularly in regions where an endogenous
dark signal is present, like calcified vascular areas. This problem
has drastically limited their use, especially in the clinical area,
in molecular imaging or multimodal approaches. This void has boosted
the quest for IONPs providing positive contrast in MRI, with several
examples in the literature where positive contrast is achieved by
tuning the core size,[17,18] coating thickness,[19] or core composition.[20] Most of the time, the positive contrast is demonstrated by in vivo MR angiography. The dilution and sample redispersion
in a large blood volume reduce the T2 effect, favoring
the generation of positive contrast. However, examples of positive
contrast in which IONPs accumulate in a specific tissue or organ are
scarce.[20]Here, we use bisphosphonate-based 68Ga-core-doped IONPs
that we termed HAP-multitag, with several key features: they provide
a simultaneous signal in PET and —positive contrast—MRI.
HAP-multitag binds predominantly to HAP and other calcium salts relevant
to vascular calcification, as demonstrated in vitro by different techniques. In vivo, HAP-multitag
accumulation in atherosclerotic lesions can be monitored by PET and
positive contrast MRI techniques. Finally, the accumulation is dependent
on the stage of lesion development, which further demonstrates the
ability of HAP-multitag to diagnose and longitudinally characterize
atherosclerotic lesions by PET/(T1)MRI in mice.
Results
and Discussion
Synthesis and Characterization of 68Ga-IONP-Alendronate
We synthesized HAP-multitag (68Ga-IONP-alendronate)
in a two-step synthetic procedure (Scheme ). First, a microwave-driven protocol rendered 68Ga-core-doped IONPs coated with citric acid (68Ga-IONP-citrate). This methodology, previously reported by our group,
produces 68Ga-nanoparticles with high radiolabeling yield,
high radiochemical purity and stability, and large r1 values, ensuring a remarkable response in both PET and
positive contrast MRI.[21] Then, we coupled
the bisphosphonate moiety (alendronate sodium) by N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide
hydrochloride (EDC)/sulfo-NHS chemistry.[22]
Scheme 1
Microwave Two-Step Synthesis of 68Ga-IONP-Alendronate
(HAP-Multitag Probe)
After purification
by size-exclusion chromatography, we analyzed
the physicochemical properties of the radiolabeled nanoparticles.
Dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements show no differences between 68Ga-IONP-citrate and 68Ga-IONP-alendronate samples
(Figure a), indicating
no aggregation after the bioconjugation step, as expected for these
hydrophilic nanoparticles when using EDC and sulfo-NHS as coupling
agents. Z-potential measurement shows a significant
reduction in the value of the superficial charge for 68Ga-IONP-alendronate (Figure b). The integration of the bisphosphonate moiety into the
nanoparticle was confirmed by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy
(Figure c). The 68Ga-IONP-alendronate spectrum shows a new area with multiple
peaks of strong intensity between 1250 and 900 cm–1 corresponding to the vibration modes of P=O and P–OH
groups and new weaker peaks between 2700 and 2200 cm–1 attributed to the O–H stretches of the O=P–OH
groups.[23] Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)
(Figure d) further
confirms the conjugation of alendronate to the surface of 68Ga-IONP-citrate, with the step between 540 and 590 °C corresponding
to the covalent bond between citric acid and alendronate. According
to TGA, the reduction in the organic coating, around 18%, can be attributed
to the loss of citrate molecules from the surface in the second reaction
and purification steps. This result (together with some exchange of
citrate molecules by bisphosphonate moieties, exposing free amines)
would also explain the reduction in the negative charge observed for 68Ga-IONP-alendronate in comparison to 68Ga-IONP-citrate.
Using TGA information for 68Ga-IONP-alendronate, we calculated
that each nanoparticle has been functionalized with approximately
140 molecules of alendronate. Finally, we studied 68Ga-IONP-citrate
and 68Ga-IONP-alendronate by electron microscopy. Since
these nanoparticles consist of an extremely small iron oxide core
and a large organic coating, electron microscopy images are not easily
obtained.
Figure 1
(a) DLS measurements for 68Ga-IONP-citrate and 68Ga-IONP-alendronate; (b) Z-potential (mV)
of 68Ga-IONP-citrate and 68Ga-IONP-alendronate, N = 3, ***P < 0.001; (c) FTIR spectra
of 68Ga-IONP-citrate and 68Ga-IONP-alendronate;
(d) TGA of 68Ga-IONP-citrate and 68Ga-IONP-alendronate;
(e) selected STEM-HAADF image of 68Ga-IONP-citrate; (f)
selected STEM-HAADF image of 68Ga-IONP-alendronate; and
(g) core size measured for 68Ga-IONP-citrate and 68Ga-IONP-alendronate. N = 50 per sample, n.s., P > 0.46.
