Yukun Mao1,2, Na Ni2,3, Linjuan Huang2,4, Jiaming Fan2,3, Hao Wang2,3, Fang He2,3, Qing Liu2,5, Deyao Shi2,6, Kai Fu1,2, Mikhail Pakvasa2,7, William Wagstaff2, Andrew Blake Tucker2,7, Connie Chen2, Russell R Reid2,7, Rex C Haydon2, Sherwin H Ho2, Michael J Lee2, Tong-Chuan He2,7, Jian Yang8, Le Shen2,7, Lin Cai1, Hue H Luu2. 1. Departments of Spine Surgery and Musculoskeletal Tumor, and Neurosurgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430072, PR China. 2. Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. 3. Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Diagnostic Medicine, and the School of Laboratory Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, PR China. 4. Departments of Nephrology, and Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, PR China. 5. Department of Spine Surgery, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410011, PR China. 6. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430022, PR China. 7. Section of Plastic Surgery and Laboratory of Craniofacial Biology and Development, and Section of Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. 8. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Materials Research Institute, The Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Abstract
As multipotent progenitor cells, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can renew themselves and give rise to multiple lineages including osteoblastic, chondrogenic and adipogenic lineages. It's previously shown that BMP9 is the most potent BMP and induces osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of MSCs. However, the molecular mechanism through which BMP9 regulates MSC differentiation remains poorly understood. Emerging evidence indicates that noncoding RNAs, especially microRNAs, may play important roles in regulating MSC differentiation and bone formation. As highly conserved RNA binding proteins, Argonaute (AGO) proteins are essential components of the multi-protein RNA-induced silencing complexes (RISCs), which are critical for small RNA biogenesis. Here, we investigate possible roles of AGO proteins in BMP9-induced lineage-specific differentiation of MSCs. We first found that BMP9 up-regulated the expression of Ago1, Ago2 and Ago3 in MSCs. By engineering multiplex siRNA vectors that express multiple siRNAs targeting individual Ago genes or all four Ago genes, we found that silencing individual Ago expression led to a decrease in BMP9-induced early osteogenic marker alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity in MSCs. Furthermore, we demonstrated that simultaneously silencing all four Ago genes significantly diminished BMP9-induced osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of MSCs and matrix mineralization, and ectopic bone formation. Collectively, our findings strongly indicate that AGO proteins and associated small RNA biogenesis pathway play an essential role in mediating BMP9-induced osteogenic differentiation of MSCs.
As multipotent progenitor cells, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can renew themselves and give rise to multiple lineages including osteoblastic, chondrogenic and adipogenic lineages. It's previously shown that BMP9 is the most potent BMP and induces osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of MSCs. However, the molecular mechanism through which BMP9 regulates MSC differentiation remains poorly understood. Emerging evidence indicates that noncoding RNAs, especially microRNAs, may play important roles in regulating MSC differentiation and bone formation. As highly conserved RNA binding proteins, Argonaute (AGO) proteins are essential components of the multi-protein RNA-induced silencing complexes (RISCs), which are critical for small RNA biogenesis. Here, we investigate possible roles of AGO proteins in BMP9-induced lineage-specific differentiation of MSCs. We first found that BMP9 up-regulated the expression of Ago1, Ago2 and Ago3 in MSCs. By engineering multiplex siRNA vectors that express multiple siRNAs targeting individual Ago genes or all four Ago genes, we found that silencing individual Ago expression led to a decrease in BMP9-induced early osteogenic marker alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity in MSCs. Furthermore, we demonstrated that simultaneously silencing all four Ago genes significantly diminished BMP9-induced osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of MSCs and matrix mineralization, and ectopic bone formation. Collectively, our findings strongly indicate that AGO proteins and associated small RNA biogenesis pathway play an essential role in mediating BMP9-induced osteogenic differentiation of MSCs.
