Literature DB >> 34500458

gutMGene: a comprehensive database for target genes of gut microbes and microbial metabolites.

Liang Cheng1,2, Changlu Qi2, Haixiu Yang2, Minke Lu2, Yiting Cai2, Tongze Fu2, Jialiang Ren2, Qu Jin2, Xue Zhang1,3.   

Abstract

gutMGene (http://bio-annotation.cn/gutmgene), a manually curated database, aims at providing a comprehensive resource of target genes of gut microbes and microbial metabolites in humans and mice. Metagenomic sequencing of fecal samples has identified 3.3 × 106 non-redundant microbial genes from up to 1500 different species. One of the contributions of gut microbiota to host biology is the circulating pool of bacterially derived small-molecule metabolites. It has been estimated that 10% of metabolites found in mammalian blood are derived from the gut microbiota, where they can produce systemic effects on the host through activating or inhibiting gene expression. The current version of gutMGene documents 1331 curated relationships between 332 gut microbes, 207 microbial metabolites and 223 genes in humans, and 2349 curated relationships between 209 gut microbes, 149 microbial metabolites and 544 genes in mice. Each entry in the gutMGene contains detailed information on a relationship between gut microbe, microbial metabolite and target gene, a brief description of the relationship, experiment technology and platform, literature reference and so on. gutMGene provides a user-friendly interface to browse and retrieve each entry using gut microbes, disorders and intervention measures. It also offers the option to download all the entries and submit new experimentally validated associations.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34500458      PMCID: PMC8728193          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


INTRODUCTION

The human body is colonized by a large number of microbes, including up to 38 trillion bacteria, eukaryotes, viruses and archaea, most of which are present in the intestine (1,2). Much evidence indicates that alterations in the diversity and composition of gut microbes are closely related to the pathogenesis of many diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, metabolic diseases and nervous system diseases (3–5). Recently, researchers have come to explore the molecular mechanism of gut microbes, which can help to understand the associations between gut microbes and host. One of the most important ways microbes significantly impact host biology is through the production of small molecules, which accumulate in the intestine and circulate in host bodies (6,7). The relationships between gut microbes and host are highly mutually beneficial, as the host provides the microbes with nutrients and a shelter, while the microbes aid the host in acquiring energy from non-digestible food and synthesizing essential metabolites (8). Metabolites produced by microbes are mainly divided into three categories: produced by microbes from exogenously consumed compounds; produced by the host and biochemically modified by gut microbes; and synthesized de novo by gut microbes (9). Actually, it has been estimated that ∼10% of metabolites found in mammalian blood, where they can produce systemic effects on the immune system and host homeostasis through engaging specific host receptors and activating downstream signaling cascades, are derived from the gut microbiota, as shown in Figure 1 (10). For example, as the most thoroughly studied gut microbial metabolites, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) can be produced by a variety of microbes such as some members of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes (11–14). Tolhurst et al. have proved that acetate and butyrate, the major types of SCFAs, promote the secretion of glucagon-like peptide 1 strongly linked to glucose homeostasis in L cells by coupling G protein-coupled receptor 43, which may help the treatment improvement of diabetes to some degree (15). Levy et al. have confirmed that taurine, biochemically modified by gut microbes, could enhance the activation of NLRP6 inflammasome and thereby increase the production of IL-18 in the intestinal epithelium, which supports epithelial barrier function and maintenance (16). Moreover, it has been substantiated that ATPs, synthesized de novo by gut microbes, have the ability to drive chemotaxis of and cytokine release by immune cells (17,18).
Figure 1.

Intestinal microbial metabolites affect host homeostasis.

Intestinal microbial metabolites affect host homeostasis. To help researchers to better understand gut microbes, some important resources have been developed. For example, GMrepo (19) and gutMEGA (20) curated and annotated human gut metagenomes. gutMDisorder (21) collected experimentally validated associations between gut microbiota and diseases or intervention measures. Nevertheless, a public resource of high-quality curated target genes and metabolites of gut microbes remains unavailable. Thus, we developed a manually curated database entitled gutMGene to collect experimentally validated relationships between gut microbes, microbial metabolites and target genes from papers. This database is freely available at http://bio-annotation.cn/gutmgene.