(a) DLS measurements for 68Ga-IONP-citrate and 68Ga-IONP-alendronate; (b) Z-potential (mV)
of 68Ga-IONP-citrate and 68Ga-IONP-alendronate, N = 3, ***P < 0.001; (c) FTIR spectra
of 68Ga-IONP-citrate and 68Ga-IONP-alendronate;
(d) TGA of 68Ga-IONP-citrate and 68Ga-IONP-alendronate;
(e) selected STEM-HAADF image of 68Ga-IONP-citrate; (f)
selected STEM-HAADF image of 68Ga-IONP-alendronate; and
(g) core size measured for 68Ga-IONP-citrate and 68Ga-IONP-alendronate. N = 50 per sample, n.s., P > 0.46.Using scanning transmission
electron microscopy high-angle annular
dark-field imaging (STEM-HAADF), it is possible to observe the small
iron oxide cores without apparent aggregation for 68Ga-IONP-citrate
(Figure e) and 68Ga-IONP-alendronate (Figure f). Analysis of the core sizes shows similar sizes
for both nanoparticles, 2.6 ± 0.3 nm for 68Ga-IONP-citrate,
and 2.8 ± 0.7 nm for 68Ga-IONP-alendronate.
Qualitative
Assessment of the Binding between 68Ga-IONP-Alendronate
and Calcium Salts
To assess the interaction between 68Ga-IONP-alendronate and calcium salts, we chose those normally
present in the microcalcifications structure, that is, HAP, calcium
oxalate monohydrate, and β-tricalcium phosphate. First, we used
DLS; by measuring the hydrodynamic size of the nanoparticles with
increasing amounts of the calcium salts, it is possible to assess
whether they are interacting or not.[24,25] We incubated 68Ga-IONP-alendronate with the aforementioned salts and measured
their hydrodynamic size (Figure a), and a similar procedure was followed with 68Ga-IONP-citrate (Figure b). The Z-average value clearly shows
the aggregation of 68Ga-IONP-alendronate as the concentration
of each salt increases. This is particularly true for HAP, which shows
a very large hydrodynamic size value, around 2000 nm, for the highest
concentration of the calcium salt. Similarly, the interaction with
the other two salts, Ca3(PO4)2 and
Ca(COO)2, is clearly reflected in the aggregation of the
nanoparticles. As a control, we performed the same titrations but
using 68Ga-IONP-citrate. In this case (Figure b), there is no aggregation
when using the same calcium salts, as reflected in the constant value
of hydrodynamic size (Figure a,b has the same scale in the Y-axis for
better comparison). In fact, the size measured for the highest concentration
of HAP with 68Ga-IONP-citrate reflects the presence of
the HAP nanoparticles (with a size around 300 nm) rather than an interaction
between the calcium salt and the citrate nanoparticles. This result
is further demonstrated by the quantitative analysis (see below).
Figure 2
(a) Change
in hydrodynamic size for 68Ga-IONP-alendronate
upon the increase in the concentration of HAP, β-tricalcium
phosphate, and calcium oxalate monohydrate; (b) change in hydrodynamic
size for 68Ga-IONP-citrate upon the increase in the concentration
of HAP, β-tricalcium phosphate, and calcium oxalate monohydrate;
(c) STEM-HAADF images for the combination of 68Ga-IONP-alendronate
with HAP; (d) EDX spectra for the three points indicated, in red,
in the STEM-HAADF image.
(a) Change
in hydrodynamic size for 68Ga-IONP-alendronate
upon the increase in the concentration of HAP, β-tricalcium
phosphate, and calcium oxalate monohydrate; (b) change in hydrodynamic
size for 68Ga-IONP-citrate upon the increase in the concentration
of HAP, β-tricalcium phosphate, and calcium oxalate monohydrate;
(c) STEM-HAADF images for the combination of 68Ga-IONP-alendronate
with HAP; (d) EDX spectra for the three points indicated, in red,
in the STEM-HAADF image.Then, we used STEM-HAADF
to analyze the interaction between 68Ga-IONP-alendronate
and HAP. Figure c
shows the large HAP particles surrounded
by the much smaller, 68Ga-IONP-alendronate nanoparticles,
indicating their affinity toward the salt (more images in Figure S1). Zooming in the image, it is possible
to see a single HAP particle completely surrounded by the much smaller 68Ga-IONP-alendronate nanoparticles. This was further confirmed
by energy-dispersive X-ray microanalysis (EDX) analysis. Analyzing
three different points, we can see the presence of Fe and P, when
only 68Ga-IONP-alendronate is studied (point 1), the presence
of large amounts of Ca when HAP with few surrounding 68Ga-IONP-alendronate particles is studied (point 2), also with Fe
and P, and finally the presence of Fe, Ca, and P, in point 3, where
many aggregated 68Ga-IONP-alendronate nanoparticles surround
an HAP particle.
