Literature DB >> 34506113

Integration of Mass Spectrometry Data for Structural Biology.

Hannah M Britt1, Tristan Cragnolini1,2, Konstantinos Thalassinos1,2.   

Abstract

Mass spectrometry (MS) is increasingly being used to probe the structure and dynamics of proteins and the complexes they form with other macromolecules. There are now several specialized MS methods, each with unique sample preparation, data acquisition, and data processing protocols. Collectively, these methods are referred to as structural MS and include cross-linking, hydrogen-deuterium exchange, hydroxyl radical footprinting, native, ion mobility, and top-down MS. Each of these provides a unique type of structural information, ranging from composition and stoichiometry through to residue level proximity and solvent accessibility. Structural MS has proved particularly beneficial in studying protein classes for which analysis by classic structural biology techniques proves challenging such as glycosylated or intrinsically disordered proteins. To capture the structural details for a particular system, especially larger multiprotein complexes, more than one structural MS method with other structural and biophysical techniques is often required. Key to integrating these diverse data are computational strategies and software solutions to facilitate this process. We provide a background to the structural MS methods and briefly summarize other structural methods and how these are combined with MS. We then describe current state of the art approaches for the integration of structural MS data for structural biology. We quantify how often these methods are used together and provide examples where such combinations have been fruitful. To illustrate the power of integrative approaches, we discuss progress in solving the structures of the proteasome and the nuclear pore complex. We also discuss how information from structural MS, particularly pertaining to protein dynamics, is not currently utilized in integrative workflows and how such information can provide a more accurate picture of the systems studied. We conclude by discussing new developments in the MS and computational fields that will further enable in-cell structural studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34506113     DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Rev        ISSN: 0009-2665            Impact factor:   60.622


  5 in total

1.  A Species-Specific Strategy for the Identification of Hemocoagulase Agkistrodon halys pallas Based on LC-MS/MS-MRM.

Authors:  Ruiqing Xian; Congcong Wang; Liping Gong; Baojian Hang; Weijian Wang; Xunjie Zhang; Hongmin Du; Fengshan Wang; Feng Shi
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-05-30

2.  Probing heavy metal binding to phycobiliproteins.

Authors:  Jeddidiah Bellamy-Carter; Jaspreet K Sound; Aneika C Leney
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 5.622

Review 3.  Label-free visual proteomics: Coupling MS- and EM-based approaches in structural biology.

Authors:  Oleg Klykov; Mykhailo Kopylov; Bridget Carragher; Albert J R Heck; Alex J Noble; Richard A Scheltema
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 4.  Generating Ensembles of Dynamic Misfolding Proteins.

Authors:  Theodoros K Karamanos; Arnout P Kalverda; Sheena E Radford
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Challenges in describing the conformation and dynamics of proteins with ambiguous behavior.

Authors:  Joel Roca-Martinez; Tamas Lazar; Jose Gavalda-Garcia; David Bickel; Rita Pancsa; Bhawna Dixit; Konstantina Tzavella; Pathmanaban Ramasamy; Maite Sanchez-Fornaris; Isel Grau; Wim F Vranken
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-08-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.