Michael A Schwarzschild1,2, Alberto Ascherio3, Cindy Casaceli4, Gary C Curhan5, Rebecca Fitzgerald6, Cornelia Kamp4, Codrin Lungu7, Eric A Macklin2,8, Kenneth Marek9, Dariush Mozaffarian10,11, David Oakes4, Alice Rudolph4, Ira Shoulson12, Aleksandar Videnovic2, Burton Scott13, Lisa Gauger14, Jason Aldred15,16, Melissa Bixby15, Jill Ciccarello15, Steven A Gunzler17, Claire Henchcliffe18,19, Matthew Brodsky20, Kellie Keith20, Robert A Hauser21, Christopher Goetz22, Mark S LeDoux23, Vanessa Hinson24, Rajeev Kumar25, Alberto J Espay26, Joohi Jimenez-Shahed27, Christine Hunter28, Chadwick Christine29, Aaron Daley29, Maureen Leehey30, J Antonelle de Marcaida31, Joseph Harold Friedman32, Albert Hung2, Grace Bwala2, Irene Litvan33, David K Simon34, Tanya Simuni35, Cynthia Poon35, Mya C Schiess36, Kelvin Chou37, Ariane Park38, Danish Bhatti39, Carolyn Peterson39, Susan R Criswell40, Liana Rosenthal41, Jennifer Durphy42, Holly A Shill43,44, Shyamal H Mehta45, Anwar Ahmed46, Andres F Deik47, John Y Fang48, Natividad Stover49, Lin Zhang50, Richard B Dewey51, Ashley Gerald51, James T Boyd52, Emily Houston53, Valerie Suski54, Sherri Mosovsky54, Leslie Cloud55, Binit B Shah56, Marie Saint-Hilaire57, Raymond James58, Sarah Elizabeth Zauber59, Stephen Reich60, David Shprecher43,44, Rajesh Pahwa61, April Langhammer61, Kathrin LaFaver35, Peter A LeWitt62, Patricia Kaminski62, John Goudreau63, Doozie Russell63, David J Houghton64, Ashley Laroche65, Karen Thomas66, Martha McGraw67, Zoltan Mari68, Carmen Serrano69, Karen Blindauer70, Marcie Rabin71, Roger Kurlan71, John C Morgan72, Michael Soileau73,74, Melissa Ainslie75, Ivan Bodis-Wollner76, Ruth B Schneider4, Cheryl Waters77, Amber Servi Ratel77, Christopher A Beck78, Patrick Bolger4, Katherine F Callahan2, Grace F Crotty2, David Klements2, Melissa Kostrzebski4, Gearoid Michael McMahon5, Lindsay Pothier2, Sushrut S Waikar57,58, Anthony Lang79,80, Tiago Mestre81. 1. Mass General Institute for Neurodegenerative Disease, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. 3. Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. University of Rochester, Rochester, New York. 5. Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Parkinson's Foundation Research Advocates, Parkinson's Foundation, New York, New York. 7. Division of Clinical Research, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, Maryland. 8. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 9. Institute for Neurodegenerative Disorders, New Haven, Connecticut. 10. Tufts School of Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 11. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Boston, Massachusetts. 12. Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York. 13. Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. 14. Duke Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 15. Inland Northwest Research, Spokane, Washington. 16. Selkirk Neurology, Spokane, Washington. 17. University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio. 18. University of California, Irvine. 19. Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York. 20. Oregon Health & Science University, Portland. 21. University of South Florida, Tampa. 22. Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois. 23. Veracity Neuroscience LLC, Memphis, Tennessee. 24. Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston. 25. Rocky Mountain Movement Disorders Center, Englewood, Colorado. 26. University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio. 27. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York. 28. Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. 29. University of California, San Francisco. 30. University of Colorado, Denver. 31. Ayer Neuroscience Institute, Hartford HealthCare, Hartford, Connecticut. 32. Butler Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island. 33. University of California, San Diego. 34. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 35. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. 36. The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston McGovern Medical School, Houston. 37. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 38. The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus. 39. University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha. 40. Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri. 41. Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 42. Albany Medical College, Albany, New York. 43. Banner Sun Health Research Institute, Sun City, Arizona. 44. University of Arizona School of Medicine-Phoenix. 45. Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale. 46. Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. 47. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 48. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 49. The University of Alabama at Birmingham. 50. UC Davis, Davis, California. 51. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas. 52. University of Vermont, Burlington. 53. University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington. 54. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 55. VCU Parkinson's & Movement Disorders Center, Richmond, Virginia. 56. University of Virginia, Charlottesville. 57. Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts. 58. Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 59. Indiana University, Bloomington. 60. University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore. 61. University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City. 62. Henry Ford Hospital-West Bloomfield, West Bloomfield Township, Michigan. 63. Michigan State University, East Lansing. 64. Ochsner Medical Center, Jefferson, Louisiana. 65. Ochsner Health System, Jefferson, Louisiana. 66. Sentara Neurology Specialists, Norfolk, Virginia. 67. Center for Movement Disorders and Neurodegenerative Disease, Northwestern Medicine/Central DuPage Hospital, Winfield, Illinois. 68. Cleveland Clinic-Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada. 69. University of Puerto Rico, San Juan. 70. Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. 71. Atlantic Neuroscience Institute, Summit, New Jersey. 72. Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia. 73. Texas Movement Disorder Specialists, Georgetown. 74. Scott & White Healthcare/Texas A&M University, Temple. 75. Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, Texas. 76. State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn. 77. Columbia University, New York, New York. 78. University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York. 79. University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 80. Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 81. University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
Importance: Urate elevation, despite associations with crystallopathic, cardiovascular, and metabolic disorders, has been pursued as a potential disease-modifying strategy for Parkinson disease (PD) based on convergent biological, epidemiological, and clinical data. Objective: To determine whether sustained urate-elevating treatment with the urate precursor inosine slows early PD progression. Design, Participants, and Setting: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial of oral inosine treatment in early PD. A total of 587 individuals consented, and 298 with PD not yet requiring dopaminergic medication, striatal dopamine transporter deficiency, and serum urate below the population median concentration (<5.8 mg/dL) were randomized between August 2016 and December 2017 at 58 US sites, and were followed up through June 2019. Interventions: Inosine, dosed by blinded titration to increase serum urate concentrations to 7.1-8.0 mg/dL (n = 149) or matching placebo (n = 149) for up to 2 years. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was rate of change in the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS; parts I-III) total score (range, 0-236; higher scores indicate greater disability; minimum clinically important difference of 6.3 points) prior to dopaminergic drug therapy initiation. Secondary outcomes included serum urate to measure target engagement, adverse events to measure safety, and 29 efficacy measures of disability, quality of life, cognition, mood, autonomic function, and striatal dopamine transporter binding as a biomarker of neuronal integrity. Results: Based on a prespecified interim futility analysis, the study closed early, with 273 (92%) of the randomized participants (49% women; mean age, 63 years) completing the study. Clinical progression rates were not significantly different between participants randomized to inosine (MDS-UPDRS score, 11.1 [95% CI, 9.7-12.6] points per year) and placebo (MDS-UPDRS score, 9.9 [95% CI, 8.4-11.3] points per year; difference, 1.26 [95% CI, -0.59 to 3.11] points per year; P = .18). Sustained elevation of serum urate by 2.03 mg/dL (from a baseline level of 4.6 mg/dL; 44% increase) occurred in the inosine group vs a 0.01-mg/dL change in serum urate in the placebo group (difference, 2.02 mg/dL [95% CI, 1.85-2.19 mg/dL]; P<.001). There were no significant differences for secondary efficacy outcomes including dopamine transporter binding loss. Participants randomized to inosine, compared with placebo, experienced fewer serious adverse events (7.4 vs 13.1 per 100 patient-years) but more kidney stones (7.0 vs 1.4 stones per 100 patient-years). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients recently diagnosed as having PD, treatment with inosine, compared with placebo, did not result in a significant difference in the rate of clinical disease progression. The findings do not support the use of inosine as a treatment for early PD. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02642393.
