Literature DB >> 34510796

L1CAM variants cause two distinct imaging phenotypes on fetal MRI.

Andrea Accogli1,2, Stacy Goergen3, Giana Izzo4, Kshitij Mankad5, Karina Krajden Haratz6, Cecilia Parazzini4, Michael Fahey7, Lara Menzies8, Julia Baptista9,10, Lucia Carpineta11, Domenico Tortora12, Ezio Fulcheri13,14, Valerio Gaetano Vellone14, Dario Paladini15, Luigina Spaccini16, Valentina Toto17, Claire Trayers18, Liat Ben Sira19, Adi Reches20, Gustavo Malinger6, Vincenzo Salpietro2,21, Patrizia De Marco1, Myriam Srour22, Federico Zara1,2, Valeria Capra1, Andrea Rossi12,23, Mariasavina Severino12.   

Abstract

Data on fetal MRI in L1 syndrome are scarce with relevant implications for parental counseling and surgical planning. We identified two fetal MR imaging patterns in 10 fetuses harboring L1CAM mutations: the first, observed in 9 fetuses was characterized by callosal anomalies, diencephalosynapsis, and a distinct brainstem malformation with diencephalic-mesencephalic junction dysplasia and brainstem kinking. Cerebellar vermis hypoplasia, aqueductal stenosis, obstructive hydrocephalus, and pontine hypoplasia were variably associated. The second pattern observed in one fetus was characterized by callosal dysgenesis, reduced white matter, and pontine hypoplasia. The identification of these features should alert clinicians to offer a prenatal L1CAM testing.
© 2021 The Authors. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34510796      PMCID: PMC8528460          DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol        ISSN: 2328-9503            Impact factor:   4.511


Introduction

L1CAM encodes for the L1 cell adhesion molecule, a membrane glycoprotein mediating cell‐to‐cell adhesion at the cell surface. Pathogenic variants of L1CAM (MIM *308840) are responsible for a spectrum of X‐linked disorders collectively known as L1 syndrome, including X‐linked hydrocephalus with aqueductal stenosis (HSAS), mental retardation, aphasia, shuffling gait, adducted thumbs (MASA) syndrome, and isolated partial corpus callosum agenesis (CCA). Postnatal imaging features include obstructive hydrocephalus, CCA, enlarged quadrigeminal plate, interthalamic adhesion hypertrophy, and vermian hypoplasia. Moreover, data on fetal MRI are scarce with relevant implications for counseling and surgical planning. , , , In particular, little information is available on the prenatal appearance of midbrain–hindbrain structures in this condition. Diencephalic–mesencephalic junction (DMJ) dysplasia (DMJD) is a rare midbrain–hindbrain malformation characterized by a poorly defined junction between the diencephalon and mesencephalon, variably associated with other brain malformations, including CCA and ventricular dilation. We previously identified two DMJD patterns characterized by abnormal cleavage between the midbrain and hypothalamus in the axial plane (type A‐DMJD) and fusion between the midbrain and thalamus in the sagittal plane (type B‐DMJD). The former includes the “butterfly‐like” pattern, originally reported by Zaki et al. and recently associated with biallelic pathogenic variants in PCDH12. Of note, a subset of type A‐DMJD is associated with obstructive ventriculomegaly and can be recognized by fetal MRI during the second‐third trimester of pregnancy. We previously suggested that these DMJD cases were potentially linked to L1CAM mutations, yet no genetic testing was performed at that time. Recently, the largest series of fetal DMJD has been reported, unveiling the contribution of L1CAM mutations in four out of seven subjects tested for this gene. Interestingly, different patterns of DMJD were associated with L1CAM variants, including a new subtype overlapping with type‐B DMJD, characterized by complete thalamic–midbrain fusion on the sagittal plane. Of note, data on additional brainstem anomalies were only provided in one fetus. Here, we describe 10 fetal cases harboring 9 L1CAM pathogenic variants, providing evidence that deleterious variants in this gene may cause a recognizable brainstem malformation variably associated with diencephalosynapsis, ventriculomegaly, and CCA.