As multipotent progenitor cells, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can renew themselves and give rise to multiple lineages including chondrogenic, adipogenic, osteogenic, and myogenic lineages.1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Osteoblastic lineage-specific differentiation of MSCs is regulated by numerous major signaling pathways.,6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are considered as the most potent osteoinductive factors.14, 15, 16 BMPs are members of the transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) superfamily,,, and at least 14 BMPs have been identified in humans and rodents.,, We conducted a comprehensive analysis of the 14 types of human BMPs, and identified the least known BMP9 as one of the most potent osteogenic BMPs in MSCs.,,18, 19, 20, 21 We further demonstrated that, unlike other osteogenic BMPs, BMP9 is refractory to the inhibitory effect exerted by the potent naturally occurring antagonist noggin, and that the TGF-β/BMP type I receptors ALK1 and ALK2 are essential for BMP9 osteogenic signaling and regulating downstream target genes in MSCs.24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 Nonetheless, the molecular mechanisms underlying BMP9-induced osteogenic differentiation of MSCs are not fully understood.For the past 20 years, significant progress has been in genome-wide transcriptomic studies, indicating that noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) may play critical roles in most if not all aspects of cellular processes under physiological and/or pathologic conditions,32, 33, 34 since only less than 2% of the human genome encodes proteins, while eukaryotic genomes are pervasively transcribed., Noncoding RNAs are divided into small ncRNAs (<200 nt) and long ncRNAs or lncRNAs (>200 nt). In fact, small ncRNAs, e.g., microRNAs (miRNAs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), have gained a lot of attention since their discoveries., It has been reported that ncRNAs, especially microRNAs, may play important roles in regulating MSC differentiation and bone formation.,MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small ncRNAs of ∼22 nucleotides and attenuate gene expression by guiding Argonaute (AGO) proteins to target mRNAs that are completely or partially complementary with miRNAs.40, 41, 42 The biogenesis of miRNAs starts with longer primary transcripts (i.e., pri-miRNAs) with a 60-120 nt RNA hairpin structure. The pri-miRNAs are then cleaved by Drosha and Dicer, yielding ∼70 nt precursor miRNAs (i.e., pre-miRNAs) and eventually 22 nt mature miRNAs. Mature miRNAs usually down-regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally through binding of target mRNAs in association with the AGO-containing RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) are also processed and subsequently silence target transcripts through interacting with the AGO2-containing RISC system.43, 44, 45 Thus, the AGO proteins are essential players in processing and biogenesis of small RNAs (smRNAs) in mammalian cells. AGOs use single-stranded small nucleic acids as guides and bind to complementary sequences in RNA targeted for modulation. There are at least four AGO proteins, namely, AGO1 to AGO4, in humans and mice.,In this study, we investigate potential roles of AGO proteins in BMP9-induced lineage-specific differentiation of MSCs. Using our recently developed FASMi technology, we engineered the multiplex siRNA vectors to express multiple siRNAs targeting individual Ago genes or all four Ago genes in either recombinant adenoviral or retroviral vector system. We demonstrated that BMP9 up-regulated the expression of Ago1, Ago2 and Ago3 in MSCs; and that silencing individual Ago expression led to a decrease in BMP9-induced alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity in MSCs. We further demonstrated that simultaneous silencing of all four Ago genes effectively diminished BMP9-induced adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation of MSCs and matrix mineralization in vitro, and ectopic bone formation in vivo. Collectively, our findings indicate that AGO proteins and associated microRNA biogenesis pathway play an important role in mediating BMP9-induced osteogenesis in MSCs.
Material and methods
Cell culture and chemicals
HEK-293 cells were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA). HEK-293 derivative lines 293pTP and RAPA cells were previously described., Reversibly immortalized mouse bone marrow stromal cells (imBMSCs) were previously characterized. All cell lines were maintained in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gemini Bio-Products, West Sacramento, CA), supplemented with 100U/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin, and incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 as described.,51, 52, 53, 54 Unless indicated otherwise, all other chemicals were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) or Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA).
Construction and generation of recombinant adenoviruses AdBMP9, AdGFP, AdRFP, AdR-simAgo1, AdR-simAgo2, AdR-simAgo3 and AdR-simAgo4
Recombinant adenoviruses were constructed by using the AdEasy technology as described., Briefly, for making the overexpression adenoviruses, the coding regions of human BMP9, eGFP and RFP were PCR amplified, subcloned into the adenoviral shuttle vector, and used to generate recombinant adenoviruses in HEK293, 293pTP, or RAPA cells as described,,,57, 58, 59 subsequently designated as AdBMP9, AdGFP and AdRFP.The multiplex siRNA expressing adenoviruses were constructed by using our recently developed FAMSi system. Briefly, three siRNAs were designed to target the coding region of each Ago member by using Invitrogen's BLOCK-IT RNAi Designer program. The siRNA sites were assembled into the FAMSi vector system, and subsequently cloned into a homemade adenoviral vector for generating adenoviruses as described.,,60, 61, 62 The resultant adenoviruses were designated as AdR-simAgo1, AdR-simAgo2, AdR-simAgo3, and AdR-simAgo4. All PCR amplified fragments were verified by DNA sequencing. The cloning construction details are available upon request.It is noteworthy that AdBMP9 and AdR-simAgo viruses also express eGFP and RFP as infection tracking markers, respectively. For all adenoviral infections, AdGFP and AdRFP were used as control viruses for mock infection as described.,,,63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69 For all adenoviral infections, polybrene (final concentration at 5 μg/mL) was added to enhance infection efficiency as described.
Construction of the retroviral vector pSEB-simAgo2134 and the establishment of stable imBMSC cells expressing simAgo2134 line imBMSC-simAgo2134
To silence all four Ago members, a multiplex siRNA construct, pSiEB-simAgo2134, was assembled by using the FAMSi system. The retroviral vector pSiEB-simAgo2134 expresses two siRNAs targeting Ago2 and one siRNA each targeting Ago1, Ago3, and Ago4. The previously engineered pSEB-siControl vector was used a negative control as described.,, The retroviral vector pSiEB-simAgo2134 or pSiEB-siControl was co-transfected with retroviral packaging plasmids into HEK-293 cells to produce retrovirus supernatants, which were used to infect subconfluent imBMSC cells to establish imBMSC-simAgo2134 or imBMSC-siControl stable line upon blasticidin S selection (final concentration at 5 μg/mL), as previously described.,71, 72, 73, 74, 75
RNA extraction and touchdown quantitative PCR (TqPCR)
Total RNA isolated with the TRIZOL Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was subjected to reverse transcription reactions using hexamer and M-MuLV Reverse Transcriptase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA,USA). The RT cDNA products were used as qPCR templates. The qPCR primers were designed by using the Primer3 Plus, and are listed in Table S1. The quantitative PCR analysis was performed using our previously optimized TqPCR protocol.,,, Briefly, SYBR Green qPCR reactions (Bimake, Houston, TX) were set up according to manufacturer's instructions. The cycling program was set up as follows: 95 °C × 3 min for 1 cycle; 95 °C × 20 s, 66 °C × 10 s per cycle, then −3 °C per cycle for 4 cycles; followed by 95 °C × 10 s, 55 °C × 15 s, and 70 °C × 1 s for 40 cycles. Gapdh was used as a reference gene. Relative expression for all samples was calculated by using the 2−ΔΔCt method as described.,,
Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity assays
Exponentially growing imBMSC cells and/or their derivative lines were plated in 24-well plates and co-infected with the indicated adenoviral vectors. At days 3, 5, or 7, the infected cells were subjected to either quantitative ALP activity assessment using the modified Great Escape SEAP chemiluminescence assay kit (BD Clontech) and/or qualitative histochemical staining of ALP activity as previously described.,,,, Each assay condition was conducted in triplicate.
In vitro matrix mineralization assay
Exponentially growing imBMSCs cells were plated in 24-well plates, co-infected with the indicated adenoviruses, and cultured with 10% FBS DMEM containing ascorbic acid (50 mg/mL) and β-glycerophosphate (10 mM). At days 14 and 21, mineralized matrix nodules were stained by Alizarin Red S staining as described.,80, 81, 82 Briefly, the cells were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 10 min, washed with PBS (pH adjusted to 4.2) twice, and then incubated with 2% Alizarin Red S for 30 min at room temperature. The stained mineral deposits were recorded under bright field microscopy. Each assay condition was done in triplicate.
Oil Red O staining assay
Exponentially growing imBMSCs cells were seeded in 24-well cell culture plates and co-infected with the indicated adenoviruses. At day 7, the cells were subjected to Oil Red O staining as described.,,,83, 84, 85 Briefly, the cells were fixed with 10% formalin at room temperature for 10min, washed with PBS, and stained with freshly prepared Oil Red-O solution at room temperature for 60 min, followed by washing with distilled water. The staining of lipid droplets was recorded under a bright field microscope. Each assay condition was performed in triplicate.
Subcutaneous stem cell implantation and ectopic bone formation
All animal use and care in this study followed the approved protocol by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. All experimental procedures were carried out according to the approved guidelines. Subcutaneous stem cell implantation procedure was performed as previously described.,,,86, 87, 88 Briefly, subconfluent imBMSC-siControl and imBMSC-simAgo2134 cells were infected with AdGFP or AdBMP9 for 36 h. The infected cells were collected, resuspended in PBS, and subcutaneously injected into the flanks of athymic nude mice (Envigo/Harlan Research Laboratories; n = 5/group, 6–8-week old; 2 × 106 cells in 50 μl per injection site). At three weeks after implantation, the mice were sacrificed, and masses at implantation sites were recovered for μCT and histologic analyses.
Micro-computed tomographic (μCT) analysis
The retrieved bony masses were fixed in 10% PBS-buffered formalin and subjected to μCT imaging by using the GE triumph (GE Healthcare) trimodality preclinical imaging system. All imaging data were analyzed with the Amira 6.0 (Visage Imaging, Inc.). The average bone volume was determined as previously described.89, 90, 91, 92
Hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) and Masson's trichrome staining
The retrieved samples were decalcified and paraffin embedded. Serial sections of the embedded samples were subjected to H & E staining and Masson's trichrome staining as previously described.,93, 94, 95, 96
Statistical analysis
The quantitative assays were performed in triplicate and/or repeated in three independent batches. Statistical differences between samples were determined by t-test or ANOVA. The P < 0.05 was defined as statistically significant.
Results
BMP9 regulates the expression of Ago family members in MSCs
We first analyzed the effect of BMP9 on the expression of Ago family members in MSCs. At 24 h of AdBMP9 infection, only Ago2 was up-regulated upon BMP9 stimulation (Fig. 1A, panel a). However, at 48 h after BMP9 stimulation, Ago1, Ago2 and Ago3 were significantly up-regulated while Ago4 was down-regulated. While the detailed regulatory mechanism remains to be fully investigated, these results indicate that Ago family members play an important role in mediating BMP9 signaling in MSCs.
Figure 1
BMP9 impacts on the expression of Ago genes, which can be effectively silenced through adenoviral vector-mediated expression of Ago-specific siRNAs in MSCs. (A) Subconfluent imBMSCs were infected with Ad-BMP9 (BMP9) and AdGFP control (GFP). At 24 h ( and 48 h ( after infection, total RNA was isolated and subjected to TqPCR analysis of Ago1, Ago2, Ago3 and Ago4 expression. Gapdh was used as a reference gene. ∗, P < 0.05, and ∗∗, P < 0.01 when compared with that of the AdGFP group. Each assay was done in triplicate. (B) Location and sequence features of the siRNAs that target the coding regions of mouse Ago1, Ago2, Ago3, Ago4. The siRNAs targeting individual Ago gene transcript were cloned into recombinant adenoviral vectors using our recently established FAMSi technique, resulting in the adenoviruses designated as AdR-simAgo1, AdR-simAgo2, AdR-simAgo3 and AdR-simAgo4, respectively. (C) AdR-simAgo viruses can transduce MSCs with high efficiency. Subconfluent imBMSCs were infected with AdR-simAgo1, AdR-simAgo2, AdR-simAgo3, or AdR-simAgo4. At 48 h after infection, RFP signal was recorded. Representative images are shown. (D) AdR-simAgo vectors effectively silence the expression of respective Ago genes in MSCs. Subconfluent imBMSCs were infected with the indicated AdR-simAgo viruses, or AdRFP. At 48 h after infection, total RNA was isolated and subjected to TqPCR analysis of expression of mouse Ago1 (a), Ago2 (b), Ago3 (c), and Ago4 (d). Gapdh was used as a reference gene. Each assay was done in triplicate. ∗∗, P < 0.01 when compared with that of the AdGFP group.
BMP9 impacts on the expression of Ago genes, which can be effectively silenced through adenoviral vector-mediated expression of Ago-specific siRNAs in MSCs. (A) Subconfluent imBMSCs were infected with Ad-BMP9 (BMP9) and AdGFP control (GFP). At 24 h ( and 48 h ( after infection, total RNA was isolated and subjected to TqPCR analysis of Ago1, Ago2, Ago3 and Ago4 expression. Gapdh was used as a reference gene. ∗, P < 0.05, and ∗∗, P < 0.01 when compared with that of the AdGFP group. Each assay was done in triplicate. (B) Location and sequence features of the siRNAs that target the coding regions of mouse Ago1, Ago2, Ago3, Ago4. The siRNAs targeting individual Ago gene transcript were cloned into recombinant adenoviral vectors using our recently established FAMSi technique, resulting in the adenoviruses designated as AdR-simAgo1, AdR-simAgo2, AdR-simAgo3 and AdR-simAgo4, respectively. (C) AdR-simAgo viruses can transduce MSCs with high efficiency. Subconfluent imBMSCs were infected with AdR-simAgo1, AdR-simAgo2, AdR-simAgo3, or AdR-simAgo4. At 48 h after infection, RFP signal was recorded. Representative images are shown. (D) AdR-simAgo vectors effectively silence the expression of respective Ago genes in MSCs. Subconfluent imBMSCs were infected with the indicated AdR-simAgo viruses, or AdRFP. At 48 h after infection, total RNA was isolated and subjected to TqPCR analysis of expression of mouse Ago1 (a), Ago2 (b), Ago3 (c), and Ago4 (d). Gapdh was used as a reference gene. Each assay was done in triplicate. ∗∗, P < 0.01 when compared with that of the AdGFP group.To further investigate the role of the Ago members in BMP9 signaling, we designed a series of siRNAs that target four Ago genes, each of which was targeted by three siRNAs (Fig. 1B). The three siRNAs (e.g., simAgo) for each Ago gene were assembled into a recombinant adenoviral vector, and the generated adenoviruses were shown to transduce MSCs with high efficiency (Fig. 1C). Quantitative qPCR analysis demonstrated that individual simAgo adenoviruses effectively silenced the expression of respective Ago genes (Fig. 1D, panels a-d).
Silencing individual Ago family members diminishes BMP9-induced early osteogenic marker ALP in MSCs
Using the AdR-simAgo adenoviruses constructed above, we analyzed the effect of individual Ago members on BMP9-induced osteogenic differentiation of MSCs. When imBMSC cells were effectively co-infected with AdR-simAgo or AdRFP, and AdBMP9 or AdGFP (Fig. 2A–D, panel a), BMP9-induced ALP activities were significantly decreased in the AdR-simAgo infection groups at the tested time points, compared with that of the AdRFP groups (Fig. 2A–D, panel b). Among the four Ago genes, silencing Ago2, and to a lesser extent, Ago3, led to the most significant reduction of BMP9-induced ALP activity in imBMSC cells, while smaller decreases in ALP activity were observed in Ago1 and Ago4 knockdown groups (Fig. 2B–b and 2C-b vs. 2A-b and 2D-b). Collectively, these findings reveal that Ago2 and Ago3 play an important role in mediating BMP9-induced osteogenic signaling in MSCs.
