| Literature DB >> 34519922 |
Hagar Elkafrawy1,2, Radwa Mehanna2,3, Fayrouz Ali1, Ayman Barghash1, Iman Dessouky1, Fredrik Jernerén4,5, Cheryl Turner4, Helga Refsum4,6, Amany Elshorbagy7,8.
Abstract
Plasma cysteine is associated with human obesity, but it is unknown whether this is mediated by reduced, disulfide (cystine and mixed-disulfides) or protein-bound (bCys) fractions. We investigated which cysteine fractions are associated with adiposity in vivo and if a relevant fraction influences human adipogenesis in vitro. In the current study, plasma cysteine fractions were correlated with body fat mass in 35 adults. Strong positive correlations with fat mass were observed for cystine and mixed disulfides (r ≥ 0.61, P < 0.001), but not the quantitatively major form, bCys. Primary human preadipocytes were differentiated in media containing cystine concentrations varying from 10-50 μM, a range similar to that in plasma. Increasing extracellular cystine (10-50 μM) enhanced mRNA expression of PPARG2 (to sixfold), PPARG1, PLIN1, SCD1 and CDO1 (P = 0.042- < 0.001). Adipocyte lipid accumulation and lipid-droplet size showed dose-dependent increases from lowest to highest cystine concentrations (P < 0.001), and the malonedialdehyde/total antioxidant capacity increased, suggesting increased oxidative stress. In conclusion, increased cystine concentrations, within the physiological range, are positively associated with both fat mass in healthy adults and human adipogenic differentiation in vitro. The potential role of cystine as a modifiable factor regulating human adipocyte turnover and metabolism deserves further study.Entities:
Keywords: Adipogenesis; BMI; Cystine; Obesity; Sulfur amino acids
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34519922 PMCID: PMC8521515 DOI: 10.1007/s00726-021-03071-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Amino Acids ISSN: 0939-4451 Impact factor: 3.520
Population characteristics and plasma sulfur amino acid and thiol profile
| Men ( | Women ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 28.0 (25.5, 32.0) | 29.0 (24.5, 32.5) |
| BMI | 29.7 (25.4, 32.5) | 27.21 (22.21, 33.51) |
| Overweight, BMI 25–29.9 (% of participants) | 33 | 25 |
| Obese, BMI ≥ 30 (% of participants) | 42 | 33 |
| Fat-free mass (kg) | 61.1 (53.4, 62.7) | 41.3 (35.9, 46.5)* |
| Fat mass (kg) | 24.8 (19.8, 34.2) | 30.2 (21.8, 41.9)* |
| Body fat (%) | 30.2 (24.0, 37.9) | 41.3 (35.8, 49.9)* |
| Waist/hip ratio | 0.92 (0.90, 0.96) | 0.95 (0.87, 1.03) |
| Plasma variables | ||
| Total cysteine (µmol/L) | 252 (233, 279) | 258 (224, 278) |
| Reduced cysteine (µmol/L) | 6.1 (4.95, 7.7) | 5.3 (4.0, 6.9) |
| Cystine (µmol/L) | 41.4 (36.2, 46.7) | 40.3 (30.9, 48.2) |
| Mixed cysteine disulfides (µmol/L) | 53.2 (47.8, 62.6) | 51.1 (39.4, 57.9) |
| Bound cysteine (µmol/L) | 155 (135, 164) | 159 (130, 181) |
| Total homocysteine (µmol/L) | 9.45 (8.50, 10.65) | 7.80 (6.90, 9.35) |
| Free homocysteine (µmol/L) | 1.70 (1.55, 1.95) | 1.50 (1.20, 1.90) |
| Total glutathione (µmol/L) | 8.62 (6.96, 9.32) | 6.6 (5.95, 8.65)* |
| Reduced glutathione (µmol/L) | 4.20 (3.55, 4.85) | 3.30 (2.40, 4.10) |
| Free glutathione (µmol/L) | 6.90 (5.80, 7.45) | 5.30 (4.40, 6.50)* |
| Methionine (µmol/L) | 25.2(22.4, 26.6) | 20.2(17.4, 22.3)* |
| S-adenosyl methionine (nmol/L) | 65.6 (58.9, 76.4) | 66.4 (57.4, 77.5) |
| S-adenosyl homocysteine (nmol/L) | 34.7 (25.6, 43.7) | 25.1 (19.8, 39.2) |
| Cystathionine (nmol/L) | 126 (110, 138) | 92.8 (75.8, 111)* |
| Taurine (µmol/L) | 91 (68, 128) | 82 (59, 116) |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 4.00 (3.75, 4.35) | 4.10 (3.90, 4.20) |
| Total protein (g/dL) | 6.90 (6.45, 7.25) | 7.05 (6.65, 7.55) |
Data are presented as median (25th, 75th percentile) or %, and compared by Mann–Whitney U test or Pearson’s X2 test
*P < 0.05 vs men
Fig. 1Correlation of different plasma cysteine species with age and fat mass. A–E Scatterplots and unadjusted Spearman correlation coefficients for the relation of different cysteine forms in fasting plasma with body total fat mass in adults; N = 35. F Partial correlations (Spearman) of cysteine forms with fat mass after adjustment for age, gender and fat-free mass (black bars) and with age after adjustment for gender (grey bars)
Fig. 2Schematic diagram of the timescale of the differentiation protocol (top) and outcome measures (bottom) of the human preadipocyte differentiation study (timepoints not to scale). SVF stromal vascular fraction. For details see Methods “In vitro study”
Fig. 3Relative mRNA expression of adipogenic genes and the cysteine catabolic enzyme cysteine dioxygenase1 (CDO1) on day 0 and day 4. Human preadipocytes were harvested on day 0 or differentiated in 10, 15, 30, or 50 μM cystine and harvested on day 4, then subjected to RT-qPCR testing. Results are presented as mean ± SEM from 5 independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. Bars not sharing the same letter are significantly different (P ˂0.05)
Fig. 4Lipid accumulation, cell viability and oxidative stress in differentiated mature adipocytes under ascending cystine concentrations of 10–50 μM. A Representative images of Oil Red O staining for lipid content in human adipocytes under varying cystine concentrations as shown; day 8 (magnification 200×; scale bar denotes 100 µm). B Quantification of the lipid-stained area on day 8. C Average lipid droplet size in differentiated adipocytes (B and C are based on 5 digital images/cystine concentration from three independent experiments, analysed using Fiji image analysis software (NIH, Bethesda, USA). D Cell viability of differentiated adipocytes assessed by the MTT assay. E Malonedialdehyde/total antioxidant capacity (MDA/TAC) oxidative stress index in culture media collected on day 0 and day 8 of differentiation. Results are mean ± SEM from 3–5 independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. Bars not sharing the same letter are significantly different (P ˂0.05)