| Literature DB >> 34529198 |
Sarah Awater-Salendo1,2, Dagmar Voigt3, Monika Hilker2, Benjamin Fürstenau4.
Abstract
Successful host search by parasitic wasps is often mediated by host-associated chemical cues. The ectoparasitoid Holepyris sylvanidis is known to follow chemical trails released by host larvae of the confused flour beetle, Tribolium confusum, for short-range host location. Although the hexane-extractable trails consist of stable, long-chain cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) with low volatility, the kairomonal activity of a trail is lost two days after release. Here, we studied whether this loss of kairomonal activity is due to changes in the chemical trail composition induced by microbial activity. We chemically analyzed trails consisting of hexane extracts of T. confusum larvae after different time intervals past deposition under sterile and non-sterile conditions. GC-MS analyses revealed that the qualitative and quantitative pattern of the long-chain CHCs of larval trails did not significantly change over time, neither under non-sterile nor sterile conditions. Hence, our results show that the loss of kairomonal activity of host trails is not due to microbially induced changes of the CHC pattern of a trail. Interestingly, the kairomonal activity of trails consisting of host larval CHC extracts was recoverable after two days by applying hexane to them. After hexane evaporation, the parasitoids followed the reactivated host trails as they followed freshly laid ones. Cryo-scanning electron microscopy showed that the trails gradually formed filament-shaped microstructures within two days. This self-assemblage of CHCs was reversible by hexane application. Our study suggests that the long-chain CHCs of a host trail slowly undergo solidification by a self-assembling process, which reduces the accessibility of CHCs to the parasitoid's receptors as such that the trail is no longer eliciting trail-following behavior.Entities:
Keywords: Bethylidae; Insect cuticle; Perception; Tenebrionidae; Trail-following behavior; Tribolium confusum
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34529198 PMCID: PMC8642257 DOI: 10.1007/s10886-021-01310-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Chem Ecol ISSN: 0098-0331 Impact factor: 2.626
Cuticular hydrocarbons identified from sterile-filtered hexane extracts Of Tribolium confusum larvae 0 H, 24 H OR 48 H after trail (extract) deposition. Mean amounts (NG ± SE LE−1) And Relative Quantities (% PER LE) are given
| Hours after trail depositionf | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 24 | 48 | |||||||||
| No.a | Compoundb | IDc | RIcald | RIlite | Mean ± SE (ng)g | (%)g | Mean ± SE (ng)g | (%)g | Mean ± SE (ng)g | (%)g | |
| 1 | I | 2498 | 2500 | 20.52 ± 3.04 | 17.22 | 17.99 ± 3.53 | 17.14 | 21.83 ± 2.40 | 17.63 | ns | |
| 2 | 11−/13-MeC25 | II | 2533 | 2534 | 0.13 ± 0.03 | 0.11 | 0.13 ± 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.15 ± 0.03 | 0.12 | ns |
| 3 | 5-MeC25 | III | 2550 | 2550 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.10 ± 0.01 | 0.08 | ns |
| 4 | 3-MeC25 | IV | 2573 | 2571 | 0.40 ± 0.09 | 0.33 | 0.36 ± 0.10 | 0.33 | 0.40 ± 0.08 | 0.32 | ns |
| 5 | V | 2598 | 2599 | 3.10 ± 0.43 | 2.58 | 2.61 ± 0.54 | 2.45 | 3.07 ± 0.34 | 2.48 | ns | |
| 6 | 10−/11−/12−/13-MeC26 | VI | 2633 | 2632 | 0.53 ± 0.04 | 0.46 | 0.46 ± 0.11 | 0.43 | 0.51 ± 0.09 | 0.41 | ns |