Methods

In this multicenter retrospective study, approved by the Liguria's Regional Ethical Board, we included 10 male fetuses from 9 distinct families with genetically confirmed L1 syndrome who underwent fetal brain MRI in six pediatric hospitals over 10 years (2010–2020). Written informed consent was obtained from participants or legal representatives. Clinical data were retrieved from electronic charts. Fetal MRI studies were performed on 1.5T or 3.0T scanners with a phased‐array abdominal or cardiac coil after a neurosonography study. All studies included 3‐mm‐thick single‐shot fast spin‐echo multiplanar T2‐weighted images. Post‐mortem MRI studies were performed on 1.5T or 3.0T scanners with dedicated protocols as previously reported. MRI examinations were reviewed in consensus by pediatric neuroradiologists. Midbrain–hindbrain malformations were classified according to the 2009 Barkovich classification, while DMJD was defined as type A or B based on previous criteria. Biometry of posterior cranial fossa structures was compared with reference data. , Ventriculomegaly was classified as mild (10–12mm), moderate (12–15 mm), or severe (>15 mm). Available histopathological findings were reviewed by experienced pathologists. Genomic DNA extracted from fetal tissues was screened for L1CAM mutations by targeted Sanger or Next‐generation sequencing. All L1CAM variants were reported according to the NM_000425.4 transcript and classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics criteria (ACMG).

Results

Clinical, neuroimaging, and genetic characteristics are detailed in Tables 1 and 2, and in Table S1. The average maternal age was 33.3 years (range 23–37 years). A positive family history was present in 7/10 (70%) cases. The median gestational age at MRI was 21.5 weeks (range 20–32). Adducted thumb/clenched hands were noted in 8/10 (80%) cases. Ventriculomegaly and adducted thumbs detected by the prenatal US in the majority of fetuses were the main reason for requesting fetal MRI.
Table 1

Clinical, neuroimaging and genetic findings of subjects with L1CAM variants.

Subject#1#2#3#4#5#6#7#8#9#10
EthnicityCaucasian ItalianCaucasian ItalianCaucasian ItalianCaucasian ItalianCaucasian AustralianIranianIranianCaucasian BritishJewish AshkenaziChinese Asian
FH of fetuses/males with hydrocephalus and DD+++++ (Sister of the mother of fetus #6)+ (Sister of the mother of fetus #5)++
Fetal MRI GW21202120222026222233
CCAMarked hypoplasiaPartial agenesisMarked hypoplasiaMarked hypoplasiaMarked hypoplasiaMarked hypoplasiaMarked hypoplasiaComplete agenesisComplete agenesisPartial agenesis
VM 1 SevereSevereSevereModerate‐severeSevereSevereSevereUnilateral severe
RO+++++++++Dysgyria
Type A DMJD+++++++++
Type B DMJD+++++++++
Diencephalosynapsis+++++++++
BK+++++++++
AS+++++++
Pontine hypoplasia++++++
Vermian hypoplasia++++++++
CH hypoplasia+
Adducted thumb++++++++
OutcomeTOPTOPTOPTOPFetal demiseTOPTOPTOPTOPMASA syndrome
Postnatal or postmortem brain MRIPost‐mortem MRI: thin and upward displaced CC, AS, severe VM, thinning of the posterior cerebral parenchyma, reduced pontine CCDPost‐mortem MRI: severe bilateral VM, AS, severe VM, dysgyria, BKMRI at 2 years: CC hypodysgenesis, VM, reduced WM volume, pontine hypoplasia, dysgyria
Histopathological findingsMild craniofacial dysmorphism, clenched hands, VM, marked CC hypoplasia, fused thalami, dysgyriaMild craniofacial dysmorphism, adducted thumbs, VM, patent cerebral aqueduct, agenesis of the pyramidal tracts, normal cortical laminationMild craniofacial dysmorphism, clenched hands, VM, patent cerebral aqueduct, cerebral cortical thinning, abnormal small cortical sulciNAVM, AS, normal cortical gyration, small medullary pyramids, cerebellar neuronal heterotopiasMild craniofacial dysmorphism, CC agenesis, normal gyral pattern, normal cerebellum
L1CAM variants (NM_000425.4)Exons 1–6 deletionc.2092G>A,p.(Gly698Arg)c.1849delC p.(Arg617Glyfs*10)c.1672C>T p.(Arg558*)c.551G>A p.(Arg184Gln)c.2215delC p.(Arg739Glyfs*112)c.2215delC p.(Arg739Glyfs*112)c.3201del p.(Tyr1067*)c.791G>A p.(Cys264Tyr)c.2260T>A p.(Trp754Arg)

