Literature DB >> 34528692

Communication Partner Engagement: A Relevant Factor for Functional Outcomes in Speech-Language Therapy for Aphasic Dementia.

Emily Rogalski1,2, Angela Roberts3, Elizabeth Salley1, Marie Saxon1, Angela Fought1,4, Marissa Esparza1, Erin Blaze1, Christina Coventry1, Marek-Marsel Mesulam1, Sandra Weintraub1,2, Aimee Mooney5, Becky Khayum1, Alfred Rademaker1,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Previous reports established the feasibility of a telehealth model for delivering speech-language therapy via Internet videoconferencing, which connects individuals with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) to an expert speech and language pathologist for treatment. This study reports feasibility of the same telehealth intervention in a larger set of progressive aphasia participants and explores factors potentially influencing functional intervention outcomes.
METHODS: Participants with PPA or progressive aphasia in the context of a neurodegenerative dementia syndrome and their communication partners were enrolled into an 8-session intervention, with 3 evaluations (baseline, 2 months, and 6 months postenrollment). Half of the participants were randomized into a "check-in" group and received 3-monthly half-hour sessions postintervention. Mixed linear models with post hoc testing and percent change in area under the curve were used to examine communication confidence over time, as well as the influence of check-in sessions and the role of communication partner engagement on communication confidence.
RESULTS: Communication confidence improved at the 2-month evaluation and showed no significant decline at the 6-month evaluation. Item-level analysis revealed gains in communication confidence across multiple communication contexts. Gains and maintenance of communication confidence were only present for the engaged communication partner group and were not bolstered by randomization to the check-in group. DISCUSSION: Internet-based, person-centered interventions demonstrate promise as a model for delivering speech-language therapy to individuals living with PPA. Maintenance is possible for at least 6 months postenrollment and is better for those with engaged communication partners, which supports the use of dyadic interventions.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer’s disease; Frontotemporal dementia; Nonpharmacologic intervention; Primary progressive aphasia; Telehealth

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34528692      PMCID: PMC9159055          DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbab165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci        ISSN: 1079-5014            Impact factor:   4.942


  26 in total

Review 1.  Primary progressive aphasia--a language-based dementia.

Authors:  M-Marsel Mesulam
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants.

Authors:  M L Gorno-Tempini; A E Hillis; S Weintraub; A Kertesz; M Mendez; S F Cappa; J M Ogar; J D Rohrer; S Black; B F Boeve; F Manes; N F Dronkers; R Vandenberghe; K Rascovsky; K Patterson; B L Miller; D S Knopman; J R Hodges; M M Mesulam; M Grossman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Effects of functional communication interventions for people with primary progressive aphasia and their caregivers: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anna Volkmer; Aimee Spector; Vanessa Meitanis; Jason D Warren; Suzanne Beeke
Journal:  Aging Ment Health       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 3.658

Review 4.  The effectiveness of dyadic interventions for people with dementia and their caregivers.

Authors:  Heehyul Moon; Kathryn Betts Adams
Journal:  Dementia (London)       Date:  2012-05-21

5.  Psychometric properties of the communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia (CCRSA): phase 1.

Authors:  Leora R Cherney; Edna M Babbitt; Patrick Semik; Allen W Heinemann
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.119

6.  Quantitative template for subtyping primary progressive aphasia.

Authors:  Marsel Mesulam; Christina Wieneke; Emily Rogalski; Derin Cobia; Cynthia Thompson; Sandra Weintraub
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2009-12

Review 7.  Communication Partner Training in Aphasia: An Updated Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nina Simmons-Mackie; Anastasia Raymer; Leora R Cherney
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 8.  Treatment for Lexical Retrieval Impairments in Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Research Update with Implications for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Karen Croot
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 1.761

9.  Efficacy and safety of sustained-delivery fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant in patients with chronic diabetic macular edema insufficiently responsive to available therapies: a real-life study.

Authors:  Pascale Massin; Ali Erginay; Bénédicte Dupas; Aude Couturier; Ramin Tadayoni
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-08

10.  Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study.

Authors:  Jane Marshall; Tracey Booth; Niamh Devane; Julia Galliers; Helen Greenwood; Katerina Hilari; Richard Talbot; Stephanie Wilson; Celia Woolf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.