Mercedes I Beltrán1, Jeroen Dudink2, Tamara M de Jong3, Manon J N L Benders2, Agnes van den Hoogen4,5. 1. Graduate School of Life Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Neonatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 3. Netherlands School of Public and Occupational Health, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Neonatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. ahoogen@umcutrecht.nl. 5. Medical and Clinical Health Science, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. ahoogen@umcutrecht.nl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Infants born preterm are known to be at risk for abnormal brain development and adverse neurobehavioral outcomes. To improve early neurodevelopment, several non-pharmacological interventions have been developed and implemented in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Sensory-based interventions seem to improve short-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in the inherently stressful NICU environment. However, how this type of intervention affects brain development in the preterm population remains unclear. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted for published studies in the past 20 years reporting the effects of early, non-pharmacological, sensory-based interventions on the neonatal brain after preterm birth. RESULTS: Twelve randomized controlled trials (RCT) reporting short-term effects of auditory, tactile, and multisensory interventions were included after the screening of 1202 articles. Large heterogeneity was identified among studies in relation to both types of intervention and outcomes. Three areas of focus for sensory interventions were identified: auditory-based, tactile-based, and multisensory interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Diversity in interventions and outcome measures challenges the possibility to perform an integrative synthesis of results and to translate these for evidence-based clinical practice. This review identifies gaps in the literature and methodological challenges for the implementation of RCTs of sensory interventions in the NICU. IMPACT: This paper represents the first systematic review to investigate the effect of non-pharmacological, sensory-based interventions in the NICU on neonatal brain development. Although reviewed RCTs present evidence on the impact of such interventions on the neonatal brain following preterm birth, it is not yet possible to formulate clear guidelines for clinical practice. This review integrates existing literature on the effect of sensory-based interventions on the brain after preterm birth and identifies methodological challenges for the conduction of high-quality RCTs.
BACKGROUND: Infants born preterm are known to be at risk for abnormal brain development and adverse neurobehavioral outcomes. To improve early neurodevelopment, several non-pharmacological interventions have been developed and implemented in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Sensory-based interventions seem to improve short-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in the inherently stressful NICU environment. However, how this type of intervention affects brain development in the preterm population remains unclear. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted for published studies in the past 20 years reporting the effects of early, non-pharmacological, sensory-based interventions on the neonatal brain after preterm birth. RESULTS: Twelve randomized controlled trials (RCT) reporting short-term effects of auditory, tactile, and multisensory interventions were included after the screening of 1202 articles. Large heterogeneity was identified among studies in relation to both types of intervention and outcomes. Three areas of focus for sensory interventions were identified: auditory-based, tactile-based, and multisensory interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Diversity in interventions and outcome measures challenges the possibility to perform an integrative synthesis of results and to translate these for evidence-based clinical practice. This review identifies gaps in the literature and methodological challenges for the implementation of RCTs of sensory interventions in the NICU. IMPACT: This paper represents the first systematic review to investigate the effect of non-pharmacological, sensory-based interventions in the NICU on neonatal brain development. Although reviewed RCTs present evidence on the impact of such interventions on the neonatal brain following preterm birth, it is not yet possible to formulate clear guidelines for clinical practice. This review integrates existing literature on the effect of sensory-based interventions on the brain after preterm birth and identifies methodological challenges for the conduction of high-quality RCTs.
Authors: J Dubois; M Benders; A Cachia; F Lazeyras; R Ha-Vinh Leuchter; S V Sizonenko; C Borradori-Tolsa; J F Mangin; P S Hüppi Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2007-10-12 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Christopher D Smyser; Abraham Z Snyder; Joshua S Shimony; Anish Mitra; Terrie E Inder; Jeffrey J Neil Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2014-10-20 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: J Dubois; M Benders; C Borradori-Tolsa; A Cachia; F Lazeyras; R Ha-Vinh Leuchter; S V Sizonenko; S K Warfield; J F Mangin; P S Hüppi Journal: Brain Date: 2008-06-28 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Kristin Keunen; Ivana Išgum; Britt J M van Kooij; Petronella Anbeek; Ingrid C van Haastert; Corine Koopman-Esseboom; Petronella C Fieret-van Stam; Rutger A J Nievelstein; Max A Viergever; Linda S de Vries; Floris Groenendaal; Manon J N L Benders Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2016-01-07 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Li Liu; Shefali Oza; Dan Hogan; Yue Chu; Jamie Perin; Jun Zhu; Joy E Lawn; Simon Cousens; Colin Mathers; Robert E Black Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-11-11 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Manu Airaksinen; Anastasia Gallen; Anna Kivi; Pavithra Vijayakrishnan; Taru Häyrinen; Elina Ilén; Okko Räsänen; Leena M Haataja; Sampsa Vanhatalo Journal: Commun Med (Lond) Date: 2022-06-15