ACMG, American College of Medical Genetics; AA, amino acidic; APD, antero‐posterior diameter; AS, aqueductal stenosis; BK, brainstem kinking; CC, corpus callosum; CCA, corpus callosum anomalies; CCD, cranio‐caudal diameter; CH, cerebellar hemispheres; CNS, central nervous system; CS, cesarean section; CSP, cavum septum pellucidum; DD, developmental delay; DMJD, diencephalon‐mesencephalic junction dysplasia; FM, family history; GW, gestational week; NA, not available; NMD, nonsense‐mediated mRNA decay; FFPE, Formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded; RO, reduced opercularization; TD, transverse diameter; TOP, termination of pregnancy; US, ultrasound; VM, Ventriculomegaly; VP, ventriculoperitoneal; WES, whole‐exome sequencing; WM, white matter.

Involving only the lateral ventricles.

Table 2

Main neuroimaging features of the two patterns associated with L1 syndrome based on the present series and the literature.

L1 Phenotype – type 1L1 Phenotype – type 2
Supratentorial anomalies
Corpus callosumHypoplasia, partial or complete agenesisHypoplasia, partial or complete agenesis
Ventricular system

Moderate to severe dilatation

usually symmetric

reduced or increased III ventricle

Mild to moderate dilatation

usually asymmetric

normal III ventricle size

Cortical development

Reduced opercularization

Neuronal migration disorders (rare)

Insular dysgyria

Neuronal migration disorders (rare)

White matterDiffusely reduced volumeReduced volume, mainly in posterior regions
ThalamiDiencephalosynapsisNormal or absent interthalamic mass
Diencephalic‐mesencephalic junctionDMJD type A and BNormal
Infratentorial anomalies
Cerebral aqueductAqueductal stenosis (variably present)Patent
Brainstem

Brainstem kinking

Mild to moderate pontine hypoplasia (variably present)

Mild pontine hypoplasia (variably present)
Cerebellum

Vermian hypoplasia (variably present)

Cerebellar hemisphere hypoplasia (rare)

Vermian hypoplasia (variably present)

Normal cerebellar hemispheres

DMJD, diencephalic‐mesencephalic junction dysplasia.

