David Z I Cherney1, Francesco Cosentino2, Samuel Dagogo-Jack3, Darren K McGuire4, Richard Pratley5, Robert Frederich6, Mario Maldonado7, Chih-Chin Liu8, Jie Liu8, Annpey Pong8, Christopher P Cannon. 1. University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada david.cherney@uhn.ca. 2. Unit of Cardiology, Karolinska Institute & Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. 3. Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee. 4. Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, Texas. 5. AdventHealth Translational Research Institute, Orlando, Florida. 6. Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, Pennsylvania. 7. MSD Limited, London, United Kingdom. 8. Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A reduction in the rate of eGFR decline, with preservation of ≥0.75 ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year, has been proposed as a surrogate for kidney disease progression. We report results from prespecified analyses assessing effects of ertugliflozin versus placebo on eGFR slope from the eValuation of ERTugliflozin effIcacy and Safety CardioVascular outcomes (VERTIS CV) trial (NCT01986881). DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease were randomized to placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg (1:1:1). The analyses compared the effect of ertugliflozin (pooled doses, n=5499) versus placebo (n=2747) on eGFR slope per week and per year by random coefficient models. Study periods (weeks 0-6 and weeks 6-52) and total and chronic slopes (week 0 or week 6 to weeks 104, 156, 208, and 260) were modeled separately and by baseline kidney status. RESULTS: In the overall population, for weeks 0-6, the least squares mean eGFR slopes (ml/min per 1.73 m2 per week [95% confidence interval (95% CI)]) were -0.07 (-0.16 to 0.03) and -0.54 (-0.61 to -0.48) for the placebo and ertugliflozin groups, respectively; the difference was -0.47 (-0.59 to -0.36). During weeks 6-52, least squares mean eGFR slopes (ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year [95% CI]) were -0.12 (-0.70 to 0.46) and 1.62 (1.21 to 2.02) for the placebo and ertugliflozin groups, respectively; the difference was 1.74 (1.03 to 2.45). For weeks 6-156, least squares mean eGFR slopes (ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year [95% CI]) were -1.51 (-1.70 to -1.32) and -0.32 (-0.45 to -0.19) for the placebo and ertugliflozin groups, respectively; the difference was 1.19 (0.95 to 1.42). During weeks 0-156, the placebo-adjusted difference in least squares mean slope was 1.06 (0.85 to 1.27). These findings were consistent by baseline kidney status. CONCLUSIONS: Ertugliflozin has a favorable placebo-adjusted eGFR slope >0.75 ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year, documenting the kidney function preservation underlying the clinical benefits of ertugliflozin on kidney disease progression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: US National Library of Medicine, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01986881. Date of trial registration: November 13, 2013.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A reduction in the rate of eGFR decline, with preservation of ≥0.75 ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year, has been proposed as a surrogate for kidney disease progression. We report results from prespecified analyses assessing effects of ertugliflozin versus placebo on eGFR slope from the eValuation of ERTugliflozin effIcacy and Safety CardioVascular outcomes (VERTIS CV) trial (NCT01986881). DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease were randomized to placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg (1:1:1). The analyses compared the effect of ertugliflozin (pooled doses, n=5499) versus placebo (n=2747) on eGFR slope per week and per year by random coefficient models. Study periods (weeks 0-6 and weeks 6-52) and total and chronic slopes (week 0 or week 6 to weeks 104, 156, 208, and 260) were modeled separately and by baseline kidney status. RESULTS: In the overall population, for weeks 0-6, the least squares mean eGFR slopes (ml/min per 1.73 m2 per week [95% confidence interval (95% CI)]) were -0.07 (-0.16 to 0.03) and -0.54 (-0.61 to -0.48) for the placebo and ertugliflozin groups, respectively; the difference was -0.47 (-0.59 to -0.36). During weeks 6-52, least squares mean eGFR slopes (ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year [95% CI]) were -0.12 (-0.70 to 0.46) and 1.62 (1.21 to 2.02) for the placebo and ertugliflozin groups, respectively; the difference was 1.74 (1.03 to 2.45). For weeks 6-156, least squares mean eGFR slopes (ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year [95% CI]) were -1.51 (-1.70 to -1.32) and -0.32 (-0.45 to -0.19) for the placebo and ertugliflozin groups, respectively; the difference was 1.19 (0.95 to 1.42). During weeks 0-156, the placebo-adjusted difference in least squares mean slope was 1.06 (0.85 to 1.27). These findings were consistent by baseline kidney status. CONCLUSIONS: Ertugliflozin has a favorable placebo-adjusted eGFR slope >0.75 ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year, documenting the kidney function preservation underlying the clinical benefits of ertugliflozin on kidney disease progression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: US National Library of Medicine, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01986881. Date of trial registration: November 13, 2013.