Figure 2
Silencing Ago expression leads to a decrease in BMP9-induced ALP activity in MSCs. Subconfluent imBMSCs were co-infected with Ad-RFP or Ad-BMP9 and AdGFP, AdR-simAgo1 (A), AdR-simAgo2 (B), AdR-simAgo3 (C), or AdR-simAgo4 (D). At 48 h post infection, GFP and RFP signals were recorded, and representative images are shown in (. At the indicated time points, ALP activity was quantitatively assessed (. Each assay condition was performed in triplicate. ∗, P < 0.05 and ∗∗, P < 0.01, compared with that of the RFP + BMP9 group at respective time points.
Silencing Ago expression leads to a decrease in BMP9-induced ALP activity in MSCs. Subconfluent imBMSCs were co-infected with Ad-RFP or Ad-BMP9 and AdGFP, AdR-simAgo1 (A), AdR-simAgo2 (B), AdR-simAgo3 (C), or AdR-simAgo4 (D). At 48 h post infection, GFP and RFP signals were recorded, and representative images are shown in (. At the indicated time points, ALP activity was quantitatively assessed (. Each assay condition was performed in triplicate. ∗, P < 0.05 and ∗∗, P < 0.01, compared with that of the RFP + BMP9 group at respective time points.
Simultaneously silencing the expression of all four Ago family members significantly diminishes BMP9-induced osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation in MSCs
To further investigate whether the Ago expression was required for BMP9-induced lineage-specific differentiation of MSCs, we sought to construct a retroviral vector expressing five siRNAs, e.g., simAgo2134, two of which target Ago2 and one each for Ago1, Ago3 and Ago4, respectively (Fig. 3A). This retroviral vector was used to establish the stable MSC line imBMSC-simAgo2134, whereas imBMSC-siControl cells were established as a control line. Quantitative qPCR analysis indicates that the expression of all four Ago members was effectively silenced in the imBMSC-simAgo2134 cells, compared with that in the control imBMSC-siControl cells (Fig. 3B).
Figure 3
Characterization of a retroviral vector that simultaneously silences the expression of all four Ago family members in MSCs. (A) Schematic depiction of the five-siRNA-containing multiplex retroviral vector pSEB-simAgo2134 and the selected siRNA sequences for individual Ago genes. The multiplex siRNA construct was accomplished by using our recently developed FAMSi system (B) Multiplex siRNA vector simAgo2134 effectively silences the expression of four Ago genes in MSCs. Retroviral stable lines imBMSC-simAgo2134 and imBMSC-siControl cells were first established. Total RNA was isolated from subconfluent imBMSC-siControl and imBMSC-simAgo2134 cells and subjected to TqPCR analysis of the expression of mouse Ago1, Ago2, Ago3, and Ago4. Each assay condition was done in triplicate. Gapdh was used as a reference gene. ∗∗, P < 0.01, compared with that of the siControl group.
Characterization of a retroviral vector that simultaneously silences the expression of all four Ago family members in MSCs. (A) Schematic depiction of the five-siRNA-containing multiplex retroviral vector pSEB-simAgo2134 and the selected siRNA sequences for individual Ago genes. The multiplex siRNA construct was accomplished by using our recently developed FAMSi system (B) Multiplex siRNA vector simAgo2134 effectively silences the expression of four Ago genes in MSCs. Retroviral stable lines imBMSC-simAgo2134 and imBMSC-siControl cells were first established. Total RNA was isolated from subconfluent imBMSC-siControl and imBMSC-simAgo2134 cells and subjected to TqPCR analysis of the expression of mouse Ago1, Ago2, Ago3, and Ago4. Each assay condition was done in triplicate. Gapdh was used as a reference gene. ∗∗, P < 0.01, compared with that of the siControl group.When these stable lines were infected with AdBMP9, both quantitative and qualitative measurements revealed that the ALP activity significantly decreased in the imBMSC-simAgo2134 cells, compared with that of the control imBMSC-siControl cells (Fig. 4A and B). Furthermore, silencing Ago expression was shown to significantly decrease BMP9-induced in vitro matrix mineralization in the imBMSC-simAgo2134 cells, compared with that of the control imBMSC-siControl cells (Fig. 4C), indicating that AGO proteins are important for both early and late stage of BMP9-induced osteogenic differentiation of MSCs. As BMP9 also induces adipogenic differentiation, we also examined whether BMP9-induced adipogenic differentiation would be impacted when the expression of the Ago genes was silenced. As shown in Fig. 4D, silencing Ago expression decreased BMP9-induced adipogenic differentiation of MSCs as revealed by Oil Red O staining.
