| Literature DB >> 34512137 |
Onyinye Hope Chime1,2, Chinonyelu Jennie Orji1,2, Tonna Jideofor Aneke1, Ijeoma Ngozi Nwoke1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Child sexual abuse (CSA) is a growing public health concern with health, academic and psychosocial implications. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence, pattern and predictors of CSA among secondary school students.Entities:
Keywords: child; child abuse; prevalence; schools; sexual; students
Year: 2021 PMID: 34512137 PMCID: PMC8407794 DOI: 10.21315/mjms2021.28.4.13
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malays J Med Sci ISSN: 1394-195X
Sociodemographic characteristics of the respondents
| Variables | Descriptions | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 11–13 | 28 (8.6) |
| 14–16 | 230 (70.8) | |
| 17–19 | 67 (20.6) | |
| Gender | Male | 147 (45.2) |
| Female | 178 (54.8) | |
| Class | SSS1 | 86 (26.5) |
| SSS2 | 187 (57.5) | |
| SSS3 | 52 (16.0) | |
| Tribe | Igbo | 306 (94.2) |
| Others | 19 (5.8) | |
| Who do you live with | Both parents | 219 (67.3) |
| One parent | 46 (14.2) | |
| Relatives | 40 (12.3) | |
| Non-relatives 20 | (6.2) | |
| Mother’s education level | Primary education and below | 58 (17.8) |
| Secondary education and above | 264 (82.2) | |
| Father’s education level | Primary education and below | 62 (19.0) |
| Secondary education and above | 263 (81.0) | |
| Mother’s occupation | Unemployed | 13 (4.0) |
| Student | 13 (4.0) | |
| Self-employed | 177 (54.5) | |
| Salary-employed | 117 (36.0) | |
| Retired | 5 (1.5) | |
| Father’s occupation | Unemployed | 15 (4.6) |
| Student | 16 (4.9) | |
| Self-employed | 160 (49.2) | |
| Salary-employed | 110 (33.9) | |
| Retired | 24 (7.4) |
Figure 1General prevalence of CSA among respondents
Prevalence of CSA among the respondents
| Variables | |
|---|---|
| CSA without physical contact ( | |
| Forced to look at the genitalia | 10 ( |
| Forced to show naked body | 9 ( |
| Forced to watch pornography | 20 ( |
| Pictures of nude body taken against will | 7 ( |
| Shared pictures of self to others against will | 4 ( |
| CSA with physical contact but without penetration ( | |
| Touched against will with sexual intention | 10 (22.2) |
| Forced to kiss someone | 5 (11.1) |
| Forced penetration with finger, someone tried to but did not succeed | 10 (22.2) |
| Forced vaginal intercourse against will, someone tried but did not succeed | 8 (17.8) |
| Forced anal intercourse, someone tried to but did not succeed | 5 (11.1) |
| Forced oral intercourse, someone tried to but did not succeed | 5 (11.1) |
| Forced into prostitution | 2 (4.5) |
| CSA with penetration ( | |
| Forced penetration with finger or object | 7 (33.3) |
| Forced vaginal intercourse | 8 (38.1) |
| Forced anal intercourse | 3 (14.3) |
| Forced oral intercourse | 3 (14.3) |
Pattern of CSA among the respondents
| Variables | Descriptions | |
|---|---|---|
| Identity of abuser | Parent | 9 (7.8) |
| Family member | 20 (17.2) | |
| Boyfriend/Girlfriend | 20 (17.2) | |
| Teacher | 7 (6.0) | |
| Neighbour | 34 (29.3) | |
