| Literature DB >> 34526745 |
Fatemeh Pyri1, Parvin Abedi1, Elham Maraghi2, Maryam Gholamzadeh Jefreh3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Premature ovarian insufficiency may impair the quality of life and expose women to disorders such as cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, and depression. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of mindfulness on the quality of life in women with premature ovarian insufficiency.Entities:
Keywords: Mindfulness; premature ovarian insufficiency; quality of life
Year: 2021 PMID: 34526745 PMCID: PMC8409706 DOI: 10.4103/jmh.JMH_66_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Midlife Health ISSN: 0976-7800
Figure 1Flow diagram of recruitment and retention of participants in the study
Demographic characteristics of participants in the mindfulness and control groups
| Variables | Mean±SD | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Mindfulness ( | Control ( | |
| Age (years) | 41.1±3.28 | 41.8±3.2 |
| Number of children | 2.77±1.49 | 2.35±1.47 |
| Number of pregnancies | 3.3±1.93 | 2.35±1.47 |
| Age of marriage (years) | 19.8±3.8 | 18.7±4.3 |
| Age of husband (years) | 46.3±4.39 | 46.57±5.6 |
| Duration of menopause (years) | 5.03±3.21 | 4.93±2.67 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 29.5±3.44 | 27.9±3.68 |
| Age of menopause (years) | 36.3±2.02 | 36.8±1.99 |
| Occupation, | ||
| House maker | 10 (32.3) | 10 (32.3) |
| Employee | 21 (67.7) | 21 (67.7) |
| Education, | ||
| Primary | 10 (32.3) | 10 (32.3) |
| Diploma | 15 (48.4) | 14 (45.2) |
| University education | 6 (19.4) | 7 (22.6) |
| Economic status, | ||
| Good | 6 (19.4) | 3 (9.7) |
| Moderate | 19 (61.3) | 20 (64.5) |
| Weak | 6 (19.4) | 8 (25.8) |
| Marital status, | ||
| Single | 5 (16.1) | 5 (16.1) |
| Married | 25 (80.6) | 25 (80.6) |
| Widow | 1 (3.2) | 1 (3.2) |
| Occupation of husband, | ||
| Employee | 23 (88.5) | 23 (88.5) |
| Not employed | 2 (7.7) | 3 (11.5) |
| Retired | 1 (3.8) | 0 |
SD: Standard deviation, BMI: Body mass index
Mean of quality of life domains in two groups of mindfulness and control
| Variables | Mean±SD |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Before intervention | After intervention | Three months follow-up | |||
| Quality of life | |||||
| Mindfulness ( | 95.6±9.77 | 77.32±7.93 | 48.32±4.96 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Control ( | 99.5±16.1 | 100.2±15.33 | 102.6±14.9 | <0.0001 | |
| | 0.25 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | ||
| Vasomotor | |||||
| Mindfulness ( | 7.96±3.45 | 6.58±2.5 | 4.61±1.49 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Control ( | 9.67±3.9 | 9.58±3.87 | 9.67±3.95 | 0.04 | |
| | 0.081 | 0.001 | <0.0001 | ||
| Psychological | |||||
| Mindfulness ( | 26.5±5.15 | 20.5±3.69 | 11.32±1.79 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Control ( | 28.3±5.6 | 28.7±5.27 | 29.4±5.16 | <0.0001 | |
| | 0.18 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | ||
| Physical | |||||
| Mindfulness ( | 54.09±5.7 | 44.2±4.75 | 29±2.56 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Control ( | 53.09±10.33 | 53.9±9.6 | 55.06±9.4 | <0.0001 | |
| | 0.64 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | ||
| Sexual | |||||
| Mindfulness ( | 7.45±3.12 | 5.93±2.36 | 3.22±1.3 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Control ( | 8.22±3.44 | 7.87±3.3 | 8.06±3.4 | 0.06 | |
| | 0.17 | 0.002 | <0.0001 | ||
*P value was calculated using repeated measure test. SD: Standard deviation
Frequency and severity of hot flashes in two groups of mindfulness and control
| Variables | Mean±SD |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Mindfulness ( | Control ( | ||
| Severity of hot flashes (per week) | |||
| Before | 1.30±0.69 | 1.32±0.63 | 0.88 |
| After | 1.1±0.56 | 1.34±0.63 | 0.004 |
| 3 months later | 0.66±0.58 | 1.4±0.65 | <0.0001 |
| Frequency of hot flashes per week | |||
| Before | 14.74±10.4 | 20.96 | 0.01 |
| After | 12.38±8.66 | 2.9±13.37 | 0.001 |
| 3 months later | 6.74±6.34 | 23.4±13.9 | <0.0001 |
SD: Standard deviation