Relaxometry
Relaxometry of 68Ga-IONP-alendronate
was carried out to confirm the positive contrast capabilities of the
nanotracer and to assess the selectivity toward Ca2+ salts. Figure a shows the r1, r2, and r2/r1 values for 68Ga-IONP-citrate and 68Ga-IONP-alendronate, measured
at 1.5 T. As expected, both nanotracers show positive contrast features
with large r1 values and small r2 values, which produces r2/r1 values smaller than 2. At
1.5 T, the 68Ga-IONP-alendronate r1 value was 10.9 ± 0.1 mM–1 s–1, while the r2 value was 22.0 ±
0.4 mM–1 s–1, rendering a r2/r1 ratio of 1.98
± 0.05. Figure b shows the r2/r1 ratio for 68Ga-IONP-alendronate as a function
of the metal concentration for different salts. As expected, titration
with Ca2+ salts produces an increase in the r2/r1 due to the aggregation
of the nanotracer; while this reduces the T1 capabilities of the nanotracer,
it would only be a problem for concentrations much larger than those
we can find in vivo, as will be shown in the MRI
experiments. Finally, the r2/r1 values when using Mg2+ or Zn2+ remain unchanged, confirming the well-known selectivity of bisphosphonate-functionalized
nanoparticles toward Ca2+.
Figure 3
(a) r1, r2, and r2/r1 ratio for 68Ga-IONP-citrate and 68Ga-IONP-alendronate
and (b) r2/r1 ratio of 68Ga-IONP-alendronate incubated with different
concentrations of calcium, magnesium, and zinc salts.
(a) r1, r2, and r2/r1 ratio for 68Ga-IONP-citrate and 68Ga-IONP-alendronate
and (b) r2/r1 ratio of 68Ga-IONP-alendronate incubated with different
concentrations of calcium, magnesium, and zinc salts.
Quantitative Assessment of the Binding between 68Ga-IONP-Alendronate
and Calcium Salts
Next, we quantitively
assessed the interaction between 68Ga-IONP-alendronate
and 68Ga-IONP-citrate with the three calcium salts often
present in vascular calcifications: HAP, Ca3(PO4)2, and Ca(COO)2 (Figure ). For this, we covalently attached to the
surface of the nanotracers a fluorescent dye (Alexa 647). The nanotracers
were incubated with the different salts and purified by ultrafiltration,
and the fluorescence of the supernatant was quantified at each point.
The percentage of binding was calculated using the initial and final
fluorescence intensities of the supernatant (see the Experimental Section).These titrations confirm several
aspects: first, in agreement with the DLS data, the interaction between 68Ga-IONP-citrate and the different salts is negligible, a
mere 11% for the largest HAP concentration (20 μM). On the contrary,
titrations with 68Ga-IONP-alendronate clearly show a strong
interaction, explaining the large aggregation observed in DLS and
electron microscopy. For example, for a low concentration of HAP of
0.2 μM, the percentage of binding is already 43%; almost half
of the nanotracer sample has bound the salt at this concentration
(Figure a). Similarly,
for the other salts (Figure b,c), there is large binding of the alendronate nanotracer
without an appreciable interaction with the citrate nanoparticles.
Finally, a similar profile was observed for the interaction of 68Ga-IONP-alendronate with Ca3(PO4)2 and 68Ga-IONP-alendronate with Ca(COO)2 (Figure d), with
a slightly stronger interaction with HAP. For example, for the lowest
calcium concentration, the percentages of binding are 43% with HAP,
31% with Ca3(PO4)2, and 39% with
Ca(COO)2, confirming that this nanotracer presents a broad
spectrum of interactions with calcium salts and not just limited to
HAP, as is the case for [18F]FNa.
Figure 4
Percentage of binding
between 68Ga-IONP-citrate and 68Ga-IONP-alendronate
and (a) HAP, (b) Ca3(PO4)2, and (c)
Ca(COO)2; (d) comparison
of the binding between 68Ga-IONP-alendronate and the three
calcium salts (60 min of incubation).
Percentage of binding
between 68Ga-IONP-citrate and 68Ga-IONP-alendronate
and (a) HAP, (b) Ca3(PO4)2, and (c)
Ca(COO)2; (d) comparison
of the binding between 68Ga-IONP-alendronate and the three
calcium salts (60 min of incubation).