Clinical, neuroimaging and genetic findings of subjects with L1CAM variants. ACMG, American College of Medical Genetics; AA, amino acidic; APD, antero‐posterior diameter; AS, aqueductal stenosis; BK, brainstem kinking; CC, corpus callosum; CCA, corpus callosum anomalies; CCD, cranio‐caudal diameter; CH, cerebellar hemispheres; CNS, central nervous system; CS, cesarean section; CSP, cavum septum pellucidum; DD, developmental delay; DMJD, diencephalon‐mesencephalic junction dysplasia; FM, family history; GW, gestational week; NA, not available; NMD, nonsense‐mediated mRNA decay; FFPE, Formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded; RO, reduced opercularization; TD, transverse diameter; TOP, termination of pregnancy; US, ultrasound; VM, Ventriculomegaly; VP, ventriculoperitoneal; WES, whole‐exome sequencing; WM, white matter. Involving only the lateral ventricles. Main neuroimaging features of the two patterns associated with L1 syndrome based on the present series and the literature. Moderate to severe dilatation usually symmetric reduced or increased III ventricle Mild to moderate dilatation usually asymmetric normal III ventricle size Reduced opercularization Neuronal migration disorders (rare) Insular dysgyria Neuronal migration disorders (rare) Brainstem kinking Mild to moderate pontine hypoplasia (variably present) Vermian hypoplasia (variably present) Cerebellar hemisphere hypoplasia (rare) Vermian hypoplasia (variably present) Normal cerebellar hemispheres DMJD, diencephalic‐mesencephalic junction dysplasia. At fetal MRI, two distinct imaging phenotypes were detected (Figures 1 and 2, Fig. S1). The first, observed in nine fetuses, was characterized by callosal anomalies, reduced opercularization, diencephalosynapsis, brainstem kinking, and features of both DMJD type A and B. On axial images, the midbrain showed an enlarged dorsoventral axis, fusion with the hypothalamus, and a ventral cleft (“butterfly sign”). On sagittal images, the enlarged massa intermedia was caudally displaced and apparently fused with the midbrain. Additional features included obstructive hydrocephalus (7/9), small vermis (8/9), aqueductal stenosis (7/9), and short pons (4/9). In the other phenotype, observed in one fetus, callosal dysgenesis was associated with asymmetric ventriculomegaly, reduced white matter volume, dysgyria, and pontine hypoplasia.
Figure 1

Fetal brain MRI (A–C) and post‐mortem MRI (D–F) in a 22‐week‐old fetus. Sagittal (A, D), axial (B, E), and coronal (C, F) T2‐weighted images show the most frequent neuroimaging pattern, characterized by obstructive hydrocephalus, marked thinning of the corpus callosum, diencephalosynapsis (asterisks), features of DMJD type B on the sagittal plane (thick arrows, A, D), features of DMJD type A with typical butterfly appearance of the midbrain on the axial plane (thick arrows, B, E), brainstem kinking (empty arrows), pontine hypoplasia (arrowheads), and small vermis (thin arrows).

Figure 2

Fetal brain MRI at 32 gestational weeks (A–C) and postnatal MRI performed at 2 years of age (D–F) of subject #10. Sagittal (A, D), axial (B, E), and coronal (C, F) T2–weighted and T1–weighted images reveal the other neuroimaging pattern, characterized by marked white matter volume reduction with asymmetric ventriculomegaly (asterisks, B, E), bilateral dysgyria (thick arrows, C, F), dysgenesis of the corpus callosum (thick arrows, A, D), normal DMJ, mild pontine hypoplasia (arrowheads, A, D), and small vermis (thin arrows, A, D).

Fetal brain MRI (A–C) and post‐mortem MRI (D–F) in a 22‐week‐old fetus. Sagittal (A, D), axial (B, E), and coronal (C, F) T2‐weighted images show the most frequent neuroimaging pattern, characterized by obstructive hydrocephalus, marked thinning of the corpus callosum, diencephalosynapsis (asterisks), features of DMJD type B on the sagittal plane (thick arrows, A, D), features of DMJD type A with typical butterfly appearance of the midbrain on the axial plane (thick arrows, B, E), brainstem kinking (empty arrows), pontine hypoplasia (arrowheads), and small vermis (thin arrows). Fetal brain MRI at 32 gestational weeks (A–C) and postnatal MRI performed at 2 years of age (D–F) of subject #10. Sagittal (A, D), axial (B, E), and coronal (C, F) T2–weighted and T1–weighted images reveal the other neuroimaging pattern, characterized by marked white matter volume reduction with asymmetric ventriculomegaly (asterisks, B, E), bilateral dysgyria (thick arrows, C, F), dysgenesis of the corpus callosum (thick arrows, A, D), normal DMJ, mild pontine hypoplasia (arrowheads, A, D), and small vermis (thin arrows, A, D). In eight cases, parents decided on the termination of pregnancy. One subject died at birth due to perinatal complications: a cephalocentesis was performed to enable delivery by cesarean section, resulting in severe bradycardia and fetal demise. The only surviving subject is a 10‐year‐old boy with MASA syndrome (Figure 2 and Data S1). Post‐mortem MRI and autopsy were performed in 2/8 and 5/8 cases, respectively, and confirmed the features identified at fetal MRI (Figure 1D–F, Fig. S2). We identified 9 pathogenic or likely pathogenic L1CAM variants in 10 fetuses (Table 1). All variants are absent from the gnomAD database (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org) and 5 are novel. The nonsense and frameshift variants were predicted to result in premature truncation of the transcript, likely leading to nonsense‐mediated mRNA decay. The missense variants affected highly conserved residues and were predicted to have a deleterious effect according to ACMG criteria.

