| Literature DB >> 34519960 |
Nicolas G Bazan1, Madigan M Reid2, Valerie A Cruz Flores2,3, Juan E Gallo4,5, William Lewis2, Ludmila Belayev2.
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most invasive type of glial tumor with poor overall survival, despite advances in surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiation. One of the main challenges in treating GBM is related to the tumor's location, complex and heterogeneous biology, and high invasiveness. To meet the demand for oxygen and nutrients, growing tumors induce new blood vessels growth. Antibodies directed against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which promotes angiogenesis, have been developed to limit tumor growth. Bevacizumab (Avastin), an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody, is the first approved angiogenesis inhibitor with therapeutic promise. However, it has limited efficacy, likely due to adaptive mutations in GBM, leading to overall survival compared to the standard of care in GBM patients. Molecular connections between angiogenesis, inflammation, oxidative stress pathways, and the development of gliomas have been recognized. Improvement in treatment outcomes for patients with GBM requires a multifaceted approach due to the converging dysregulation of signaling pathways. While most GBM clinical trials focus on "anti-angiogenic" modalities, stimulating inflammation resolution is a novel host-centric therapeutic avenue. The selective therapeutic possibilities for targeting the tumor microenvironment, specifically angiogenic and inflammatory pathways expand. So, a combination of agents aiming to interfere with several mechanisms might be beneficial to improve outcomes. Our approach might also be combined with other therapies to enhance sustained effectiveness. Here, we discuss Suramab (anti-angiogenic), LAU-0901 (a platelet-activating factor receptor antagonist), Elovanoid (ELV; a novel lipid mediator), and their combination as potential alternatives to contain GBM growth and invasiveness.Entities:
Keywords: Glioma; Lipid mediators; Oncology; Platelet-activating factor; Suramin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34519960 PMCID: PMC8556176 DOI: 10.1007/s10555-021-09987-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Metastasis Rev ISSN: 0167-7659 Impact factor: 9.264
Fig. 1Diagram depicting characteristics of glioblastoma and potentially novel therapeutics. Glioblastomas comprise multiple cell types: microglia, astrocytes, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells facilitating tumor progression. Cytokines released by glioma cells recruit immune cells into the tumor microenvironment, inducing pro-inflammatory signaling. Inflammatory signaling elicits pro-tumor activity allowing cells to evade immune cells contributing to tumor progression. Increased growth factor and platelet-activating factor (PAF) secretion from surrounding and glioma cells and their ability to evade growth factor suppressors contribute to the tumor’s proliferative and invasive nature. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a critical growth factor for blood vessel formation in glioblastoma. Inhibition of inflammatory signaling molecules IL-1β, IL-6, and TNFα by elovanoids (ELVs) and inhibition of growth factor and PAF activity by Suramab and LAU-0901 reduces tumor proliferation and migration. Suramab and ELV also reduce blood vessel formation through inhibition of VEGF. Representative bioluminescent images of the brain tumors after implantation of the luciferase modified U87MG cells from all experimental groups on day 30. The intensity of light emission corresponding to tumor burden is represented by a colorimetric scale, where red indicates the highest radiance and blue/violet shows the least. There was progressive and rapid tumor growth in the saline group. In contrast, mice treated with LAU-0901, Suramab, ELV, ELV + Suramab, and LAU-0901 + Suramab showed reduced tumor growth compared to vehicle-treated mice