Literature DB >> 34521111

How Selection Over Time Contributes to the Inconsistency of the Association Between Sex/Gender and Cognitive Decline Across Cognitive Aging Cohorts.

Anaïs Rouanet, Justina Avila-Rieger, Aline Dugravot, Jérémie Lespinasse, Rachel Stuckwisch, Richard Merrick, Emma Anderson, Leann Long, Catherine Helmer, Hélène Jacqmin-Gadda, Carole Dufouil, Suzanne Judd, Jennifer Manly, Séverine Sabia, Alden Gross, Cécile Proust-Lima.   

Abstract

The association between sex/gender and aging-related cognitive decline remains poorly understood because of inconsistencies in findings. Such heterogeneity could be attributable to the cognitive functions studied and study population characteristics, but also to differential selection by dropout and death between men and women. We aimed to evaluate the impact of selection by dropout and death on the association between sex/gender and cognitive decline. We first compared the statistical methods most frequently used for longitudinal data, targeting either population estimands (marginal models fitted by generalized estimating equations) or subject-specific estimands (mixed/joint models fitted by likelihood maximization) in 8 studies of aging: 6 population-based studies (the Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly (ACTIVE) Study (1996-2009), Personnes Âgées QUID (PAQUID; 1988-2014), the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study (2003-2016), the Three-City Study (Bordeaux only; 1999-2016), the Washington Heights-Inwood Community Aging Project (WHICAP; 1992-2017), and the Whitehall II Study (2007-2016)) and 2 clinic-based studies (the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI; 2004-2017) and a nationwide French cohort study, MEMENTO (2011-2016)). We illustrate differences in the estimands of the association between sex/gender and cognitive decline in selected examples and highlight the critical role of differential selection by dropout and death. Using the same estimand, we then contrast the sex/gender-cognitive decline associations across cohorts and cognitive measures suggesting a residual differential sex/gender association depending on the targeted cognitive measure (memory or animal fluency) and the initial cohort selection. We recommend focusing on subject-specific estimands in the living population for assessing sex/gender differences while handling differential selection over time.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aging cohorts; cognition; death; dropout; longitudinal models; selection; sex/gender

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34521111      PMCID: PMC9214252          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwab227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   5.363


  49 in total

1.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  The one-minute mental status examination.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Cummings
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2004-02-24       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 3.  Lifelong endocrine fluctuations and related cognitive disorders.

Authors:  M L Ancelin; K Ritchie
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.116

4.  Gender and education impact on brain aging: a general cognitive factor approach.

Authors:  Cécile Proust-Lima; Hélène Amieva; Luc Letenneur; Jean-Marc Orgogozo; Hélène Jacqmin-Gadda; Jean-François Dartigues
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2008-09

5.  Quantile regression for incomplete longitudinal data with selection by death.

Authors:  Hélène Jacqmin-Gadda; Anaïs Rouanet; Robert D Mba; Viviane Philipps; Jean-François Dartigues
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 3.021

6.  To What Extent Does Age at Death Account for Sex Differences in Rates of Mortality From Alzheimer Disease?

Authors:  Rachel F Buckley; Michael Waller; Colin L Masters; Annette Dobson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 7.  How to investigate and adjust for selection bias in cohort studies.

Authors:  Ellen A Nohr; Zeyan Liew
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study.

Authors:  M G Marmot; G D Smith; S Stansfeld; C Patel; F North; J Head; I White; E Brunner; A Feeney
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-06-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Female advantage in verbal memory: Evidence of sex-specific cognitive reserve.

Authors:  Erin E Sundermann; Pauline M Maki; Leah H Rubin; Richard B Lipton; Susan Landau; Anat Biegon
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 10.  Guidelines for reporting methodological challenges and evaluating potential bias in dementia research.

Authors:  Jennifer Weuve; Cécile Proust-Lima; Melinda C Power; Alden L Gross; Scott M Hofer; Rodolphe Thiébaut; Geneviève Chêne; M Maria Glymour; Carole Dufouil
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 21.566

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Relative Importance of Vascular Risk Factors on Early Cognitive Aging Varies Only Slightly Between Men and Women.

Authors:  Nadine Bonberg; Niklas Wulms; Klaus Berger; Heike Minnerup
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 5.750

2.  The Influence of Alcohol Consumption, Depressive Symptoms and Sleep Duration on Cognition: Results from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Tianyue Guan; Chao Zhang; Xuanmin Zou; Chen Chen; Li Zhou; Xiaochang Wu; Jiahu Hao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 4.614

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.