Literature DB >> 34522089

Evaluation of Post-Vaccination Symptoms of Two Common COVID-19 Vaccines Used in Abha, Aseer Region, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Mohamed Adam1, Moawia Gameraddin2, Magbool Alelyani1, Mohammad Y Alshahrani3, Awadia Gareeballah2, Irshad Ahmad4, Abdulrahman Azzawi5, Basem Komit6, Alamin Musa1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) and the Oxford-AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) COVID-19 vaccines have shown promising safety and acceptability. However, COVID-19 vaccine side effects play an essential role in public vaccine confidence. We aimed to study the side effects of these COVID-19 vaccines.
METHODS: A randomized, cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted between March and May of 2021. In total, 330 participants among the King Khalid University community in the Aseer region of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia reported their side effects following the COVID-19 vaccine. A questionnaire was designed and validated to collect the participants' demographic data and COVID-19-related symptoms after COVID-19 vaccine injection.
RESULTS: Symptoms associated with COVID-19 were reported by 226 participants (68.5%). The most common side effects reported by the participants were fever (n = 136, 41.2%), fatigue (n = 119, 36.1%), headache (n = 86, 24.2%), malaise (n = 121, 36.7%), myalgia (n = 121, 36.7%), and muscle and joint pain (n = 76, 23%). Of the participants, 5.1% became infected with COVID-19 after vaccination. Symptoms were significantly more common in males than in females (p = 0.006).
CONCLUSION: The incidence of COVID-19 vaccination side effects in the Aseer region, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, was consistent with the manufacturers' data. The most common post-vaccination symptoms reported by the participants were fever, myalgia, malaise, fatigue, muscle and joint pain, and headache. The results of this study showed significant variation in adverse events between Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines. Healthcare providers and recipients of vaccines can be more confident about the safety of Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines.
© 2021 Adam et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Oxford-AstraZeneca; Pfizer-BioNTech; side effects; symptoms; vaccines

Year:  2021        PMID: 34522089      PMCID: PMC8434920          DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S330689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence        ISSN: 1177-889X            Impact factor:   2.711


Introduction

The global influence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in increased public interest in vaccines. Mass and social media have spread awareness about vaccine importance. However, the incidence of adverse events (side effects) has caused some people to have increased concerns about getting vaccinated, delay getting vaccinated, or strongly oppose vaccination. Due to the ease and speed of the spread of COVID-19 and its infection of the majority of the world’s population, awareness of the importance of vaccination has increased.1 Various COVID-19 vaccines have exhibited effectiveness to 95% in counteracting symptomatic infections due to coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic.2 As of April 2021, 16 vaccines are authorized for public utilization by at least one or more national regulatory authorities.3 Saudi Arabia has commenced an early vaccination campaign as a continuation of its outstanding efforts and actions to control the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19.3,4 The ultimate aim of the ministry of health in Saudi Arabia is to vaccinate 70% of the population.1,5 Previously, various studies have reported mild to moderate side effects and reactions to COVID-19 vaccines.6–9 These can include mild adverse effects after the first or second doses, including redness or swelling at the injection site, pain, fatigue, fever, muscle pain, nausea, headache, vomiting, chills, and joint pain.8,9 Some side effects have been reported for both the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines; however, the occurrence of adverse effects is reported to be lower for the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine as compared to Oxford-AstraZeneca and others.10,11 This study aimed to evaluate participants’ short-term symptoms after receiving either the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA (BNT162b2) or the Oxford-AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) COVID-19 vaccine in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This study will play an important role in vaccine safety by reporting and recognizing post-vaccination symptoms. It will also be beneficial for clinicians and healthcare professionals who must be aware of potential long-term complications and enrich their knowledge about the presence of these possible complications.

Materials and Methods

Study Design and Sampling

This cross-sectional study, based on an online survey, was carried out at King Khalid University, Abha, Aseer region of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, from March to May of 2021. A questionnaire was designed with the help of an extensive literature review that elucidated the most common questions for collection of this type of data this type of study.12–14 After ethical approval from the Deanship of Research, we gave the questionnaire link to the Deanship of E-Learning. A link was displayed on the website for participants to prove that they were associated with King Khalid University. The study population consisted of participants who, during the study period, received either one or two doses of the Oxford-AstraZeneca or Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and were at least 18 years of age. Participants who did not receive any vaccination or were not vaccinated with AstraZeneca or Pfizer-BioNTech were excluded from the study. The study’s sample size was calculated using rasoft.com. As the Ministry of Health of Saudi Arabia aims to vaccinate 70% of the population (approximately 28,000 individuals), a sample size of 330 participants was sufficient to achieve 95% confidence with a 5.35% margin of error. A pilot study was performed prior to initiation of this study to ensure the reliability and validity of the questionnaire. All participants received COVID-19 vaccines during the time of the study. Data was collected using an online survey to evaluate the side effects associated with the vaccines. The survey was distributed to the participants through social media (eg, WhatsApp groups) and e-mails. Three hundred and thirty participants completed the survey (a 33% response rate).

Data Analysis and Measurement Tool

The questionnaire was designed following the COVID-19 guidelines of the Ministry of Health of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the World Health Organization,15 and it was available in two languages (English and Arabic). It collected information on participants’ socio-demographic characteristics, including gender and age, and clinical medical history (eg, diabetes mellitus and hypertension) prior to COVID-19. The other part of the questionnaire focused on COVID-19-vaccine-related data, such as the type of COVID-19 vaccine, the number of doses received, and the onset of side effects within certain time periods. The dependent variable was the frequency of symptoms (eg, fever, muscle and joint pain, redness at the injection site, myalgia, malaise, fatigue) after injection of COVID-19 vaccines. The participants’ onset of symptoms associated with the first and second vaccine doses were determined and compared. The incidence of COVID-19 after vaccination was determined from the Saudi Ministry of Health website.17 Thus, frequency and onset of side effects for two common COVID-19 vaccines were analyzed and compared.

Analysis Methods

Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics were used for qualitative data. A chi-square test (χ2) was used to compare symptoms between males and females to assess the side effects between the two types of COVID-19 vaccines. Cronbach’s α (used to assess the reliability of the questionnaire) was estimated at 0.79, indicating good reliability. P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the College of Medicine, King Khalid University given the number ECM#2021-4805. Electronic informed consent was obtained from each participant prior to completion of the questionnaire, as requested by the Research Ethics Committee at King Khalid University. All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were performed following the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committees and the Declaration of Helsinki.

Results

In total, this study included 330 participants (216 [65.5%] males and 114 [34.5%] females). The majority of participants (n = 106, 32.1%) were in the age group of 21–30 years; 77 (23.3%) were between 31 and 40 years; and 94 (28.5%) were between 41 and 50 years (Table 1). Table 1 also summarizes the clinical history of the participants; the majority (83%) declared no clinical history of any chronic diseases. Eighteen participants (5.5%) reported having hypertension, 8 (2.4%) reported having diabetes mellitus, and 8 (2.4%) reported having prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Other diseases (hypothyroidism, cardiovascular diseases, anaphylaxis asthma, and depression) were less frequent (below 1%).
Table 1

Demographic Characteristics of the Participants and Clinical History

VariablesFrequencyPercent
Gender
Males21665.5
Females11434.5
Age groups
18–20 years164.8
21–30 years10632.1
31–40 years7723.3
41–50 years9428.5
> 50 years3711.2
Total330100.0
Clinical history
No clinical history27483.0
Diabetes mellitus82.4
Hypertension185.5
Diabetes and hypertension82.4
Prior SARS-COVID-1982.4
Immune disease20.6
Hypothyroidism10.3
Hypertension and CVD10.3
Diabetes mellitus and immune disease20.6
Cardiovascular diseases10.3
History of anaphylaxis20.6
Thyroidectomy10.3
CVD with diabetes mellitus and hypertension10.3
Asthma20.6
Depression10.3
Total33017.0
Demographic Characteristics of the Participants and Clinical History Table 2 summarizes the reported side effects of first and second doses of AstraZeneca and Pfizer/BioNTech vaccines. The majority of participants (n = 226, 68.5%) reported no post-vaccination side effects of both doses (Figure 1). The most frequently reported symptoms were fever (n = 136, 41.2%), fatigue (n = 119, 36.1%), headache (n = 86, 24.2%), and muscle and joint pain (n = 76, 23%), with very few participants reporting redness at the injection site (n = 4, 1.2%) or seizures (n = 3, 0.9%) (Table 2).
Table 2

Post-Vaccination Symptoms of First and Second Doses of COVID-19 Vaccines

SymptomsFrequency (%)
Fever136 (41.2)
Muscle and joint pain76 (23)
Redness at the injection site4 (1.2)
Myalgia121 (36.71)
Malaise121 (36.71)
Fatigue119 (36.1)
Pain and swelling at the injection site65 (19.7)
Chills46 (13.9)
Headache86 (24.2)
Diarrhea20 (6.1)
Depression13 (3.9)
Muscle tone16 (4.9)
Dizziness27 (8.2)
Cough11 (3.3)
Nausea24 (7.3)
Seizures3 (0.9)
Anxiety7 (2.1)
Dyspnea11 (3.3)
Swollen lip and tongue3 (0.9)
Sore throat24 (7.3)
Anosmia4 (1.2)
Figure 1

Frequency of post-vaccination symptoms.

Post-Vaccination Symptoms of First and Second Doses of COVID-19 Vaccines Frequency of post-vaccination symptoms. Concerning the onset of symptoms following the first vs second doses of COVID-19 vaccines, most participants (n=126, 32.1%) reported no symptoms after the first dose. Most of the symptoms appeared in less than 24 hours after injection (n = 85, 25.8%) or in the first 15 minutes after injection (n = 83, 24.2%). The onset of symptoms differed significantly between the first and second vaccine doses (p < 0.001) (Table 3). Among the participants, 5.15% reported getting COVID-19 after vaccination (Figure 2). The post-vaccination symptoms were significantly higher in participants who received the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine than in those who received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine (p = 0.022) (Table 4). Notably, symptoms were significantly higher in males than in females (p = 0.006) (Figure 3).
Table 3

The Onset of Symptoms in the First Dose and Second Dose of COVID-19 Vaccines

Onset of SymptomsFirst Dose Frequency (%)Second Dose Frequency (%)χ2P-value
No symptoms after the first dose/second dose106 (32.1)70 (21.2)156.610< 0.001
< 5 minutes10 (3.0)14 (4.2)
6–10 minutes9 (2.4)3 (0.9)
11–15 minutes4 (1.2)5 (1.5)
> 15 minutes83 (25.2)32 (9.7)
<24 hours85 (25.8)1 (0.3)
< 24 hours5 (1.5)204 (61.8)
> 24 hours28 (8.5)1 (0.3)
Total330330
Figure 2

Percentage of participants who got infection with covid-19 after vaccination.

Table 4

The Onset of Adverse Events of Side Effects in the Two Common Types of COVID-19 Vaccines

Type of VaccinesPost-Vaccination SymptomsTotalχ2P-value
YesNo
Pfizer/BioNTech102 (62.6%)61 (37.4%)163 (100.0%)5.2090.022
Oxford-AstraZeneca124 (74.3%)43 (25.7%)167 (100.0%)
Total226 (68.5%)104 (31.5%)330 (100.0%)
Figure 3

Comparison of post-vaccination side effects of first and second doses between males and females.

The Onset of Symptoms in the First Dose and Second Dose of COVID-19 Vaccines The Onset of Adverse Events of Side Effects in the Two Common Types of COVID-19 Vaccines Percentage of participants who got infection with covid-19 after vaccination. Comparison of post-vaccination side effects of first and second doses between males and females. Comparison of the most common adverse events between Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines was demonstrated in Table 5. It was observed that most of the side effects were significantly higher in Oxford-AstraZeneca than Pfizer-BioNTech (P-value < 0.05). Myalgia was the only adverse event that showed no significant difference between the two COVID-19 vaccines.
Table 5

The Most Common Adverse Events of Side Effects for Pfizer and Oxford-AstraZeneca Vaccines