Biodistribution of 68Ga-IONP-Alendronate, HAP-Multitag
After characterizing the in vitro interaction
between 68Ga-IONP-alendronate and the selected calcium
salts, we tested its performance to diagnose atherosclerosis. First,
biodistribution experiments were conducted to evaluate whether HAP-multitag
has any affinity toward atherosclerotic plaques in mice. Atherosclerotic
ApoE–/– mice were selected as the disease
model. The development of hypercholesterolemia triggering aortic and
carotid artery lesions throughout ApoE–/– mice aging and high fat diet is well established.[26] A longitudinal study was carried out in mice between 12
and 26 weeks of age. In addition, mice were fed with high-cholesterol
diet from 8 weeks old onward to accelerate atherosclerosis progression.[27] A complete biodistribution study was performed
in a gamma counter after intravenous injection of 68Ga-IONP-alendronate
in ApoE–/– mice. We studied four different
groups: 12 weeks old and fed 4 weeks with a high-fat cholesterol diet
(HFD) (group A), 16 weeks old and 8 weeks HFD (group B), 24 weeks
old and 16 weeks HFD (group C), and 26 weeks old and 18 weeks HFD
(group D) (Figure a). Main organs, blood, and perfused aortas were evaluated in five
mice of each group. Uptake values, calculated as the percentage of
injected dose per gram of tissue, showed the liver and spleen as the
organs with the highest accumulation. This is an expected result since
biodistribution and clearance studies of IONPs have demonstrated the
liver and spleen as the main uptake organs.[28]
Figure 5
(a)
Distribution of HAP-multitag measured in a gamma counter expressed
as the percentage injected dose per gram (%ID/g) in ApoE–/– mice (N = 5) of groups A–D; (b) aorta uptake
of HAP-multitag showing significant differences between mice groups.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, one-way ANOVA; error bars indicate s.d., N = 5.
(a)
Distribution of HAP-multitag measured in a gamma counter expressed
as the percentage injected dose per gram (%ID/g) in ApoE–/– mice (N = 5) of groups A–D; (b) aorta uptake
of HAP-multitag showing significant differences between mice groups.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, one-way ANOVA; error bars indicate s.d., N = 5.Aortas show an important
uptake with significant differences following
mice aging and hence atherosclerosis progression (Figure b). Negligible blood circulation
of the nanoparticles (<1.5 %ID/g) and the aortas’ perfusion,
prior to the measurement, ensure that the signal measured in the aorta
is due to nanoparticle uptake. Figure b shows the uptake of the nanoparticles in the aorta
depending on the mice’s age. The HAP-multitag uptake is similar
for the youngest and oldest mice, with a maximum for 16 weeks old
mice. This observation may have important consequences for atherosclerosis
characterization. First, this profile appears to follow the reported
calcification process: initially, the amount of microcalcifications
is too low to show a significant uptake—at 12 weeks; then,
as more microcalcifications accumulate, an increase in the nanotracer
uptake is observed—at 16 weeks; finally, the growth of the
calcified deposits, and the concurrent reduction of the active surface,
translates in a reduction of the nanotracer uptake, a process well
known for other tracers.[4] Similarly, [18F]FNa uptake appears to be inversely dependent on calcification
growth.[29,30] Second, the maximum uptake for HAP-multitag
is the earliest reported, allowing for very early diagnosis of atherosclerosis.
For comparison, the maximum uptake for [18F]FNa is reported
in ApoE–/– mice at 30 weeks old under high
fat diet.[31]
In Vivo Multimodal Imaging of Atherosclerosis
with HAP-Multitag
PET/CT Imaging
Encouraged by the
biodistribution results,
we tested the ability of the HAP-multitag probe to diagnose atherosclerosis
by in vivo imaging by first using PET/CT. HAP-multitag
was intravenously injected in group B ApoE–/– mice, and images recorded 90 min post injection. Spots of nanotracer
uptake are observed in the aortic arch and the aorta (Figures a and S2). PET/CT images were also obtained in group D ApoE–/– mice for comparison. Contrary to what we
see in young mice, these mice showed negligible uptake in the specific
ROIs (Figure b), agreeing
with the biodistribution results we have previously shown. Compared
to [18F]FNa and other BP-based tracers, bone uptake of
HAP-multitag is negligible (Figures a and S2). Uptake of HAP-multitag
was also compared with the use of 68Ga-IONP-citrate as
a nanotracer control. Figure b shows the percentage of injected dose per gram of tissue
when using HAP-multitag or 68Ga-IONP-citrate in groups
B and C ApoE–/– mice (those groups with the
highest uptake of the nanotracer). As expected, 68Ga-IONP-citrate
does not accumulate in groups B and D ApoE–/– mice since they lack the microcalcification targeting capabilities.
Figure 6
(a) Aorta
uptake of HAP-multitag (the graph corresponds to Figure b, included here
to compare uptake with images) and PET/CT images of group B and group
D ApoE–/– mice 90 min post i.v. injection
with HAP-multitag; (b) uptake of nanotracers, expressed as the percentage
injected dose per gram (%ID/g), in ApoE–/– mice (N = 5) of groups B and C using 68Ga-IONP-citrate or HAP-multitag; error bars indicate s.d., N = 5. (c) Ex vivo PET imaging of a group
B ApoE–/– mouse aorta 90 min post i.v. injection
with HAP-multitag; (d) ex vivo fluorescence imaging
of a group B ApoE–/– mouse aorta 24 h post
i.v. injection of OsteoSense 680EX; (e) Perls’ Prussian Blue
staining of aorta sections from group B and group D ApoE–/– mice, both injected with HAP-multitag (scale bar is 250 μm).
(f) Histology of the Group B ApoE–/– mice
aortas stained with Perls’ Prussian Blue, Alizarin Red, and
von Kossa.
