Erratum to "Sex-Specific Negative Association between Iron Intake and Cellular Aging Markers: Mediation Models Involving TNFα".

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1155/2019/4935237.].

In the article titled “Sex-Specific Negative Association between Iron Intake and Cellular Aging Markers: Mediation Models Involving TNFα” [1], there were errors in Figures 4 and 5 and in Authors' Contributions.

Figure 4(a) should show “1.535” instead of “-1.535” and “-0.018” instead of “0.018.” The corrected figure is shown below and listed as Figure 1.

Figure 1

Path models of associations between iron intake, TNFα, and cellular aging markers. (a) The p value for regression (A) was 0.0182, for regression (B) was <0.001, and for direct effect was 0.0016. (b) The p value for regression (A) was 0.0457, for regression (B) was 0.1848, and for direct effect was 0.0429. As for the indirect effect, significance was achieved when zero was not included in confidence intervals and did not have a p value. Models were adjusted for age, hypertension status, BMI, and HbA1c, LnTG, HDL-C, and carbohydrate proportion.

Figure 5 should show “-1.920” instead of “-0.1920” and “3.044” instead of “-3.044,” and the caption should state “In Figure 5” instead of “In Figure 4.” The corrected figure and corrected caption are shown below and listed as Figure 2.

Figure 2

Path model of association between iron intake, mtDNAcn, and SOD. In Figure 5, the p value for regression (a) was 0.0153, for regression (b) was 0.4453, and for direct effect was 0.0157. As for the indirect effect, significance was achieved when zero was not included in confidence intervals and did not have a p value. Models were adjusted for age, hypertension status, BMI, and HbA1c, LnTG, HDL-C, and carbohydrate proportion.

There was an error in Authors' Contributions, where some of the contributions were listed incorrectly. The corrected section appears below: