| Literature DB >> 34516772 |
Fengfeng Zhu1,2, Lichuan Zhang3,4, Xiao Wang1, Flaviano José Dos Santos3,5, Junda Song1, Thomas Mueller1, Karin Schmalzl6, Wolfgang F Schmidt6, Alexandre Ivanov7, Jitae T Park8, Jianhui Xu8,9, Jie Ma2, Samir Lounis3,10, Stefan Blügel3, Yuriy Mokrousov3,11, Yixi Su1, Thomas Brückel12.
Abstract
The bosonic analogs of topological insulators have been proposed in numerous theoretical works, but their experimental realization is still very rare, especially for spin systems. Recently, two-dimensional (2D) honeycomb van der Waals ferromagnets have emerged as a new platform for topological spin excitations. Here, via a comprehensive inelastic neutron scattering study and theoretical analysis of the spin-wave excitations, we report the realization of topological magnon insulators in CrXTe3 (X = Si, Ge) compounds. The nontrivial nature and intrinsic tunability of the gap opening at the magnon band-crossing Dirac points are confirmed, while the emergence of the corresponding in-gap topological edge states is demonstrated theoretically. The realization of topological magnon insulators with intrinsic gap-unability in this class of remarkable 2D materials will undoubtedly lead to new and fascinating technological applications in the domain of magnonics and topological spintronics.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34516772 PMCID: PMC8442887 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abi7532
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Adv ISSN: 2375-2548 Impact factor: 14.136
Fig. 1.Schematic of the trivial and topological magnon bands and of the magnetic and atomic structures of CrXTe3.
(A) Schematic of the band dispersion for a Dirac magnon, a topological magnon, and a trivial magnon. (B) Magnetic structure of CrSiTe3. In the ab plane, the Cr atoms form a honeycomb lattice represented by the dark blue spheres and green solid lines. The magnetic moments are represented by red arrows. The first and second NN exchange interactions in intra- and interplanes are represented by purple, green, black, and yellow dashed lines, respectively. (C) View perpendicular to the ab plane showing the honeycomb network of CrSiTe3. The honeycomb network is caged by the edge-sharing octahedra composed of Te atoms and Si─Si dimers located at the center. The light blue arrows represent the bond directions of the DM interactions between the second NN Cr atoms, and all the DM vectors share a common sign along the c axis.
Fig. 2.Spin-wave excitations in CrSiTe3.
(A to C) Energy- and momentum-resolved neutron scattering intensity maps of magnons in CrSiTe3 along the high-symmetry directions measured at the thermal neutron triple-axis spectrometer PUMA and IN8 and at the cold neutron triple-axis spectrometer IN12, respectively. The black solid lines are the calculated magnon dispersion curves based on the parameters of Heisenberg-DM model presented in this paper. The inset in (B) is a contrast-adjusted plot for the dashed rectangle part to make the acoustic branch easy to see. The inset in (C) shows the exact scan paths in the reciprocal space. (D to F) Calculated magnon spectra intensity maps for (A) to (C), respectively. The calculated spectra are convolved with an energy resolution of 1 meV to compare with the experimental data. (G) Zoom-in plot of the magnon spectra from (B) near the K points. (H) Energy scans of magnon density of states at the K points. The solid lines are the two-peak Gauss fitting results, and the fitted peak positions and error bars are indicated by the vertical dashed lines with gray shadow. r.l.u, reciprocal lattice unit.
Fig. 3.Spin-wave excitations in CrGeTe3.
(A and B) Energy- and momentum-resolved neutron scattering intensity maps of magnon in CrGeTe3 along the high-symmetry directions measured at IN8 and IN12, respectively. Black solid lines are the calculated magnon dispersion curves. Inset in (B) shows the projected BZ with high-symmetry points and the scan paths in the experiments. (C and D) The corresponding calculated magnon spectra intensity maps for (A) and (B) by using the 2nd-NN DM interaction model. The calculated spectra are convolved with an energy resolution of 1 meV to compare with experimental data. (E to G) The line profiles of constant-Q energy scan at the positions of 1,2,3 marked by the green arrows in (A) near the K point Q = (5/3,2/3,0). The solid lines are the multipeak Gauss fitting results. The peak positions and the errors are indicated, respectively, by the dashed lines and the gray shadows; the corresponding energy resolutions are represented by the black horizontal bar with caps. (H to J) The actual Q positions of the cut 1, 2, and 3 are marked by black circles with center dots in the reciprocal space. The red solid lines are the BZ boundaries.
Spin Hamiltonian parameters.
The values of exchange interactions including the DM interactions are listed together for both CrSiTe3 and CrGeTe3. The value of the 2nd-NN DM vector was chosen to reproduce the experimental spin-wave dispersion. The unit of the parameters indicated here is milli–electron volts. The single-ion anisotropy is fixed to 0.01 meV.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CrSiTe3 | 1.49 | 0.15 | 0.07 | 0.06 | (0,0,0.12) |
| CrGeTe3 | 2.73 | 0.33 | 0.10 | 0.08 | (0,0,0.32) |
Fig. 4.The impact of the DM interaction on the magnon dispersion.
The magnon dispersions of CrSiTe3 with different DM interaction strength are compared in (A). (B) The relationships between the opened global bandgap and the strength of the DM interaction; the red and blue filled circles correspond to the values extracted from the magnon bands. (C and D) The edge states of the monolayer CrSiTe3 for the respective zigzag and armchair nanoribbon. The color scale represents the weight of the magnonic wave function along the slab. (E) Temperature dependence of the topological thermal Hall conductivity of CrSiTe3 and of CrGeTe3 in the ferromagnetic ordered phases.