OBJECTIVE: Carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) is an emerging radiation technique with advantageous physical and radiobiologic properties compared to conventional radiotherapy (RT) providing better response in case of radioresistant and hypoxic tumors. Our aim is to critically review if functional imaging techniques could play a role in predicting outcome of CIRT-treated tumors, as already proven for conventional RT. METHODS: 14 studies, concerning Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Positron Emission Tomography (PET), were selected after a comprehensive search on multiple electronic databases from January 2000 to March 2020. RESULTS: MRI studies (n = 5) focused on diffusion-weighted MRI and, even though quantitative parameters were the same in all studies (apparent diffusion coefficient, ADC), results were not univocal, probably due to different imaging acquisition protocols and tumoral histology. For PET studies (n = 9), different tracers were used such as [18F]FDG and other uncommon tracers ([11C]MET, [18F]FLT), with a relevant heterogeneity regarding parameters used for outcome assessment. CONCLUSION: No conclusion can be drawn on the predictive value of functional imaging in CIRT-treated tumors. A standardization of image acquisition, multi-institutional large trials and external validations are needed in order to establish the prognostic value of functional imaging in CIRT and to guide clinical practice. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Emerging studies focused on functional imaging's role in predicting CIRT outcome. Due to the heterogeneity of images acquisition and studies, results are conflicting and prospective large studies with imaging standardized protocol are needed.
OBJECTIVE: Carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) is an emerging radiation technique with advantageous physical and radiobiologic properties compared to conventional radiotherapy (RT) providing better response in case of radioresistant and hypoxic tumors. Our aim is to critically review if functional imaging techniques could play a role in predicting outcome of CIRT-treated tumors, as already proven for conventional RT. METHODS: 14 studies, concerning Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Positron Emission Tomography (PET), were selected after a comprehensive search on multiple electronic databases from January 2000 to March 2020. RESULTS: MRI studies (n = 5) focused on diffusion-weighted MRI and, even though quantitative parameters were the same in all studies (apparent diffusion coefficient, ADC), results were not univocal, probably due to different imaging acquisition protocols and tumoral histology. For PET studies (n = 9), different tracers were used such as [18F]FDG and other uncommon tracers ([11C]MET, [18F]FLT), with a relevant heterogeneity regarding parameters used for outcome assessment. CONCLUSION: No conclusion can be drawn on the predictive value of functional imaging in CIRT-treated tumors. A standardization of image acquisition, multi-institutional large trials and external validations are needed in order to establish the prognostic value of functional imaging in CIRT and to guide clinical practice. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Emerging studies focused on functional imaging's role in predicting CIRT outcome. Due to the heterogeneity of images acquisition and studies, results are conflicting and prospective large studies with imaging standardized protocol are needed.
Authors: Michael Baumann; Mechthild Krause; Jens Overgaard; Jürgen Debus; Søren M Bentzen; Juliane Daartz; Christian Richter; Daniel Zips; Thomas Bortfeld Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2016-03-18 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: Sungheon Kim; Laurie Loevner; Harry Quon; Eric Sherman; Gregory Weinstein; Alex Kilger; Harish Poptani Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-02-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Albert J S Idema; Aswin L Hoffmann; Hieronymus D Boogaarts; Esther G C Troost; Pieter Wesseling; Arend Heerschap; Winette T A van der Graaf; J Andre Grotenhuis; Wim J G Oyen Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2012-10-17 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Pierluigi Bonomo; A Merlotti; E Olmetto; A Bianchi; I Desideri; A Bacigalupo; P Franco; C Franzese; E Orlandi; L Livi; S Caini Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-06-09 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Oliver J Gurney-Champion; Faisal Mahmood; Marcel van Schie; Robert Julian; Ben George; Marielle E P Philippens; Uulke A van der Heide; Daniela Thorwarth; Kathrine R Redalen Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2020-02-27 Impact factor: 6.280