(a) Aorta
uptake of HAP-multitag (the graph corresponds to Figure b, included here
to compare uptake with images) and PET/CT images of group B and group
D ApoE–/– mice 90 min post i.v. injection
with HAP-multitag; (b) uptake of nanotracers, expressed as the percentage
injected dose per gram (%ID/g), in ApoE–/– mice (N = 5) of groups B and C using 68Ga-IONP-citrate or HAP-multitag; error bars indicate s.d., N = 5. (c) Ex vivo PET imaging of a group
B ApoE–/– mouse aorta 90 min post i.v. injection
with HAP-multitag; (d) ex vivo fluorescence imaging
of a group B ApoE–/– mouse aorta 24 h post
i.v. injection of OsteoSense 680EX; (e) Perls’ Prussian Blue
staining of aorta sections from group B and group D ApoE–/– mice, both injected with HAP-multitag (scale bar is 250 μm).
(f) Histology of the Group B ApoE–/– mice
aortas stained with Perls’ Prussian Blue, Alizarin Red, and
von Kossa.Nanotracer uptake was also confirmed
by ex vivo PET imaging of excised aortas after in vivo experiments.
Signaling spots are clearly identified throughout the aorta, predominantly
in the aortic arch and the renal bifurcation (Figure c). To confirm whether the uptake is related
to vascular calcifications, ex vivo fluorescence
images were obtained using OsteoSense. This is a commercial dye, showing
fluorescence in the near-infrared region, which includes a bisphosphonate
moiety and is the gold standard for ex vivo microcalcification
detection by fluorescence techniques.[32,33] Following
the manufacturer instructions, ex vivo fluorescence
imaging was conducted 24 h post intravenous injection of OsteoSense
in group B ApoE–/– mice (n = 5, Figure S3). Comparing the ex vivo PET signal (Figure c) with the fluorescence signal from OsteoSense (Figure d), there is a perfect
match between the different spots showing uptake of the probes, confirming
the presence of microcalcifications in the sites where there is a
clear uptake of HAP-multitag. The uptake of HAP-multitag in the aorta
and its colocalization with microcalcification areas are further studied
by histology. First, we compared the accumulation in aorta samples
between groups B and D ApoE–/– mice (Figures e and S4). While iron is clearly present in group B,
as blue spots due to Perls’ Prussian Blue staining, there are
no spots in group D. Then, we analyzed the colocalization between
iron deposits in group B and microcalcifications to confirm the driving
force for the uptake of the nanotracer. Figure f shows the results of triple stained aortas
from a group B ApoE–/– mouse. We detected
iron accumulation with Perls and microcalcifications with Alizarin
Red and von Kossa. The colocalization between iron deposits and microcalcifications
is clearly visible (more images in Figure S5), confirming the mechanism of accumulation for HAP-multitag.
Magnetic
Resonance Imaging
Finally, the HAP-multitag
performance, as a positive contrast tracer in MRI, was evaluated.
As extensively revised, nanoparticles with r2/r1 ratios below 4 have a high
capability to provide positive MRI contrast.[17,19] Therefore, the low ratio for HAP-multitag (Figure a) ensures its performance as a positive
imaging probe in MRI. However, even with low ratios, the in
vivo performance in large magnetic fields and with the accumulation
in a particular tissue is more challenging.In vivo imaging using non-functionalized 68Ga-IONP-citrate was
conducted in group A, group B, and group D ApoE–/– mice with no significant contrast enhancement observed in the aortic
arch of these groups (Figures d–f and S6). Then, MRI was
carried out using HAP-multitag as the nanotracer. In the case of group
A and group D ApoE–/– mice, some brightening
of the arterial wall is visible; however, no significant contrast
was observed (Figure a,c). On the contrary, the positive contrast was unambiguously appreciated
90 min after i.v. injection of HAP-multitag in the group B ApoE–/– mice (Figures b and S7).
Figure 7
T1-weighted
MRI before (baseline) and 90 min after i.v.
injection of HAP-multitag for (a) group A ApoE–/–, (b) group B ApoE–/–, and (c) group D ApoE–/–; average ROI intensity (n = 10 per mouse) in the muscle and aorta 90 min after i.v. injection
of 68Ga-IONP-citrate or HAP-multitag in ApoE–/– mice (n = 3) for (d) group A ApoE–/–, (e) group B ApoE–/–, and (f) group D ApoE–/–. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, one-way ANOVA;
error bars indicate s.d.
T1-weighted
MRI before (baseline) and 90 min after i.v.
injection of HAP-multitag for (a) group A ApoE–/–, (b) group B ApoE–/–, and (c) group D ApoE–/–; average ROI intensity (n = 10 per mouse) in the muscle and aorta 90 min after i.v. injection
of 68Ga-IONP-citrate or HAP-multitag in ApoE–/– mice (n = 3) for (d) group A ApoE–/–, (e) group B ApoE–/–, and (f) group D ApoE–/–. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, one-way ANOVA;
error bars indicate s.d.Semi-quantitative analysis
of the images confirmed these results.
