Literature DB >> 34524575

Development of a Programme Theory for Early Intervention Vocational Rehabilitation: A Realist Literature Review.

Jennifer A Dunn1, Jonathan J Hackney2, Rachelle A Martin2,3, Donna Tietjens4, Timothy Young2, John A Bourke2,5,6, Deborah L Snell7, Joanne L Nunnerley7,2, Andrew Hall8, Sarah Derrett6.   

Abstract

Purpose Little is currently known about how early intervention vocational rehabilitation (EIVR) works for people with newly acquired neurological conditions such as traumatic brain injury, acquired brain injury and spinal cord injury. This study aims, from a realist framework, to identify relevant literature and develop an initial programme theory to understand how EIVR might work for people experiencing acquired neurological disability. Realist reviews are ideally placed to address the identified knowledge gap as they assist in gaining a deeper understanding of how the intervention works, for whom it works best, and the contexts that promote the activation of desired outcomes. Methods We used a seven-step iterative process to synthesise literature using a realist approach. The steps included: development of initial programme theory, literature search, article selection, extracting and data organising, synthesis of evidence and programme theory refinement. We performed a literature search using the following databases: Cinahl, Embase, EMcare, Medline, PsychInfo and Scopus. Articles were selected if they contributed to the knowledge describing what is EIVR and how it works in newly acquired neurological conditions. Data were extracted and synthesised to develop a programme theory for EIVR. Results Following screening of 448 references, 37 documents were eligible for data extraction. We developed a refined programme theory of EIVR consisting of three contexts (prioritisation of exploring work options, return to work discussed as an option, and workplace support), nine mechanisms (ensuring rehabilitation teams' culture, fostering hope, exploring options, optimising self-efficacy, maintaining worker identity, staying connected, setting goals, engaging employer, and flexing roles) and three outcomes (confidence in ability to work, psychological adjustment, and engagement in solution focussed options). Conclusions This appears to be the first paper to explore how EIVR works, for whom and in what situations. We have produced a programme theory that may provide an initial understanding of EIVR following acquired neurological conditions.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Early intervention; Neurological disability; Realist review; Vocational rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34524575     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-021-10000-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  35 in total

1.  Return to work in selected disabilities.

Authors:  Salvatore Giaquinto; Haim Ring
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 3.033

Review 2.  Approaches to vocational rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Joanna Kristin Fadyl; Kathryn M McPherson
Journal:  J Head Trauma Rehabil       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.710

3.  The experience of seeking, gaining and maintaining employment after traumatic spinal cord injury and the vocational pathways involved.

Authors:  Gillean Hilton; Carolyn A Unsworth; Ruth Stuckey; Gregory C Murphy
Journal:  Work       Date:  2018

4.  Biographical work and returning to employment following a spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Isabelle Ville
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2005-04

5.  Longitudinal employment outcomes of an early intervention vocational rehabilitation service for people admitted to rehabilitation with a traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  G Hilton; C A Unsworth; G C Murphy; M Browne; J Olver
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 6.  Interpreting the meaning individuals ascribe to returning to work after traumatic brain injury: a qualitative approach.

Authors:  Jannah D Oppermann
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  What's in a mechanism? Development of a key concept in realist evaluation.

Authors:  Sonia Michelle Dalkin; Joanne Greenhalgh; Diana Jones; Bill Cunningham; Monique Lhussier
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Early vocational rehabilitation for people with spinal cord injury: a research protocol using realist synthesis and interviews to understand how and why it works.

Authors:  Jennifer Dunn; Rachelle A Martin; Jonathan J Hackney; Joanne L Nunnerley; Deborah Snell; John A Bourke; Andrew Hall; Sarah Derrett
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Returning to work after stroke: perspectives of employer stakeholders, a qualitative study.

Authors:  Carol Coole; Kathryn Radford; Mary Grant; Jane Terry
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-09

10.  RAMESES II reporting standards for realist evaluations.

Authors:  Geoff Wong; Gill Westhorp; Ana Manzano; Joanne Greenhalgh; Justin Jagosh; Trish Greenhalgh
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  1 in total

1.  Factors associated with long term work incapacity following a non-catastrophic road traffic injury: analysis of a two-year prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Christopher Papic; Annette Kifley; Ashley Craig; Genevieve Grant; Alex Collie; Ilaria Pozzato; Belinda Gabbe; Sarah Derrett; Trudy Rebbeck; Jagnoor Jagnoor; Ian D Cameron
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 4.135

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.