Literature DB >> 34518346

Reflecting on my experience after coronary artery bypass grafting.

J Joel Jeffries1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34518346      PMCID: PMC8443276          DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.79961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


× No keyword cloud information.
I am prompted to respond to the CMAJ article “Management of Patients After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: A Guide for Primary Care Practitioners.”1 I compared my own experience 14 months ago, when I had double bypass surgery, with the typical outcomes detailed in the article. I was not readmitted within 30 days, as occurs in patients older than 80 years (I was 81). I did not develop cardiac tamponade, which occurs in 1%–12.6% of patients. I did not have a perioperative myocardial infarction, which occurs in 0.6%–19% of patients. I have not had a graft occlusion, which occurs in 2%–5% of patients per annum. I did not develop pneumonia, which occurs in 2.4% of patients. I did not have any cognitive dysfunction, which affects 50%–70% of patients. I did not develop depression, euphoria or anxiety. I did not have postoperative delirium, which affects 73% of patients. I did not develop kidney dysfunction, which affects 30% of patients. I did not develop atrial fibrillation, which affects 30% of patients. Not seeing a general practitioner (GP) within 30 days is associated with 5 times worse outcomes. I did not get to see my GP within 30 days because of the COVID-19 pandemic, and have not seen her yet, although I have had the best possible care by telephone. It therefore appears that my outcome was remarkably good, for which I am very thankful. Two factors may have helped: for an electrophysiology study, I was kept in hospital an extra 4 days; then, for 5 days, I had phone access to a skilled nurse practitioner. This leads me to 2 reflections. I am happy I was not aware of the possible outcomes described in the article, as I would have been full of trepidation. I actually had complications not mentioned by the authors in their literature review, which focused on dire outcomes. These were as follows: Pain on coughing or sneezing which, I was informed, might have been a result of minor cracks in my ribs. Dehiscence of a leg wound — the site of harvest of my left saphenous vein graft, which took 4 months to heal. Electric shock feelings in the lower left leg, which went on for 9 months and were attributed to nerves being cut during the saphenous harvesting. Swelling of the lower left leg, which I am told is permanent, although now minimal. Feelings of light-headedness when walking; it was discovered I had developed iron-deficiency anemia. Thus, I have 4 suggestions: Coronary artery bypass grafting has a very complex recovery period and the GP should have ongoing, rapid access to the cardiologist and surgeon. Although surgeons have a legal responsibility to inform patients of potential risks, carrying out that responsibility in detail may have negative impact and should be done cautiously. Postoperative hospital stays should be at least a week. During the first week after discharge, there should be daily follow-up by phone with the cardiology team.
  1 in total

Review 1.  Management of patients after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a guide for primary care practitioners.

Authors:  Dominique de Waard; Andrew Fagan; Christo Minnaar; David Horne
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 8.262

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.