Literature DB >> 34512160

Multi-omics Analysis of Ferroptosis Regulation Patterns and Characterization of Tumor Microenvironment in Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Wenchao Gu1, Mai Kim2, Lei Wang3,4, Zongcheng Yang5, Takahito Nakajima6, Yoshito Tsushima1.   

Abstract

Ferroptosis is a newly recognized mechanism of regulated cell death. It was reported to be highly associated with immune therapy and chemotherapy. However, its mechanism of regulation in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and influence on oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) therapy are unknown. We identified a ferroptosis-specific gene-expression signature, an FPscore, developed by a principal component analysis (PCA) algorithm to evaluate the ferroptosis regulation patterns of individual tumor. Multi-omics analysis of ferroptosis regulation patterns was conducted. Three distinct ferroptosis regulation subtypes, which linked to outcomes and the clinical relevance of each patient, were established. A high FPscore of patients with OSCC was associated with a favorable prognosis, a ferroptosis-related immune-activation phenotype, potential sensitivities to the chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Importantly, a high FPscore correlated with a low gene copy number burden and high immune checkpoint expressions. We validated the prognostic value of the FPscore using independent immunotherapy and pan-cancer cohorts. Comprehensive evaluation of individual tumors with distinct ferroptosis regulation patterns provides new mechanistic insights, which may be clinically relevant for the application of combination therapies in OSCC. © The author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ferroptosis; Immunotherapy; Oral squamous cell carcinoma; Prognosis; Tumor microenvironment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34512160      PMCID: PMC8416738          DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.61441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biol Sci        ISSN: 1449-2288            Impact factor:   6.580


Introduction

Cell death, which occurs in all organisms, is an important aspect of development. In particular, certain mechanisms of cell death depend on a specific molecular machinery, which may be pharmacologically or genetically controlled. Ferroptosis, discovered in 2012, is an iron-dependent, nonapoptotic mechanism of cell death, characterized by iron-dependence, and excess levels of reactive oxygen species and lipid peroxidation 1. The cell morphology and function of ferroptosis clearly differs from those of necrosis, apoptosis, and autophagy 2, 3. Further, ferroptosis is closely associated with numerous diseases, such as cancers, neuropathies, as well as kidney injury 4. Cancer cells require increased levels of iron and lipid metabolism compared with those of normal cells to promote development. Thus, cancer cells are more sensitive to ferroptosis 5, 6. Further, inducers of ferroptosis, such as erastin and RLS3, show strong potential for suppressing the growth of colorectal cancer, clear cell renal cell carcinoma, and melanoma 7, 8. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) represent the sixth most common cancer worldwide with at least 350,000 deaths every year 9, 10. Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), the most frequently occurring subtype of HNSCC, is characterized by high morbidity and mortality 11. Most patients with OSCC are diagnosed only when the disease is advanced. However, current treatments for OSCC, such as chemoradiotherapy and surgery, have not significantly improved the survival rate 11. The increased recognition of the complexity and importance of the tumor microenvironment (TME) has inspired numerous investigations of the regulation of the TME in tumor metastasis 12, 13. Moreover, evidence continues to indicate that the expression of ferroptosis regulators is highly associated with the immune response and the TME 14. For example, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies have revolutionized the treatment of certain cancers 15, 16. In 2016, the US Food and Drug Administration approved PD-L1 and PD-1 for treatment of HNSCC 17. In 2021, PD-1 has been used as a first-line therapy for patients with advanced OSCC according to the NCCN guidelines (https://www.nccn.org/home). Furthermore, ICI treatment enhances CD8+ T cell-mediated ferroptosis in melanoma and ovarian cancer 18. Unfortunately, insufficient information is available that describes the overall characteristic infiltration of the TME mediated by interconnected functions of multiple regulators of ferroptosis, and some studies concentrate on one type of cell or some regulators 19-21. Therefore, characterizing the role of ferroptosis in the cellular infiltration of the TME will enhance our understanding of the antitumor response of components of the TME and improve immunotherapy strategies. In this study, the first identification of ferroptosis regulation patterns and the characterization of the TME in patients with OSCC was accomplished using samples from the Gene-Expression Omnibus (GEO) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. This study identified three TME-relevant phenotypes as follows: immune-inflamed, immune-desert, and immune-excluded 22. Moreover, we discovered that the immune-inflamed phenotype is a ferroptosis phenotype. Moreover, we developed the FPscore to comprehensively evaluate individual tumors with each of the above ferroptosis patterns. The findings reveal that the FPscore shows promise as a prognostic biomarker for patients undergoing chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Therefore, we believe that this information will provide new insights into the regulation of ferroptosis in association with the TME and serve as a platform for developing new strategies to implement optimal combination therapy of cancer.

Materials and methods

Data acquisition

Data for patients with OSCC were downloaded from the GEO and TCGA, which included the original “CEL” files of seven GEO data (GSE41613, GSE42743, GSE9844, GSE30784, GSE74530, GSE78060, and GSE138206; n = 510) and the level 3 gene-expression data (counts) of the TCGA-HNSCC cohort. Background adjustment and quantile normalization were performed for GEO data using the “affy” package. We selected 292 samples with OSCC and 30 normal control samples from TCGA-HNSCC data according to the previously described position of the tumor 23. To establish TCGA-OSCC datasets, RNA sequencing, somatic mutation, and copy number aberrations data were downloaded from Genomic Data Commons (GDC, http://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/) and the Broad Institute (https://www.broadinstitute.org/). The original counts data were transformed into transcripts per kilobase million (TPM) values, because the TPM values were more similar to those of microarrays. Batch effects were corrected using the “Remove Batch Effects” algorithm to eliminate nonbiological technical biases for the seven datasets. The GEO + TCGA cohort represented the combination of TCGA-OSCC, GSE41613, and GSE42743 cohorts where every sample contained overall survival (OS) information. The accession numbers, platforms, and other details of datasets are summarized in .

Consensus clustering of ferroptosis regulation patterns

Ferroptosis regulators were downloaded from http://www.zhounan.org/ferrdb/. After matching with our datasets, we included 232 ferroptosis regulatory genes (). Based on these genes and the GEO + TCGA cohort, data were selected to perform unsupervised clustering analysis using the “ConsensusClusterPlus” R package. Further, this consensus clustering algorithm was used to identify the number of clusters, and the analysis included 1000 iterations to ensure the stability of the classification 24.

Gene set variation analysis and functional analysis

The “ClusterProfiler” R package was used for the analyses of the Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) databases. A false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 served as the cutoff to select the pathways that were significantly enriched. Non-parametric and unsupervised Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA) analysis was performed using the “GSVA” R package and gene sets of the MSigDB database of the Broad Institute. Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA), including all TME and immune cell signatures, was conducted using the package “IOBR” 25. The enrichment scores were calculated to represent the relative expression in each sample.

Differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis and development of the ferroptosis score (FPscore)

To identify genes associated with ferroptosis patterns, DEGs among the ferroptosis clusters were determined using the limma R package. The significant criteria were selected using FDR < 0.01 and absolute fold-change (FC) > 2. To evaluate the classification value of the DEGs, dimension reduction was conducted using the Boruta algorithm 26 and the ferroptosis gene signature was determined. The unsupervised clustering method was performed using the TCGA-OSCC dataset. Patients were divided into different groups according to the clustering of ferroptosis gene signature for further analysis. PCA was then performed to determine the FPscore using principal components 1 and 2. This approach concentrated on the score of the set comprising the most significantly associated genes and involved scaling down the score of genes that did not track to other members of the set. The FPscore, which is described according to a GGI-like procedure 27, was calculated as follows: FPscore = ∑(PC1i-PC2i).

Evaluation of the FPscore of the TCGA cohort

To evaluate the FPscore of TCGA-OSCC data, we first used Kaplan-Meier analysis to determine high and low FPscore subtype via the “survminer” R package. Next, HALLMARK gene set (h.all.v7.2.symbols) enrichment analysis (GSEA) was used to determine the biological signaling pathways associated with two groups using the “clusterProfiler” R package (P < 0.05, FDR < 0.25) 28. To assess the importance of the association of the FPscore with patients' clinical characteristics, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to establish a Cox proportional hazard regression model. The tumor mutation burden (TMB) of OSCC was calculated using the total number of nonsynonymous mutations per megabase with the “maftool” R package 29. The chi-square test was performed to evaluate the significance of differences of the numbers of mutated genes between FPscore subtypes. GISTIC 2.0 (https://cloud.genepattern.org) was used determine copy number alterations to classify genes that were amplified or deleted 30. The total number of each gene with an arm or focal region, which was deleted or amplified, was calculated as the burden of copy number loss or gain 31.

Prediction of the immunotherapeutic response and evaluation of drug sensitivity

The immunophenoscore, tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion (TIDE) algorithm, and the subclass mapping (submap) algorithm were used to predict responses to ICI treatment as previously described 32-34. To predict the chemotherapeutic responses of FPscore subtypes, the drug sensitivity data for cancer cell lines was obtained from the Cancer Therapeutics Response Protal (CTRP v2.0, https://portals.broadinstitute.org/ctrp) and the PRISM Repurposing dataset (PRISM, https://depmap.org/portal/prism/). The CTRP and PRISM databases contained 481 and 1448 compounds, respectively. We evaluated the most widely used drugs to treat OSCC (afatinib, aphidicolin, capecitabine, cisplatin, etoposide, fluorouracil, and paclitaxel) as well as the other four inducers of ferroptosis, which included RSL-3, erastin, ML162, and ML210. The lower area under the curve (AUC) of the dose-response curve indicated increased sensitivity to a chemotherapeutic drug 35.

Connectivity map analysis

To further identify candidate compounds that target FPscore subtypes and to classify potentially beneficial therapeutics, connectivity map analysis (CMap, https://clue.io/) was conducted utilizing genes with the most significant fold-changes (up- and downregulated; absolute FC > 1.5, FDR < 0.05) 36. Compounds with enrichment scores > 0.5 (P < 0.05) were designated potential agents for treating patients with OSCC.

Influence of the ferroptosis patterns on immunotherapy and TCGA analyses of pan-cancer

We analyzed five independent immunotherapy datasets, which included the melanoma cohort treated with pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1, GSE78220, n = 27) 37, advanced melanoma treated with nivolumab (anti-PD-1, GSE91061, n = 50) 38, melanoma treated with the immunotherapy TCGA-SKCM (n = 70) 39, melanoma treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab or pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA4, Gide. El at cohort, n = 32) 40, and metastatic urothelial cancer treated with atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1, IMvigro210, n = 298) 41. Data were transformed from FPKM to TPM for further analysis. Survival analysis was performed to validate the prognostic value of the FPscore as applied to ICI treatment cohorts. Further, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to evaluate the predictive significance of the FPscore. The pan-cancer data of 33 independent TCGA cancer cohorts comprising 9703 tumor samples were acquired using the UCSC Xena browser (http://xena.ucsc.edu/), and the correlations between FPscore and PD-L1, PD-1, CTLA-4, GPX4 in the pan-cancer cohort were evaluated. The prognostic value of the FPscore for predicting the OS was validated through univariate Cox regression analysis and displayed as a forest plot.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using R software (version 3.63). Comparisons of ≥ 2 groups were conducted using a parametric test (Student t-test or ANOVA test) or a nonparametric test (Wilcoxon rank-sum test or Kruskal-Wallis test). Post hoc tests were performed with Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment of P values after a Kruskal-Wallis test to compare each pair of groups using the R package “PMCMR”. Pearson correlation coefficients of the two groups were compared. Additionally, chi-square tests were used to analyze correlations between the ferroptosis gene clusters and OSCC clinicopathological characteristics. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the significance of differences was evaluated using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to establish a Cox proportional hazard regression model and a nomogram model. We generated a time-dependent ROC curve to estimate the power of the nomogram model. The AUC was calculated using the R package “pROC”. Alluvial diagrams show the distribution of clusters. The data in nomograms included the standard error of the mean (SEM). P < 0.05 indicates a significant difference, and ns, *, **, and *** represent not significant (P ≥ 0.05) and significant at the levels P < 0.05, P ≤ 0.01, and P ≤ 0.001.

Results

The ferroptosis regulation patterns in OSCC

According to the results of unsupervised cluster analysis, k = 3 was selected as the optimal ferroptosis cluster number, according to the expression levels of 232 ferroptosis regulators (;). Using these data, we distinguished ferroptosis regulation patterns as ferroptosis cluster A, ferroptosis cluster B, and ferroptosis cluster C by PCA (Figure ). The circos plot shows the expression levels of genes encoding ferroptosis regulators in the clusters and the chromosomal positions of their corresponding genes (Figure ). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that these ferroptosis regulation patterns significantly differed with patients' survival (log-rank test, P = 0.009) (Figure ). To identify the biological differences that potentially explain these differences in survival, we investigated immune-cell infiltration and the TME associated with ferroptosis regulation patterns. Among three ferroptosis clusters, all of their immune-cell populations and TME were significantly different. Further, the ferroptosis cluster C subtype, which was associated with the shortest survival, comprised of fewer immune cells; and the ferroptosis cluster A and B subtypes were mainly enriched in immune cells, such as B cells and CD8 T cells (Figure ;). But the populations of exhausted CD8 T cells, T cell exhaustion, and regulator T cells were significantly elevated in ferroptosis cluster A. The TME results showed marked enrichment of ferroptosis cluster A in TGF-β, the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), co-inhibition antigen-presenting cells (APC), co-inhibition T cells, and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) Class I. GSVA analysis revealed that ferroptosis cluster A was strongly associated with stromal activation, which included extracellular matrix receptor interaction, focal adhesion molecules, and cell adhesion molecules (Figure ;). Ferroptosis cluster B was associated with ferroptosis-related metabolism and immune response pathways (Figure ; ). Moreover, ferroptosis cluster C was associated with DNA repair pathways (;). Together, these findings indicated that ferroptosis cluster B was associated with immune activation and ferroptosis-related activities. Ferroptosis cluster C showed more genomic instability and less immune activation than the other two clusters. In contrast, ferroptosis cluster A showed T cell suppression and activation of stromal cells.

Identification of genes associated with ferroptosis regulatory subtypes

To evaluate the transcriptome differences among ferroptosis regulation patterns, we conducted analyses of DEGs () together with the Boruta algorithm to minimize dimensions of the ferroptosis gene signature to reduce noise or redundant genes and 245 DEGs were finally obtained as ferroptosis gene signatures (). We next analyzed the TCGA-OSCC cohort (292 patients with OSCC; ) to better identify and recognize the biological and clinical variations between these patterns. The summaries of GO and KEGG analyses of the DEGs are shown in Figure and . DEGs were significantly enriched in ferroptosis-related metabolism pathways, including fatty acid metabolism and the metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P450 (FDR < 0.05). Unsupervised clustering was performed according to the expression of 245 DEGs. We identified three genomic clusters in the TCGA-OSCC cohort, namely ferroptosis gene clusters A, B, and C (). The heatmap illustrated significantly different transcriptome profiles of the 245 DEGs according to genomic cluster (Figure ). Further, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed important prognostic variations in the TCGA-OSCC cohort associated with the three ferroptosis gene clusters as follows: The ferroptosis gene cluster B correlated with better prognosis, whereas ferroptosis gene clusters A and C were associated with worse outcomes (P = 0.032) (Figure ). The chi-square test stratified patients into three discrete clusters with distinct ferroptosis gene signature and clinicopathological characteristics. The ferroptosis gene clusters were significantly associated with differences in the immune response according to the TIDE algorithms (P < 0.05). Furthermore, gene cluster B exhibited low tumor grades and mainly the basal molecular subtype, whereas gene clusters A and C showed diverse patterns (Figure ). Similarities between the landscape of infiltration of immune cells and TME signatures characteristic of the ferroptosis regulation patterns are shown in and. Gene cluster B and C exhibited higher B cells and CD8 T cells than were exhibited by gene cluster A. T cell exhaustion and regulatory T cells were most enriched in gene cluster C. Patients with higher expression levels of PD-L1 as well as expression of immune activation-related genes, such as CD8A, CXCL10, and IFNG, were more abundant in gene cluster B than they were in clusters A and C (Figure ;;). These results were consistent with patients' outcomes and the clinical relevance of different gene clusters, indicating that our classification was reasonable.

Generation of the FPscore

To apply the ferroptosis regulation patterns to each patient with OSCC according to these ferroptosis gene signatures, we developed the FPscore. The circle plot shows that the FPscore was significantly associated (P < 0.05) with canonical ferroptosis-related genes 42, 43 (Figure ; ). Notably, ferroptosis cluster B and gene cluster B, which had the highest FPscore, were associated with better prognosis compared to other clusters (Figure -I).

FPscore is an independent prognostic factor in OSCC

Further, the FPscore was significantly different between normal and tumor samples in all cohorts (seven GEO datasets and TCGA-OSCC cohort, n = 832) and TCGA-OSCC cohorts (n = 322) (Figure -B). The prognostic value of the FPscore for predicting OS, progression-free interval (PFI), and the disease-specific survival (DSS) of the TCGA-OSCC cohort was evaluated (Figure ;-B). These results were confirmed by Kaplan-Meier analyses of the GEO + TCGA, GSE42743, and GSE41613 cohorts (Figure ;-D). Based on the OS results in TCCA-OSSC cohort, we divided the OSCC patients into high/low FPscore subtype and the association between ferroptosis-related clusters and status were displayed in Figure . These results showed that the high FPscore subtype experienced significantly better outcomes compared with the low FPscore subtype. The FPscore, which was subsequently evaluated as a continuous variable in univariate and multivariate Cox regression models, was identified as an independent and stable prognostic factor of the TCGA-OSCC and GEO + TCGA cohorts (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39-0.87; P = 0.008 and HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47-0.84; P = 0.002, respectively) (Figure ). Further, a nomogram that combined the FPscore with the tumor stage was created to provide clinicians with a predictive tool for estimating the 1-, 3-, and 5-year prognoses of patients with OSCC (Figure ). The calibration plot showed that the nomogram performed well in predicting OS (Figure ). The C-indices of our nomogram model used to predict OS of the TCGA-OSCC and GEO + TCGA cohorts were 0.61 and 0.60, respectively. Further, the AUC values showed that the FPscore was superior to the TIDE score for predicting OS (Figure ).