Side EffectsPfizerOxford-AstraZenecaP-value
Myalgia58 (47.9%)63 (52.1%)0.69
Malaise47 (38.8%)74 (61.2%)0.004
Fever46 (33.8%)90 (66.2%)> 0.001
Fatigue46 (38.7%)73 (61.3%)0.003
Muscle and joint pain27 (35.5%)49 (64.5%)0.006
Headache21 (26.3%)59 (73.8%)< 0.001
The Most Common Adverse Events of Side Effects for Pfizer and Oxford-AstraZeneca Vaccines

Discussion

Vaccines are considered the most effective intervention in public health, as they prevent and control the spread of infectious diseases, therefore reducing mortality. However, as with other drugs, reactions may occur following vaccination.16 The majority of these reactions are neither severe nor frequent. Individuals’ confidence in vaccines shows significant variation and relies on several factors, including awareness about vaccines, religious or political aspects, potential associated risks, and social and economic conditions.17 Moreover, it has been shown that people assess vaccination risks compared to other related risks differently than experts do.18 In this large-scale, community-based study in the Aseer region of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, we investigated adverse effects and infection rates following the administration of Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines. Participants reported considerable systemic adverse effects, including fever, fatigue, headache, and muscle and joint pain, but very few reported having redness at the injection site, seizures, or other symptoms. Fever was observed to be the most common symptom. These findings are consistent with other recently published results, which reported that the most common post-injection side effects for first and second doses were fever, myalgia, fatigue, injection site pain, headache, joint pain, and chills.19–22 In the present study, vaccinated individuals reported adverse effects after both doses, with the majority occurring after the second dose. These findings are highly consistent with the published results of Phase III clinical trials of second doses of COVID-19 vaccines.6,7,9,23,24 Although all COVID-19 vaccines cause similar side effects, it was found that participants who received the AstraZeneca vaccine reported significantly higher side effects than those who received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. This is in line with results of previous studies, which stated that Pfizer-BioNTech was associated with lower side effects compared to Oxford-AstraZeneca and other vaccines.11,12 Consistently, the previous published results of phase III clinical trials and the fact sheets of the vaccines, which reported post-vaccination symptoms for those who received the second dose.6,7,9,23,24 Similar findings were also reported in a recent prospective observational study performed by Menni et al.8 The present study found the incidence of post-COVID-19-vaccination side effects to be significantly more prevalent in males than in females. This finding contradicts that reported by Alhazmi et al,25 who studied the short-term side effects of COVID-19 vaccines in Saudi people and found that the incidence was higher in females than males. The higher incidence of side effects in males in our study may be attributed to the lower proportion of females in our study sample. The present study showed that many symptoms appeared within 15 minutes after injection of both vaccines. This finding is consistent with CDC guidelines, which recommend that all vaccine recipients be observed for a minimum of 15 minutes after injection; this is because it is mostly the inactive ingredients or excipients (including gelatine, egg protein, formaldehyde, neomycin, and thimerosal) that precipitate allergic reactions.26 There are concerns about whether the vaccine can cause COVID-19; however, this is not possible, as these mRNA vaccines are not developed using the live SARS-CoV-2 virus. In the present study, approximately 5.15% of vaccinated participants still contracted the virus, this is because the body takes a few weeks after vaccination to produce T-lymphocytes and B-lymphocytes. Therefore, it is possible for a person to be infected with SARS-CoV-2 just before or just after vaccination and then get sick because the vaccine did not have enough time to provide protection. These cases are called breakthrough infections. With increasing studies on the side effects of COVID-19 vaccines, public confidence in vaccine safety may improve, which would accelerate the vaccination process against COVID-19. The findings of this study are of interest to health professionals and clinicians; the results raise awareness of COVID-19 vaccine safety, effectiveness, benefits, as no severe health problems were reported. These findings provide evidence against misunderstandings and conspiracy beliefs about the post-vaccination symptoms of COVID-19 vaccines, which increase vaccine hesitancy.

Limitations

This study faced some limitations. Some participants may not have fully reported all applicable data, resulting in a reporting bias. Moreover, community-based surveys were challenging to achieve during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, the present study did not cover the whole country; it was only located in the southern Aseer region. Further studies are recommended to cover the entire Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to confirm the initial results of this study. The recommended studies of post-vaccination side effects should distinguish between side effects that emerged after the first dose, second dose, and both doses.