Discussion

We describe the neuroimaging features of the largest cohort of fetuses harboring L1CAM mutations, unravelling two distinct patterns that mainly differ for the brainstem appearance (Table 2). In addition to callosal anomalies and/or hydrocephalus, the majority of fetuses presented a peculiar brainstem malformation characterized by features of both DMJD type A and B, brainstem kinking, and a variable combination of aqueductal stenosis, short pons, and small vermis. In particular, on axial images, the midbrain was fused with the hypothalamus and showed a ventral cleft leading to the so‐called “butterfly‐like” appearance of type A‐DMJD. , , On sagittal images, the interthalamic mass was enlarged and caudally displaced leading to partial third ventricle atresia, as described in diencephalosynapsis, in apparent continuity with the midbrain, as described in type B‐DMJD. These features were confirmed on post‐mortem MRI. Remarkably, thalamic–mesencephalic fusion on sagittal planes should be reassessed after birth, since this might be over‐estimated on fetal MRI due to its limited spatial resolution, as shown by Lawrence et al. It is noteworthy that pathological data of roughly 100 fetal cases of genetically confirmed L1 syndrome have been reported yet none of them described in detail the DMJ. This is likely because the vast majority of these cases were identified prior to the recognition of DMJD as a distinct neuroradiological sign, thereby suggesting that the occurrence of DMJD might be underestimated in L1 fetuses. Of note, the combination of hydrocephalus, CCA, diencephalosynapsis, DMJD, brainstem kinking, and early anteroposterior/dorsoventral patterning brainstem defects might facilitate the prenatal identification of L1CAM mutations, thus helping with timely prenatal counseling. Moreover, this might have relevant implications in the surgical management of congenital hydrocephalus, since DMJD and diencephalosynapsis obliterate the floor of the third ventricle preventing endoscopic third ventriculostomy procedures. Finally, brainstem evaluation on fetal MRI is fundamental in cases of presumed aqueduct stenosis, because brainstem malformations are largely undiagnosed or undiagnosable with prenatal ultrasound but impact significantly on neurodevelopmental outcome. The L1 cell adhesion molecule plays pivotal roles in neuronal adhesion, neuronal migration, axonal growth and pathfinding, and in the development of the ventricular system and cerebellum. However, its contribution to the formation and positioning of the DMJ remains unclear. To date, several molecules including the Paired box 2 and 6 (Pax2, Pax6), Engrailed‐1 (En1), and Fibroblast growth factor 8 (Fgf8) have been claimed to play a crucial function in the DMJ development. , PCDH12, originally described to mediate cell adhesion in endothelial cells, was recently shown to promote neurite outgrowth and its deficiency perturbed the correct DMJ development in patients carrying biallelic mutations. Likewise, other cell adhesion molecules involved in neuronal migration and axon guidance may contribute to the mid‐hindbrain development. In mice, L1CAM is expressed on tangential fibers in the ventral midbrain where it modulates axonal growth via trans‐heterophilic interaction with PTPRZ1 (Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Receptor Type Z, polypeptide 1) and ALCAM (Activated Leukocyte Cell Adhesion Molecule) that are expressed in murine midbrain dopamine (mDA) neurons. , Interestingly, in L1CAM knockout mice, mDA neurons appear to be abnormally positioned, underscoring a pivotal role of L1CAM in migration and pathfinding also for midbrain neurons with consequent possible involvement in DMJ formation. The second phenotype, identified in one fetus presenting after birth with a MASA syndrome, was characterized by callosal dysgenesis, reduced white matter volume, and pontine hypoplasia. Interestingly, these features have been recently described in five subjects harboring L1CAM mutations presenting with mild intellectual disability, even in the absence of adducted thumbs. Moreover, four additional subjects with MASA syndrome reported in the literature presented similar brain abnormalities. , , , Considered the rarity of L1 disorders and the fact that subjects without obstructive hydrocephalus may not immediately be recognized as potential L1 mutation cases, we submit that this L1 phenotype may remain largely underdiagnosed. Future studies on larger cohorts are awaited to shed light on this intriguing hypothesis. Finally, although model mice with different sites of L1CAM mutation have been studied, the pathogenetic mechanisms of ventricular dilatation in L1 syndrome remain unsolved. Considering that L1CAM is involved in axonal growth and fasciculation, several hypotheses have been formulated, including: i) the hypoplasia of the white matter secondary to poor neuronal connections, ii) the increase in brain compliance due to the loss of L1‐mediated adhesion between axons, leading to an increase in ventricle size even with normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure, and iii) the alteration of the shape and caliper of the cerebral aqueduct leading to obstructive hydrocephalus. , , An alternative explanation for the obstructive hydrocephalus observed in fetuses without aqueductal stenosis presenting with the first L1 phenotype could be related to the presence of diencephalosynapsis causing partial or complete III ventricle atresia. Conversely, we speculate that the asymmetric ventriculomegaly observed in the second L1 phenotype might be better explained by primary hypoplasia of the white matter and/or by an increase in brain compliance. In summary, in the majority of fetuses, we identified a peculiar diencephalic and midbrain–hindbrain malformation that especially when associated with hydrocephalus and CCA should alert clinicians to offer a prenatal L1CAM testing. The prenatal diagnosis of L1 disorder would be extremely important to guide parents through the challenging decision‐making process regarding the option of a therapeutic abortion. Further genetic studies extending the L1CAM genetic analysis to male fetuses with callosal anomalies, reduced white matter volume, and pontine hypoplasia are needed to understand the real prevalence of rarer L1 imaging phenotypes.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