Characteristics of the FPscore of TCGA molecular subtypes and their clinical relevance

When we investigated the relationship between the FPscore and clinical characteristics, we found that a high FPscore was significantly associated with low tumor grade, early tumor stage, wild-type TP53, T and N stage, and low mDNAsi and mRNAsi (P < 0.05) (Figure ; ). Further, the distributions of FPscore were significantly different among the molecular subtypes (Figure ;). To further investigate the biological differences between FPscore subtypes, we performed GSEA analysis. The results showed that TP53 pathway, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha signaling, Kras signaling decreasing, and responses to interferon-gamma were activated in the high FPscore subtype. In contrast, the EMT, DNA repair pathway, hypoxia, and mTORC1 were activated in the low FPscore subtype (Figure ). Further, the ferroptosis level was significantly higher in the high FPscore subtype (P < 0.05) (Figure ). A correlation matrix heat map showed that the FPscore was significantly and positively associated with the immune-activation signature, TMEscore, fatty acid biosynthesis, and arachidonic acid metabolism; although there were significant negative correlations with stroma, EMT, the m6A signature and glutathione metabolism (P < 0.05) (Figure ; ). Together, these results support the conclusion that the FPscore achieved clinical prognostic value and that the TME was strongly associated with ferroptosis. Moreover, the FPscore accurately reflected the ferroptosis regulation patterns in patients with OSCC.

Comparison of copy number aberrations and somatic mutations using the FPscore

Changes of gene copy numbers are associated with ICI. We therefore determined the copy number aberrations between the FPscore subtypes. We found that the high FPscore subtype showed a significant lower focal-level gain/loss burden and a lower arm-level gain/loss burden compared with those of the low FPscore subtype (P < 0.05) (Figure ). The distributions of G-scores among all chromosomes of these subtypes (Figure ) showed difference in copy number aberrations. In contrast, there was no significant difference in TMB associated with the FPscore subtypes (P = 0.130) (). The number of each somatic mutation type in FPscore subtypes was showed in . The oncoplot of somatic mutations showed the top 20 most frequently mutated genes (). The chi-square test revealed that the high FPscore subtype was associated with a significantly low TP53 mutation burden compared with the low FPscore subtype (). A lollipop plot showed similar results and provided details about the positions of the TP53 mutations between the FPscore subtypes (Figure ).

Predicting responses to immune therapy and chemotherapy

To determine whether the FPscore predicted the response of ICI treatment in OSCC, we evaluated the expression of immune checkpoint and immune-activation-related genes. There was a significant increase in the high FPscore subtypes including PD-L1, CTLA4, PD-1, IFNG, and MHC (P < 0.05) (Figure ). Next, we used the immunophenoscore scoring system and TIDE algorithm to evaluate the potential therapeutic effectiveness of immunotherapy. immunophenoscore was found significantly elevated in high FPscore subtype (P < 0.05) (Figure ). A greater propensity for immune evasion was demonstrated by the higher TIDE predictor score, indicating that patients may not benefit from ICI therapy. Interestingly, the high FPscore subtype had a significantly lower TIDE score compared with that of the low FPscore subtype (P < 0.05) (Figure ). We next investigated whether the higher FPscore subtype correlated with an objective response to ICI therapy though TIDE (P < 0.001) (Figure ). The submap result showed that the high FPscore subtype may respond to PD-1 treatment (P < 0.05) (Figure ). These results provided evidence that the ferroptosis regulation patterns play a key role in mediating the immune response in OSCC. Chemotherapy is frequently administered to patients with OSCC, although drug resistance is a major problem that hinders treatment. We therefore applied CTRP and PRISM data to delineate drug resistance and sensitivity associated with the FPscore subtype. A high FPscore was associated with sensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs, and a low FPscore subtype was significantly associated with drug resistance (P < 0.05) (Figure ). Moreover, we found that the sensitivity of erastin, an inducer of ferroptosis, significantly correlated with the high FPscore subtype. These findings indicated that a patient with a high FPscore may achieve a good response to chemotherapy. Further, the CMap mode of action analysis identified 21 pathways shared by the 24 compounds. (Figure ;). To decipher the prognostic value of the FPscore for immunotherapy, we performed Kaplan-Meier analyses of five independent ICI treatment cohorts. Each cohort showed that a high FPscore subtype was associated with better prognosis compared with that of a low FPscore (Figure ) and time-dependent ROC curves validated the accuracy of the FPscore (). These results suggested that the FPscore has prognostic value for ICI therapy administered patients.

Analysis of pan-cancer data

To systematically analyze the significance of the FPscore in pan-cancer, we evaluated the expression of the immune check-points and GPX4. The FPscore was significantly associated with GPX4, PD-L1, PD-1, and CTLA4 in many cancers, including HNSCC (Figure ;). A high FPscore was identified as a favorable prognostic biomarker for 13 independent TCGA cohorts, some of which comprised “hot tumors” with high immunogenicity, such as head and neck cancer, colon cancer, kidney cancer, urothelial cancer, and cervical cancer (Figure ).

