Muhammad U Manzoor1, Ibrahim A Almulhim1, Abdullah A Alrashed1, Abdulrahman Y Alturki1,2, Fatimah A Alghabban3, Sultan M Al-Qahtani1. 1. Department of Medical Imaging, Diagnostic & Interventional Neuroradiology section, 37849King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, National Neuroscience Institute, 37849King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, 48172King Abdul Aziz Specialist Hospital, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recently, radial artery access has gained popularity for interventional neurovascular procedures due to patient comfort and fewer complications. However, there are instances where the radial artery approach is not feasible. In such cases, trans-ulnar artery access (TUA) can offer an alternate route. There is limited data regarding neuro-interventional procedures performed via this approach. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of trans-ulnar approach for a wide range of interventional neurovascular procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data for all patients who underwent ulnar artery access for diagnostic or interventional neuroradiology procedures was retrospectively collected between September 2020 and March 2021. Patient demographics, procedural details, procedure success, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: During the study period, 23 patients underwent 24 trans-ulnar approach procedures. The mean age of patients was 50.1 ± 14.2 years. Fourteen diagnostic cerebral angiograms and ten interventional procedures were performed. All procedures were successfully completed via trans-ulnar approach without a switch to alternate access. No major access site complication was observed. CONCLUSION: Ulnar artery access is a safe and feasible option for neurovascular procedures. It can be effectively utilized for diagnostic cerebral angiography and a wide range of interventional procedures.
BACKGROUND: Recently, radial artery access has gained popularity for interventional neurovascular procedures due to patient comfort and fewer complications. However, there are instances where the radial artery approach is not feasible. In such cases, trans-ulnar artery access (TUA) can offer an alternate route. There is limited data regarding neuro-interventional procedures performed via this approach. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of trans-ulnar approach for a wide range of interventional neurovascular procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data for all patients who underwent ulnar artery access for diagnostic or interventional neuroradiology procedures was retrospectively collected between September 2020 and March 2021. Patient demographics, procedural details, procedure success, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: During the study period, 23 patients underwent 24 trans-ulnar approach procedures. The mean age of patients was 50.1 ± 14.2 years. Fourteen diagnostic cerebral angiograms and ten interventional procedures were performed. All procedures were successfully completed via trans-ulnar approach without a switch to alternate access. No major access site complication was observed. CONCLUSION: Ulnar artery access is a safe and feasible option for neurovascular procedures. It can be effectively utilized for diagnostic cerebral angiography and a wide range of interventional procedures.
Authors: Sanjit S Jolly; Salim Yusuf; John Cairns; Kari Niemelä; Denis Xavier; Petr Widimsky; Andrzej Budaj; Matti Niemelä; Vicent Valentin; Basil S Lewis; Alvaro Avezum; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Sunil V Rao; Peggy Gao; Rizwan Afzal; Campbell D Joyner; Susan Chrolavicius; Shamir R Mehta Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-04-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Krishna C Joshi; André Beer-Furlan; R Webster Crowley; Michael Chen; Stephan A Munich Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2020-03-09 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: Milena Miszczuk; Hans Christian Bauknecht; Justus F Kleine; Thomas Liebig; Georg Bohner; Eberhard Siebert Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2020-08-15 Impact factor: 2.804