Kay L Cox1,2, Linda Clare3, Elizabeth V Cyarto4,5,6, Kathryn A Ellis4,7, Christopher Etherton-Beer1,2, Jenny Southam4, David Ames4,8, Leon Flicker1,2, Osvaldo P Almeida1,2, Dina LoGiudice9, Danny Liew10, Philip Vlaskovsky11, Nicola T Lautenschlager2,4,12. 1. Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia. 2. Western Australian Centre for Health and Ageing, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia. 3. Centre for Research in Ageing and Cognitive Health, College of Medicine and Health, University ofExeter, UK. 4. Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 5. Bolton Clarke Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia. 6. Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Qld, Australia. 7. Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 8. St George's Hospital, Kew, Victoria, Australia. 9. Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 10. School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. 11. Royal Perth Hospital Research Foundation Biostatistical Unit, Perth, Australia. 12. North Western Mental Health, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increasing physical activity (PA) in those who have memory concerns requires innovative approaches. OBJECTIVE: To compare in this randomized controlled trial (RCT) the effects on PA, adherence, and fitness of two approaches to deliver a 6-month home-based PA program in older, inactive individuals at risk of cognitive decline. METHODS: Individuals (n = 52) aged 60-85 years, inactive with mild cognitive impairment or subjective cognitive decline were recruited from the community and memory clinics. Randomization was to 6 months of 150 min/week moderate intensity PA with either: goal-setting with mentor support; or education and peer contact. A subset of participants (n = 36) continued for a further 6 months. PA, moderate and vigorous PA, and secondary outcomes, fitness, goal performance/satisfaction and self-efficacy were assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Modelling of primary and secondary outcomes was conducted with linear mixed models. RESULTS: Participants were mean age (±sd) 70.1 (6.4) years. Six-month retention was 88.5%(n = 46). No significant between-group differences were observed for PA or fitness. Post-hoc combined group data showed a significant, moderate-large effect size increase in PA with time. PA increased by a mean 1,662 (943, 2383) steps/day (95%CI) and 1,320 (603, 2037) steps/day at 6 and 12 months (p < 0.001). Median (quartiles Q1-Q3) 6 and 6-12 month combined group adherence was 88.9 (74.4-95.7)%and 84.6 (73.9-95.4)%respectively. CONCLUSION: In this target group, no differences were detected between groups both intervention strategies were highly effective in increasing PA and fitness.
BACKGROUND: Increasing physical activity (PA) in those who have memory concerns requires innovative approaches. OBJECTIVE: To compare in this randomized controlled trial (RCT) the effects on PA, adherence, and fitness of two approaches to deliver a 6-month home-based PA program in older, inactive individuals at risk of cognitive decline. METHODS: Individuals (n = 52) aged 60-85 years, inactive with mild cognitive impairment or subjective cognitive decline were recruited from the community and memory clinics. Randomization was to 6 months of 150 min/week moderate intensity PA with either: goal-setting with mentor support; or education and peer contact. A subset of participants (n = 36) continued for a further 6 months. PA, moderate and vigorous PA, and secondary outcomes, fitness, goal performance/satisfaction and self-efficacy were assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Modelling of primary and secondary outcomes was conducted with linear mixed models. RESULTS: Participants were mean age (±sd) 70.1 (6.4) years. Six-month retention was 88.5%(n = 46). No significant between-group differences were observed for PA or fitness. Post-hoc combined group data showed a significant, moderate-large effect size increase in PA with time. PA increased by a mean 1,662 (943, 2383) steps/day (95%CI) and 1,320 (603, 2037) steps/day at 6 and 12 months (p < 0.001). Median (quartiles Q1-Q3) 6 and 6-12 month combined group adherence was 88.9 (74.4-95.7)%and 84.6 (73.9-95.4)%respectively. CONCLUSION: In this target group, no differences were detected between groups both intervention strategies were highly effective in increasing PA and fitness.