Discussion

Here we established three distinct ferroptosis regulation patterns, defined by immune phenotypes, which were associated with various levels of anticancer immunity and the scheme of our study is shown in Figure . This study depicts the identification of ferroptosis cluster A, associated with the immune-excluded phenotype, which was characterized by the stromal activation. Ferroptosis cluster B was characterized by immune-activation and metabolism, which represents an immune-inflamed and ferroptosis phenotype. The ferroptosis cluster C was characterized by less infiltration with immune cells, represented as the immune-desert phenotype (Figure ). Previous studies showed that stromal activation prevented the infiltration of immune cells in tumor by retaining them in the stroma, which were consequently blocked from penetrating into tumors. And the activation of stromal cells was considered to suppress T cell activation 22, 44. Consistent with these results, ferroptosis cluster A was associated with poor prognosis despite having abundant immune cells. Notably, we identified ferroptosis cluster B, which was associated with better prognosis, activated T cell abundance, and high ferroptosis activity. We believe that it is reasonable to conclude therefore that the activation of T cells enhances ferroptosis and contributes to its strong antitumor effect. For example, ferroptosis is consistent with T cell-mediated cancer immunity 18. We showed here that the DEGs of distinct ferroptosis patterns were greatly overrepresented in biological pathways involved in ferroptosis-related metabolism, indicating that DEGs represented gene signature linked to ferroptosis phenotypes (Figure ). Similar to the ferroptosis clustering data, three subtypes of transcriptomic profiles were significantly associated with survival outcomes; and the ferroptosis gene signature was established and designated gene clusters A, B, and C. These gene clusters were each significantly associated with a specific clinical subtype (Figure ). We therefore sought to quantify the ferroptosis trends of individual tumors according to the specific heterogeneity of alterations of ferroptosis. Therefore, the FPscore was developed to identify the ferroptosis patterns of an individual patient. As a result, we found that the FPscore was significantly associated with the expression of canonical ferroptosis-related genes and was consistent with the ferroptosis patterns (Figure ). And the immune-inflamed and ferroptosis phenotype had a higher FPscore compared with those of the immune-desert and immune-excluded phenotypes (Figure ). These findings indicate that the FPscore will serve as an accurate and robust tool for detailed evaluation of the patterns of alterations of ferroptosis in individual tumors, which may be useful for further evaluation of the patterns of TME, such as tumor immune phenotypes. Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the FPscore. In clincal practices, Cox regression analysis indicated that the FPscore was an independent clinical predictive factor of the prognosis of OSCC (Figure ). Further, a nomogram model comprising the FPscore and tumor stage achieved good prognostic predictive performance when applied to patients with OSCC (Figure ). However, from a clinical perspective, a large-cohort validation is needed. These results convincingly demonstrate that the nomogram model may provide clinicians with robust prognostic biomarkers for managing patients with OSCC. We further demonstrated that the FPscore was related to clinicopathological characteristics. FPscore was found to be elevated in patients with low grade, early stage, immune C2 subtype, low mRNAsi/mDNAsi, T1 stage, and no lymph node metastasis, which always represents a better prognosis (Figure ). Immune subtype C1 was reported to be highly enriched in angiogenesis and C2 subtype represented the strong CD8 signal and antitumor immune response 45. Moreover, the high value of mRNAsi/mDNAsi in tumors has been identified to reflect the dedifferentiation and metastasis of tumors 46. Taken together, these results indicated that the FPscore is associated with tumor progression and TME remodeling. Through GSEA, our data revealed that a high FPscore was significantly enriched in ferroptosis-positive regulatory pathways and immune-activation signature (Figure ). For example, arachidonic acid metabolites release oxidized lipid mediators, such as 11-HETE and 15-HETE during ferroptosis to recruit immune cells 6. Fatty acid accumulation in cells and the depletion of cysteine and glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) will also induce ferroptosis 45, 46. Therefore, those factors were in concordance with our results that high FPscore subtype had higher ferroptosis levels (Figure ). These results also explain that the patients with a high FPscore subtype survived longer compared with those with low FPscore subtype. We were intrigued by our findings that the FPscore positively correlated with the TMEscore and negatively with the m6A signature (Figure ). Previous studies showed that a lower m6A signature and a higher TMEscore represented the immune-inflamed phenotype. Both showed a predictive advantage of immunotherapy for gastric cancer 24, 47; here, the TIDE algorithm and the immunophenoscore showed that a high FPscore was significantly associated with a better response to ICI treatment (Figure ). Further, PD-L1, PD-1, and CTLA-4 were significantly expressed at high levels by the high FPscore subtype (Figure ). Specifically, the submap results imply that the high FPscore subtype may respond to PD-1 treatment (Figure ). The results of the study by Wang et al. are consistent with our findings using a mice model, in which ICIs enhanced T cell-mediated antitumor immunity though the upregulation of IFN-γ and downregulation of the cystine/glutamate antiporter, system Xc- 18. Recently, several clinical studies have reported that gene mutations may reflect the response of immune therapy; in particular, TMB has been identified as an independent factor for predicting ICI treatment 48, 49. However, some studies have also concluded that high-TMB failed to predict ICI treatment; thus, whether TMB could be a biomarker across all tumors is still unclear 50, 51. When we evaluated the TMB of the two ferroptosis subtypes, we found that they were not significantly different (P = 0.13, ). In contrast, we were further intrigued that copy number aberrations associated with the FPscore subtype (Figure ). A significantly lower copy number burden in the high FPscore subtype compared with that of the low FPscore subtype was demonstrated. Indeed, copy number aberrations make a larger contribution to the immune signature, and the low burden of copy number gain/loss correlates with the response to immunotherapy 16, 52. A recent report demonstrating that the burden of copy number loss did not correlate with the mutational load during immune therapy 16. Notably, the FPscore may predict the response to immunotherapy as an independent factor or even among OSCC patients with the same TMB level. Furthermore, we found that the low FPscore subtype showed more TP53 mutations than the high FPscore subtype; additionally, the TP53 pathway was activated in tumors with a high FPscore (Figure ; Figure ). Therefore, these findings indicate that TP53 may regulate ferroptosis in OSCC cells and are consistent with those of recent studies showing that TP53 and the tumor-associated mutant TP53 may play import roles in ferroptosis of cancer cells 53, 54. Moreover, the high FPscore subtype showed significant sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents and to erastin (Figure ), the latter of which induces ferroptosis of cancer cells through the cysteine-glutamate transporter 55. However, other inducers of ferroptosis, such as RLS3, ML162, and ML210, which directly inhibit GPX4 leading to ferroptosis, did not exhibit drug sensitivity in FPscore subtypes. These findings are likely explained by low GPX4 expression in the high FPscore subtype 5, 56. We used CMap to identify other inhibitors that may have antitumor efficacy in OSCC (Figure ). The above suggest that ferroptosis represents a pathway in cancers cells that can be effectively targeted by therapeutic agents. For example, we validated the prognostic value of the FPscore of five independent ICI treatment cohorts (Figure ), the same results were obtained. That is, patients with a high FPscore experience a better prognosis than those with a low FPscore, suggesting that the FPscore predicts the survival ratio of patients who undergo immunotherapy. Further, our present pan-cancer analysis showed that the FPscore was associated with the immune checkpoints and GPX4 (Figure ), which predicted the OS of patients with “hot tumors.” These findings support our conclusion that the FPscore could be suitable for translation to the clinic. In short, the high FPscore subtype was defined as the ferroptosis-related immune-activation subtype and was associated with clinicopathological features, various biomarkers including TME, immune checkpoint expression, and copy number aberrations, which indicates that the FPscore is a promising prognostic biomarker related to ICI treatment and chemotherapy in OSCC. However, further studies including single-cell RNA-seq and proteomics data analyses are required to identify the details of the activation of T cells caused by ferroptosis, such as the mechanism of ferroptosis-induced cell death, which releases signals that trigger cytotoxic T cell-mediated adaptive immunity, which is beyond the scope of the current study. Moreover, ferroptosis also occurred in the normal cells and play a role as a double-edged sword in oncogenesis through the release of signaling molecules that inhibit or promote tumor growth and proliferation 57. A critical cutoff value and the role of FPscore in assessing prognosis and the immunotherapy responses of OSCC remain to be accurately determined through prospective studies.

