| Literature DB >> 34526082 |
Yiyi Ding1, Shuo Wang2, Rui Guo1, Aizhen Zhang1, Yufang Zhu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although it is known that unbound bilirubin can enter the brain, there is little evidence of its association with the development of acute bilirubin encephalopathy. Here, we investigated this potential relationship in neonates who had undergone exchange transfusion.Entities:
Keywords: Acute bilirubin encephalopathy; Exchange transfusion; Neonatal; Unbound bilirubin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34526082 PMCID: PMC8444375 DOI: 10.1186/s13052-021-01143-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ital J Pediatr ISSN: 1720-8424 Impact factor: 2.638
Fig. 2Bilirubin metabolic cycle
Baseline characteristics of participants (n = 46)
| ABE | No ( | Yes ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean (SD), hours | 128.7 (94.2) | 174.2 (67.6) | 0.042 |
| Gestational age, mean (SD), weeks | 38.8 (1.5) | 38.3 (0.9) | 0.205 |
| Birth weight, mean (SD), kilogram | 3.28 (0.35) | 3.25 (0.45) | 0.825 |
| Weight, mean (SD), kilogram | 3.14 (0.39) | 3.13 (0.41) | 0.923 |
| Male, No. (%) | 13 (46.43%) | 11 (61.11%) | 0.331 |
| TSB1, mean (SD), mg/dL | 25.96 (5.53) | 33.77 (5.94) | < 0.001 |
| UB, mean (SD), mg/dL | 23.74 (5.12) | 30.35 (5.54) | < 0.001 |
| TSB2, mean (SD), mg/dL | 11.13 (3.32) | 17.53 (6.27) | < 0.001 |
| Blood glucose, mean (SD), mmol/L | 5.3 (1.2) | 6.9 (3.0) | 0.017 |
| White blood cell, mean (SD), *10⋀9/L | 13.2 (5.1) | 14.2 (4.7) | 0.508 |
| Blood platelet count, mean (SD), *10⋀9/L | 289.7 (125.6) | 264.0 (116.0) | 0.493 |
| Red blood cell, mean (SD), *10⋀12/L | 4.07 (1.08) | 3.29 (0.72) | 0.010 |
| Hemoglobin, mean (SD), g/L | 143.2 (35.5) | 116.1 (29.6) | 0.011 |
| Serum sodium, mean (SD), mmol/L | 142.5 (3.0) | 142.1 (2.6) | 0.584 |
| Serum calcium, mean (SD), mmol/L | 2.40 (0.25) | 2.38 (0.17) | 0.762 |
| Serum potassium, mean (SD), mmol/L | 4.62 (0.52) | 4.39 (0.38) | 0.117 |
| Serum albumin, mean (SD), g/L | 37.45 (2.80) | 36.12 (4.16) | 0.201 |
| Acidosis, No. (%) | 5 (17.86%) | 6 (33.33%) | 0.230 |
| Hypoxia, No. (%) | 1 (3.57%) | 2 (11.11%) | 0.552 |
| Hemorrhage, No. (%) | 6 (21.43%) | 3 (16.67%) | 0.691 |
| Hemolysis, No. (%) | 16 (57.14%) | 12 (66.67%) | 0.518 |
| Infection, No. (%) | 11 (39.29%) | 8 (44.44%) | 0.729 |
| Erythrocytosis, No. (%) | 2 (7.14%) | 0 (0.00%) | 0.246 |
| Unknown reason, No. (%) | 1 (3.57%) | 3 (16.67%) | 0.124 |
| Iv immunoglobulins, No. (%) | 6 (21.43%) | 7 (38.89%) | 0.199 |
| Receive phototherapy before ET, No. (%) | 25 (89.29%) | 11 (61.11%) | 0.024 |
TSB1:TSB at the start of ET
TSB2:TSB at the end of the ET
Hemorrhage: include scalp hematoma (n = 2), subarachnoid hemorrhage (n = 2), subdural hemorrhage(n = 1), and intracranial hemorrhage(n = 4) showed by MRI
Hemolysis: include ABO haemolytic, RhD haemolytic, Autoimmune haemolytic and Glucose-6-phosphate Dehydrogenase defificiency
Infection: include sepsis, pulmonary infection, intracranial infection and umbilical infection
Relationship between UB VS ABE in different models
| OR(95%CI) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Non-adjusted | 1.29 (1.10, 1.52) | 0.002 |
| Adjust I | 1.34 (1.11, 1.63) | 0.003 |
| Adjust II | 1.41 (1.05, 1.91) | 0.025 |
Result variable: ABE
Exposure variable: UB
Non-adjusted model adjust for: None
Adjust I model adjust for: Sex; Age; Birth weight;
Adjust II model adjust for: Sex; Age; Birth weight; Blood glucose; Red blood cell; Hemolysis; Receive phototherapy before ET;
Fig. 1Inclusion and exclusion criteria