Conclusion

The most common post-COVID-19-vaccination side effects reported by participants who received the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines were fever, myalgia, malaise, fatigue, muscle and joint pain, and headache, with very few having seizures, anosmia, or swollen lip and tongue. Adverse events were more common in participants who received the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine than in those who received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. Further studies on vaccine safety are strongly recommended to strengthen public confidence in COVID-19 vaccines.
  20 in total

1.  Addressing the vaccine confidence gap.

Authors:  Heidi J Larson; Louis Z Cooper; Juhani Eskola; Samuel L Katz; Scott Ratzan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Reactogenicity Following Receipt of mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccines.

Authors:  Johanna Chapin-Bardales; Julianne Gee; Tanya Myers
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  COVID-19 vaccines: comparison of biological, pharmacological characteristics and adverse effects of Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna Vaccines.

Authors:  S A Meo; I A Bukhari; J Akram; A S Meo; D C Klonoff
Journal:  Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 3.507

4.  Parental perceptions surrounding risks and benefits of immunization.

Authors:  D A Gust; R Woodruff; A Kennedy; C Brown; K Sheedy; B Hibbs
Journal:  Semin Pediatr Infect Dis       Date:  2003-07

5.  Non-life-threatening adverse effects with COVID-19 mRNA-1273 vaccine: A randomized, cross-sectional study on healthcare workers with detailed self-reported symptoms.

Authors:  Renuka Ananth Kalyan Kadali; Ravali Janagama; Sharanya Peruru; Viswanath Gajula; Rajasekhar R Madathala; Nikhita Chennaiahgari; Srikrishna V Malayala
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.327

Review 6.  Preparedness and response to COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia: Building on MERS experience.

Authors:  Abdullah A Algaissi; Naif Khalaf Alharbi; Mazen Hassanain; Anwar M Hashem
Journal:  J Infect Public Health       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.718

7.  Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: an interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK.

Authors:  Merryn Voysey; Sue Ann Costa Clemens; Shabir A Madhi; Lily Y Weckx; Pedro M Folegatti; Parvinder K Aley; Brian Angus; Vicky L Baillie; Shaun L Barnabas; Qasim E Bhorat; Sagida Bibi; Carmen Briner; Paola Cicconi; Andrea M Collins; Rachel Colin-Jones; Clare L Cutland; Thomas C Darton; Keertan Dheda; Christopher J A Duncan; Katherine R W Emary; Katie J Ewer; Lee Fairlie; Saul N Faust; Shuo Feng; Daniela M Ferreira; Adam Finn; Anna L Goodman; Catherine M Green; Christopher A Green; Paul T Heath; Catherine Hill; Helen Hill; Ian Hirsch; Susanne H C Hodgson; Alane Izu; Susan Jackson; Daniel Jenkin; Carina C D Joe; Simon Kerridge; Anthonet Koen; Gaurav Kwatra; Rajeka Lazarus; Alison M Lawrie; Alice Lelliott; Vincenzo Libri; Patrick J Lillie; Raburn Mallory; Ana V A Mendes; Eveline P Milan; Angela M Minassian; Alastair McGregor; Hazel Morrison; Yama F Mujadidi; Anusha Nana; Peter J O'Reilly; Sherman D Padayachee; Ana Pittella; Emma Plested; Katrina M Pollock; Maheshi N Ramasamy; Sarah Rhead; Alexandre V Schwarzbold; Nisha Singh; Andrew Smith; Rinn Song; Matthew D Snape; Eduardo Sprinz; Rebecca K Sutherland; Richard Tarrant; Emma C Thomson; M Estée Török; Mark Toshner; David P J Turner; Johan Vekemans; Tonya L Villafana; Marion E E Watson; Christopher J Williams; Alexander D Douglas; Adrian V S Hill; Teresa Lambe; Sarah C Gilbert; Andrew J Pollard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Minor to Moderate Side Effects of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Among Saudi Residents: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Nagla A El-Shitany; Steve Harakeh; Shaimaa M Badr-Eldin; Amina M Bagher; Basma Eid; Haifa Almukadi; Badrah S Alghamdi; Ahlam A Alahmadi; Nibal A Hassan; Nariman Sindi; Samar A Alghamdi; Hailah M Almohaimeed; Zuhair M Mohammedsaleh; Turki M Al-Shaikh; Mohammed S Almuhayawi; Soad S Ali; Manal El-Hamamsy
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-04-19