Conclusions

In conclusion, multi-omics analysis revealed that a high FPscore identified patients with OSCC with ferroptosis-related immune activation, who experienced longer survival and benefited from immunotherapy and chemotherapy in OSCC. These findings contribute toward new insights into the regulation of ferroptosis associated with the TME, which may be clinically relevant for developing combination therapies of OSCC. Supplementary figures. Click here for additional data file. Supplementary tables. Click here for additional data file.
  56 in total

Review 1.  Enhancing anti-tumour efficacy with immunotherapy combinations.

Authors:  Funda Meric-Bernstam; James Larkin; Josep Tabernero; Chiara Bonini
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Tumor and Microenvironment Evolution during Immunotherapy with Nivolumab.

Authors:  Nadeem Riaz; Jonathan J Havel; Vladimir Makarov; Alexis Desrichard; Walter J Urba; Jennifer S Sims; F Stephen Hodi; Salvador Martín-Algarra; Rajarsi Mandal; William H Sharfman; Shailender Bhatia; Wen-Jen Hwu; Thomas F Gajewski; Craig L Slingluff; Diego Chowell; Sviatoslav M Kendall; Han Chang; Rachna Shah; Fengshen Kuo; Luc G T Morris; John-William Sidhom; Jonathan P Schneck; Christine E Horak; Nils Weinhold; Timothy A Chan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  A Comparison of Random Forest Variable Selection Methods for Classification Prediction Modeling.

