Literature DB >> 34517167

Comparison of phosphonate, hydroxypropyl and carboxylate pendants in Fe(III) macrocyclic complexes as MRI contrast agents.

Elizabeth A Kras1, Samira M Abozeid2, Waldine Eduardo1, Joseph A Spernyak3, Janet R Morrow4.   

Abstract

Fe(III) macrocyclic complexes containing a macrocycle and three pendant groups including phosphonate (NOTP =1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triyl-tris(methylenephosphonic acid), carboxylate (NOTA = 1,4,7 - triazacyclononane - N,N',N″ - triacetate) or hydroxypropyl (NOHP =(2S,2'S,2"S)-1,1',1″-(1,4,7-triazonane-1,4,7-triyl)tris(propan-2-ol)) were studied in order to compare the effect of these donor groups on solution chemistry and water proton relaxivity. All three complexes, Fe(NOTP), Fe(NOHP) and Fe(NOTA), display a large degree of kinetic inertness to dissociation in the presence of phosphate and carbonate, under acidic conditions of 100 mM HCl or 1 M HCl or to trans-metalation with Zn(II). The r1 proton relaxivity of the complexes at 1.4 T, 33 °C is compared over the pH range of 1 to 10. At pH 7.4, 33 °C, 1.4 T, Fe(NOHP) has the largest relaxivity (1.5 mM-1 s-1), Fe(NOTP) is second at 1.0 mM-1 s-1, whereas Fe(NOTA) is the lowest at 0.61 mM-1 s-1. Fe(NOTP), Fe(NOHP) and Fe(NOTA) all show an increase in relaxivity at very acidic pH values (< 3) that is consistent with an acid-catalyzed process. Variable temperature 17O NMR studies at near neutral pH are consistent with the absence of an inner-sphere water molecule for Fe(NOTP) and Fe(NOHP), supporting second-sphere or outer-sphere water contributions to proton relaxation. Fe(NOTP) shows contrast enhancement in T1 weighted MRI studies in mice and clears through a renal pathway.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coordination chemistry; Iron complexes; MRI; MRI contrast agents; Mice imaging; Solution chemistry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34517167      PMCID: PMC9124524          DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2021.111594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Inorg Biochem        ISSN: 0162-0134            Impact factor:   4.336


  38 in total

Review 1.  The biological fate of gadolinium-based MRI contrast agents: a call to action for bioinorganic chemists.

Authors:  Mariane Le Fur; Peter Caravan
Journal:  Metallomics       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 4.526

2.  Exploring the intramolecular catalysis of the proton exchange process to modulate the relaxivity of Gd(iii)-complexes of HP-DO3A-like ligands.

Authors:  Irene Maria Carnovale; Marco Lucio Lolli; Sonia Colombo Serra; Alberto Fringuello Mingo; Roberta Napolitano; Valeria Boi; Nicol Guidolin; Luciano Lattuada; Fabio Tedoldi; Zsolt Baranyai; Silvio Aime
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  An FeIII Azamacrocyclic Complex as a pH-Tunable Catholyte and Anolyte for Redox-Flow Battery Applications.

Authors:  Pavel B Tsitovich; Anjula M Kosswattaarachchi; Matthew R Crawley; Timothy Y Tittiris; Timothy R Cook; Janet R Morrow
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 5.236

4.  Molecular Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Gd(III)-Based Contrast Agents: Challenges and Key Advances.

Authors:  Hao Li; Thomas J Meade
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Gear Up for a pH Shift: A Responsive Iron(II) 2-Amino-6-picolyl-Appended Macrocyclic paraCEST Agent That Protonates at a Pendent Group.

Authors:  Pavel B Tsitovich; Jordan M Cox; Joseph A Spernyak; Janet R Morrow
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 5.165

Review 6.  Safety of the Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Focusing in Part on Their Accumulation in the Brain and Especially the Dentate Nucleus.

Authors:  Val M Runge
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  CoII Complexes as Liposomal CEST Agents.

Authors:  Samira M Abozeid; Didar Asik; Gregory E Sokolow; Jonathan F Lovell; Alexander Y Nazarenko; Janet R Morrow
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 15.336

8.  Low-Spin Fe(III) Macrocyclic Complexes of Imidazole-Appended 1,4,7-Triazacyclononane as Paramagnetic Probes.

Authors:  Pavel B Tsitovich; Frédéric Gendron; Alexander Y Nazarenko; Brooke N Livesay; Alejandra P Lopez; Matthew P Shores; Jochen Autschbach; Janet R Morrow
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 5.165

9.  MRI and fluorescence studies of Saccharomyces cerevisiae loaded with a bimodal Fe(III) T1 contrast agent.

Authors:  Akanksha Patel; Didar Asik; Joseph A Spernyak; Paul J Cullen; Janet R Morrow
Journal:  J Inorg Biochem       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 4.155

10.  Modulating the Properties of Fe(III) Macrocyclic MRI Contrast Agents by Appending Sulfonate or Hydroxyl Groups.

Authors:  Didar Asik; Rachel Smolinski; Samira M Abozeid; Travis B Mitchell; Steven G Turowski; Joseph A Spernyak; Janet R Morrow
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.411

View more
  3 in total

1.  Enzyme Control Over Ferric Iron Magnetostructural Properties.

Authors:  Huan Wang; Michael B Cleary; Luke C Lewis; Jeffrey W Bacon; Peter Caravan; Hannah S Shafaat; Eric M Gale
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Liposomal Fe(III) Macrocyclic Complexes with Hydroxypropyl Pendants as MRI Probes.

Authors:  Samira M Abozeid; Md Saiful I Chowdhury; Didar Asik; Joseph A Spernyak; Janet R Morrow
Journal:  ACS Appl Bio Mater       Date:  2021-10-15

Review 3.  Low-Molecular-Weight Fe(III) Complexes for MRI Contrast Agents.

Authors:  Shangjun Chen; Lu An; Shiping Yang
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.927

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.