Moon Young Oh1, Jung-Man Lee2,3, Myung-Ho Lee4, Hyun Suk Choi5, Jongjin Kim1,4, Ki-Tae Hwang1,4, Young Jun Chai1,4,6. 1. Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 2. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 3. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government - Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. 4. Department of Surgery, Seoul Metropolitan Government - Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. 5. Department of Nursing, Seoul Metropolitan Government - Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. 6. Transdisciplinary Department of Medicine & Advanced Technology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) is frequently used in thyroid surgery to reduce recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury by providing the surgeon with real-time feedback on nerve stimulation during dissection. We applied a disposable adhesive patch electrode to a dissecting instrument to transfer electrical stimulation to the dissecting instrument for IONM during thyroid surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using the patch stimulator approach for IONM during thyroid surgery. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent thyroidectomy using both conventional stimulator and adhesive patch stimulator for IONM. The electromyography (EMG) amplitudes of the vagal and the RLNs before (V1, R1) and after thyroid resection (V2, R2) were alternatively checked with each type of stimulator at the same location of each nerve. RESULTS: Fifteen consecutive patients (4 males, 11 females) were included in this analysis, and a total of 38 nerves (19 vagus nerves and 19 RLNs) were evaluated. No statistically significant differences were seen in the mean amplitudes evoked by the patch stimulator and the conventional probe stimulator for the V1 signal (825.5±394.6 vs. 821.8±360.9 µV, P=0.954), R1 signal (1,044.8±471.2 vs. 1,039.2±507.4 µV, P=0.898), R2 signal (1,037.8±495.0 vs. 938.2±415.8 µV, P=0.948), or V2 signal (812.5±391.9 vs. 787.3±355.7 µV, P=0.975). CONCLUSIONS: The patch stimulator was safely and effectively used for IONM during thyroid surgery and provided similar nerve monitoring responses as the conventional stimulator. This approach may be used to enhance the surgeon's convenience during thyroid surgery. 2021 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) is frequently used in thyroid surgery to reduce recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury by providing the surgeon with real-time feedback on nerve stimulation during dissection. We applied a disposable adhesive patch electrode to a dissecting instrument to transfer electrical stimulation to the dissecting instrument for IONM during thyroid surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using the patch stimulator approach for IONM during thyroid surgery. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent thyroidectomy using both conventional stimulator and adhesive patch stimulator for IONM. The electromyography (EMG) amplitudes of the vagal and the RLNs before (V1, R1) and after thyroid resection (V2, R2) were alternatively checked with each type of stimulator at the same location of each nerve. RESULTS: Fifteen consecutive patients (4 males, 11 females) were included in this analysis, and a total of 38 nerves (19 vagus nerves and 19 RLNs) were evaluated. No statistically significant differences were seen in the mean amplitudes evoked by the patch stimulator and the conventional probe stimulator for the V1 signal (825.5±394.6 vs. 821.8±360.9 µV, P=0.954), R1 signal (1,044.8±471.2 vs. 1,039.2±507.4 µV, P=0.898), R2 signal (1,037.8±495.0 vs. 938.2±415.8 µV, P=0.948), or V2 signal (812.5±391.9 vs. 787.3±355.7 µV, P=0.975). CONCLUSIONS: The patch stimulator was safely and effectively used for IONM during thyroid surgery and provided similar nerve monitoring responses as the conventional stimulator. This approach may be used to enhance the surgeon's convenience during thyroid surgery. 2021 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.
Authors: Gregory W Randolph; Henning Dralle; Hisham Abdullah; Marcin Barczynski; Rocco Bellantone; Michael Brauckhoff; Bruno Carnaille; Sergii Cherenko; Fen-Yu Chiang; Gianlorenzo Dionigi; Camille Finck; Dana Hartl; Dipti Kamani; Kerstin Lorenz; Paolo Miccolli; Radu Mihai; Akira Miyauchi; Lisa Orloff; Nancy Perrier; Manuel Duran Poveda; Anatoly Romanchishen; Jonathan Serpell; Antonio Sitges-Serra; Tod Sloan; Sam Van Slycke; Samuel Snyder; Hiroshi Takami; Erivelto Volpi; Gayle Woodson Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Henning Dralle; Carsten Sekulla; Johannes Haerting; Wolfgang Timmermann; Hans Jürgen Neumann; Eberhard Kruse; Stefan Grond; Hans Peter Mühlig; Christian Richter; Johannes Voss; Oliver Thomusch; Hans Lippert; Ingo Gastinger; Michael Brauckhoff; Oliver Gimm Journal: Surgery Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: G Dionigi; P F Alesina; M Barczynski; L Boni; F Y Chiang; H Y Kim; G Materazzi; G W Randolph; D J Terris; C W Wu Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2012-04-05 Impact factor: 4.584