| 7 | 4-MeC26 | VII | 2656 | 2656 | 0.27 ± 0.03 | 0.23 | 0.21 ± 0.06 | 0.21 | 0.22 ± 0.05 | 0.18 | ns |
| 8 | VIII | 2700 | 2700 | 53.27 ± 5.70 | 45.07 | 46.66 ± 7.15 | 45.49 | 57.52 ± 5.41 | 46.65 | ns | |
| 9 | 11−/13-MeC27 | IX | 2730 | 2731 | 8.10 ± 0.75 | 6.95 | 7.25 ± 1.51 | 6.91 | 8.61 ± 1.12 | 6.91 | ns |
| 10 | 5-MeC27 | X | 2747 | 2750 | 3.81 ± 0.32 | 3.28 | 3.35 ± 0.65 | 3.25 | 3.84 ± 0.45 | 3.11 | ns |
| 11 | 3-MeC27 | XI | 2771 | 2773 | 3.50 ± 0.39 | 2.97 | 3.07 ± 0.59 | 2.94 | 3.58 ± 0.38 | 2.89 | ns |
| 12 | 5,X-DiMeC27 | XII | 2778 | 2781 | 1.95 ± 0.15 | 1.69 | 1.71 ± 0.37 | 1.64 | 1.86 ± 0.27 | 1.50 | ns |
| 13 | XIII | 2797 | 2799 | 4.86 ± 0.53 | 4.11 | 4.23 ± 0.71 | 4.11 | 4.97 ± 0.50 | 4.03 | ns | |
| 14 | 3,X-DiMeC27 | XIV | 2803 | 2807 | 2.64 ± 0.18 | 2.28 | 2.15 ± 0.49 | 2.04 | 2.42 ± 0.31 | 1.97 | ns |
| 15 | 12−/13−/14-MeC28 | XV | 2828 | 2831 | 0.93 ± 0.07 | 0.81 | 1.07 ± 0.32 | 1.02 | 0.70 ± 0.14 | 0.56 | ns |
| 16 | 4-MeC28 | XVI | 2854 | 2856 | 0.54 ± 0.03 | 0.47 | 0.47 ± 0.13 | 0.46 | 0.36 ± 0.07 | 0.30 | ns |
| 17 | XVIII | 2897 | 2904 | 11.77 ± 1.28 | 9.99 | 10.42 ± 1.86 | 10.04 | 11.96 ± 1.20 | 9.71 | ns | |
| 18 | 11−/13-MeC29 | XIX | 2928 | 2931 | 1.25 ± 0.12 | 1.07 | 1.15 ± 0.29 | 1.06 | 0.93 ± 0.09 | 0.78 | ns |
| 19 | 3-MeC29 | XXI | 2970 | 2978 | 0.23 ± 0.05 | 0.20 | 0.27 ± 0.11 | 0.22 | 0.31 ± 0.06 | 0.27 | ns |
| 20 | XXV | 3096 | 3100 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.12 | 0.08 ± 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.10 ± 0.01 | 0.08 | ns | |
aNumber of peaks identified in the total ion chromatogram
bn-alkanes were identified by comparing RIs and mass spectra with authentic standards. Methyl-branched alkanes were tentatively identified by the diagnostic ions, which resulted from favored fragmentation at branched points (see by Fürstenau and Hilker 2017, and by comparing RIs with data from literature
cIdentity of CHCs used for comparison of sterile- and non-sterile-filtered larval host trails
dRIcal = Retention index calculated on a HP-5 ms capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.5 μm)
eRIlit = Retention index as reported for compounds analyzed on HP-5 ms or similar columns in the database (http://www.pherobase.com/) and by Fürstenau and Hilker (2017)
fFor the preparation of host larval trails, see experimental part
gFor each time interval, five replicates were used (N = 5)
hFor each compound, a p value denotes a significant quantitative difference between sterile-filtered larval CHC trails of T. confusum 0 h, 24 h, and 48 h after trail deposition (one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test, ns = not significant)
Fig. 1Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) visualization of the CHC composition of trails consisting of two differently treated Tribolium confusum larval extracts 0 h, 24 h, and 48 h after trail deposition: a) sterile-filtered hexane extracts, which were applied and kept under sterile conditions (N = 5) and b) non-sterile-filtered hexane extracts, which were applied and kept under non-sterile conditions (N = 6)
Fig. 2Partial total ion chromatograms (TIC) of trails consisting of non-sterile-filtered hexane extracts of Tribolium confusum larvae; trails (hexane extracts) were extracted from a substrate and analyzed a) 0 h, b) 24 h, and c) 48 h after deposition. Numbers above peaks refer to the identified compounds listed in Table 2. The n-alkanes (n-C25 – n-C31) detected in the larval trails are highlighted in bold. Crossed-out compounds are contaminations