DATA COLLECTION AND DATABASE CONTENT

To collect high-quality data, all the associations between gut microbes, microbial metabolites and genes were manually extracted from previously published studies. Here, we searched PubMed database with a list of keywords to acquire potentially relevant papers, such as ‘gut’, ‘intestinal’, ‘microbe’, ‘metabolite’, etc., and finally we selected >3000 papers. Then, we screened out papers documenting experimentally validated associations. Subsequently, we manually extracted microbe–metabolite, microbe–target and metabolite–target relationships in humans and mice from over 360 publications. As a result, 1331 curated relationships among 332 gut microbes, 207 microbial metabolites and 223 genes in humans, and 2349 curated relationships among 209 gut microbes, 149 microbial metabolites and 544 genes in mice were collected in the current version of gutMGene (Table 1).
Table 1.

The number of gut microbes, metabolites, genes and their relationships in humans and mice

SpeciesNo. of gut microbesNo. of metabolitesNo. of genesNo. of relationships
Human3322072221331
Mouse2091495442349
The number of gut microbes, metabolites, genes and their relationships in humans and mice Each entry in the gutMGene contains two sections for documenting an association. The ‘Relationships between gut microbes, metabolites, and genes’ section documents intestinal microbe, sample type, substrate, metabolite, gene, brief description of the alteration in the gene under the intestinal microbe or metabolite, detailed description, species (human or mouse), experimental methods and measurement techniques. Especially, it contains a throughput description of gene expression experimental technologies, which include low-throughput [e.g. quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and western blot] and high-throughput experimental technologies (e.g. microarray or RNA-seq). The gut microbe, substrate, metabolite and gene are organized based on NCBI Taxonomy database (22), PubChem (23), HMDB (24), ChEBI (25) and NCBI gene database. The experimental method includes cell culture, in vitro bacterial culture, in vivo infection experiment, control experiment, supplementation of metabolite and so on. The measurement technique includes 16S rDNA sequence, high-performance liquid chromatography analysis, electrospray ionization mass spectrometry analysis, qRT-PCR, fluorescence microscopy, western blot assay, RNA-seq and so on. Meanwhile, the ‘Literature’ section documents a detailed description of the literature reference. Figure 2A shows the distribution of gut microbes in humans among different classifications of NCBI Taxonomy database (22). Current version of gutMGene documents microbes according to phylum, class, family, genus, species and strain levels. One hundred sixty-nine (50.90%) microbes are at strain level, which make up almost half of our database. As in humans, a great many of the microbes (47.85%, 100/209) in mice are at strain level, which is shown in Figure 2B.
Figure 2.

The distribution of gut microbes, metabolites and genes in gutMGene. (A) The distribution of gut microbes in humans among different taxa. (B) The distribution of gut microbes in mice among different taxa. (C) Histogram of the number of microbes in humans associated with individual metabolite. (D) Histogram of the number of microbes in mice associated with individual metabolite. (E) Histogram of the number of metabolites associated with individual microbe in humans. (F) Histogram of the number of metabolites associated with individual microbe in mice. (G) Histogram of the number of microbes in humans associated with individual gene. (H) Histogram of the number of microbes in mice associated with individual gene. (I) Histogram of the number of genes associated with individual microbe in humans. (J) Histogram of the number of genes associated with individual microbe in mice.

The distribution of gut microbes, metabolites and genes in gutMGene. (A) The distribution of gut microbes in humans among different taxa. (B) The distribution of gut microbes in mice among different taxa. (C) Histogram of the number of microbes in humans associated with individual metabolite. (D) Histogram of the number of microbes in mice associated with individual metabolite. (E) Histogram of the number of metabolites associated with individual microbe in humans. (F) Histogram of the number of metabolites associated with individual microbe in mice. (G) Histogram of the number of microbes in humans associated with individual gene. (H) Histogram of the number of microbes in mice associated with individual gene. (I) Histogram of the number of genes associated with individual microbe in humans. (J) Histogram of the number of genes associated with individual microbe in mice. Figure 2C and D shows the number of metabolites associated with individual microbe in humans and mice, respectively. 46.63% microbes from humans (90/193) and 53.24% from mice (74/139) are associated with only one metabolite, which could be a potential marker. Consistently, 60.00% metabolites in humans (111/185) and 43.10% in mice (50/116) are associated with only one microbe, which is shown in Figure 2E and F. Similarly, as shown in Figure 2G–J, microbes and genes have a consistent association pattern with gut microbes and metabolites except that the majority of human microbes are associated with two genes.