Figure 4
Silencing the expression of the Ago family members diminishes BMP9-induced osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of MSCs. (A–C) Silencing the expression of the Ago family members diminishes BMP9-induced ALP activity and matrix mineralization in MSCs. Subconfluent imBMSC-siControl and imBMSC-Ago2134 cells were infected with AdGFP or AdBMP9. At 3, 5, and 7 days after infection, ALP activity was determined quantitatively (A) and histochemically (B). At 14, 21 days after infection, the cells were fixed and subjected to Alizarin Red S staining (C). Each assay condition was done in triplicate. Representative images are shown. ∗∗, P < 0.01, compared with that of the siControl + BMP9 group (D) Silencing Ago family members reduces BMP9-induced adipogenic differentiation of MSCs. Subconfluent imBMSC-siControl and imBMSC-Ago2134 cells were infected with AdGFP or AdBMP9. At 7 days after infection, the cells were fixed and subjected to Oil Red O staining. Representative images are shown. Each assay condition was done in triplicate.
Silencing the expression of the Ago family members diminishes BMP9-induced osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of MSCs. (A–C) Silencing the expression of the Ago family members diminishes BMP9-induced ALP activity and matrix mineralization in MSCs. Subconfluent imBMSC-siControl and imBMSC-Ago2134 cells were infected with AdGFP or AdBMP9. At 3, 5, and 7 days after infection, ALP activity was determined quantitatively (A) and histochemically (B). At 14, 21 days after infection, the cells were fixed and subjected to Alizarin Red S staining (C). Each assay condition was done in triplicate. Representative images are shown. ∗∗, P < 0.01, compared with that of the siControl + BMP9 group (D) Silencing Ago family members reduces BMP9-induced adipogenic differentiation of MSCs. Subconfluent imBMSC-siControl and imBMSC-Ago2134 cells were infected with AdGFP or AdBMP9. At 7 days after infection, the cells were fixed and subjected to Oil Red O staining. Representative images are shown. Each assay condition was done in triplicate.We further analyzed the impact of Ago silencing on the expression of the key BMP9-regulated lineage-specific transcriptional factors Runx2 (osteogenic), Sox9 (chondrogenic) and Pparγ (adipogenic) in MSCs.,, As expected, while BMP9 simulation significantly up-regulated the expression of Runx2, Sox9 and Pparγ in the imBMSC-siControl cells, compared with that of the GFP groups, silencing Ago expression effectively decreased the expression of the Runx2, Sox9 and Pparγ in the imBMSC-simAgo2134 cells, compared with that of the imBMSC-siControl cells (Fig. 5A). We further analyzed the effect of Ago silencing on the expression of common osteogenic markers and found that the BMP9-induced expression of Osx, Alp and Col1a1 was significantly reduced in the imBMSC-simAgo2134 cells, compared with that of the imBMSC-siControl cells (Fig. 5B). Collectively, these results demonstrate that silencing Ago significantly diminishes BMP9-induced lineage-specific, especially osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of MSCs.
Figure 5
Silencing Ago family members diminishes BMP9-regulated expression of osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation related genes in MSCs. Subconfluent imBMSC-siControl and imBMSC-simAgo2134 cells were infected with AdBMP9 or AdGFP. At 72 h post infection, cells were lysed, and total RNA was isolated and subjected to TqPCR analysis of the expression of MSC lineage-specific regulators including Runx2, Sox9 and Pparγ(A) and osteogenic markers including Osx2, Alp and Col1a1(B)Gapdh was used as a reference gene. Each assay condition was done in triplicate. ∗, P < 0.05 and ∗∗, P < 0.01, compared with that of the siControl group. #, P < 0.05 and ##, P < 0.01, compared with that of the GFP group.
Silencing Ago family members diminishes BMP9-regulated expression of osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation related genes in MSCs. Subconfluent imBMSC-siControl and imBMSC-simAgo2134 cells were infected with AdBMP9 or AdGFP. At 72 h post infection, cells were lysed, and total RNA was isolated and subjected to TqPCR analysis of the expression of MSC lineage-specific regulators including Runx2, Sox9 and Pparγ(A) and osteogenic markers including Osx2, Alp and Col1a1(B)Gapdh was used as a reference gene. Each assay condition was done in triplicate. ∗, P < 0.05 and ∗∗, P < 0.01, compared with that of the siControl group. #, P < 0.05 and ##, P < 0.01, compared with that of the GFP group.
Silencing Ago family members inhibits BMP9-induced ectopic bone formation in vivo
Lastly, we analyzed whether silencing Ago expression would impact BMP9-induced bone formation in vivo. Using the MSC implantation assay, we found that, upon BMP stimulation, the ectopic bony masses were slightly smaller and much softer in the imBMSC-simAgo2134 injection group, than that of the imBMSC-siControl injection group (Fig. 6A, panel a). MicroCT imaging analysis indicated that silencing Ago expression led to a significant decrease in bone mineral density and average bone volume in the imBMSC-simAgo2134 injection group, compared with that of the imBMSC-siControl injection group (Fig. 6A, panel a and b). Histologic evaluation revealed that silencing Ago expression significantly decreased mature bone formation in the imBMSC-simAgo2134 injection group, compared with that of the imBMSC-siControl injection group (Fig. 6B, panel a), which was further confirmed by Masson's Trichrome staining (Fig. 6B, panel b). Collectively, these in vivo results were supportive of the in vitro findings, strongly indicating that Ago-mediated microRNA biogenesis plays an essential role in BMP9-induced osteogenic differentiation of MSCs.