Authors:  Jaime Lynn Speiser; Michael E Miller; Janet Tooze; Edward Ip
Journal:  Expert Syst Appl       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 6.954

Review 4.  Ferroptosis: process and function.

Authors:  Y Xie; W Hou; X Song; Y Yu; J Huang; X Sun; R Kang; D Tang
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 15.828

5.  Atezolizumab as first-line treatment in cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Arjun V Balar; Matthew D Galsky; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Thomas Powles; Daniel P Petrylak; Joaquim Bellmunt; Yohann Loriot; Andrea Necchi; Jean Hoffman-Censits; Jose Luis Perez-Gracia; Nancy A Dawson; Michiel S van der Heijden; Robert Dreicer; Sandy Srinivas; Margitta M Retz; Richard W Joseph; Alexandra Drakaki; Ulka N Vaishampayan; Srikala S Sridhar; David I Quinn; Ignacio Durán; David R Shaffer; Bernhard J Eigl; Petros D Grivas; Evan Y Yu; Shi Li; Edward E Kadel; Zachary Boyd; Richard Bourgon; Priti S Hegde; Sanjeev Mariathasan; AnnChristine Thåström; Oyewale O Abidoye; Gregg D Fine; Dean F Bajorin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: understanding the molecular basis of histologic grade to improve prognosis.

Authors:  Christos Sotiriou; Pratyaksha Wirapati; Sherene Loi; Adrian Harris; Steve Fox; Johanna Smeds; Hans Nordgren; Pierre Farmer; Viviane Praz; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Christine Desmedt; Denis Larsimont; Fatima Cardoso; Hans Peterse; Dimitry Nuyten; Marc Buyse; Marc J Van de Vijver; Jonas Bergh; Martine Piccart; Mauro Delorenzi
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  GISTIC2.0 facilitates sensitive and confident localization of the targets of focal somatic copy-number alteration in human cancers.

Authors:  Craig H Mermel; Steven E Schumacher; Barbara Hill; Matthew L Meyerson; Rameen Beroukhim; Gad Getz
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  Cancer systems biology of TCGA SKCM: efficient detection of genomic drivers in melanoma.

Authors:  Jian Guan; Rohit Gupta; Fabian V Filipp
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Identification of AUNIP as a candidate diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Zongcheng Yang; Xiuming Liang; Yue Fu; Yingjiao Liu; Lixin Zheng; Fen Liu; Tongyu Li; Xiaolin Yin; Xu Qiao; Xin Xu
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 8.143

10.  Distinct TP53 Mutation Types Exhibit Increased Sensitivity to Ferroptosis Independently of Changes in Iron Regulatory Protein Activity.

Authors:  Laurie R Thompson; Thais G Oliveira; Evan R Hermann; Winyoo Chowanadisai; Stephen L Clarke; McKale R Montgomery
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  6 in total

1.  Construction of a Ferroptosis-Related Gene Signature for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Prognosis Prediction.

Authors:  Qun Li; Yangli Jin; Zhisen Shen; Huigao Liu; Yi Shen; Zhenhua Wu
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-12-21

2.  Mutation Analysis of Radioresistant Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Tae Oike; Yoshihito Sekiguchi; Yuya Yoshimoto; Takahiro Oike; Ken Ando; Wenchao Gu; Yasushi Sasaki; Takashi Tokino; Akira Iwase; Tatsuya Ohno
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Network Pharmacology Identifies Therapeutic Targets and the Mechanisms of Glutathione Action in Ferroptosis Occurring in Oral Cancer.

Authors:  Chen Huang; Lei Zhan
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  Robust Validation and Comprehensive Analysis of a Novel Signature Derived from Crucial Metabolic Pathways of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Wenchao Gu; Shaocong Mo; Yulin Wang; Reika Kawabata-Iwakawa; Wei Zhang; Zongcheng Yang; Chenyu Sun; Yoshito Tsushima; Huaxiang Xu; Takahito Nakajima
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Deciphering the immune landscape dominated by cancer-associated fibroblasts to investigate their potential in indicating prognosis and guiding therapeutic regimens in high grade serous ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Yimin Li; Ruotong Tian; Jiaxin Liu; Juanni Li; Hong Tan; Qihui Wu; Xiaodan Fu
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 6.  Emerging Role of Autophagy in the Development and Progression of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yomna S Abd El-Aziz; Lionel Y W Leck; Patric J Jansson; Sumit Sahni
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 6.639

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.