9.  Evaluation of Side Effects Associated with COVID-19 Vaccines in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Alhazmi; Edrous Alamer; Dalia Daws; Mashael Hakami; Majid Darraj; Siddig Abdelwahab; Amani Maghfuri; Abdullah Algaissi
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-18

10.  Vaccine side-effects and SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination in users of the COVID Symptom Study app in the UK: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Cristina Menni; Kerstin Klaser; Anna May; Lorenzo Polidori; Joan Capdevila; Panayiotis Louca; Carole H Sudre; Long H Nguyen; David A Drew; Jordi Merino; Christina Hu; Somesh Selvachandran; Michela Antonelli; Benjamin Murray; Liane S Canas; Erika Molteni; Mark S Graham; Marc Modat; Amit D Joshi; Massimo Mangino; Alexander Hammers; Anna L Goodman; Andrew T Chan; Jonathan Wolf; Claire J Steves; Ana M Valdes; Sebastien Ourselin; Tim D Spector
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 25.071

View more
  8 in total

1.  COVID-19 vaccination, do women suffer from more side effects than men? A retrospective cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Harith Kh Al-Qazaz; Luma M Al-Obaidy; Heba M Attash
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2022-06-10

2.  Exploring COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects: A Correlational Study Using Python.

Authors:  Ferddie Quiroz Canlas; Sarachandran Nair; Isabelo D Paat
Journal:  Procedia Comput Sci       Date:  2022-04-27

3.  More Than Three-Fourths of AstraZeneca (ChAdox1 COV-19) COVID-19 Vaccinated Individuals Develop Post Immunization Adverse Event in Northwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  Atalay Goshu Muluneh; Mehari Woldemariam Merid; Kassahun Alemu Gelaye; Sewbesew Yitayih Tilahun; Nahom Worku Teshager; Aklilu Yiheyis Abereha; Kalkidan Samuel Sugamo; Mulugeta Ayalew Yimer; Getahun Molla Kassa
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 4.177

4.  Vesicular Rash Following Immunisation With BTN162b2 Messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 Vaccine: Vaccine Related or Coincidence?

Authors:  Mohd Radzniwan A Rashid; Sharifah Najwa Syed Mohamad; Anu Suria; Rokiah Shahra
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-11

5.  Prospective Evaluation of Side-Effects Following the First Dose of Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 Vaccine among Healthcare Workers in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Majid A Darraj; Hesham M Al-Mekhlafi
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-30

6.  Evaluation of Prevalence of Side-Effects Associated with Booster Dose of mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccine Among Healthcare Workers in Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Mohammad Daud Ali; Leena Zakariya Almadan; Ruba Ahmed Alghamdi; Alanood Saleh Alghamdi; Sarah Ali Almarhoon; Yousif A M Hassan; Ayaz Ahmad; Sherihan Ahmad Ghosn; Nuzhat Banu; Zainab Eltrafi
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 4.177

7.  Detection of Short-Term Side Effects of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccine: A Cross-Sectional Study in a War-Torn Country.

Authors:  Mohammed Alshakka; Najmaddin A H Hatem; Wafa Badullah; Rabab Alsakaf; Ali Rageh; Seena Abdulla Yousef; Mohamed Izham Mohamed Ibrahim
Journal:  Pragmat Obs Res       Date:  2022-08-25

8.  Reported Adverse Effects and Attitudes among Arab Populations Following COVID-19 Vaccination: A Large-Scale Multinational Study Implementing Machine Learning Tools in Predicting Post-Vaccination Adverse Effects Based on Predisposing Factors.

Authors:  Ma'mon M Hatmal; Mohammad A I Al-Hatamleh; Amin N Olaimat; Rohimah Mohamud; Mirna Fawaz; Elham T Kateeb; Omar K Alkhairy; Reema Tayyem; Mohamed Lounis; Marwan Al-Raeei; Rasheed K Dana; Hamzeh J Al-Ameer; Mutasem O Taha; Khalid M Bindayna
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.