Figure 6
Silencing Ago family members attenuates BMP9-induced ectopic bone formation in vivo. (A) Subconfluent imBMSC-siControl and imBMSC-simAgo2134 cells were infected with AdBMP9 or AdGFP for 36 h and collected for subcutaneous injection into the flanks of athymic nude mice. At 3 weeks after implantation, the mice were sacrificed and ectopic bone masses were retrieved. No retrievable masses were found in the AdGFP group. Representative gross images (a) and micro-CT iso-surface 3D reconstruction (b) are shown. The average bone volumes were quantitatively analyzed by using the Amira software (c). ∗, P < 0.05, compared with that of the siControl + BMP9 group. (B) H & E and Masson's Trichrome staining. The retrieved masses were fixed, decalcified and subjected to H & E staining (a) and Masson's trichrome staining (b). Representative images are shown.
Silencing Ago family members attenuates BMP9-induced ectopic bone formation in vivo. (A) Subconfluent imBMSC-siControl and imBMSC-simAgo2134 cells were infected with AdBMP9 or AdGFP for 36 h and collected for subcutaneous injection into the flanks of athymic nude mice. At 3 weeks after implantation, the mice were sacrificed and ectopic bone masses were retrieved. No retrievable masses were found in the AdGFP group. Representative gross images (a) and micro-CT iso-surface 3D reconstruction (b) are shown. The average bone volumes were quantitatively analyzed by using the Amira software (c). ∗, P < 0.05, compared with that of the siControl + BMP9 group. (B) H & E and Masson's Trichrome staining. The retrieved masses were fixed, decalcified and subjected to H & E staining (a) and Masson's trichrome staining (b). Representative images are shown.
Discussion
We have previously demonstrated that BMP9 is not only the most potent osteogenic factor but also induces adipogenic and chondrogenic differentiation in MSCs.,,,,, Our subsequent studies revealed that BMP9 binds to ALK1/2 type I receptors and regulates a panel of downstream target genes, as well as cross-talking with several major signaling pathways in MSCs.,,24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30,,,,97, 98, 99 However, the exact mechanism through which BMP9 regulates lineage-specific differentiation of MSCs remains to be elucidated. In this study, through a comprehensive multiplex siRNA-based silencing expression analysis of both individual Ago genes, or all four Ago genes, we have demonstrated that AGO proteins are important mediators of BMP9-induced osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation in MSCs, indicating that noncoding RNAs, especially microRNAs participate in BMP9-regulated lineage commitment in MSCs.Noncoding RNAs, particularly miRNAs, have been implicated in bone formation and/or skeletal homeostasis.,,100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105 However, how noncoding RNAs or miRNAs exert their impact on osteogenesis remains to be fully investigated. In this study, we found that BMP9 up-regulated Ago1, Ago2 and Ago3 in MSCs at the immediate early stage, indicating that regulating Ago gene expression provides at least a plausible mechanism to govern miRNA biogenesis and thus regulate miRNA functions in osteogenic differentiation. Alternatively, BMP9 may regulate miRNAs that target other lncRNAs and/or signaling pathways, thus indirectly mediating BMP9 osteogenic signaling. In fact, we have recently found that upon BMP9 stimulation lncRNA H19 was upregulated in MSCs at the early stage and then decreased rapidly, followed by a gradual return to basal expression. Notably, H19 overexpression or H19 expression knockdown in MSCs interrupted BMP9-induced osteogenesis, which can be rescued by activated Notch signaling. We further revealed that H19 might modulate Notch pathway-targeting miRNAs and then indirectly impact BMP9 signaling in MSCs., It has been reported that several miRNAs, including miR-133, miR-135, miR-206, miR-141 and miR-200a, miR-208, miR-125b, miR-204, miR-26a, miR-29, miR-27 and miR-2861, regulate the BMP-mediated induction of osteoblastic differentiation. Furthermore, miRNAs may regulate osteoblast and osteoclast lineage-specific transcription factors, and orchestrate feedforward and reverse loops of signaling pathways and regulatory networks, leading to control of normal bone formation and turnover. Thus, miRNA deregulation may impact the progression of bone-related disorders including osteoporosis.,AGOs are conserved and specialized smRNA-binding proteins for miRNAs, siRNAs or PIWI-associated RNAs (i.e., piRNAs), leading to silencing target mRNAs by interacting with other factors.,, Thus, AGO proteins serve as a major component of