| Literature DB >> 34513686 |
Yunyu Xu1,2, Wenbin Ji3, Liqiao Hou1, Shuangxiang Lin3, Yangyang Shi4, Chao Zhou1, Yinnan Meng1, Wei Wang1, Xiaofeng Chen5, Meihao Wang2, Haihua Yang1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate whether enhanced CT-based radiomics can predict micropapillary pattern (MPP) of lung invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) in the pre-op phase and to develop an individual diagnostic predictive model for MPP in IAC.Entities:
Keywords: computer tomography; early diagnosis of cancer; lung adenocarcinoma; micropapillary pattern; radiomics
Year: 2021 PMID: 34513686 PMCID: PMC8429899 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.704994
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Figure 1The flow chart of patient selection.
Patient characteristics.
| Variables | Training cohort (N=121) | Test cohort (N=49) |
|---|---|---|
| Age, mean ± SD (range) | 67.7 ± 8.8 (45-87) | 63.2 ± 12.1 (26-85) |
| Gender, n | ||
| Female | 52 | 33 |
| Male | 69 | 16 |
| Smoker, n | 34 | 10 |
| Family tumor history, n | 11 | 11 |
| Histologic subtypes within a tumor, n | ||
| One subtype | ||
| Acinar pre* | 38 | 17 |
| Micropapillary pre | 5 | 1 |
| Solid | 7 | 0 |
| Papillary | 2 | 0 |
| Adherent | 14 | 4 |
| Two subtypes | ||
| Acinar + micropapillary | 20 | 13 |
| Adherent + micropapillary | 1 | 0 |
| Solid + micropapillary | 3 | 2 |
| Papillary + micropapillary | 2 | 1 |
| Adherent + papillary | 1 | 1 |
| Acinar + papillary | 6 | 2 |
| Acinar + solid | 1 | 1 |
| Acinar + adherent | 6 | 1 |
| Three subtypes | ||
| Acinar + papillary + micropapillary | 8 | 0 |
| Adherent + papillary + micropapillary | 1 | 1 |
| Acinar + solid + micropapillary | 6 | 3 |
| Acinar + adherent + micropapillary | 0 | 1 |
| Acinar + adherent + solid | 0 | 1 |
| TNM stage*, n | ||
| IA | 80 | 36 |
| IB | 11 | 4 |
| IIA | 1 | 0 |
| IIB | 12 | 5 |
| IIIA | 14 | 2 |
| IIIB | 3 | 0 |
| IV | 0 | 2 |
*“pre” means to take the ingredient as the main ingredient.
*TNM stage is based on the eighth edition lung cancer TNM staging of International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) (18).
Figure 2Dimension reduction to find 14 relevant radiomics features by LASSO. (A) The cross validation was performed by LASSO regression and the parameter λ was adjusted to find the best set of functions. The vertical dotted line on the left indicates that the logarithm (λ) corresponds to the optimal λ. The selection criterion is the minimum deviation value. (B) The texture parameter coefficients varied with λ. The vertical line represents the 14 features selected when the LASSO cross validation coefficients is non-zero. (λ=0.074).
Figure 3Heatmap of radiomics features which showed the correlation between the 5 radiomics features and lung invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) with micropapillary pattern (MPP).
Five characteristic predictive parameters in the radiomics signature.
| Code name | Full name | MEAN (SD) | W value | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feature 1 | wavelet.LLL_glszm_LowGrayLevelZoneEmphasis | 0.39 (0.19) | 1855.00 | <0.01 |
| Feature 2 | wavelet.LHL_glrlm_LongRunLowGrayLevelEmphasis | 4.21 (1.22) | 5040.00 | <0.01 |
| Feature 3 | wavelet.LLH_firstorder_RobustMeanAbsoluteDeviation | 9.68 (4.52) | 5156.00 | <0.01 |
| Feature 4 | wavelet.LHL_glrlm_LongRunEmphasis | 6.14 (1.39) | 5198.00 | <0.01 |
| Feature 5 | original_firstorder_InterquartileRange | 18.9 (9.23) | 5372.00 | <0.01 |
Figure 5The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis of the effect of the radiomics model nomogram (A) and the individual diagnostic prediction model nomogram (B) to predict micropapillary pattern within lung invasive adenocarcinoma.
Figure 4Based on the training cohort data, the nomogram of radiomics was established, and the statistical analysis showed that the nomogram consisted of radiomics signature, age, smoking and family tumor history, which could predict the risk of micropapillary pattern within lung invasive adenocarcinoma.