| Literature DB >> 34508170 |
Cherng-Ru Hsu1,2, Tso-Ting Lai1, Yi-Ting Hsieh1, Tzyy-Chang Ho1,3, Chung-May Yang1,3, Chang-Hao Yang4,5.
Abstract
To investigate choroidal neovascularization (CNV) characteristics after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and to assess the potential predictive role of combined qualitative and quantitative biomarkers for disease activity. Patients diagnosed with type 1 or type 2 CNV via multimodal imaging who had received anti-VEGF treatment were retrospectively reviewed. Qualitative and quantitative CNV responses on OCTA after serial injections were analyzed. The enrolled eyes were divided into two groups based on treatment intervals during follow-up, including an active group with less than 12 weeks intervals and a stable group with 12 weeks or longer intervals. Fifty-six eyes of 56 patients were included in the study. Twenty-seven eyes (48.2%) were classified as the "active group", and 29 eyes (51.8%) were categorized as the "silent group". Qualitative biomarkers of CNV showed significant differences between the two groups (branching capillaries: 48.1% vs 6.9%, p = 0.001; anastomoses and loops: 81.5% vs 13.8%, p < 0.001; peripheral arcade: 40.7% vs 10.3%, p = 0.013, and hypointense halo: 81.5% vs 41.4%, p = 0.002). A significantly higher vessel density was found in the active group (median 39.6% vs 30.5%, p = 0.003). "Anastomoses and loops" and "vessel density" predicted an active CNV status with a probability of 93.7% and achieved the best performance. The combination of two potential biomarkers of CNV on OCTA shows good discrimination for the prediction of recurrent exudation auxiliary to structural OCT that might associate with disease activity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34508170 PMCID: PMC8433312 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97652-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Representative examples of different choroidal neovascularization (CNV) shapes and their structural OCT scans after serial anti-VEGF treatments. (Left column) Medusa pattern, consisting of central feeder vessels with main vascular trunks and tiny capillaries that radiated from the center of the lesion in all directions on outer retina segmentation. Note the features of active lesions, such as branching capillaries (dotted square), anastomotic loops (asterisks), and peripheral arcade(arrow-heads) present after 15 intravitreal injections (a). Sea fan pattern with branching capillaries (dotted square) radiate from one side of the main vessel trunk and anastomotic loops (asterisks) of CNV on outer retina segmentation following four intravitreal injections (d). Indistinct pattern of CNV on outer retina segmentation with tiny branching capillaries (dotted square) are seen after six intravitreal injections. No anastomoses loops, peripheral arcade, or perilesional hypointense halo are noticed (g). Another indistinct pattern of CNV on the choriocapillaris slab showing anastomotic loops (asterisks) and a perilesional halo (arrows indicated area) following five intravitreal injections (j). (Middle column) The neovascular network is highlighted in yellow, automatically detected vessels are highlighted by red lines, and vessel junctions are highlighted by blue spots (b, e, h, k). (Right column) The corresponding OCT B-scans of the medusa shape CNV reveals subretinal hyperreflective material without subretinal fluid accumulation (c). The OCT B-scans for the sea fan shape CNV reveals pigment epithelium detachment (PED) at the macula (f). The corresponding OCT B-scans for the indistinct shape CNV revealed posterior hyaloid membrane and epiretinal membrane with subretinal fluid accumulation (i). The associated OCT scans reveals type 1 CNV below the pigment epithelium without exudative structural signs for another indistinct shape CNV (l).
Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients.
| Variable | Active | Silent | P value† |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean ± SD (years) | 70.43 ± 8.23 | 69.55 ± 8.06 | 0.740 |
| Gender (M) | 17 | 24 | 0.064 |
Mean BCVA, mean ± SD (LogMAR) (Snellen equivalent) | 0.99 ± 0.48 20/200 | 0.90 ± 0.47 20/160 | 0.528 |
Mean BCVA, mean ± SD (LogMAR), last follow-up (Snellen equivalent) | 0.89 ± 0.53 20/160 | 0.63 ± 0.39 20/86 | |
| Central foveal thickness(μm) | 307.8 ± 131.74 | 259.0 ± 104.12 | 0.131 |
| Type 1 | 17 (63.0) | 20 (68.9) | 0.474 |
| Type 2 | 3 (11.1) | 5 (17.2) | |
| Type 1 + 2 | 7 (25.9) | 4 (13.8) | |
| Follow-up time, mean ± SD (months) | 21.71 ± 9.20 | 22.40 ± 10.03 | 0.792 |
| Anti-VEGF treatment, mean ± SD, n | 7.74 ± 4.07 | 5.24 ± 3.18 | |
| IVI interval, mean ± SD (months) | 2.70 ± 1.17 | 2.98 ± 1.81 | 0.451 |
Continuous variables were presented as mean and standard deviation (SD).
IVI intra vitreal injection, BCVA best-corrected visual acuity, LogMAR logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution.