For this, 10 different ROIs were selected in the muscle (used as reference)
and the aorta in 3 different animals per group. No significant differences
were obtained using 68Ga-IONP-citrate in all animals and
HAP-multitag for group A and group D ApoE–/– mice (Figure d–f).
In agreement with the in vivo imaging results, significant
intensity differences were found for group B ApoE–/– mice. These results show the ability of HAP-multitag to generate
positive contrast in MRI in a manner relevant to the calcification
stage of the aorta.
Conclusions
The
development of PET/MRI as a powerful molecular imaging technique
requires the development of imaging probes capable of providing simultaneous
signals in both modalities. In this sense, IONPs are the perfect candidate
due to their tailored synthesis, biofunctionalization, and biocompatibility.
They are perfect for the purpose, with the exception of one key aspect,
that is, the typical negative contrast they provide. Here, we show
that it is possible to combine the PET signal and positive contrast
using IONPs. The in vitro affinity of HAP-multitag
for calcium salts translates into an in vivo uptake
that depends on mice age and therefore in the calcification stage.
We show how the targeted accumulation of these nanoparticles translates
into easily identifiable PET and—bright signal—MRI beyond
the magnetic resonance angiography typically performed with other
IONPs. Using our nanotracer, HAP-multitag, it is possible to perform
an early characterization of atherosclerotic plaques in ApoE–/– mice just 16 weeks old. Its uptake enables the longitudinal characterization
of microcalcifications.
Experimental Section
68Ga (t1/2 = 68 min, β+
= 89%, and EC = 11%) was obtained from a 68Ge/68Ga generator system (ITG Isotope Technologies Garching GmbH, Germany)
in which 68Ge (t1/2 = 270 d)
was attached to a column based on an organic matrix generator. 68Ga was eluted with 4 mL of 0.05 M hydrochloric acid. Iron(III)
chloride, hydrazine monohydrate, N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride, N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide sodium salt, and alendronate sodium salt
were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Citric acid trisodium salt dihydrate
was purchased from Acros organics. OsteoSense 680TM EX was purchased
from PerkinElmer, and disposable PD-10 desalting salt columns were
purchased from GE Healthcare Life Sciences and Amicon Ultra centrifugal
filters from Merck Millipore.
Synthesis of 68Ga-IONP-Citrate
FeCl3 × 6 H2O (75 mg, 0.28 mmol), sodium
citrate
hydrate (80 mg, 0.27 mmol), and 1280 MBq of 68GaCl3 in HCl (0.05 M, 4 mL) were dissolved in water (5 mL) in a
microwave-adapted flask, followed by addition of 1 mL of hydrazine
hydrate. The solution was ramped to 120 °C over 54 s and held
at this temperature for 10 min (240 W) in a Monowave 300 microwave
reactor equipped with an internal temperature probe and an external
IR probe (Anton Paar, GmbH, Ostfildern-Scharnhausen, Germany). The
reaction mixture was then cooled to 60 °C, and the 68Ga-IONP-citrate product was purified by passing the mixture through
a PD-10 column to eliminate excess small reagents, including all unincorporated
radioisotopes. This purification process provided 9 mL of 68Ga-IONP-citrate with a total activity of 781 MBq (measured 40 min
after starting the reaction), with a radiolabeling yield of 92%.
Synthesis of 68Ga-IONP-Alendronate (HAP-Multitag)
To 750 MBq of 68Ga-IONP-citrate (5 mL) were added 0.07
mmol of EDC and 0.075 mmol of N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide
sodium salt (sulfo-NHS). The solution was stirred for 30 min at room
temperature (r.t.) and then ultracentrifuged at 10,350g through Amicon Ultra-15 30 kDa centrifugal filters for 4 min to
remove excess reagents. The retentate was resuspended in 1.5 mL of
N-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine-N′-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES)
buffer, pH 8, and 1 mg of alendronate sodium salt was added to the
solution. The mixture was maintained at r.t for 60 min with stirring.
Finally, another ultrafiltration step was performed to eliminate unreacted
alendronate. The retentate was resuspended in saline solution, giving
195.6 MBq of HAP-multitag with a radiolabeling yield of 98%.
Physicochemical
Characterization
The hydrodynamic size
and polydispersity index were measured with a Zetasizer Nano ZS90
system (Malvern Instruments, UK) using folded capillary cells with
samples in water unless other solvents are indicated. For determination
of the morphology and mean particle size and distribution, samples
were examined under a transmission electron microscope (Tecnai F30,
FEI) operated at 300 kV using scanning-transmission imaging with a
high-angle annular dark-field detector (STEM-HAADF). Chemical analysis
of the nanoparticles was performed by EDX. A drop of the nanoparticle
suspension was deposited onto a holey-carbon-coated copper grid and
left to evaporate at r.t. Mean sizes and standard deviations were
calculated for approximately 50 particles.