USER INTERFACE

gutMGene provides a tree browser and a search engine to query detailed information about associations between gut microbe, metabolite and target gene. Figure 3 shows the schematic workflow.
Figure 3.

Schematic workflow of gutMGene.

Schematic workflow of gutMGene. The tree browser organizes the data according to species, using ‘Human’ and ‘Mouse’ as root categories. Each of the species involves three subcategories named ‘GutMicrobiota’, ‘Metabolite’ and ‘Gene’. By clicking ‘GutMicrobiota’, ‘Metabolite’ or ‘Gene’ category, all the names of gut microbes, metabolites or target genes belonging to the corresponding species would be listed as leaf nodes. Figure 3 shows a partial list of mouse gut microbes. After selecting a microbe ‘Akkermansia muciniphila’, all the associations between Akkermansia muciniphila and metabolites or target genes would be retrieved and shown in a table, where an association with a brief introduction is represented into one row. The identifier of microbe, substrate, metabolite, gene and PMID could be linked to NCBI Taxonomy database, PubChem, HMDB, ChEBI and PubMed for detailed description of these entities. In the result table, clicking the ‘detail’ link of a row would lead to the detailed information about an association. For an association between a microbe and a metabolite or a target gene in a row, clicking the ‘network’ link, microbes, metabolites and genes associated with these items would be shown in a network. gutMGene provides a search engine to query associations by inputting a term of microbe, substrate, metabolite and gene. Additionally, ChEBI ontology (25) was imported for searching broad chemical classes of compounds by inputting a term of ChEBI ontology in the ‘Substrate’ or ‘Metabolite’ search box after selecting ‘ChEBI ontology’. For ease of use, these inputting terms could be autocompleted by selecting a species. After submitting the input items, entries that matched with these items exactly will be returned and shown in a table as above. gutMGene provides a ‘Submit’ page for researchers to submit a traceable introduction about important associations that are not documented in the database. Once approved by the reviewer committee, the associations with detailed information will be included in the updated version. In addition, a ‘Resource’ page was offered for downloading all the data and associated networks between gut microbe and metabolite or gene in humans and mice.

FUTURE DEVELOPMENT

With the development of high-throughput technologies, the number of experiments discovering target genes of gut microbes and microbial metabolites increases exponentially. We will continue to manually curate newly validated relationships by prescreening papers in MEDLINE titles and abstracts using text-mining tools and reviewing the submission in web page. Meanwhile, with the emergence of more gut microbial resources, more links through gut microbes, metabolites and genes to other potential related resources would be provided to incorporate gutMGene in other resources for annotating the function of gut microbiota.

CONCLUSION

gutMGene is a comprehensive resource for documenting target genes of gut microbes and microbial metabolites, which provides an easy way to search, browse and download all the experiment-based associations in humans and mice. The current version of gutMGene documents 1331 curated relationships among 332 gut microbes, 207 microbial metabolites and 223 genes in humans, and 2349 curated relationships among 209 gut microbes, 149 microbial metabolites and 544 genes in mice. Recently, researchers come to explore the molecular mechanism of gut microbiota, which can help to understand the associations between gut microbiota and host. Since the influence of the gut microbiome is mainly achieved through metabolism, gutMGene provides a choice in exploring the role of gut microbes in the occurrence and development of diseases and predicting novel drugs using commensal bacteria as a medium.

DATA AVAILABILITY

This database is freely available at http://bio-annotation.cn/gutmgene.
  25 in total

1.  Metabolomics analysis reveals large effects of gut microflora on mammalian blood metabolites.

Authors:  William R Wikoff; Andrew T Anfora; Jun Liu; Peter G Schultz; Scott A Lesley; Eric C Peters; Gary Siuzdak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The Microbiome-Gut-Brain Axis in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Timothy G Dinan; John F Cryan
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.806

3.  gutMEGA: a database of the human gut MEtaGenome Atlas.

Authors:  Qingfeng Zhang; Kai Yu; Shihua Li; Xiaolong Zhang; Qi Zhao; Xia Zhao; Zekun Liu; Han Cheng; Ze-Xian Liu; Xiaoxing Li
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 11.622

Review 4.  Understanding the Holobiont: How Microbial Metabolites Affect Human Health and Shape the Immune System.

Authors:  Thomas Siegmund Postler; Sankar Ghosh
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 27.287

Review 5.  Extracellular ATP and adenosine: The Yin and Yang in immune responses?