| Stranger | 17 (14.7) | |
| Others | 9 (7.8) | |
| Age at first abuse | 1–6 years old | 234 (72.0) |
| 7–11 years old | 42 (12.9) | |
| 12–18years old | 49 (15.1) | |
| Place where event occurred | At home | 39 (3.6) |
| At another home | 30 (25.9) | |
| At school | 14 (12.1) | |
| At public place | 18 (15.5) | |
| Others | 15 (12.9) | |
| Frequency of occurrence | Once | 79 (68.1) |
| 2–5 times | 27 (23.3) | |
| 6–10 times | 5 (4.3) | |
| More than 10 times | 5 (4.3) | |
| Still experiencing abuse | Yes | 15 (12.9) |
| No | 101 (87.1) | |
| Still feel bad about the incident | Yes | 75 (64.7) |
| No | 41 (35.3) | |
| Reported to the authorities | Yes | 15 (1.5) |
| No | 101 (98.5) |
Figure 2The identity of the CSA
Figure 3Common venues of CSA
Bivariate analysis of CSA among the respondents
| Variables | Yes ( | No ( | Chi-squared ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 46 (39.7) | 101 (48.3) | 2.264 | 0.132 |
| Female | 70 (60.3) | 108 (51.7) | ||
| Age group (years old) | ||||
| 11–13 | 5 (4.3)) | 23 (11.0) | 11.109 | 0.004 |
| 14–16 | 95 (81.9) | 135 (64.6) | ||
| 17–19 | 16 (13.8) | 51 (24.4) | ||
| Class | ||||
| SSS1 | 8 (6.9) | 78 (37.3) | 61.203 | < 0.001 |
| SSS2 | 100 (86.2) | 87 (41.6) | ||
| SSS3 | 8 (6.9) | 44 (21.1) | ||
| Tribe | ||||
| Igbo | 111 (95.7) | 195 (93.3) | 0.773 | 0.379 |
| Others | 5 (4.3) | 14 (6.7) | ||
| Who they live with | ||||
| Non-relatives | 4 (3.4) | 16 (7.7) | 2.286 | 0.131 |
| Parents/Relatives | 112 (96.6) | 193 (92.3) | ||
| Mother’s education | ||||
| Primary education and below | 9 (7.8) | 49 (23.4) | 12.520 | < 0.001 |
| Secondary and above | 107 (92.2) | 160 (76.6) | ||
| Father’s education | ||||
| Primary education and below | 7 (6.0) | 55 (26.3) | 19.876 | < 0.001 |
| Secondary education and above | 109 (94.0) | 154 (73.7) | ||
| Mother’s occupation | ||||
| Unemployed | 4 (3.4) | 14 (6.7) | 1.506 | 0.220 |
| Employed | 112 (96.6) | 195 (93.3) | ||
| Father’s occupation | ||||
| Unemployed | 9 (7.8) | 33 (15.8) | 4.275 | 0.039 |
| Employed | 107 (92.2) | 176 (84.2) | ||
Note:
Signifies significant variables entered into logistic regression
Predictors of CSA among the respondents
| Variables | Wald | AOR (95% CI on multivariate analysis) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (female) | 1.378 | 0.240 | 1.401 (0.798–2.459) |
| Class | |||
| SSS1 | 46.243 | < 0.001 | 1 |
| SSS2 | 2.297 | 0.130 | 2.482 (0.766–8.045) |
| SSS3 | 13.997 | < 0.001 | 0.181 (0.074–0.444) |
| Graded age (years old) | |||
| 11–13 | 1.589 | 0.452 | 1 |
| 14–16 | 0.341 | 0.559 | 0.653 (0.156–2.736) |
| 17–19 | 1.589 | 0.207 | 0.613 (0.286–1.312) |
| Mother’s education (secondary and above) | 1.097 | 0.295 | 1.643 (0.649–4.159) |
| Father’s education (secondary and above) | 11.728 | 0.001 | 5.264 (2.035–13.618) |
| Father’s occupation (employed) | 2.790 | 0.095 | 2.126 (0.877–5.150) |
| Living with relatives | 2.612 | 0.106 | 2.819 (0.802–9.902) |
Notes: AOR = adjusted odds ratio; P-value of 0.2 was used as a cut-off point from which variables were moved from bivariate into multivariate analysis