| Literature DB >> 34511844 |
Azar Asgari Pari1, Mohammad Yousefi2.
Abstract
Electronic structure analysis of bimolecular formation of favipiravir (Fav) and a representative model of boron-nitrogen-carbon (BNC) cage was performed in this work for providing more insightful information regarding the drug delivery purposes by the importance of Fav drug for medication of COVID-19. To achieve the purpose of this work, density functional theory (DFT) calculations were carried out to obtain the stabilized structures and corresponding molecular and atomic scale descriptors. Six models of BNC-Fav complexes were obtained reading the participation of different atomic positions of Fav to interactions with the BNC cage surface. The results yielded BNC-Fav2 at the highest strength and BNC-Fav4 at the lowest strength of bimolecular formations. Molecular orbital-related features and atomic scale quadrupole coping constants all revealed that BNC-Fav2 complex could be proposed for employing in drug delivery process by managing the loaded Fav contribution to future interactions.Entities:
Keywords: BNC cage; COVID-19; DFT; Favipiravir; Molecular interactions; Nanostructure
Year: 2021 PMID: 34511844 PMCID: PMC8424618 DOI: 10.1007/s11224-021-01833-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Struct Chem ISSN: 1040-0400 Impact factor: 1.887
Fig. 1Favipiravir (Fav)
Fig. 2BNC cage
Fig. 3Different views of the bimolecular complex models. Intermolecular distances (Å) are shown
The obtained descriptors for the optimized models
| −16526.320 | n/a | n/a | −9.064 | −1.188 | 7.876 | 3.938 | 0.254 | 6.263 | |
| −21278.094 | n/a | n/a | −7.628 | −2.187 | 5.440 | 2.720 | 0.368 | 1.984 | |
| −37805.830 | −1.416 | 0.087 | −6.363 | −2.347 | 4.016 | 2.008 | 0.498 | 16.113 | |
| −37807.883 | −3.469 | 0.035 | −7.954 | −2.375 | 5.579 | 2.790 | 0.358 | 7.581 | |
| −37805.847 | −1.433 | 0.009 | −7.088 | −2.398 | 4.690 | 2.345 | 0.426 | 5.235 | |
| −37804.588 | −0.174 | 0.036 | −7.728 | −2.293 | 5.436 | 2.718 | 0.368 | 6.626 | |
| −37805.595 | −1.180 | 0.014 | −6.297 | −2.213 | 4.083 | 2.042 | 0.490 | 12.906 | |
| −37804.753 | −0.339 | 0.071 | −7.602 | −2.175 | 5.427 | 2.713 | 0.369 | 5.768 |
See Figs. 1–3 for visual descriptions of the models
The obtained quadrupole coupling constants (Cq MHz) for the Fav of optimized models
| 0.249 | 0.202 | 0.236 | 0.266 | 2.632 | 5.348 | 3.673 | 8.143 | 9.054 | |
| 0.246 | 0.200 | 0.226 | 0.185 | 2.448 | 5.435 | 2.001 | 8.108 | 6.048 | |
| 0.202 | 0.199 | 0.250 | 0.266 | 4.480 | 5.082 | 3.870 | 8.834 | 9.179 | |
| 0.183 | 0.199 | 0.249 | 0.262 | 1.434 | 5.449 | 3.753 | 8.691 | 9.135 | |
| 0.249 | 0.198 | 0.236 | 0.265 | 2.606 | 5.342 | 3.674 | 8.164 | 9.050 | |
| 0.247 | 0.201 | 0.222 | 0.255 | 2.506 | 5.304 | 2.772 | 7.987 | 8.156 | |
| 0.249 | 0.202 | 0.235 | 0.265 | 2.570 | 5.292 | 3.623 | 8.168 | 9.038 |
See Figs. 1 and 3 for visual descriptions of the models
Fig. 4HOMO-LUMO distribution patterns and ESP surfaces