| Literature DB >> 34522639 |
Francyelle Borges Rosa de Moura1,2, Bruno Antonio Ferreira1,3, Simone Ramos Deconte1, Breno Costa Landim1, Allisson Benatti Justino3, Andrea Aparecida de Aro2, Foued Salmen Espindola3, Rodney Alexandre Ferreira Rodrigues4, Daniele Lisboa Ribeiro1, Fernanda de Assis Araújo1, Tatiana Carla Tomiosso1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Maytenus ilicifolia has analgesic, healing, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. This study evaluated effect of the hydroalcoholic extract of M. ilicifolia leaves on skin wound repair. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE: Wounds were induced on mice and treated with the extract. The treatment was performed daily, until day 7 after wound induction. Wound closure was measured and the features of the repaired tissue were investigated, including mast cell quantification, neutrophil and macrophage activities, collagen deposition, angiogenesis, and pro-metalloproteases and metalloproteases 2 and 9 activity (pro-MMPs and MMPs). RESULTS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Celastraceae; Collagen; Hb, Hemoglobin; Inflammation; MMP2, metalloprotease 2 active; MMP9, metalloprotease 9 active; MPO, myeloperoxidase; Medicinal plants; MiHE, Maytenus ilicifolia hydroethanolic extract; NAG, N-acetyl-beta-d-glucosaminidase; Polyphenol; Pro-MMP2, pro-metalloprotease 2; Pro-MMP9, pro-metalloprotesase 9
Year: 2021 PMID: 34522639 PMCID: PMC8427480 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2021.03.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Tradit Complement Med ISSN: 2225-4110
Description and distribution of the evaluated groups (treated groups and control group).
| Number of animals for treatment time | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Animals injured and treated with the vehicle (vaseline 70%/lanolin 30%). | 8 | 8 | |
| Animals injured and treated with | 8 | 8 | |
| Animals injured and treated with | 8 | 8 | |
| Animals injured and treated with | 8 | 8 | |
Compounds identified in MiHE by HPLC-ESI-MS/MS (negative mode).
| Compound identified | Retention time (min) | Formula [M − H]- | Mass calculated for [M − H]- | Error (ppm) | References | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Malic acid | 0.707 | C4H5O5− | 133.0142 | 133.0144 | 1.50 | 115, 114 | |
| Citric acid | 0.841 | C6H7O7− | 191.0197 | 191.0200 | 1.57 | 165, 133, 111 | |
| (Epi)gallocatechin | 4.003 | C15H13O7− | 305.0667 | 305.0666 | −0.32 | 287, 219, 203, 167, 147, 125, 109 | |
| Type B proanthocyadinin (dimer) | 4.202 | C30H25O11− | 561.1389 | 561.1397 | 1.42 | 517, 435, 289, 271, 203, 125 | |
| Type B procyanidin (dimer) | 4.419 | C30H25O12− | 577.1351 | 577.1352 | 0.17 | 451, 407, 289, 245, 205, 161, 125 | |
| Type B proanthocyanidin (trimer) | 4.735 | C45H37O16− | 833.2070 | 833.2078 | 0.96 | 707, 543, 407, 289, 125 | |
| (Epi)catechin | 5.118 | C15H13O6− | 289.0718 | 289.0720 | 0.69 | 245, 203, 151, 109 | |
| Type B proanthocyanidin (trimer) | 5.434 | C45H37O17− | 849.2026 | 849.2042 | 1.88 | 723, 559, 407, 289, 203, 125 | |
| Epiafzelechin | 5.717 | C15H13O5− | 273.0761 | 273.0772 | 4.02 | 255, 227, 205, 187, 167, 109 | |
| Quercetin-rutinoside-glucoside | 5.966 | C33H39O21− | 771.1989 | 771.1990 | 0.12 | 573, 505, 303, 301, 300, 255 | |
| Quercetin rhamnosylrutinoside | 6.166 | C33H39O20− | 755.2039 | 755.2040 | 0.13 | 609, 547, 489, 393, 301, 300, 229, 179, 103 | |
| Quercetin-glucoside | 6.915 | C12H19O12− | 463.0877 | 463.0875 | −0.43 | 343, 301, 300, 207, 151 | |
| Kaempferol-glucoside | 7.231 | C21H19O11− | 447.0933 | 447.0928 | −1.11 | 363, 327, 284, 285, 227, 151 | |
| Apigenin-glucoside-arabinoside | 7.348 | C26H27O14− | 563.1406 | 563.1402 | −0.71 | 518, 474, 430, 385, 333, 284, 181, 130 |
Fig. 1Wound closure area. (A) Graphical representation of the percentage of wound closure treated with M. ilicifolia hydroethanolic extracts at concentrations of 2% (2% MiHE), 4% (4% MiHE) and 6% (6% MiHE) and animals injured and treated with vehicle (group CO), after 3 and 7 days of treatment. (B) Macroscopic images of wound closure immediately after wound induction (day 0) and after 3 and 7 days of treatment. The results are shown as mean and standard error, statistically evaluated with One-Way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-tests (n = 8). ∗ indicates a statistically difference in relation to CO group considering p ≤ 0.05, ∗∗p ≤ 0.01 and ∗∗∗∗p ≤ 0.0001.