LM consults for Mendelian Ltd, a rare disease digital health company. All other authors report no financial disclosure/conflict of interest concerning the research related to the manuscript.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION

Conception and Design of the study, Acquisition and analysis of data, and Drafting a significant portion of the manuscript or figures: Andrea Accogli, Stacy Goergen, Giana Izzo, Kshitij Mankad, Karina Krajden Haratz, Cecilia Parazzini, Michael Fahey, Lara Menzies, Julia Baptista, Lucia Carpineta, Domenico Tortora, Ezio Fulcheri, Valerio Gaetano Vellone, Dario Paladini, Luigina Spaccini, Valentina Toto, Claire Trayers, Liat Ben Sira, Adi Reches, Gustavo Malinger, Vincenzo Salpietro, Patrizia De Marco, Myriam Srour, Federico Zara, Valeria Capra, Andrea Rossi, Mariasavina Severino. Figure S1. Fetal MRI findings in L1 syndrome. Fetal MRI of a control fetus at 21 gestational weeks (A) and of fetuses #1–9 harboring L1CAM variants (B–J). B–J) Sagittal (top row), axial (middle row), coronal (bottom row) T2‐weighted images show marked thinning or agenesis of the corpus callosum, diencephalosynapsis, features of both DMJD type A and B, and brainstem kinking in all fetuses. Aqueductal stenosis is present in fetuses #2–7 and #9 (arrows), while pontine hypoplasia is observed in fetuses #3–7 (arrowheads), and small vermis in fetuses #1, #3–6, #8, #9 (thick arrows). Click here for additional data file. Figure S2. Macroscopic appearance in the fixed brain of the diencephalic–mesencephalic region in fetus #1. A, B) Coronal slices through the fixed brain show ventriculomegaly with thinning of the cerebral parenchyma, agenesis of the corpus callosum (arrowhead), fusion of the thalami with atresia of the third ventricle consistent with diencephalosynapsis (empty arrows), and fusion between the midbrain and thalamus (thick arrows). Click here for additional data file. Table S1. Clinical, neuroimaging and genetic findings of subjects with L1CAM variants. Click here for additional data file. Data S1. Supplemental case report. Click here for additional data file.
  32 in total