Authors:  M M Faas; T Sáez; P de Vos
Journal:  Mol Aspects Med       Date:  2017-01-16

6.  Clostridium butyricum, a butyrate-producing probiotic, inhibits intestinal tumor development through modulating Wnt signaling and gut microbiota.

Authors:  Danfeng Chen; Duochen Jin; Shumin Huang; Jingyi Wu; Mengque Xu; Tianyu Liu; Wenxiao Dong; Xiang Liu; Sinan Wang; Weilong Zhong; Yi Liu; Ruihuan Jiang; Meiyu Piao; Bangmao Wang; Hailong Cao
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 8.679

7.  Phylogenetic distribution of three pathways for propionate production within the human gut microbiota.

Authors:  Nicole Reichardt; Sylvia H Duncan; Pauline Young; Alvaro Belenguer; Carol McWilliam Leitch; Karen P Scott; Harry J Flint; Petra Louis
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 10.302

8.  HMDB 4.0: the human metabolome database for 2018.

Authors:  David S Wishart; Yannick Djoumbou Feunang; Ana Marcu; An Chi Guo; Kevin Liang; Rosa Vázquez-Fresno; Tanvir Sajed; Daniel Johnson; Carin Li; Naama Karu; Zinat Sayeeda; Elvis Lo; Nazanin Assempour; Mark Berjanskii; Sandeep Singhal; David Arndt; Yonjie Liang; Hasan Badran; Jason Grant; Arnau Serra-Cayuela; Yifeng Liu; Rupa Mandal; Vanessa Neveu; Allison Pon; Craig Knox; Michael Wilson; Claudine Manach; Augustin Scalbert
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  mAML: an automated machine learning pipeline with a microbiome repository for human disease classification.

Authors:  Fenglong Yang; Quan Zou
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.451

10.  PubChem in 2021: new data content and improved web interfaces.

Authors:  Sunghwan Kim; Jie Chen; Tiejun Cheng; Asta Gindulyte; Jia He; Siqian He; Qingliang Li; Benjamin A Shoemaker; Paul A Thiessen; Bo Yu; Leonid Zaslavsky; Jian Zhang; Evan E Bolton
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  17 in total

1.  Heterogeneity Analysis of Bladder Cancer Based on DNA Methylation Molecular Profiling.

Authors:  Shuyu Wang; Dali Xu; Bo Gao; Shuhan Yan; Yiwei Sun; Xinxing Tang; Yanjia Jiao; Shan Huang; Shumei Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 5.738

2.  The 2022 Nucleic Acids Research database issue and the online molecular biology database collection.

Authors:  Daniel J Rigden; Xosé M Fernández
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Identification of Diagnostic Markers for Breast Cancer Based on Differential Gene Expression and Pathway Network.

Authors:  Shumei Zhang; Haoran Jiang; Bo Gao; Wen Yang; Guohua Wang
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-01-12

4.  Pseudo-188D: Phage Protein Prediction Based on a Model of Pseudo-188D.

Authors:  Xiaomei Gu; Lina Guo; Bo Liao; Qinghua Jiang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 5.  Genomic Variation Prediction: A Summary From Different Views.

Authors:  Xiuchun Lin
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-11-25

6.  Alterations of the Gut Microbiota in Patients With Severe Chronic Heart Failure.

Authors:  Weiju Sun; Debing Du; Tongze Fu; Ying Han; Peng Li; Hong Ju
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Identification of Prognostic Biomarkers for Bladder Cancer Based on DNA Methylation Profile.

Authors:  Shumei Zhang; Jingyu Zhang; Qichao Zhang; Yingjian Liang; Youwen Du; Guohua Wang
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-01-31

8.  Identification of Helicobacter pylori Membrane Proteins Using Sequence-Based Features.

Authors:  Mujiexin Liu; Hui Chen; Dong Gao; Cai-Yi Ma; Zhao-Yue Zhang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 9.  Bioinformatics Research on Drug Sensitivity Prediction.

Authors:  Yaojia Chen; Liran Juan; Xiao Lv; Lei Shi
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 10.  AOPM: Application of Antioxidant Protein Classification Model in Predicting the Composition of Antioxidant Drugs.

Authors:  Yixiao Zhai; Jingyu Zhang; Tianjiao Zhang; Yue Gong; Zixiao Zhang; Dandan Zhang; Yuming Zhao
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 5.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.