Fig. 2Myeloperoxidase activity (neutrophil marker) and -glucosaminidase (macrophage marker). Graphical representation of MPO (A) and NAG (B) activities in wounds after 3 and 7 days of treatment with M. ilicifolia hydroethanolic extract at concentrations of 2% (2% MiHE), 4% (4% MiHE), and 6% (6% MiHE) and treated with vehicle (CO group). The results are shown as mean and standard error, statistically evaluated with One-Way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-tests (n = 8). ∗ indicates statistically significant difference in relation to the control group considering p ≤ 0.05, ∗∗p ≤ 0.01, ∗∗∗p ≤ 0.001 and ∗∗∗∗p ≤ 0.0001.
Fig. 3Quantification of mast cells in wound areas stained with Toluidine Blue. (A) Quantification of mast cells in photomicrographs of cutaneous wounds after 3 and 7 days of treatment with M. ilicifolia hydroethanolic extract at concentrations of 2% (2% MiHE), 4% (4% MiHE) and 6% (6% MiHE) and vehicle-treated wounds (CO group). The results are shown as mean and standard error, statistically evaluated with One-Way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-tests (n = 8). ∗ indicates statistical difference in relation to the CO group considering p ≤ 0.05 and ∗∗p ≤ 0.01. (C) Photomicrograph of skin wounds stained with Toluidine Blue after the treatment with mast cells indicated by the arrows. Photomicrograph (A) represents an enlarged mast cell about the graphic and (B) the injured tissue after 7 days of treatment. The delimited area (B) showing the region where the photomicrographs were personalized Photomicrographs are presented with the following magnitudes: (B) 40x and (C) 400x.
Fig. 4Pro-MMPs and active MMPs quantification. Zymography gel and graphical representation of band densitometry of pro-MMP9 and active forms of MMP-9 after 3 (A) and 7 days (B) of treatment in CO group (animals injured and treated with vehicle) and M. ilicifolia hydroethanolic extract at concentrations of 2% (2% MiHE), 4% (4% MiHE) and 6% (6% MiHE). (C) Represents optical density from the bands obtained by the zymography gel for pro-MMP2 and active MMP2 after 3 days of treatment. The results are shown as mean and standard error, statistically evaluated with One-Way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-tests (n = 3). ∗ indicates statistically significant difference in relation to the control group considering p ≤ 0.05 and ∗∗p ≤ 0.01.
Fig. 5Quantification of hemoglobin and collagen in wounds. Graphical representation of hemoglobin (A), total collagen deposition (B), soluble collagen (C) and proportions of types I and III collagen (D). All evaluations were carried out in wounds after 3 and 7 days of treatment with M. ilicifolia hydroethanolic extract at concentrations of 2% (2% MiHE), 4% (4% MiHE) and 6% (6% MiHE) and CO group (animals injured and treated with vehicle). The results are shown as mean and standard error, statistically evaluated with One-Way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-tests (n = 8). ∗ indicates statistically significant difference in relation to the control group considering p ≤ 0.05, ∗∗p ≤ 0.01 and ∗∗∗p ≤ 0.001 and ∗∗∗∗p ≤ 0.0001.
Fig. 6Total collagen deposited on the extracellular matrix of the wound area. Photomicrograph of skin wounds stained with Sirius Red showing total collagen (B)and collagen types I and III (C) in wound of CO group (vehicle-treated wounds) and M. ilicifolia hydroethanolic extract at concentrations of 2% (2% MiHE), 4% (4% MiHE) and 6% (6% MiHE) after 3 and 7 days of treatment. In the photomicrographs shown in (C), type I collagen is observed in orange-red, while type III collagen is observed in green. The delimitation (rectangle) in the upper image (A) represents the area where the images were obtained. Photomicrographs are presented with the following magnitudes: (A) 40x, (B) and (C) 400x.