Sample Preparation for
Electron Microscopy
68Ga-IONP-citrate and 68Ga-IONP-alendronate (cold samples,
without the active 68Ga isotope) were incubated with 20
μM HAP. After 30 min of incubation at r.t., a drop of the nanoparticle
suspension was deposited onto a holey-carbon-coated copper grid and
left to evaporate at r.t.
Titration of the Ca2+ Salts
68Ga-IONP-citrate and 68Ga-IONP-alendronate
(cold samples,
without the active 68Ga isotope) were incubated with different
concentrations (0.2, 0.4, 1, 2, 4, 10, 20 μM) of three different
calcium salts: HAP, calcium oxalate monohydrate, and β-tricalcium
phosphate. After 60 min of incubation at r.t., the hydrodynamic size
of the samples was measured using a Zetasizer Nano ZS90 system (Malvern
Instruments, UK).
Binding Quantification by Fluorescence
The Alexa Fluor
647 (A647) dye (excitation λ = 649 nm; emission λ = 666
nm) was used to quantify the binding (%) of 68Ga-IONP-citrate
and 68Ga-IONP-alendronate (cold samples, without the active 68Ga isotope) to different calcium salts: HAP, calcium oxalate
monohydrate, and β-tricalcium phosphate. To synthesize 68Ga-IONP-citrate-A647 and 68Ga-IONP-alendronate-A647,
5 mL of 68Ga-IONP-citrate was added to 0.07 mmol EDC and
0.075 mmol of N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide sodium salt
(sulfo-NHS). The solution was stirred for 30 min at r.t. and then
ultracentrifuged at 10,350g through Amicon Ultra-15
30 kDa centrifugal filters for 4 min to remove excess reagents. The
retentate was resuspended in 1.5 mL of HEPES buffer, pH 8, and 100
μg of Alexa 647 hydrazide to synthesize 68Ga-IONP-citrate-A647,
and 100 μg of Alexa 647 hydrazide plus 1 mg of alendronate sodium
salt to obtain 68Ga-IONP-alendronate-A647. The samples
were maintained at r.t. for 60 min under vigorous stirring. Once this
step was finished, samples were purified by ultrafiltration to eliminate
unreacted A647 and alendronate. The retentate was resuspended in saline
solution.68Ga-IONP-citrate-A647 and 68Ga-IONP-alendronate-A647 were incubated for 60 min at r.t. with different
concentrations of the calcium salts (0.2, 0.4, 1, 2, 4, 10, 20 μM).
Posteriorly, supernatant fluorescence was measured at λ = 666
nm after 150 min centrifugation at 13,680g.The degree of Ca salt binding was assessed using the following
formula:where X is the initial amount
of fluorescence in 68Ga-IONP-citrate-A647 and 68Ga-IONP-alendronate-A647 and Y is the amount of
fluorescence left in the supernatant after centrifugation.Relaxometric properties of the samples
were assessed by measuring longitudinal and transverse relaxation
times. Four concentrations of each nanoparticle sample were selected,
and the longitudinal and transversal relaxation times of each one
were measured using a Bruker mq60 at 1.5 T and 37 °C. The r1 and r2 values
were plotted against the Fe concentration (0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, and 2
mM).68Ga-IONP-citrate and 68Ga-IONP-alendronate
(cold samples, without the active 68Ga isotope) were incubated
with different concentrations (0.2, 0.4, 1, 2, 4, 10, 20 μM)
of three different calcium salts: HAP, calcium oxalate monohydrate,
and β-tricalcium phosphate, as well as magnesium and zinc chloride.
After 60 min of incubation at r.t., r1 and r2 values were measured to calculate
the r2/r1 ratio.
Animal Model
Mice were housed in the specific pathogen-free
facilities at the Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares
Carlos III, Madrid. All animal experiments conformed to EU Directive
2010/63EU and Recommendation 2007/526/EC, enforced in Spanish law
under Real Decreto 53/2013. The protocol was approved by the Madrid
regional government (PROEX16/277).ApoE–/– mice were fed with high-cholesterol diet (Western diet) from 8 weeks
old onward to obtain the atherosclerosis mouse model.
PET/CT Imaging
In vivo PET/CT imaging
in mice was performed with a nanoPET/CT small-animal imaging system
(Mediso Medical Imaging Systems, Budapest, Hungary). List-mode PET
data acquisition commenced 90 min after injection of a bolus of 10–15
MBq of HAP-multitag through the tail vein and continued for 30 min.
At the end of PET, a micro-CT was performed for attenuation correction
and anatomic reference. The dynamic PET images were reconstructed
in a 105 × 105 matrix (frame rates: 3 × 10 min, 1 ×
30 min, 1 × 60 min) using a Tera-Tomo 3D iterative algorithm.
Images were obtained and reconstructed with proprietary Nucline software
(Mediso, Budapest, Hungary). Images were analyzed using Horos software
v.3.3.6.
