Estela Barbosa Ribeiro1, Luiza D'Ottaviano Cobos2, Nicollas Nunes Rabelo3, Gustavo Frigeri4, Francisco Assis Carvalho Vale5. 1. Department of Nursing, Nursing Postgraduate Program, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil. 2. Department of Medicine, UNIFENAS, Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Atenas Medical School, Passos, Minas Gerais, Brazil. 4. Brain4care, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil. 5. Department of Medicine, Nursing Postgraduate Program, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
The Editors, on behalf of the journal, have retracted this article[1] because following publication, the
Editor’s were made aware that the author’s claims did not appear to be
supported by the data presented and the authors were not forthcoming in response to
inquiries. Specifically:The authors claimed a statistically significant relationship between ICP and the presence
of Alzheimer’s disease, as well as again claiming a statistically significant
difference in ICP waveform morphology between healthy patients and those with mild
cognitive impairment. This claim was not supported by the evidence presented in the
manuscript, and although for several months the authors promised to provide the data,
none was ever produced to justify this statement.One of the authors is the chief medical officer for brain4care, the company that produces
the medical device that was used in this investigation. This direct conflict of interest
was never disclosed during the publication process. When asked about this by Editors, no
response was given.In addition to these findings, the Editors’ review of other articles published by
the same group of authors found that the potentially conflicting relationship between
themselves and brain4care was rarely if ever disclosed in published manuscripts.Because of the lack of evidence to support their claims in the manuscript as well as the
opaqueness of their response to clarifying questions, the Editors no longer have
confidence in the integrity of the data presented and are compelled to retract this
paper instead of publishing an erratum.