Authors: David Z I Cherney; Claire C J Dekkers; Sean J Barbour; Daniel Cattran; Abdul Halim Abdul Gafor; Peter J Greasley; Gozewijn D Laverman; Soo Kun Lim; Gian Luca Di Tanna; Heather N Reich; Marc G Vervloet; Muh Geot Wong; Ron T Gansevoort; Hiddo J L Heerspink Journal: Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 32.069
Authors: Lesley A Inker; Hiddo J L Heerspink; Hocine Tighiouart; Andrew S Levey; Josef Coresh; Ron T Gansevoort; Andrew L Simon; Jian Ying; Gerald J Beck; Christoph Wanner; Jürgen Floege; Philip Kam-Tao Li; Vlado Perkovic; Edward F Vonesh; Tom Greene Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-07-10 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Tom Greene; Jian Ying; Edward F Vonesh; Hocine Tighiouart; Andrew S Levey; Josef Coresh; Jennifer S Herrick; Enyu Imai; Tazeen H Jafar; Bart D Maes; Ronald D Perrone; Lucia Del Vecchio; Jack F M Wetzels; Hiddo J L Heerspink; Lesley A Inker Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-07-10 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: David Z I Cherney; Enrico Repetto; David C Wheeler; Suzanne V Arnold; Sharon MacLachlan; Philip R Hunt; Hungta Chen; Jiten Vora; Mikhail Kosiborod Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2019-12-06 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: Jie Zhang; Jin Wei; Shan Jiang; Lan Xu; Lei Wang; Feng Cheng; Jacentha Buggs; Hermann Koepsell; Volker Vallon; Ruisheng Liu Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-03-13 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Christopher P Cannon; Richard Pratley; Samuel Dagogo-Jack; James Mancuso; Susan Huyck; Urszula Masiukiewicz; Bernard Charbonnel; Robert Frederich; Silvina Gallo; Francesco Cosentino; Weichung J Shih; Ira Gantz; Steven G Terra; David Z I Cherney; Darren K McGuire Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2020-09-23 Impact factor: 176.079
Authors: Megumi Oshima; Bruce Neal; Tadashi Toyama; Toshiaki Ohkuma; Qiang Li; Dick de Zeeuw; Hiddo J L Heerspink; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Gregory Fulcher; William Canovatchel; David R Matthews; Vlado Perkovic Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2020-07-21 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Vlado Perkovic; Dick de Zeeuw; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Greg Fulcher; Ngozi Erondu; Wayne Shaw; Terrance D Barrett; Michele Weidner-Wells; Hsiaowei Deng; David R Matthews; Bruce Neal Journal: Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 32.069
Authors: David Z I Cherney; Bernard Charbonnel; Francesco Cosentino; Samuel Dagogo-Jack; Darren K McGuire; Richard Pratley; Weichung J Shih; Robert Frederich; Mario Maldonado; Annpey Pong; Christopher P Cannon Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: David Z I Cherney; Hiddo J L Heerspink; Robert Frederich; Mario Maldonado; Jie Liu; Annpey Pong; Zhi J Xu; Shrita Patel; Anne Hickman; James P Mancuso; Ira Gantz; Steven G Terra Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2020-03-31 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: David Tak Wai Lui; Ivan Chi Ho Au; Eric Ho Man Tang; Ching Lung Cheung; Chi Ho Lee; Yu Cho Woo; Tingting Wu; Kathryn Choon Beng Tan; Carlos King Ho Wong Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2022-06-25
Authors: Melanie J Davies; Heinz Drexel; François R Jornayvaz; Zoltan Pataky; Petar M Seferović; Christoph Wanner Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2022-08-04 Impact factor: 8.949
Authors: David Z I Cherney; Samuel Dagogo-Jack; Francesco Cosentino; Richard E Pratley; Robert Frederich; Mario Maldonado; Chih-Chin Liu; Christopher P Cannon Journal: Kidney Int Rep Date: 2022-05-13