Fluorescence Imaging
Experiments were conducted following
the standard protocol provided by the manufacturer. OsteoSense 680EX
was reconstituted by addition of 1.2 mL of phosphate-buffered saline
(PBS) 1× into the vial. The mixture was gently shaken for 5 min
at r.t. Then, 100 μL of the resultant solution was intravenously
injected into 5 ApoE–/– mice. 24 h post injection,
animals were sacrificed in a CO2 chamber and perfused with
8 mL of PBS 1×, and the aortas were excised. Ex vivo imaging of the aortas was carried out in an IVIS Imaging System
200, Xenogen (acquisition parameters: Cy5.5 ex/em filter, high level,
BIN-HR, FOV 13.3, f2, 4s).
MRI Acquisition
All experiments
were performed on a
7 T Bruker Biospec 70/30 USR MRI system (Bruker Biospin GmbH, Ettlingen,
Germany), interfaced to an AVANCE III console. Anesthesia was induced
with 3% isoflurane in 30% oxygen and maintained 1–2% isoflurane
along the experiment.A BGA12 imaging gradient (maximum gradient
strength 400 mT/m) system with a 40 mm diameter quadrature volume
resonator was used for MRI data acquisition. Animals were positioned
in a customized 3D printed bed with a head holder and kept warmed
with heated air pumped through an MRI compatible system interfaced
to a Monitoring and Gating Model 1025 (SA instruments). Temperature
control (anal) and respiration (through a respiratory pad) were registered
along the experiment.To ensure an accurate positioning, pure
axial and four-chamber
view scout images were used to set up the representative aortic arch
view. From these, images were obtained between the brachiocephalic
artery and left common carotid artery, perpendicular to the direction
of the flow in the aorta. A single 0.8 mm, 2.8 × 2.8 cm isotropic
FOV (obtained and reconstructed with 256 × 256) slice was obtained
using a Bruker self-gated cine gradient echo FLASH sequence using
the following parameters: minimum TE 4 ms, TR 9 ms, flip angle 10°,
1 average. An additional image in the same position was obtained with
a fat suppression module.
Ex Vivo Biodistribution
Biodistribution
was studied with a Wizard 1470 gamma counter (PerkinElmer). Animals
were sacrificed in a CO2 chamber, after which blood was
extracted and the animals perfused with 8 mL of PBS 1×. Organs
were extracted and counted in the gamma counter for 1 min each. Readings
were decay-corrected and presented as the percentage of injected dose
per gram (%ID/g).
Histological Analysis
Excised aortas
were fixed in
10% formalin for 24 h. The tissue was dehydrated and embedded in paraffin
until sectioning. Aorta sections were stained with Perl’s Prussian
Blue, von Kossa, and Alizarin red. Images were processed and digitalized
with NIS-Elements acquisition software.
Authors: Martin S Judenhofer; Hans F Wehrl; Danny F Newport; Ciprian Catana; Stefan B Siegel; Markus Becker; Axel Thielscher; Manfred Kneilling; Matthias P Lichy; Martin Eichner; Karin Klingel; Gerald Reischl; Stefan Widmaier; Martin Röcken; Robert E Nutt; Hans-Jürgen Machulla; Kamil Uludag; Simon R Cherry; Claus D Claussen; Bernd J Pichler Journal: Nat Med Date: 2008-03-23 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Eric C Ehman; Geoffrey B Johnson; Javier E Villanueva-Meyer; Soonmee Cha; Andrew Palmera Leynes; Peder Eric Zufall Larson; Thomas A Hope Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-03-30 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Juan Pellico; Jesús Ruiz-Cabello; Irene Fernández-Barahona; Lucía Gutiérrez; Ana V Lechuga-Vieco; Jose A Enríquez; M Puerto Morales; Fernando Herranz Journal: Langmuir Date: 2017-09-18 Impact factor: 3.882
Authors: George H Wilson; John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov; Stephanie Barnes; Todd E Peterson; Jarrod M True; Sepideh Shokouhi; J Oliver McIntyre; Melinda Sanders; Vandana Abramson; The-Quyen Ngyuen; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen; Mohammed N Tantawy Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2014-05-15 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Jayanta Kumar Bordoloi; David Berry; Irfan Ullah Khan; Kavitha Sunassee; Rafael Torres Martin de Rosales; Catherine Shanahan; Philip J Blower Journal: Dalton Trans Date: 2015-03-21 Impact factor: 4.390
Authors: Juan Pellico; Ana V Lechuga-Vieco; Elena Almarza; Andrés Hidalgo; Cristina Mesa-Nuñez; Irene Fernández-Barahona; Juan A Quintana; Juan Bueren; Jose A Enríquez; Jesús Ruiz-Cabello; Fernando Herranz Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-10-16 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Leon J Schurgers; Asim C Akbulut; Dawid M Kaczor; Maurice Halder; Rory R Koenen; Rafael Kramann Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2018-04-06