Literature DB >> 34524502

Methotrexate versus expectant management in ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis.

Ahmed Kunwer Naveed1, Muhammad Umair Anjum2, Ali Hassan2, Sumbal Nasir Mahmood3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ectopic pregnancy (EP) affects 1-2% of all pregnant females'(Barnhart et al., Expert Opin Pharmacother 2(3):409-417, 2001) that can require emergent surgical intervention. Noninvasive diagnostic tests like transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS), and serial β-hCG levels have enabled early diagnosis and allowed medical therapy to be tried. Methotrexate (MTX) versus expectant management, both have been considered safe but superiority of one over the other is lacking.
METHODS: We searched for RCT that have shown efficacy of MTX versus expectant management in hemodynamically stable patients. Our primary outcome was whether one modality is superior to the other.
RESULTS: Four RCT were included in the meta-analysis after review. Our pooled analysis when comparing MTX and expectant management showed us that the difference between the uneventful decline in β-hCG levels (treatment success) was statistically insignificant (RR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.93-1.21) with no significant heterogeneity between trials (I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.578). The difference between need for surgical intervention between methotrexate and expectant management was also statistically insignificant (RR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.43-1.40) with no significant heterogeneity between trials (I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.552).
CONCLUSION: We conclude that expectant management is not inferior to MTX in hemodynamically stable patients with ectopic pregnancy that have declining or low β-hCG levels.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ectopic pregnancy; Expectant management; Methotrexate; Tubal pregnancy; β-hCG

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34524502     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-06236-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  4 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of single-dose methotrexate compared with laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  R J Morlock; J E Lafata; D Eisenstein
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Early ectopic pregnancy; comments on conservative treatment.

Authors:  J LUND
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp       Date:  1955-02

3.  The medical management of ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis comparing "single dose" and "multidose" regimens.

Authors:  Kurt T Barnhart; Gabriella Gosman; Rachel Ashby; Mary Sammel
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Expectant management of ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  P Ylöstalo; B Cacciatore; J Sjöberg; M Kääriäinen; A Tenhunen; U H Stenman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 7.661

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Atypical course of a caesarean scar pregnancy.

Authors:  Katharina Schlammerl; Stefan Kommoss; Bernhard Krämer; Markus Hoopmann; Cornelia Bachmann
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 2.  Caesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Case Report and a Literature Review.

Authors:  George Valasoulis; Ioulia Magaliou; Dimitrios Koufidis; Antonios Garas; Alexandros Daponte
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 2.948

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.