Cuticular hydrocarbons identified from non-sterile-filtered hexane extracts of Tribolium confusum larvae 0 h, 24 h or 48 h after trail (extract) deposition. Mean amounts (ng ± SE LE−1) and relative quantities (% per LE) are given
| Hours after trail depositionf | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 24 | 48 | |||||||||
| No.a | Compoundb | IDc | RIcald | RIlite | Mean ± SE (ng) | (%) | Mean ± SE (ng) | (%) | Mean ± SE (ng) | (%) | |
| 1 | I | 2503 | 2500 | 20.12 ± 0.67 | 11.26 | 19.47 ± 0.77 | 11.41 | 19.10 ± 0.49 | 11.25 | ns | |
| 2 | 11−/13-MeC25 | II | 2534 | 2534 | 0.56 ± 0.06 | 0.31 | 0.46 ± 0.03 | 0.27 | 0.63 ± 0.10 | 0.37 | ns |
| 3 | 5-MeC25 | III | 2550 | 2550 | 0.36 ± 0.04 | 0.20 | 0.31 ± 0.02 | 0.18 | 0.38 ± 0.06 | 0.22 | ns |
| 4 | 3-MeC25 | IV | 2573 | 2571 | 1.31 ± 0.12 | 0.73 | 1.22 ± 0.06 | 0.71 | 1.28 ± 0.07 | 0.75 | ns |
| 5 | V | 2599 | 2599 | 5.19 ± 0.23 | 2.90 | 5.02 ± 0.15 | 2.95 | 5.12 ± 0.15 | 3.01 | ns | |
| 6 | 10−/11−/12−/13-MeC26 | VI | 2633 | 2632 | 1.44 ± 0.16 | 0.79 | 1.37 ± 0.09 | 0.80 | 1.50 ± 0.15 | 0.88 | ns |
| 7 | 4-MeC26 | VII | 2658 | 2656 | 0.79 ± 0.08 | 0.44 | 0.66 ± 0.05 | 0.39 | 0.82 ± 0.10 | 0.48 | ns |
| 8 | VIII | 2708 | 2700 | 56.50 ± 2.77 | 31.50 | 53.37 ± 1.68 | 31.28 | 52.23 ± 0.78 | 30.75 | ns | |
| 9 | 11−/13-MeC27 | IX | 2735 | 2731 | 15.75 ± 1.56 | 8.68 | 15.13 ± 0.90 | 8.86 | 14.72 ± 0.95 | 8.62 | ns |
| 10 | 5-MeC27 | X | 2750 | 2750 | 7.61 ± 0.65 | 4.20 | 7.24 ± 0.34 | 4.24 | 8.30 ± 1.19 | 4.85 | ns |
| 11 | 3-MeC27 | XI | 2774 | 2773 | 7.30 ± 0.30 | 4.07 | 7.17 ± 0.10 | 4.21 | 7.02 ± 0.16 | 4.13 | ns |
| 12 | 5,X-DiMeC27 | XII | 2781 | 2781 | 3.79 ± 0.35 | 2.09 | 3.47 ± 0.19 | 2.03 | 3.36 ± 0.18 | 1.97 | ns |
| 13 | XIII | 2801 | 2799 | 10.45 ± 0.41 | 5.84 | 10.28 ± 0.18 | 6.03 | 10.18 ± 0.21 | 5.99 | ns | |
| 14 | 3,X-DiMeC28 | XIV | 2806 | 2807 | 5.10 ± 0.35 | 2.83 | 4.82 ± 0.16 | 2.82 | 4.80 ± 0.23 | 2.82 | ns |
| 15 | 12−/13−/14-MeC28 | XV | 2830 | 2831 | 1.98 ± 0.19 | 1.09 | 1.86 ± 0.12 | 1.09 | 1.87 ± 0.18 | 1.09 | ns |
| 16 | 4-MeC28 | XVI | 2856 | 2856 | 1.50 ± 0.12 | 0.83 | 1.29 ± 0.05 | 0.76 | 1.35 ± 0.11 | 0.79 | ns |
| 17 | 3-MeC28 | XVII | 2873 | 2872 | 0.71 ± 0.16 | 0.39 | 0.44 ± 0.02 | 0.26 | 0.57 ± 0.08 | 0.33 | ns |
| 18 | XVIII | 2904 | 2904 | 29.10 ± 1.57 | 16.18 | 28.06 ± 0.52 | 16.46 | 27.68 ± 0.33 | 16.28 | ns | |
| 19 | 11−/13-MeC29 | XIX | 2930 | 2931 | 4.51 ± 0.43 | 2.49 | 4.06 ± 0.32 | 2.38 | 4.10 ± 0.39 | 2.40 | ns |
| 20 | 5-MeC29 | XX | 2948 | 2948 | 0.91 ± 0.11 | 0.50 | 0.70 ± 0.02 | 0.41 | 0.71 ± 0.05 | 0.41 | ns |
| 21 | 3-MeC29 | XXI | 2972 | 2978 | 1.40 ± 0.10 | 0.78 | 1.29 ± 0.05 | 0.76 | 1.34 ± 0.09 | 0.78 | ns |
| 22 | 5,X-DiMeC29 | XXII | 2979 | 2980 | 0.83 ± 0.05 | 0.46 | 0.65 ± 0.03 | 0.38 | 0.70 ± 0.06 | 0.41 | ns |
| 23 | XXIII | 2999 | 3000 | 0.64 ± 0.03 | 0.35 | 0.54 ± 0.03 | 0.32 | 0.58 ± 0.05 | 0.34 | ns | |
| 24 | 3,X-DiMeC29 | XXIV | 3004 | 3005 | 0.68 ± 0.07 | 0.38 | 0.55 ± 0.04 | 0.32 | 0.61 ± 0.12 | 0.36 | ns |
| 25 | XXV | 3098 | 3100 | 1.29 ± 0.04 | 0.73 | 1.15 ± 0.10 | 0.68 | 1.19 ± 0.05 | 0.70 | ns | |
aPeak numbers referring to Fig. 2
