Literature DB >> 34504001

Eye contact marks the rise and fall of shared attention in conversation.

Sophie Wohltjen1, Thalia Wheatley2,3.   

Abstract

Conversation is the platform where minds meet: the venue where information is shared, ideas cocreated, cultural norms shaped, and social bonds forged. Its frequency and ease belie its complexity. Every conversation weaves a unique shared narrative from the contributions of independent minds, requiring partners to flexibly move into and out of alignment as needed for conversation to both cohere and evolve. How two minds achieve this coordination is poorly understood. Here we test whether eye contact, a common feature of conversation, predicts this coordination by measuring dyadic pupillary synchrony (a corollary of shared attention) during natural conversation. We find that eye contact is positively correlated with synchrony as well as ratings of engagement by conversation partners. However, rather than elicit synchrony, eye contact commences as synchrony peaks and predicts its immediate and subsequent decline until eye contact breaks. This relationship suggests that eye contact signals when shared attention is high. Furthermore, we speculate that eye contact may play a corrective role in disrupting shared attention (reducing synchrony) as needed to facilitate independent contributions to conversation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conversation; eye contact; pupillometry; shared attention; synchrony

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34504001      PMCID: PMC8449315          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2106645118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  55 in total

1.  Nonverbal synchrony in psychotherapy: coordinated body movement reflects relationship quality and outcome.

Authors:  Fabian Ramseyer; Wolfgang Tschacher
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2011-06

2.  Speaker-listener neural coupling underlies successful communication.

Authors:  Greg J Stephens; Lauren J Silbert; Uri Hasson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Frontal temporal and parietal systems synchronize within and across brains during live eye-to-eye contact.

Authors:  Joy Hirsch; Xian Zhang; J Adam Noah; Yumie Ono
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  What Makes Eye Contact Special? Neural Substrates of On-Line Mutual Eye-Gaze: A Hyperscanning fMRI Study.

Authors:  Takahiko Koike; Motofumi Sumiya; Eri Nakagawa; Shuntaro Okazaki; Norihiro Sadato
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-02-28

5.  Neural substrates of shared attention as social memory: A hyperscanning functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Takahiko Koike; Hiroki C Tanabe; Shuntaro Okazaki; Eri Nakagawa; Akihiro T Sasaki; Koji Shimada; Sho K Sugawara; Haruka K Takahashi; Kazufumi Yoshihara; Jorge Bosch-Bayard; Norihiro Sadato
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Relationships between Pupil Diameter and Neuronal Activity in the Locus Coeruleus, Colliculi, and Cingulate Cortex.

Authors:  Siddhartha Joshi; Yin Li; Rishi M Kalwani; Joshua I Gold
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Pupillometric evidence for the decoupling of attention from perceptual input during offline thought.

Authors:  Jonathan Smallwood; Kevin S Brown; Christine Tipper; Barry Giesbrecht; Michael S Franklin; Michael D Mrazek; Jean M Carlson; Jonathan W Schooler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparison of Human Social Brain Activity During Eye-Contact With Another Human and a Humanoid Robot.

Authors:  Megan S Kelley; J Adam Noah; Xian Zhang; Brian Scassellati; Joy Hirsch
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2021-01-29

9.  Neural signatures of response planning occur midway through an incoming question in conversation.

Authors:  Sara Bögels; Lilla Magyari; Stephen C Levinson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Mirroring and beyond: coupled dynamics as a generalized framework for modelling social interactions.

Authors:  Uri Hasson; Chris D Frith
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  A convergent interaction engine: vocal communication among marmoset monkeys.

Authors:  J M Burkart; J E C Adriaense; R K Brügger; F M Miss; K Wierucka; C P van Schaik
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 6.671

2.  Eye Contact in Video Communication: Experiences of Co-creating Relationships.

Authors:  Niclas Kaiser; Kimberly Henry; Hanna Eyjólfsdóttir
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-25

3.  Abstract and concrete concepts in conversation.

Authors:  Caterina Villani; Matteo Orsoni; Luisa Lugli; Mariagrazia Benassi; Anna M Borghi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Social synchronization of brain activity increases during eye-contact.

Authors:  Caroline Di Bernardi Luft; Ioanna Zioga; Anastasios Giannopoulos; Gabriele Di Bona; Nicola Binetti; Andrea Civilini; Vito Latora; Isabelle Mareschal
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-05-04

5.  Resonance as a Design Strategy for AI and Social Robots.

Authors:  James Derek Lomas; Albert Lin; Suzanne Dikker; Deborah Forster; Maria Luce Lupetti; Gijs Huisman; Julika Habekost; Caiseal Beardow; Pankaj Pandey; Nashra Ahmad; Krishna Miyapuram; Tim Mullen; Patrick Cooper; Willem van der Maden; Emily S Cross
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.493

6.  Understanding Design Features of Music and Language: The Choric/Dialogic Distinction.

Authors:  Felix Haiduk; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-22

7.  Simultaneous functional MRI of two awake marmosets.

Authors:  Kyle M Gilbert; Justine C Cléry; Joseph S Gati; Yuki Hori; Kevin D Johnston; Alexander Mashkovtsev; Janahan Selvanayagam; Peter Zeman; Ravi S Menon; David J Schaeffer; Stefan Everling
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Liking as a balance between synchronization, complexity and novelty.

Authors:  Inbal Ravreby; Yoel Shilat; Yaara Yeshurun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.