†Statistical analyses of age, BCVA, central foveal thickness, follow-up time, number of anti-VEGF treatment, and IVI interval were performed using Student’s t tests. Analyses of other variables were performed using chi-square test.
*p < 0.05 (bold numbers) was considered statistically significant.
Optical coherence tomography angiography of qualitative parameters.
| Variable | Active (n = 27, %) | Silent (n = 29, %) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medusa or sea fan | 8 (29.6) | 1 (3.4) | |
| Long linear vessels | 3 (11.1) | 11 (36.9) | |
| Indistinct network | 16 (59.3) | 17 (59.6) | |
| Branching capillaries | 13 (48.1) | 2 (6.9) | |
| Anastomoses and loops | 22 (81.5) | 4 (13.8) | |
| Peripheral arcade | 11 (40.7) | 3 (10.3) | |
| Hypointense halo | 22 (81.5) | 12 (41.4) | |
†Statistical analyses were calculated by chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test.
*p < 0.05 (bold numbers) was considered statistically significant.
Optical coherence tomography angiography of quantitative parameters.
| Variable | Active (n = 27) | Silent (n = 29) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNV area, mm2 | 0.83 (0.61–1.43) | 0.83 (0.36–1.18) | 0.305 |
| Vessel density (%) | 39.6 (31.9–49.4) | 30.5 (21.6–40.0) | |
| Total length of CNV, mm | 14.1 (10.6–33.9) | 15.8 (10.2–25.6) | 0.688 |
| Number of CNV junctions | 53.0 (35.0–98.0) | 52.0 (32.0–78.0) | 0.617 |
| Lacunarity | 0.29 (0.26–0.36) | 0.32 (0.26–0.44) | 0.204 |
†Statistical analyses were calculated using the Mann–Whitney U test. Variables were reported as median and interquartile range (IQR)
*p < 0.05 (bold numbers) was considered statistically significant.
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Diagnostic Accuracy of qualitative and quantitative parameters.
| Variable | Sensitivity | Specificity | AUC† (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Branching capillaries | 0.93 | 0.48 | 0.706 (0.57–0.85) |
| Anastomoses and loops | 0.86 | 0.81 | 0.838 (0.73–0.95) |
| Peripheral arcade | 0.90 | 0.41 | 0.652 (0.51–0.80) |
| Hypointense halo | 0.59 | 0.81 | 0.701 (0.56–0.84) |
| CNV area, mm2 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 0.581 (0.43–0.73) |
| Vessel density (%) | 0.93 | 0.48 | 0.733 (0.61–0.86) |
| Total length of CNV, mm | 0.33 | 0.79 | 0.531 (0.38–0.69) |
| Number of CNV junctions | 0.37 | 0.76 | 0.539 (0.39–0.69) |
| Lacunarity | 0.96 | 0.28 | 0.599 (0.45–0.75) |
†AUC: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
Univariate and backward stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis of qualitative and quantitative factors correlated with active group.
| Variable | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | p value | OR (95% CI) | p value | |
| Long ve | 0.034 (0.0–0.4) | |||
| Indistinct versus medusa or sea fan | 0.118 (0.0–1.0) | 0.055 | – | – |
| Branching | 12.536 (2.5–63.5) | – | – | |
| Loops | 27.500 (6.6–115.4) | 68.420 (8.6–381.5) | ||
| Arcade | 5.958 (1.4–24.7) | – | – | |
| Halo | 6.233 (1.8–21.1) | – | – | |
| CNV area, mm2 | 1.581 (0.7–3.7) | 0.286 | – | – |
| Vessel density (%) | 1.076 (1.0–1.3) | 1.137 (1.0–1.3) | ||
| Total length of CNV, mm | 1.010 (0.9–1.0) | 0.554 | – | – |
| Number of CNV junctions | 1.005 (0.9–1.0) | 0.464 | – | – |
| Lacunarity | 0.953 (0.9–1.0) | 0.081 | – | – |
*p < 0.05 (bold numbers) was considered statistically significant.
The AUC of the ROC Curve, sensitivity, and specificity of different predicted models.
| Variable | AUC (95% CI) | Sensitivity | Specificity | AIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Combined Loops and VD | 0.937 (0.88–0.99)* | 0.93 | 0.83 | 41.8 |
| Loops | 0.838 (0.73–0.95)* | 0.86 | 0.81 | 51.4 |
| VD | 0.733 (0.61–0.86)† | 0.93 | 0.48 | 70.1 |
*p < 0.001.
†p = 0.003.
loops = anastomoses and loops; VD = vessel density (%); AIC = Akaike information criterion.
Figure 2The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve between sensitivity and specificity revealed different area under the curve (AUC) of predicted models, with the highest probability of 0.937 for the correct prediction of choroidal neovascularization activity based on optical coherence tomography angiography biomarkers.