Literature DB >> 34515929

Does adoption of new technology increase surgical volume? The robotic inguinal hernia repair model.

Tara M Barry1, Haroon Janjua2, Christopher DuCoin2, Emanuel Eguia3, Paul C Kuo2.   

Abstract

Robotic Inguinal Hernia repair has been associated with higher costs but shorter length of stay. Robotic surgery is an appealing option for patients undergoing elective hernia surgery however given the high startup, maintenance and operating costs, the adoption of robotic technology may not guarantee increased profitability. Our hypothesis is that the introduction of robotic technology increases the overall surgical volume of inguinal hernia repairs within a hospital as compared to non-robotic hospitals. The 2010-2018 Florida Agency for Health Care Administration Ambulatory Patient data were queried for Open, Laparoscopic and Robotic inguinal hernia repairs using ICD9, ICD10 and CPT codes. Using a difference in difference (DID) technique, we determined the difference of the total hernia volume of robotic hospitals pre- and post-adoption of robotic technology. In addition, selected hospitals which were early adopters of robotic technology were compared to with their surrounding non-robotic competitor hospitals. Incident Rate Ratios-IRR, from the difference in difference analysis determined the significance of robotic technology. Hospital and patient demographic data were evaluated, and chi square test were used to determine statistical significance. p < 0.05 was considered significant. There were a total of 258,785 inguinal hernia repairs (5774 Robotic, 88,265 Laparoscopic and 164,746 Open) performed at 398 hospitals, 94 of which had robotic capabilities. Of all the procedure types, around 90% were primary inguinal hernia repairs. The majority of patients in this cohort were white non-Hispanic or Latino males (85%, 84%, 92%), age group 51-70 (46%), holding commercial health insurance (43%) and belonged to the lowest Charlson comorbidity index level (82%). Facility types designation for almost all robotic hospitals was hospital (99%), whereas 65% of non-robotic hospitals were ambulatory surgery centers and all other hospitals. Robotic hospitals experienced a 9.5% increase in total volume of inguinal hernia repairs after introduction of robotic technology (Incident Rate Ratios-IRR 1.095, p value < 0.0001). A significant increase in total hernia volume was observed for the early adopter hospitals with the IRR(s) ranging 1.20-2.51 (all p values < 0.0001), implying that adoption of robotic technology can in fact lead to very significant increase in total hernia volume for a hospital. The introduction of robotic technology leads to an increase in the overall volume of inguinal hernia repairs performed at a given hospital. To further evaluate the impact of robotic technology and significance of this methodology, additional work is underway using additional procedures and data from other states.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Case volume; Difference in difference; Inguinal hernia; Laparoscopy; Robotic; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34515929     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01304-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  9 in total

1.  Outcomes and impact of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair versus open inguinal hernia repair on healthcare spending and employee absenteeism.

Authors:  Gurteshwar Rana; Priscila Rodrigues Armijo; Shariq Khan; Nathan Bills; Marsha Morien; Jianying Zhang; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Patients' Perceptions After Robot-Assisted Surgery: An Integrative Review.

Authors:  Rita Moloney; Brid O'Brien; J Calvin Coffey; Alice Coffey; Fiona Murphy
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 0.676

Review 3.  Robotic laparoscopic surgery: cost and training.

Authors:  A Amodeo; A Linares Quevedo; J V Joseph; E Belgrano; H R H Patel
Journal:  Minerva Urol Nefrol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.720

4.  The paradox of the robotic approach to inguinal hernia repair in the inpatient setting.

Authors:  Haroon Janjua; Evelena Cousin-Peterson; Tara M Barry; Marissa C Kuo; Marshall S Baker; Paul C Kuo
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  The cost of robotics: an analysis of the added costs of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery using the National Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Zhamak Khorgami; Wei T Li; Theresa N Jackson; C Anthony Howard; Guido M Sclabas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Estimation of the Acquisition and Operating Costs for Robotic Surgery.

Authors:  Christopher P Childers; Melinda Maggard-Gibbons
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Robotic Approach to Outpatient Inguinal Hernia Repair.

Authors:  Haroon Janjua; Evelena Cousin-Peterson; Tara M Barry; Marissa C Kuo; Marshall S Baker; Paul C Kuo
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Trends in the Adoption of Robotic Surgery for Common Surgical Procedures.

Authors:  Kyle H Sheetz; Jake Claflin; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-01-03

9.  Patient perceptions of acute pain and activity disruption following inguinal hernia repair: a propensity-matched comparison of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open approaches.

Authors:  James G Bittner Iv; Lawrence W Cesnik; Thomas Kirwan; Laurie Wolf; Dongjing Guo
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-02-16
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Exploring the paradigm of robotic surgery and its contribution to the growth of surgical volume.

Authors:  Emily A Grimsley; Tara M Barry; Haroon Janjua; Emanuel Eguia; Christopher DuCoin; Paul C Kuo
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2022-06-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.