Literature DB >> 34524636

Morphological, Biochemical, and Proteomic Studies Revealed Impact of Fe and P Crosstalk on Root Development in Phaseolus vulgaris L.

Madhiya Manzoor1, Sajad Majeed Zargar2, Parveen Akhter1, Uneeb Urwat1, Reetika Mahajan1, Sajad Ahmad Bhat3, Tanveer Ali Dar4, Imran Khan5.   

Abstract

Mineral stress is one of the major abiotic stresses faced by crop plants. The present study was undertaken to investigate the impact of mineral stress (iron (Fe) and phosphorus (P)) on various morphological and biochemical responses of the shoot and root tissues and root architecture of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). This study also leads us to the identification of P stress responsive proteins. The study was conducted under in vitro conditions, in which seeds of Shalimar French Bean-1 (SFB-1) variety were cultured on four different MGRL medium (control (P1Fe1), iron deficient (P1Fe0), phosphorus deficient (P0Fe1), and phosphorus and iron deficient (P0Fe0)). Chlorophyll content of leaves, Fe/P content of root tissues, total sugars, proline, length, and weight of shoot and root tissues were assessed and compared within and between the treatments. The analyzed data revealed significant difference between control and other three treatments. Chlorophyll content of shoots was found significantly decreased under mineral stress treatments P0Fe1, P1Fe0, and P0Fe0 than control. Length and weight of shoot and root were also observed significantly decreased under P0Fe1, P1Fe0, and P0Fe0 as compared to control. Total sugar was significantly higher in P0Fe1 of roots in comparison to control. Proline content was significantly higher in both tissues of shoots and roots of plants grown under P1Fe0, P0Fe1, and P0Fe0 than control condition. Furthermore, we unexpectedly observed the recovery of roots (mainly primary roots) under P0Fe0 as compared to P1Fe0 and P0Fe1. Interestingly higher concentration of Fe was also observed in P0Fe1 compared to other treatments and also higher concentration of P was observed in P1Fe1. These findings suggested that there is a crosstalk between Fe and P and also revealed that there is a disruption in the ability of PR (primary root) to sense local P deficiency in the absence of Fe. Furthermore, proteomics analysis (SDS-PAGE followed by MALDI MS) helped in identification of defensive proteins in P stress condition compared to control.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Common bean; Crosstalk; In vitro; Iron; Mineral stress; Phosphorus; Proteomics; Root architecture

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34524636     DOI: 10.1007/s12010-021-03662-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol        ISSN: 0273-2289            Impact factor:   2.926


  8 in total

Review 1.  Iron nutrition, biomass production, and plant product quality.

Authors:  Jean-François Briat; Christian Dubos; Frédéric Gaymard
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 18.313

Review 2.  Role of sugars under abiotic stress.

Authors:  Fareen Sami; Mohammad Yusuf; Mohammad Faizan; Ahmad Faraz; Shamsul Hayat
Journal:  Plant Physiol Biochem       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.270

3.  Phosphorus Uptake by Plants: From Soil to Cell

Authors: 
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1998-02-01       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 4.  Assembly of the Complexes of the Oxidative Phosphorylation System in Land Plant Mitochondria.

Authors:  Etienne H Meyer; Elina Welchen; Chris Carrie
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 26.379

5.  Differential tolerance to iron deficiency of chickpea varieties and Fe resupply effects.

Authors:  Henda Mahmoudi; Nehla Labidi; Riadh Ksouri; Mohamed Gharsalli; Chedly Abdelly
Journal:  C R Biol       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 1.583

6.  Low sink demand limits photosynthesis under P(i) deficiency.

Authors:  A J Pieters; M J Paul; D W Lawlor
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.992

7.  Proteome characterization of two contrasting soybean genotypes in response to different phosphorus treatments.

Authors:  Hongyu Zhao; Ahui Yang; Lingjian Kong; Futi Xie; Haiying Wang; Xue Ao
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.276

Review 8.  Common Bean: A Legume Model on the Rise for Unraveling Responses and Adaptations to Iron, Zinc, and Phosphate Deficiencies.

Authors:  Norma A Castro-Guerrero; Mariel C Isidra-Arellano; David G Mendoza-Cozatl; Oswaldo Valdés-López
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 5.753

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.