| Literature DB >> 34525965 |
Alexander Eng1, Hillary S Hayden2, Christopher E Pope3, Mitchell J Brittnacher2, Anh T Vo2, Eli J Weiss2, Kyle R Hager2, Daniel H Leung4, Sonya L Heltshe3,5, Daniel Raftery6, Samuel I Miller1,2,7, Lucas R Hoffman8,9,10, Elhanan Borenstein11,12,13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Infants with cystic fibrosis (CF) suffer from gastrointestinal (GI) complications, including pancreatic insufficiency and intestinal inflammation, which have been associated with impaired nutrition and growth. Recent evidence identified altered fecal microbiota taxonomic compositions in infants with CF relative to healthy infants that were characterized by differences in the abundances of taxa associated with GI health and nutrition. Furthermore, these taxonomic differences were more pronounced in low length infants with CF, suggesting a potential link to linear growth failure. We hypothesized that these differences would entail shifts in the microbiome's functional capacities that could contribute to inflammation and nutritional failure in infants with CF.Entities:
Keywords: Cystic fibrosis; Fecal microbiome; Infants; Metabolomics; Metagenomics; Nutrition
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34525965 PMCID: PMC8444586 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-021-02305-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Fig. 1Differential abundances of modules and pathways between healthy infants and infants with CF during the first year of life. Each cell in the heatmap represents the log10 ratio of the median abundances of controls to CF. Modules/pathways are grouped vertically by temporal pattern of significant differential abundance (q < 0.01, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Significance labels indicate at which time points and in which cohort the function was significantly increased in one cohort relative to the other (CF for significantly increased in infants with CF, Control for significantly increased in healthy controls, and ns for not significant). Sample sizes at each time point are indicated in the x-axis label
Fig. 2Metagenomic age model performance and relative metagenomic age predictions. (a) Boxplots displaying performance of metagenomic age models across 10 trained replicate models trained on 3 different sets of functional features. Left panel shows correlations between true and predicted ages for predictions made using model replicates trained on a subset of healthy infants, right panel shows correlations using model replicates trained on a subset of infants with CF. Color indicates which cohort the model is generating age predictions for. (b) Densities of relative metagenomic age predictions made on one cohort using models trained on the opposite cohort (CF ages predicted by control-trained models, control ages predicted by CF-trained models). Fractions on the left indicate the number of replicate models that predicted relative metagenomic ages significantly below 0 for CF, fractions on the right indicate relative metagenomic ages significantly shifted above 0 for controls
Fig. 3Differential abundances of modules and pathways between exclusively breast-fed and exclusively formula-fed infants with CF during the first year of life. Each cell in the heatmap represents the log10 ratio of the median abundances of breast-fed to formula fed. Modules/pathways are grouped vertically by temporal pattern of significant differential abundance (q < 0.01, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Significance labels indicate at which time points and in which cohort a specific function was significantly increased in one cohort relative to the other (Only formula for significantly increased in formula feeding infants relative to only breast milk fed infants, Only breast milk for significantly increased in breast feeding relative to formula feeding infants, and ns for not significant). Sample sizes at each time point are indicated in the x-axis label
Fig. 4Boxplots of FishTaco contributions to driving function differential abundances between cohorts within CF. Genera are ordered based on their median contribution to driving a function’s differential abundance across all modules/pathways found differentially abundant in (a) infants at month 3 that were solely breast feeding, (b) infants at month 3 that were solely formula feeding, and (c) infants at month 8 on antibiotics. Only genera with at least one contribution greater than 0.1 are displayed. Color indicates in which cohort the genus’s relative abundance was higher
Fig. 5Quantified taxonomic contributors to the variance of aqueous metabolite abundances. Each bar indicates the MIMOSA2-calculated contribution of a genus to the variance in a metabolite’s abundance. Genera are ordered vertically by the absolute value of their contribution