1.  Engrailed and Fgf8 act synergistically to maintain the boundary between diencephalon and mesencephalon.

Authors:  Steffen Scholpp; Claudia Lohs; Michael Brand
Journal:  Development       Date:  2003-08-13       Impact factor: 6.868

2.  Prenatal diagnosis of X-linked hydrocephalus in a family with a novel mutation in L1CAM gene.

Authors:  I Ochando; V Vidal; J Gascón; M Acién; A Urbano; J Rueda
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 3.  Posterior Fossa Malformations.

Authors:  Mariasavina Severino; Thierry A G M Huisman
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 2.264

4.  X-linked partial corpus callosum agenesis with mild intellectual disability: identification of a novel L1CAM pathogenic variant.

Authors:  Pascale Saugier-Veber; Audrey Putoux; Idriss Bousquet; Muriel Bozon; Valérie Castellani; Renaud Touraine; Amélie Piton; Bénédicte Gérard; Laurent Guibaud; Damien Sanlaville; Patrick Edery
Journal:  Neurogenetics       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.660

5.  MR Imaging Diagnosis of Diencephalic-Mesencephalic Junction Dysplasia in Fetuses with Developmental Ventriculomegaly.

Authors:  M Severino; A Righini; D Tortora; L Pinelli; C Parazzini; G Morana; P Accorsi; V Capra; D Paladini; A Rossi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Axonal Growth of Midbrain Dopamine Neurons is Modulated by the Cell Adhesion Molecule ALCAM Through Trans-Heterophilic Interactions with L1cam, Chl1, and Semaphorins.

Authors:  Christopher R Bye; Valeria Rytova; Walaa F Alsanie; Clare L Parish; Lachlan H Thompson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Expanding the phenotypic spectrum of L1CAM-associated disease.

Authors:  L Basel-Vanagaite; R Straussberg; M J Friez; D Inbar; L Korenreich; M Shohat; C E Schwartz
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 8.  The role of L1cam in murine corticogenesis, and the pathogenesis of hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Kyoko Itoh; Shinji Fushiki
Journal:  Pathol Int       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.534

9.  Severe second-trimester obstructive ventriculomegaly related to disorders of diencephalic, mesencephalic and rhombencephalic differentiation.

Authors:  M Cagneaux; A Vasiljevic; M Massoud; F Allias; J Massardier; P Gaucherand; L Guibaud
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 7.299

10.  Prenatal molecular diagnosis of X-linked hydrocephalus via a silent C924T mutation in the L1CAM gene.

Authors:  Takehiro Serikawa; Kenichi Nishiyama; Jun Tohyama; Ryushi Tazawa; Kiyoe Goto; Yoko Kuriyama; Kazufumi Haino; Yonehiro Kanemura; Mami Yamasaki; Koh Nakata; Koichi Takakuwa; Takayuki Enomoto
Journal:  Congenit Anom (Kyoto)       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.409

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic Approach to Macrocephaly in Children.

Authors:  Andrea Accogli; Ana Filipa Geraldo; Gianluca Piccolo; Antonella Riva; Marcello Scala; Ganna Balagura; Vincenzo Salpietro; Francesca Madia; Mohamad Maghnie; Federico Zara; Pasquale Striano; Domenico Tortora; Mariasavina Severino; Valeria Capra
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.418

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.