Alexander Nieto1, Markus Albertsmeier2, Jens Werner2, Dorit Di Gioia3, Lars H Lindner3, Josefine Rauch1, Silke Nachbichler1, Claus Belka1, Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann4. 1. Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Campus Großhadern, LMU Klinikum, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, München, Deutschland. 2. Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Campus Großhadern, LMU Klinikum, München, Deutschland. 3. Zentrum für Knochen- und Weichteiltumoren (SarKUM), Medizinische Klinik III, Campus Großhadern, LMU Klinikum, München, Deutschland. 4. Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Campus Großhadern, LMU Klinikum, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, München, Deutschland. nina-sophie.hegemann@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas (RPS) include tumors of mesenchymal origin with overall well-defined histological subtypes and heterogenic prognosis. For the first time with the publication of the STRASS study, which investigated the value of neoadjuvant radiotherapy in primary RPS, there is phase III evidence for the use of radiotherapy. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of the present article is to present the role of neoadjuvant radiotherapy in RPS since the publication of the STRASS study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a non-systematic literature search. The results of retrospective and observational studies were compared to those of the STRASS study. RESULTS: In the two of the largest analyses, the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program (SEER) and the American National Cancer Database (NCDB), an improvement in overall survival due to radiotherapy in RPS could be shown. In contrast to these results, there was no significant improvement in 3‑year abdominal recurrence-free survival in the STRASS study. There was solely a trend to improved abdominal recurrence-free survival in initially unplanned subgroup analyses for patients with liposarcoma as well as low-grade sarcoma but not for leiomyosarcoma or high-grade sarcoma. CONCLUSION: Thanks to international collaboration an academic randomized trial was even feasible in such a rare disease as RPS. The results of the STRASS study have relativized the potential benefit of radiotherapy in RPS. A longer follow-up especially regarding the role of radiotherapy in liposarcomas is desirable.
BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas (RPS) include tumors of mesenchymal origin with overall well-defined histological subtypes and heterogenic prognosis. For the first time with the publication of the STRASS study, which investigated the value of neoadjuvant radiotherapy in primary RPS, there is phase III evidence for the use of radiotherapy. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of the present article is to present the role of neoadjuvant radiotherapy in RPS since the publication of the STRASS study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a non-systematic literature search. The results of retrospective and observational studies were compared to those of the STRASS study. RESULTS: In the two of the largest analyses, the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program (SEER) and the American National Cancer Database (NCDB), an improvement in overall survival due to radiotherapy in RPS could be shown. In contrast to these results, there was no significant improvement in 3‑year abdominal recurrence-free survival in the STRASS study. There was solely a trend to improved abdominal recurrence-free survival in initially unplanned subgroup analyses for patients with liposarcoma as well as low-grade sarcoma but not for leiomyosarcoma or high-grade sarcoma. CONCLUSION: Thanks to international collaboration an academic randomized trial was even feasible in such a rare disease as RPS. The results of the STRASS study have relativized the potential benefit of radiotherapy in RPS. A longer follow-up especially regarding the role of radiotherapy in liposarcomas is desirable.
Authors: Zheng Zhou; Theodore P McDade; Jessica P Simons; Sing Chau Ng; Laura A Lambert; Giles F Whalen; Shimul A Shah; Jennifer F Tseng Journal: Arch Surg Date: 2010-05
Authors: M Toulmonde; S Bonvalot; P Méeus; E Stoeckle; O Riou; N Isambert; E Bompas; M Jafari; C Delcambre-Lair; E Saada; A Le Cesne; C Le Péchoux; J Y Blay; S Piperno-Neumann; C Chevreau; J O Bay; V Brouste; P Terrier; D Ranchère-Vince; A Neuville; A Italiano Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Dario Callegaro; Chandrajit P Raut; Deanna Ng; Dirk C Strauss; Charles Honoré; Eberhard Stoeckle; Sylvie Bonvalot; Rick L Haas; Nikolaos Vassos; Lorenzo Conti; Rebecca A Gladdy; Mark Fairweather; Winan van Houdt; Yvonne Schrage; Frits van Coevorden; Piotr Rutkowski; Rosalba Miceli; Alessandro Gronchi; Carol J Swallow Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2020-10-18 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Sylvie Bonvalot; Alessandro Gronchi; Cécile Le Péchoux; Carol J Swallow; Dirk Strauss; Pierre Meeus; Frits van Coevorden; Stephan Stoldt; Eberhard Stoeckle; Piotr Rutkowski; Marco Rastrelli; Chandrajit P Raut; Daphne Hompes; Antonino De Paoli; Claudia Sangalli; Charles Honoré; Peter Chung; Aisha Miah; Jean Yves Blay; Marco Fiore; Jean-Jacques Stelmes; Angelo P Dei Tos; Elizabeth H Baldini; Saskia Litière; Sandrine Marreaud; Hans Gelderblom; Rick L Haas Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2020-09-14 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: S Bonvalot; E Gaignard; E Stoeckle; P Meeus; G Decanter; S Carrere; C Honore; J B Delhorme; M Fau; D Tzanis; S Causeret; P Gimbergues; J M Guillois; B Meunier; A Le Cesne; F Ducimetiere; M Toulmonde; J Y Blay Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2019-05-07 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Brian O'Sullivan; Aileen M Davis; Robert Turcotte; Robert Bell; Charles Catton; Pierre Chabot; Jay Wunder; Rita Kandel; Karen Goddard; Anna Sadura; Joseph Pater; Benny Zee Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-06-29 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Markus Albertsmeier; Alexandra Rauch; Falk Roeder; Sandro Hasenhütl; Sebastian Pratschke; Michaela Kirschneck; Alessandro Gronchi; Nina L Jebsen; Philippe A Cassier; Paul Sargos; Claus Belka; Lars H Lindner; Jens Werner; Martin K Angele Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2017-09-11 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Daniel P Nussbaum; Christel N Rushing; Whitney O Lane; Diana M Cardona; David G Kirsch; Bercedis L Peterson; Dan G Blazer Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Carolyn Nessim; Chandrajit P Raut; Dario Callegaro; Francesco Barretta; Rosalba Miceli; Mark Fairweather; Jean-Yves Blay; Dirk Strauss; Piotr Rutkowski; Nita Ahuja; Ricardo Gonzalez; Giovanni Grignani; Vittorio Quagliuolo; Eberhard Stoeckle; Guy Lahat; Antonino De Paoli; Venu G Pillarisetty; Robert J Canter; John T Mullen; Elisabetta Pennacchioli; Winan van Houdt; Carol J Swallow; Yvonne Schrage; Kenneth Cardona; Marco Fiore; Alessandro Gronchi; Sanjay P Bagaria Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-04-27 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Meike Ressing; Eva Wardelmann; Peter Hohenberger; Jens Jakob; Bernd Kasper; Katharina Emrich; Andrea Eberle; Maria Blettner; Sylke Ruth Zeissig Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-02-12 Impact factor: 3.295