| Literature DB >> 34526006 |
Hongjie Gao1, Jiawei Chen2, Guowei Li2, Xinhai Cui2, Fengyin Sun3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of carrying out pediatric laparoscopic partial cystectomies (LPC) when treating benign bladder tumors and urachal cysts.Entities:
Keywords: Benign bladder tumor; Laparoscopy; Partial cystectomy; Urachal cyst
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34526006 PMCID: PMC8444363 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-021-00893-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Urol ISSN: 1471-2490 Impact factor: 2.264
Perioperative patient data
| Age (yrs) | Gender | Clinical symptom | CT | Cytoscopic examination | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient 1 | 4.7 | Male | Odynuria 20 days | The left lateral wall is markedly thickened, at top of the left lateral wall are rounded enhanced nodules | There is a 5.2 cm irregular lump on the top of posterior wall, the basilar part is broad, from the ureterostoma 1–2 cm |
| Patient 2 | 4.6 | Male | Micturition unwell 9 days | The left bladder wall is diffuse thickening, an irregular soft tissue mass protruded into the bladder | There is a 4.32 cm cauliflower-like lump on the left wall, from the ureterostoma about 3 cm |
| Patient 3 | 9.5 | Male | Ultrasound found space occupying 1 month | The left side wall is thickened with clear boundary and irregular shape | There is a 2 cm cauliflower-like lump on the left of the bottom wall, the basilar part is broad, from the ureterostoma about 3.5 cm |
| Patient 4 | 7.3 | Female | Paroxysm celialgia half month | A sharp angular shadow of tissue is seen above the bladder, considering urachal duct isn’t close |
Fig. 1Photographs of CT scan: Patient 1 (a), Patient 2 (b), Patient 3 (c), Patient 4 (d); the arrow points to the tumor
Fig. 2Photographs of laparoscopic Urachal cyst (e), postoperative Urachal cyst (f)
Fig. 3Photographs of laparoscopic bladder exogenic tumor (a), bladder endogenous tumor (b), and bladder wound (c) and suture of bladder wound (d)
Fig. 4Double lenses combination method, arrow indicates cystoscope light source
Postoperative and pathological data
| Operative time (min) | EBL (ml) | Hospital stat (days) | Complications | Bladder biopsy pathology | Postoperative pathology | Follow-up period (mons) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient 1 | 115 | 45 | 14 | – | Polypoid hyperplasia | Myofibroblastoma | 16 |
| Patient 2 | 125 | 20 | 16 | Hematuria | Granulation tissue | Adenomatiodmetaplasia | 14 |
| Patient 3 | 120 | 24 | 13 | – | Inflammatory polyp | Inflammatory granuloma | 13 |
| Patient 4 | 105 | 15 | 12 | – | – | Urachal cyst | 10 |
Fig. 5Photomicrograph of resected bladder lesion showing inflammatory myofibroblastoma (a), adenomatoid metaplasia (b), inflammatory granuloma (c) and urachanl cyst (d)