Literature DB >> 3450453

Investigation of the criteria for assessing the outcome of treatment in acromegaly.

J Lindholm1, B Giwercman, A Giwercman, J Astrup, P Bjerre, N E Skakkebaek.   

Abstract

The outcome of treatment in acromegaly is usually assessed by measuring plasma concentrations of growth hormone (GH)--either basal spontaneous levels or during hyperglycaemia. There is no consensus on how cure should be defined. Many studies have considered basal plasma growth hormone concentrations below 20 mU/l (10 ng/ml) as proof of cure, although some recent studies have applied lower values. At present a limit of 10 mU/l (5 ng/ml) seems to be accepted as evidence of cure. We have studied 28 acromegalic patients after transsphenoidal adenomectomy. Plasma GH concentrations (basal and during hyperglycaemia) as well as plasma somatomedin C (SMC) concentrations were measured and compared to the clinical symptoms. There was a close correlation between plasma GH and SMC concentrations (except when plasma GH levels were low) and between the clinical assessment and SMC concentrations. Very low plasma GH levels (less than 1 mU/l or 0.5 ng/ml) were associated with normal SMC values and clinical cure, high GH levels (greater than 10 mU/l or 5 ng/ml) with elevated SMC levels and persisting acromegaly. Moderately elevated plasma GH concentrations (1.9-9.6 mU/l) did not allow any conclusions on the outcome of treatment as assessed from SMC determinations and clinical evaluation. It is concluded that the usual criteria for cure in acromegaly may not be sufficiently strict.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3450453     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1987.tb01185.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)        ISSN: 0300-0664            Impact factor:   3.478


  8 in total

1.  "Micromegaly": an update on the prevalence of acromegaly with apparently normal GH secretion in the modern era.

Authors:  Laura B Butz; Stephen E Sullivan; William F Chandler; Ariel L Barkan
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.107

2.  Factors predicting pituitary adenoma invasiveness in acromegalic patients.

Authors:  A Rieger; N G Rainov; H Ebel; L Sanchin; K Shibib; C Helfrich; O Hoffmann; W Burkert
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 3.  Biochemical investigations in diagnosis and follow up of acromegaly.

Authors:  Katharina Schilbach; Christian J Strasburger; Martin Bidlingmaier
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.107

4.  Acromegaly with normal growth hormone levels: response to Sandostatin-LAR treatment.

Authors:  I Shimon; D Nass; M Hadani
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.107

5.  Visual field defects in 23 acromegalic patients.

Authors:  Emrah Kan; Elif Kilic Kan; Aysegul Atmaca; Hulusi Atmaca; Ramis Colak
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Long-term treatment of acromegalic patients with repeatable parenteral depot-bromocriptine.

Authors:  C Jaspers; R Haase; H Pfingsten; G Benker; D Reinwein
Journal:  Clin Investig       Date:  1993-07

7.  Ascertainment and natural history of treated acromegaly in Northern Ireland.

Authors:  C M Ritchie; A B Atkinson; A L Kennedy; A R Lyons; D S Gordon; T Fannin; D R Hadden
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  1990-04

8.  Comparing two acromegalic patients with respect to central corneal thickness, intraocular pressure, and tear insulin-like growth factor levels before and after treatment.

Authors:  Kan Emrah; Kilic Kan Elif; Okuyucu Ali
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.848

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.