the RISCs with small RNAs and other proteins such as Dicer, GW182 proteins, and Hsp70/Hsp90. Four AGO proteins (AGO1–4) in humans and mice are conserved at the amino acid level with 99% for AGO2, 3, and 4 and 100% for AGO1 between mouse and human. The Ago2 knockout mice were lethal during early development at post-implantation stages, whereas Ago1, 3, and 4 knockout mice are viable. Nonetheless, the phenotype of the Ago2-deficient mice compared to other RNAi-deficient mice, e.g., Dicer- or Drosha-deficient mice, is not identical, indicating distinct regulatory roles for the RNAi or RISC effectors during mouse development. In fact, emerging evidence indicates that the biological functions of AGO-associated smRNAs expand beyond the posttranscriptional regulation by miRNAs, and are implicated in transcriptional gene silencing or activation, alternative splicing, antiviral defense, genome integrity control, DNA repair, and epigenetic modifications. An early in vitro study showed that silencing DICER or DROSHA in human MSCs inhibited osteogenic differentiation. Thus, it is conceivable AGO proteins and the associated smRNAs, especially miRNAs, may play an essential role in modulating lineage commitments and tissue-specific terminal differentiation of MSCs, and bone homeostasis, although many detailed mechanisms have yet to be uncovered.In summary, we examined the potential roles of AGO proteins in BMP9-induced lineage-specific differentiation of MSCs. Using multiplex siRNA vectors to express multiple siRNAs silencing individual Ago genes or all four Ago genes, we demonstrated that the expression of Ago1, Ago2 and Ago3 was up-regulated by BMP9 in MSCs and that silencing individual Ago expression decreased BMP9-induced ALP activity in MSCs. We further demonstrated that simultaneous silencing of all four Ago genes effectively diminished osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation in MSCs, in vitro matrix mineralization, and in vivo ectopic bone formation induced by BMP9. Taken together, our results strongly suggest that AGO proteins and associated small RNA biogenesis pathway may be essential for BMP9-induced osteogenic differentiation of MSCs.
Authors contribution
HHL, TCH, LC, JY, LS and YM conceived and designed the study. YM, NN, LH, JF, HW and FH performed the experiments and collected data. QL, DS, KF, MP, WW, ABT and CC participated in molecular cloning experiments; provided essential experimental materials; and assisted in histological preparations and staining, and qPCR data analysis and interpretations. YM, LC, RRR, HHL, RCH, SHH, MJL, JY, LS and TCH drafted and revised the manuscript. All authors read, reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare no competing conflicts of interest.
Authors: Hue H Luu; Wen-Xin Song; Xiaoji Luo; David Manning; Jinyong Luo; Zhong-Liang Deng; Katie A Sharff; Anthony G Montag; Rex C Haydon; Tong-Chuan He Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Linghuan Zhang; Qing Luo; Yi Shu; Zongyue Zeng; Bo Huang; Yixiao Feng; Bo Zhang; Xi Wang; Yan Lei; Zhenyu Ye; Ling Zhao; Daigui Cao; Lijuan Yang; Xian Chen; Bin Liu; William Wagstaff; Russell R Reid; Hue H Luu; Rex C Haydon; Michael J Lee; Jennifer Moriatis Wolf; Zhou Fu; Tong-Chuan He; Quan Kang Journal: Genes Dis Date: 2019-05-08
Authors: Na Ni; Fang Deng; Fang He; Hao Wang; Deyao Shi; Junyi Liao; Yulong Zou; Hongwei Wang; Piao Zhao; Xue Hu; Connie Chen; Daniel A Hu; Maya Sabharwal; Kevin H Qin; William Wagstaff; David Qin; Bryce Hendren-Santiago; Rex C Haydon; Hue H Luu; Russell R Reid; Le Shen; Tong-Chuan He; Jiaming Fan Journal: Mol Ther Oncolytics Date: 2021-11-20 Impact factor: 7.200
Authors: Fang He; Na Ni; Hao Wang; Zongyue Zeng; Piao Zhao; Deyao Shi; Yinglin Xia; Connie Chen; Daniel A Hu; Kevin H Qin; William Wagstaff; David Qin; Bryce Hendren-Santiago; Sherwin H Ho; Rex C Haydon; Hue H Luu; Russell R Reid; Le Shen; Hua Gan; Jiaming Fan; Tong-Chuan He Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2022-02-28 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Yannian Gou; Yaguang Weng; Qian Chen; Jinghong Wu; Hao Wang; Jiamin Zhong; Yang Bi; Daigui Cao; Piao Zhao; Xiangyu Dong; Meichun Guo; William Wagstaff; Bryce Hendren-Santiago; Connie Chen; Andrew Youssef; Rex C Haydon; Hue H Luu; Russell R Reid; Le Shen; Tong-Chuan He; Jiaming Fan Journal: Bioeng Transl Med Date: 2022-03-10
Authors: Linghuan Zhang; Wenping Luo; Jiang Liu; Maozhu Xu; Qi Peng; Wenjing Zou; Jingyi You; Yi Shu; Piao Zhao; William Wagstaff; Guozhi Zhao; Kevin Qin; Rex C Haydon; Hue H Luu; Russell R Reid; Yang Bi; Tianyu Zhao; Tong-Chuan He; Zhou Fu Journal: Cell Biosci Date: 2022-09-22 Impact factor: 9.584