Importance: Urate elevation, despite associations with crystallopathic, cardiovascular, and metabolic disorders, has been pursued as a potential disease-modifying strategy for Parkinson disease (PD) based on convergent biological, epidemiological, and clinical data. Objective: To determine whether sustained urate-elevating treatment with the urate precursor inosine slows early PD progression. Design, Participants, and Setting: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial of oral inosine treatment in early PD. A total of 587 individuals consented, and 298 with PD not yet requiring dopaminergic medication, striatal dopamine transporter deficiency, and serum urate below the population median concentration (<5.8 mg/dL) were randomized between August 2016 and December 2017 at 58 US sites, and were followed up through June 2019. Interventions: Inosine, dosed by blinded titration to increase serum urate concentrations to 7.1-8.0 mg/dL (n = 149) or matching placebo (n = 149) for up to 2 years. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was rate of change in the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS; parts I-III) total score (range, 0-236; higher scores indicate greater disability; minimum clinically important difference of 6.3 points) prior to dopaminergic drug therapy initiation. Secondary outcomes included serum urate to measure target engagement, adverse events to measure safety, and 29 efficacy measures of disability, quality of life, cognition, mood, autonomic function, and striatal dopamine transporter binding as a biomarker of neuronal integrity. Results: Based on a prespecified interim futility analysis, the study closed early, with 273 (92%) of the randomized participants (49% women; mean age, 63 years) completing the study. Clinical progression rates were not significantly different between participants randomized to inosine (MDS-UPDRS score, 11.1 [95% CI, 9.7-12.6] points per year) and placebo (MDS-UPDRS score, 9.9 [95% CI, 8.4-11.3] points per year; difference, 1.26 [95% CI, -0.59 to 3.11] points per year; P = .18). Sustained elevation of serum urate by 2.03 mg/dL (from a baseline level of 4.6 mg/dL; 44% increase) occurred in the inosine group vs a 0.01-mg/dL change in serum urate in the placebo group (difference, 2.02 mg/dL [95% CI, 1.85-2.19 mg/dL]; P<.001). There were no significant differences for secondary efficacy outcomes including dopamine transporter binding loss. Participants randomized to inosine, compared with placebo, experienced fewer serious adverse events (7.4 vs 13.1 per 100 patient-years) but more kidney stones (7.0 vs 1.4 stones per 100 patient-years). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients recently diagnosed as having PD, treatment with inosine, compared with placebo, did not result in a significant difference in the rate of clinical disease progression. The findings do not support the use of inosine as a treatment for early PD. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02642393.
Authors: Kelly Claire Simon; Shirley Eberly; Xiang Gao; David Oakes; Caroline M Tanner; Ira Shoulson; Stanley Fahn; Michael A Schwarzschild; Alberto Ascherio Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2014-10-03 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Michael A Schwarzschild; Eric A Macklin; Rachit Bakshi; Shamik Battacharyya; Robert Logan; Alberto J Espay; Albert Y Hung; Grace Bwala; Christopher G Goetz; David S Russell; John L Goudreau; Sotirios A Parashos; Marie H Saint-Hilaire; Alice Rudolph; Joshua M Hare; Gary C Curhan; Alberto Ascherio Journal: Neurology Date: 2019-09-04 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Michael A Schwarzschild; Steven R Schwid; Kenneth Marek; Arthur Watts; Anthony E Lang; David Oakes; Ira Shoulson; Alberto Ascherio; Christopher Hyson; Emily Gorbold; Alice Rudolph; Karl Kieburtz; Stanley Fahn; Lisa Gauger; Christopher Goetz; John Seibyl; Misser Forrest; John Ondrasik Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2008-04-14
Authors: Alberto Ascherio; Peter A LeWitt; Kui Xu; Shirley Eberly; Arthur Watts; Wayne R Matson; Connie Marras; Karl Kieburtz; Alice Rudolph; Mikhail B Bogdanov; Steven R Schwid; Marsha Tennis; Caroline M Tanner; M Flint Beal; Anthony E Lang; David Oakes; Stanley Fahn; Ira Shoulson; Michael A Schwarzschild Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2009-12
Authors: Serge Guerreiro; Aurélie Ponceau; Damien Toulorge; Elodie Martin; Daniel Alvarez-Fischer; Etienne C Hirsch; Patrick P Michel Journal: J Neurochem Date: 2009-03-19 Impact factor: 5.372
Authors: Demis A Kia; Alastair J Noyce; Jon White; Doug Speed; Aude Nicolas; Stephen Burgess; Debbie A Lawlor; George Davey Smith; Andrew Singleton; Mike A Nalls; Reecha Sofat; Nicholas W Wood Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Alex Page; Norman Yung; Peggy Auinger; Charles Venuto; Alistair Glidden; Eric Macklin; Larsson Omberg; Michael A Schwarzschild; E Ray Dorsey Journal: Digit Biomark Date: 2022-01-10
Authors: Haotian Zou; Varun Aggarwal; Glenn T Stebbins; Martijn L T M Müller; Jesse M Cedarbaum; Anne Pedata; Diane Stephenson; Tanya Simuni; Sheng Luo Journal: CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol Date: 2022-08-09
Authors: Richard J Johnson; Laura G Sánchez-Lozada; Takahiko Nakagawa; Bernardo Rodriguez-Iturbe; Dean Tolan; Eric A Gaucher; Peter Andrews; Miguel A Lanaspa Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2022-10 Impact factor: 9.298
Authors: Chen Dong; Chandrashekhar Honrao; Leonardo O Rodrigues; Josephine Wolf; Keri B Sheehan; Matthew Surface; Roy N Alcalay; Elizabeth M O'Day Journal: Metabolites Date: 2022-02-05