bn-alkanes were identified by comparing RIs and mass spectra with authentic standards. Methyl alkanes were tentatively identified by the diagnostic ions, which resulted from favored fragmentation at branched points (see by Fürstenau and Hilker 2017), and by comparing RIs with data from literature
cIdentity of CHCs used for comparison of sterile and non-sterile-filtered larval host trails
dRIcal = Retention index calculated on a HP-5 ms capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.5 μm)
eRIlit = Retention index as reported for compounds analyzed on HP-5 ms or similar columns in the database (http://www.pherobase.com/) and by Fürstenau and Hilker (2017)
fFor the preparation of host larval trails, see experimental part
gFor each time interval, six replicates were used (N = 6)
hFor each compound, the p value denotes a significant quantitative difference between non-sterile-filtered larval CHC trails of T. confusum 0 h, 24 h, and 48 h after trail deposition (one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test, ns = not significant)
Fig. 3Behavioral response of female Holepyris sylvanidis to trails consisting of non-sterile-filtered larval extracts of Tribolium confusum (5 LE of T. confusum 4th instar larvae per trail). Circular trails were deposited 0 h, 24 h, or 48 h before being offered to the parasitoids (N = 28 per time interval). Mean differences (Δ) of a) walked sections and b) residence time (indicated by the clock inset) on test and control circle at different time intervals are displayed. Test circle: hexane-extracted larval host trails. Control circle: hexane only. The parasitoid’s trail-following activity at different time intervals was analyzed by a Kruskal-Wallis test followed by pairwise Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test with Bonferroni-Holm correction. Different letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05
Fig. 4Behavioral response of female Holepyris sylvanidis to hexane-redissolved trails from non-sterile-filtered larval extracts of Tribolium confusum (5 LE of T. confusum 4th instar larvae per trail). The circular trails were offered to the parasitoids as freshly laid trails (0 h) or 48 h after deposition. Both trail types had been re-dissolved with n-hexane (25 μl) prior to the beginning of the bioassays (N = 28 per time interval). Test circle: hexane-extracted larval host trails. Control circle: hexane only. Mean differences (Δ) of a) walked sections and b) residence time (indicated by the clock inset) on test and control circle at different time points are displayed. The parasitoid’s trail-following activity at different time intervals was analyzed by Student’s t- test or Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test (ns = not significant, P > 0.05)
Fig. 5Cryo-SEM images of non-sterile-filtered hexane extracts of Tribolium confusum larvae applied to polar (A.1–4) and apolar (B.1–4) silicon wafers. Photos were taken at different time intervals after release onto the substrate, i.e. after 1 h (A.1–2, B.1–2) and 48 h (A.3–4, B.3–4). Note the “coffee ring” pattern in A.1, thin fluid patches in A.2, solidified filaments in A.3, very thin, re-dissolved fluid patches and granules in A.4, voluminous residues in B.1, tiny fluid droplets at the edges of larger patches in B.2, solidified amorphous films in B.3, and re-dissolved small fluid droplets in B.4. al, solidified, amorphous layer; fd, fluid droplets; fl, fluid layer; fp, fluid patches; sf, solidified filaments; gr, granules