| Literature DB >> 34498100 |
Maximiliane Amelie Schlenz1, Moritz Benedikt Schlenz2, Bernd Wöstmann2, Alexandra Jungert3, Carolina Ganss4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate tooth wear in young adults, intraoral scanning was used for digital monitoring of the mandibular first molar over 12 months. A possible influence of aetiological factors obtained by a questionnaire on tooth wear was investigated.Entities:
Keywords: Attrition; Erosion; Intraoral scanner; Monitoring; Tooth wear; Young adults
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34498100 PMCID: PMC8816769 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04162-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Oral Investig ISSN: 1432-6981 Impact factor: 3.573
Fig. 1Flow scheme of the observational study
Fig. 2Classification of the occlusal surface of each study tooth distributed into seven areas: mesiobuccal (mb), distobuccal (db), mesiolingual (ml), distolingual (dl) and if existing distal (d) cusp as well as mesial (mr) and distal ridge (dr)
Distribution of lesion types [%] in the different tooth areas (mesiobuccal (mb), distobuccal (db), mesiolingual (ml), distolingual (dl) and if existing distal (d) cusp as well as mesial (mr) and distal ridge (dr) of the occlusal surface (n.o. not observed) for T0 and T1
| Observation point | Area | Type of lesion | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| None | Cupping | Facet | Combined cupping-facet | Not present | ||
| T0 | mb | 6.6 | 16.5 | 56.0 | 20.9 | |
| db | 15.4 | 1.1 | 74.7 | 8.8 | ||
| ml | 42.9 | 4.4 | 49.5 | 3.3 | ||
| dl | 31.9 | 4.4 | 59.3 | 4.4 | ||
| d | 11.0 | 4.4 | 61.5 | 3.3 | 19.8 | |
| mr | 87.9 | n.o | 12.1 | n.o | ||
| dr | 80.2 | n.o | 19.8 | n.o | ||
| T1 | mb | 6.6 | 15.4 | 56.0 | 22.0 | |
| db | 12.1 | 1.1 | 76.9 | 9.9 | ||
| ml | 35.2 | 5.5 | 56.0 | 3.3 | ||
| dl | 30.8 | 4.4 | 60.4 | 4.4 | ||
| d | 9.9 | 4.4 | 62.6 | 3.3 | 19.8 | |
| mr | 83.5 | n.o | 16.5 | n.o | ||
| dr | 74.7 | n.o | 25.3 | n.o | ||
Changes in lesion type (total number of instances of change = 20) from T0 to T1 in the different areas (mesiobuccal (mb), distobuccal (db), mesiolingual (ml), distolingual (dl) and if existing distal (d) cusp as well as mesial (mr) and distal ridge (dr))
| T1 cupping | T1 facet | T1 combined cupping-facet | |
|---|---|---|---|
| mb | |||
| T0 cupping | 1 | ||
| db | |||
| T0 none | 3 | ||
| T0 facet | 1 | ||
| ml | |||
| T0 none | 1 | 4 | |
| dl | |||
| T0 none | 1 | ||
| d | |||
| T0 none | 1 | ||
| mr | |||
| T0 none | 4 | ||
| dr | |||
| T0 none | 4 |
Fig. 3Boxplot diagram of maximum vertical loss [micrometre] for the seven areas (buccal cusps are shaded oblique, lingual cusps are checkered small and ridges are checkered big)
Fig. 4Boxplot diagram of maximum vertical loss [micrometre] for the seven areas (mesiobuccal (mb), distobuccal (db), mesiolingual (ml), distolingual (dl) and if existing distal (d) cusp as well as mesial (mr) and distal ridge (dr)) distributed to type of lesion (cupping = yellow, facet = blue, combined cupping-facet = green)
Results of the questionnaires and loss values (median and 95% confidence interval) according to the different influencing factors
| Item | Category | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | ||||
| Sex | 35 (38.5) | 56 (61.5) | |||
Loss (µm) 95% CI | 46.0 39.0;54.0 | 39.0 35.0;46.0 | |||
| No | Yes | ||||
| Wearing a nightguard | 74 (81.3) | 17 (18.7) | |||
Loss (µm) 95% CI | 40.5 37.0;46.5 | 47.0 22.0;66.0 | |||
| Consumption of chewing gum | 37 (40.7) | 54 (59.3) | |||
Loss (µm) 95% CI | 41.0 37.0;49.0 | 43.0 38.0;49.0 | |||
| No | Neither | Yes | |||
| I like acidic food | 31 (34.1) | 19 (20.9) | 41 (45.1) | ||
Loss (µm) 95% CI | 47.0 36.0;52.0 | 35.0 31.0;56.0 | 40.0 37.0;48.0 | ||
| I like acidic drinks | 55 (60.4) | 17 (18.7) | 19 (20.9) | ||
Loss (µm) 95% CI | 39.0 36.0;46.5 | 43.0 35.0;53.0 | 44.0 37.0;58.0 | ||
Fig. 5Correlation between the number of daily acid impacts and loss values [micrometre] of the mesiobuccal cusp (n = 89, calculation is presented in the Supplementary Information)