Xifang Zhang1, Rui Ding2, Haiyan Li2, Yaqi Liu2, Weiyang Ou1, Jiangang Hu3, Yu Tian4, Qiujing Wang5. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, The National Key Clinical Specialty, The Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Brain Function Repair and Regeneration, Guangzhou, 510282, China. 2. Department of Cerebrovascular Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No 600 Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong, China. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Shenzhen Baoan People's Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518101, China. 4. Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510282, China. 5. Department of Neurosurgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, The National Key Clinical Specialty, The Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Brain Function Repair and Regeneration, Guangzhou, 510282, China; Department of Cerebrovascular Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No 600 Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong, China. Electronic address: wangqj9@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Evidence is currently accumulating for the role of inflammation in cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte/high-density lipoprotein ratio (MHR), and systematic immune-inflammation index (SII) are easily obtainable indicators of systemic inflammations. However, there were few studies on the relationship between them and CVT. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the connection between the occurrence of CVT and the inflammatory markers described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The samples from 150 participants (including 90 CVT and 60 primary headaches as controls) with similar baseline characteristics were collected in this retrospective study. The NLR, PLR, MHR, SII and file records were employed to compare CVT patients with the control group. RESULTS: The levels of NLR (3.93 [2.27, 7.87] vs. 1.65 [1.31, 2.06], P < 0.001), PLR (149.52 [98.39, 198.82] vs. 107.34 [83.31, 129.47], P < 0.001), SII (896.84 [559.89, 1591.87] vs. 382.45 [273.51, 520.92], P < 0.001) and MHR (0.51 [0.40, 0.64] vs. 0.41 [0.29, 0.53], P = 0.001) were significantly higher in the CVT group. After multivariate logistic regression analysis, the SII degree (13.136, [5.675, 30.407], P < 0.001) and MHR degree (2.620, [1.123, 6.113], P < 0.01) were found as independent predictors of CVT. CONCLUSIONS: NLR, PLR, SII, and MHR may be able to assist in the diagnosis of CVT which confirmed that inflammation played an important role in CVT.
OBJECTIVES: Evidence is currently accumulating for the role of inflammation in cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte/high-density lipoprotein ratio (MHR), and systematic immune-inflammation index (SII) are easily obtainable indicators of systemic inflammations. However, there were few studies on the relationship between them and CVT. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the connection between the occurrence of CVT and the inflammatory markers described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The samples from 150 participants (including 90 CVT and 60 primary headaches as controls) with similar baseline characteristics were collected in this retrospective study. The NLR, PLR, MHR, SII and file records were employed to compare CVT patients with the control group. RESULTS: The levels of NLR (3.93 [2.27, 7.87] vs. 1.65 [1.31, 2.06], P < 0.001), PLR (149.52 [98.39, 198.82] vs. 107.34 [83.31, 129.47], P < 0.001), SII (896.84 [559.89, 1591.87] vs. 382.45 [273.51, 520.92], P < 0.001) and MHR (0.51 [0.40, 0.64] vs. 0.41 [0.29, 0.53], P = 0.001) were significantly higher in the CVT group. After multivariate logistic regression analysis, the SII degree (13.136, [5.675, 30.407], P < 0.001) and MHR degree (2.620, [1.123, 6.113], P < 0.01) were found as independent predictors of CVT. CONCLUSIONS: NLR, PLR, SII, and MHR may be able to assist in the diagnosis of CVT which confirmed that inflammation played an important role in CVT.